web analytics
May 26, 2013 /17 Sivan, 5773
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
The Tosfos Yomtov was convinced that the death of 300,000 –600,000 Jews during the Chmielnicki massacres of 1648-49 were because of improper Tefila. Communicated: Tefilla

Chillul Tefila Bifarhesia, as well as halachicly challenged verbiage and dress, are external manifestations of a critical lack of personal yiras shomayim which has lethal consequences.



Israel Acts – And The Media Howl (Part II)


tell a friend
Media-Monitor-logo

Further observations on the generally poor performance of the American media in covering Israel’s military actions in Palestinian areas:

The only solace to be taken from The New York Times’s coverage of the Israeli operation is that Deborah Sontag is no longer on the ground in Jerusalem filing her daily devotionals to Yasir Arafat and the Palestinian cause. Can a sensitive reader even bear to contemplate the thought of Sontag twisting the truth and shilling for the Palestinian Authority at the Church of the Nativity or in Jenin?

Sontag’s absence aside, the Times has not exactly acquitted itself well in terms of balance and objectivity, though at times one can – if one makes a superhuman effort – almost sense some semblance of fairness straining to emerge in the reporting of James Bennet. The same cannot, however, be even playfully said for Times reporters Serge Schmemann, C.J. Chivers and, worst of all, Joel Greenberg, a junior varsity Deborah Sontag whose personal history and political leanings were exposed earlier this year by the veteran Israeli journalist Uri Dan.

Greenberg’s unreliability – others would call it dishonesty, but the Monitor is a gentle soul - was thrown into particular relief in his April 3 dispatch on the gaggle of Palestinian sympathizers who had barricaded themselves in Arafat’s besieged offices. Not once in his piece did Greenberg mention the hard-left ideological inclination of Arafat’s defenders, preferring instead to refer to them, collectively and individually, by such innocuous appellations as “foreign activists”; foreigners”; “peace advocate”; and “activist.”

Greenberg’s fascination with the “peace advocates” was again on display in an April 18 piece on Adam Shapiro. His short-lived celebrity has mercifully faded, but you remember Shapiro, the pathetic specimen who achieved his 15 minutes – or, in this case, 15 days – of fame as the political equivalent of a circus geek or carnival freak: Ladies and gents, step right up and marvel at the gen-u-i-ne Brooklyn-born Jew who holed up overnight with Yasir Arafat, enjoyed the breakfast of a lifetime with the Palestinian Authority chairman, and announced to the world that Israel’s treatment of Palestinians reminded him of Kristallnacht and other Nazi atrocities. Limited time only, five bucks a view, over in the purple tent.

In Greenberg’s hands, of course, this aberration called Shapiro becomes a thoughtful young humanist, a suffering servant of the oppressed who, along with his Palestinian fiancee, unblinkingly puts his life on the line for his fellow man. “Since leaving Mr. Arafat’s compound,” Greenberg writes admiringly, “Mr. Shapiro and Ms. Arraf have been busy challenging the Israeli curfew, defying Israeli snipers by walking the streets and delivering food and medicine.”

As in Greenberg’s earlier piece on the “activists” in Arafat’s compound, the words “left,” “leftist” or “left-wing” are nowhere to be found – but Greenberg did take care to characterize Shapiro’s critics as “right-wing Jewish groups who labeled him a traitor.”

On now to Andy Rooney, and didja ever wonder how he’s able to convince otherwise sober CBS executives that he’s worth the king’s ransom they pay him for a few minutes’ worth of absolutely inane chatter once a week on “60 Minutes”?

It’s bad enough that Rooney is terminally unfunny, but whenever he veers from his usual contemplation of cereal boxtops or the contents of his desk drawers he reveals his utter lack of depth. Here’s the alleged funnyman’s take on the Israeli prime minister (Rooney had already gently dismissed Yasir Arafat as “a toothless tiger who no longer has the power to stop terrorism if he wanted to”), delivered on April 14:

“Ariel Sharon doesn’t want peace. He loves this war. The Israelis are our friends and the Palestinians are strangers. But Sharon is not our friend and President Bush should stop pussyfooting around and say so….If Sharon and the Palestinian terrorists persist with their arrogance, we have the power to save Israel and Palestine from themselves by cutting off both the money and the weapons with which this war is being fought.”

(Continued Next Week)

Jason Maoz can be reached at jmaoz@jewishpress.com

tell a friend

About the Author: Jason Maoz is the Senior Editor of The Jewish Press.


You might also be interested in:


no comments

You must log in to post a comment.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
IDF Etzion brigade commander Col. Yaniv Alalouf (with Jewish men who fought in Gush Etzion in 1948).
Colonel: IDF to Build Bridge to Bypass Terrorist Village in Judea
Latest Indepth Stories
Rabbi William Handler

If you’re lucky enough to avoid losing your children, you’re still not home free.

Al-Dura_Postage_Stamp

France 2 and Enderlin must have their press accreditation revoked and be thrown out of Israel.

Palestinian kindergarten children enacting a military operation.

Slaughter is a routine, widespread practice among many Moslem families.

Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas has said he will never recognize a Jewish state and there will be no Jews allowed in a Palestinian State.

parently an affront to J Street’s worldview, the focus of which appears to be the creation of a Palestinian State, whether or not that will bring peace.

The importance of the caucus on organ harvesting in China, sponsored recently by the Liberal Lobby in the Knesset, cannot be exaggerated.

My mother, the eldest daughter of Reb Yaakov Kamenetsky, zt”l, was niftar last month at the age of 92. She took her last breath in her home in Efrat, Israel, next door to the shul that was my father’s for 24 years before his passing in 2007.

Following the Boston Marathon bombing, one crucial point will likely remain overlooked. The most loathsome aspect of this or any other terror bombing attack on civilians will always lie in the inexpressibility of physical pain. While all decent people will abhor the idea of bombs expressly directed at the innocent, whether here or in other countries, none will ever be able to process the very deepest horrors of what has been inflicted.

It’s only natural to see increasing evidence of Jerusalem’s glorious Jewish past being unearthed, quite literally, under modern Israeli sovereignty. The new archaeological finds are also very timely – as the Arab onslaught attempting to detach Jerusalem from its Jewish roots gains steam, the facts on the ground, or “under” the ground, show quite otherwise.

The Talmud (Berachot 26b) says, “tefillot avot tiknum” – “prayer was established by the avot.” The Talmud then uses the following verse (Bereshit 19:27) to prove how Avraham established prayer: “Vayaskem Avraham baboker el hamakom asher amad sham et pnei Hashem” – “And Avraham got up early in the morning to the place where he had stood before God.”

Nearly 13 years ago, then-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak journeyed to Camp David to end the conflict with the Palestinians. With the approval of President Clinton, he offered Yasir Arafat an independent Palestinian state in almost all of the West Bank, Gaza and in part of Jerusalem. Arafat said no.

The news that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative groups has brought renewed spotlight on a 2010 lawsuit filed by the pro-Israel group Z Street, which alleges it was also singled out by the IRS when applying for tax-exempt status.

In an editorial last week (“Circling the Wagons”) we noted the efforts by the administration and its supporters to dismiss allegations that the government’s spin on the Benghazi attack was designed to shield the president and that the IRS was improperly used to stifle opposition to Mr. Obama’s reelection.

As the controversies besetting the Obama administration continue to grow in number and intensity, the prospect that President Obama would seriously consider military action against Iran, should that country continue its drive to become a nuclear power, becomes more and more remote. So we welcome the current enhancement of sanctions against Iran on the federal and New York State levels.

More Articles from Jason Maoz
Front-Page-040513

I was shamed into becoming a baseball fan by my mother, a Holocaust survivor who came to America in 1953 and who to this day doesn’t know the difference between a home run and a strikeout.

Michael Kelly

The late Michael Kelly was a brilliant writer and editor (The New York Times, Washington Post, The New Republic, The Atlantic) who coincidentally happened to be an American patriot and a strong supporter of Israel – a combination not commonly found in the circles in which he traveled.

Even as he left office in January 2002 on a note of unprecedented triumph and popularity, the tone of the New York Times’s editorials and most of its news coverage was startlingly jaundiced.

Koch became a chronic – some would say compulsive – critic of Giuliani.

Resnick has collected five dozen of his best interviews in book format. Called “Movers and Shakers: Sixty Prominent Personalities Speak Their Mind on Tape” (Brenn Books), the collection includes updates on nearly every interviewee plus several questions that never appeared in The Jewish Press.

Al Gore has been in the news again, and even some of his biggest admirers are upset with Gore’s decision to sell his Current TV cable network to Al Jazeera, which is owned by the oil-rich Islamic monarchy of Qatar, for $500 million.

Ehud Barak may or may not be out of Israeli politics for good, but his recent resignation announcement reminded the Monitor of just how much the man had been willing to give up to Yasir Arafat at the tail end of Bill Clinton’s presidency.

Roughly 30 percent of those Jews who had voted for Reagan in 1980 went for Mondale in 1984.

    Latest Poll

    If you could only choose one of the following scenarios regarding Chareidi IDF service, which would you choose?





    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/media-monitor/media-monitor-41/2002/05/22/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online:

Close