web analytics
October 2, 2014 / 8 Tishri, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
Meir Panim with Soldiers 5774 Roundup: Year of Relief and Service for Israel’s Needy

Meir Panim implements programs that serve Israel’s neediest populations with respect and dignity. Meir Panim also coordinated care packages for families in the South during the Gaza War.



Home » InDepth » Monitor »

Mike Wallace Loves Arab Dictators


Media-Monitor-logo

Like a pig returning to his vomit, Mike Wallace came out of retirement last month to genuflect in the presence of Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and then to spread the word that the man who’s denied the Holocaust and called for wiping Israel off the map is not really such a bad guy after all.

“He’s actually, in a strange way, he’s a rather attractive man,” gushed the 88-year-old Wallace, “very smart, savvy, self-assured, good looking in a strange way…. He couldn’t have been more accommodating.”

The interview itself, portions of which aired on “60 Minutes,” was not all that offensive, although Wallace didn’t try very hard to get Ahmadinejad to respond to the few tough questions he threw at him. But Wallace’s comments before and after the inter-view aired, particularly his stupefying performance on Sean Hannity’s ABC radio program, confirmed yet again that Arab dictators have a way of stripping away Wallace’s tough-guy persona and leaving him exposed as a swooning schoolgirl.

Asked by Hannity if he considers Ahmadinejad to be an anti-Semite, Wallace said, “No, I don’t.” When Hannity observed that Hitler and Stalin might have appeared “informed, smart, reasonable, even though they were evil,” Wallace responded: “Adolf Hitler? Good Lord. I mean, the man was such a hate-ful, hateful man.”

“So is Ahmadinejead, Mike,” replied Hannity. “Listen to his statements.”

To which a perplexed and increasingly incoherent Wallace responded: “What…running a Holocaust, which the Iranians have not done, as you know, running a Holocaust, doing that sort of thing, slaughtering six million Jews, that’s not what this man is talking about doing.”

The conversation continued (transcript courtesy of radioblogger.com):

Hannity: But Mike, but let me answer that. Mike, but his statements are such that he wants to go beyond that. His statements are annihilate, wipe off the Earth…

Wallace: No, no, no.

Hannity: …the world.

Wallace: Hold it, hold it.

Hannity: Wipe off the map.

Wallace: Yes, he says wipe off the map, and of course I asked him over and over about that. He says in effect, hey, it’s perfectly sensible to do…pardon me. It’s perfectly sensible for them, and I’m not quoting directly, obviously, because I don’t have the translation in front of me, to…for them to…it’s per-fectly sensible, if there is a Holocaust, and let’s buy the fact that there was a Holocaust. Where did the Holocaust take place? Did it take place in an Arab neighborhood? Did it take place in Jerusalem? No. It took place in Germany. Then it seems to me, under those circumstances, take Israel, the Zionist entity, he called it, move it to Germany. Move it to Europe. That’s where it happened.

Hannity: Do you agree with him?

Wallace: Move it to the United States.

Hannity: Do you think that’s a legitimate argument?

Wallace: It’s an argument. I’m not a commentator. You are.

The sad thing is that Wallace, as mentioned above, has a history of fawning over the most ruthless enemies of his own people. Back in 2002 he appeared on “Larry King Live” to talk up an interview he’d recently conducted with Palestinian terror boss Yasir Arafat.

“You know something, Larry,” he said, expressing the kind of sympathy and understanding he never extends to American leaders, “I came to – I came to admire Arafat beginning back in 1977….He has made mistakes along the way as all of us do….”

In 1975, during a notorious “60 Minutes” whitewashing of the late Syrian dictator Hafez As-sad, Wallace characterized the thug who killed tens of thousands of his own people as “cool, strong, austere and independent.” (One can almost feel Wallace’s knees turning to jelly as he spoke those words.)

And then there was Anwar Sadat – a despot who arrested and jailed thousands of political opponents, a one-man junta who never won an openly contested election in his life, an admirer of Hitler who in 1953 wrote that Hitler, even in defeat, had “become the immortal leader of Germany.”

In his memoir Close Encounters Wallace described himself as “an unabashed admirer” of Sadat. “I respected him as a statesman, a leader of his people, and in my personal dealings with him…he came across as an honest and sensitive man who was endowed with considerable charm and a fine sense of humor.”

About the Author: Jason Maoz is the Senior Editor of The Jewish Press.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Mike Wallace Loves Arab Dictators”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Which glass has the poison?
State Dept. Complains New Homes in Jerusalem ‘Poison’ US Peace Plan
Latest Indepth Stories

There is not even a hint of recognition that Hamas deliberately fires rockets at civilian targets in Israel while storing arms and rocket launchers among its own civilians in Gaza.

No one with any sanity would dream of rationalizing or justifying the depredations perpetrated on the Arab world by ISIS.

With $2 billion on hand the Islamic State is an extremely well-funded terrorist group that may pose a major international crisis for the U.S. and the world. Learn about their rise to power and the toll they’ve taken thus far.

In the recent Gaza war and its aftermath, we saw a totally illogical reaction from the world.

A., a teacher: “I do not know a single Gazan who is pro-Hamas at the moment, except for those on its payroll.”

Is the global community clear in its response to these extremist groups?

Like our fabled character, Don Quixote, President Obama has constantly spawned his own reality.

Boroujerdi was informed that “the pressures and tortures will increase until he has been destroyed.”

Fatah: Hamas stole relief aid for Gaza and distributed it amongst its followers in mosques.

Can teenagers seriously be expected to behave properly when they are surrounded by so much suggestive material? Is it fair to expose them (and ourselves) to so much temptation and then tell them, “Just say no”?

Washington remains ignorant of the need to dismantle alliances with various Muslim countries.

Defeating IS requires bombing its strongholds and recognizing the violent nature of Islam.

Abbas again used the UN to attack Israel, distort history, and undermine prospects for peace.

Israel and the Palestinian Authority cannot even agree to move their clocks back on the same day.

More Articles from Jason Maoz
William Safire

“It’s a lousy column and a dishonest one,” Halberstam wrote. “So close it. Or you will end up just as shabby as Safire.”

Charles Krauthammer

Wye would be seen to have set the groundwork for the creation of a Palestinian state

These are not necessarily the best all-around biographies or studies of the individual presidents listed (though some rank right up there), but the strongest in terms of exploring presidential attitudes and policies toward Israel.

The Clintonan “engagement” liberals remember with such fondness did nothing but embolden Arafat and Hamas and Hizbullah as they witnessed Israel’s only real ally elevate process ahead of policy.

What really makes one wonder about the affinity felt by certain Jews for Grant was the welcome mat he put out for some of the country’s most pernicious anti-Semites.

With 2013 marking half a century since Kennedy’s fateful limousine ride in Dallas, the current revels are exceeding the revisionist frenzies of years past, with a seemingly endless parade of books, articles and television specials designed to assure us that, despite everything that has come to light about him since his death, JFK was a great president, or at least a very good president who would have been great had his life not been so cruelly cut short.

As someone who for the past fifteen years has been writing a column that largely focuses on the news media, I’ve read what is no doubt an altogether unhealthy number of books on the subject. Most of them were instantly forgettable while some created a brief buzz but failed to pass the test of time. And then there were those select few that merited a permanent spot on the bookshelf.

George W. Bush has been getting some positive media coverage lately, with recent polls showing him at least as popular as his successor, Barack Obama, and a big new book about the Bush presidency by New York Times chief White House correspondent Peter Baker (Days of Fire, Doubleday) portraying Bush as a much more hands-on chief executive than his detractors ever imagined.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/media-monitor/mike-wallace-loves-arab-dictators/2006/08/30/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: