web analytics
January 30, 2015 / 10 Shevat, 5775
 
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Home » InDepth » Monitor »

Obama, Jews And 2012


Media-Monitor-logo

A Gallup poll released last week showed Barack Obama maintaining a strong level of Jewish support. The poll sparked yet another round of newspaper stories and web articles on whether the Republicans have any hope of even a respectable showing among Jews in the 2012 presidential election.
The answer should be drearily obvious, at least based on the historical record.
Democratic presidential candidates first began winning big among Jews in 1928, when New York governor Al Smith, a Roman Catholic of immigrant stock, rolled up 72 percent of the Jewish vote while losing the election to Herbert Hoover.
Jewish support for the Democratic presidential ticket solidified four years later when another New York governor, Franklin Roosevelt, won the votes of better than 8 in 10 American Jews. Roosevelt, whom Jews idolized more than any other politician before or since, went on to win 85 percent of the Jewish vote in 1936 and 90 percent in both 1940 and 1944.
Harry Truman was the next Democrat to benefit from Jewish party loyalty, though his share of the Jewish vote in 1948 slipped from Rooseveltian heights to a “mere” 75 percent, thanks to the third-party candidacy of Henry Wallace, whose left-wing campaign attracted those 15 percent of Jewish voters for whom Truman apparently was not liberal enough.
Whether either Roosevelt or Truman was deserving of such Jewish support is a question most Jews were reluctant to ask until relatively recently. As the late Sidney Zion wrote years ago, Roosevelt “refused to lift a finger to save [Jews] from Auschwitz…. Then, in 1948, the Jews helped elect Harry Truman, who recognized Israel but immediately embargoed arms to the Jewish state while knowing that the British had fully armed the Arabs.”
The Republican share of the Jewish vote – roughly 10 percent in 1940, 1944 and 1948 – improved significantly in the 1950s as Dwight Eisenhower won the support of 36 percent of Jews in 1952 and 40 percent in 1956.
It wasn’t until nearly a quarter-century later that a Republican presidential candidate would come anywhere close to matching Ike’s 1956 success with Jewish voters.
The 1980 presidential election offered a clear choice between a Republican candidate – former California governor Ronald Reagan – who was unambiguous in his support of Israel and a Democrat – the incumbent president, Jimmy Carter – whose record on Israel was problematic, to say the least.
For many Jews who ordinarily voted Democratic, it was Carter’s dismal overall performance as president – as opposed to his perceived tilt against Israel – that made the decision to vote for Reagan a little easier. On Election Day Carter was repudiated by better than half the American Jewish electorate, garnering a mere 45 percent of their votes. Thirty-nine percent of the Jewish vote went to Reagan, with third-party candidate John Anderson polling better than 14 percent among Jews who were sick of Carter but could not take the step of voting for a Republican.
Jews would flock home to the Democratic Party in 1984, preferring the Democratic candidate, Walter Mondale, to President Reagan by a 69 percent to 31 percent margin. (Some voter surveys put Reagan’s support among Jews in 1984 at closer to 34 percent.)
The ’84 election was a strong indication that a Republican presidential candidate, whether incumbent or challenger and no matter how strong his record on Israel, will always lose among Jewish voters when the alternative is a liberal Democrat without any pronounced or well-known hostility to Israel.
   The Jewish vote has, if anything, become more strongly Democratic in presidential elections since the Reagan era. While George H.W. Bush managed to win 27 percent of the Jewish vote in 1988, his aloof attitude toward Israel coupled with his uninspiring performance in office sent his support among Jews plummeting four years later, when he won just 15 percent of their votes.
Bob Dole in 1996 (16 percent) and George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004 (19 and 24 percent, respectively) did only incrementally better among Jews.

By 2008, when Barack Obama held John McCain to barely more than 20 percent of the Jewish vote, it was obvious that American Jews were as squarely in the Democratic camp as they’d ever been. Unless Obama replaces Joe Biden with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright as his running mate next year, it’s difficult to see that political fact of life changing in any appreciable sense.

 

Jason Maoz can be reached at jmaoz@jewishpress.com

About the Author: Jason Maoz is the Senior Editor of The Jewish Press.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Obama, Jews And 2012”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz.
Sen. Cruz Asks if Obama ‘Launched Political Campaign against Netanyahu’
Latest Indepth Stories
Israeli-flag

At some point we need to stop simply defending and promoting Israel and start living in Israel

Rabbi Berel Wein

“We Jews are the only people who when we drop a book on the floor pick it up and kiss it.”

Rabbi Sholom Klass

Though Zaide was the publisher of The Jewish Press, a big newspaper,I always remember him learning

Sheldon Silver

Speaker Silver has been an extraordinary public servant since his election to the Assembly in 1975 and has been an exemplary leader of that body since 1994.

He spent the first leg of his daylong visit to the French capital at Hyper Cacher.

Drawing Congress into the Iran nuclear debate is the last thing the White House wants.

Great leaders like Miriam and like Sarah Schenirer possess the capacity to challenge the status quo that confronts them.

Obama’s foreign policy is viewed by both liberals and conservatives as deeply flawed

Many journalists are covertly blaming the Charlie Hebdo writers themselves through self-censorship.

Why does the Times relay different motivations and narratives for jihadists in Europe and Israel?

To defeat parasites-the hosts of terrorists-we need to deny them new people, potential terrorists

Combating Amalek doesn’t mean all who disagree with you is evil-rather whom to follow and to oppose

Desperate people take what they can, seizing opportunity to advance their main goal; the Arabs don’t

There was a glaring void in the President’s State of the Union speech: Israel.

More Articles from Jason Maoz
Comptroller DiNapoli celebrates Sukkot with Crown Heights Jewish community leaders at the sukkah of Rabbi Chanina Sperlin of the Crown Heights Jewish Community Council.

The New York State comptroller manages the state’s $180.7 billion pension fund, audits the spending practices of all state agencies and local governments, oversees the New York State and Local Retirement System, reviews the New York State and City budgets, and approves billions in State contracts and spending.

Front-Page-102414

While not all criticism of Israel stemmed from anti-Semitism, Podhoretz contends the level of animosity towards Israel rises exponentially the farther left one moved along the spectrum.

When you grow up in a home where your parents went through what my parents went through, you realize that life has to be meaningful. You have to be there for other people.

“It’s a lousy column and a dishonest one,” Halberstam wrote. “So close it. Or you will end up just as shabby as Safire.”

Wye would be seen to have set the groundwork for the creation of a Palestinian state

These are not necessarily the best all-around biographies or studies of the individual presidents listed (though some rank right up there), but the strongest in terms of exploring presidential attitudes and policies toward Israel.

The Clintonan “engagement” liberals remember with such fondness did nothing but embolden Arafat and Hamas and Hizbullah as they witnessed Israel’s only real ally elevate process ahead of policy.

What really makes one wonder about the affinity felt by certain Jews for Grant was the welcome mat he put out for some of the country’s most pernicious anti-Semites.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/media-monitor/obama-jews-and-2012/2011/07/13/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: