web analytics
October 2, 2014 / 8 Tishri, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
Meir Panim with Soldiers 5774 Roundup: Year of Relief and Service for Israel’s Needy

Meir Panim implements programs that serve Israel’s neediest populations with respect and dignity. Meir Panim also coordinated care packages for families in the South during the Gaza War.



Home » InDepth » Monitor »

The Lingering Intoxication


Media-Monitor-logo

No doubt there were some well-meaning consumers of news who labored under the naïve illusion that the mainstream media would become just a wee bit more objective in its coverage of Barack Obama once their anointed one won the White House.

Not a chance. If anything, the coverage has grown even more celebratory and worshipful. Here in New York City, the two tabloids seem to be in competition as to which can shoehorn into any given issue the greater number of flattering photos and gee-whiz mentions of the president-elect and his family.

The Daily News endorsed Obama and has always been in the tank for the Illinois senator, but the Post, which endorsed John McCain, is in the midst of its own unique version of Obamamania, even gifting readers with a full color, two-page spread poster of a glowing Obama on which was inscribed the words “President Barack Obama” – premature, to be sure, as he’s no such thing for another nine weeks yet, but Rupert Murdoch seems to be desperately attempting to make up for backing the wrong horse.

The Media Research Center (mediaresearch.org) has compiled some of the more embarrassingly egregious examples of the media’s intoxication with Obama in the days immediately before and after the election, several of which follow, along with something of a mea culpa from Time magazine’s Mark Halperin.

● “Media Bias Largely Unseen in U.S. Presidential Race” – Headline over November 6 Reuters dispatch claiming no liberal tilt in favor of Barack Obama.

● MSNBC’s Chris Matthews: “You know what? I want to do everything I can to make this thing work, this new presidency work, and I think that – ” Host Joe Scarborough: “Is that your job? You just talked about being a journalist.” Matthews: “Yeah, it is my job. My job is to help this country…. This country needs a successful presidency more than anything right now.” – MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” November 6.

● “It was Hollywood. It was romance. It was realism. The technical quality of it, the production values were perfect, the way they timed going to live, the biographical material. But most important, the connection with the average person in the economic turmoil we face right now I thought was fabulous…. Everything was just right…. You’d have to be a tough customer not to be touched by it.” – MSNBC’s Chris Matthews moments after his network aired the half-hour Obama infomercial, October 29.

● “Some princes are born in palaces. Some are born in mangers. But a few are born in the imagination, out of scraps of history and hope…. Barack Hussein Obama did not win because of the color of his skin. Nor did he win in spite of it. He won because at a very dangerous moment in the life of a still young country, more people than have ever spoken before came together to try to save it. And that was a victory all its own.” – Time’s Nancy Gibbs, November 17 cover story.

● “As the nation prepares for President-elect Barack Obama to move into the White House, many Americans can’t help but draw similarities between him and the late President John F. Kennedy…. The similarities are striking. JFK was 43 when he was inaugurated. Obama is just three years older, bringing a certain youthful vigor to the White House, including, young children…. Kennedy had more than his share of charisma and Obama knows how to light up a room. But it’s their wives who might be the real superstars.” – CBS’s Harry Smith on “The Early Show,” November 7.

● “Yes, in the closing weeks of this election, John McCain and Sarah Palin are getting hosed in the press, and at Politico…. We’d take an educated guess – nothing so scientific as a Pew study – that Obama will win the votes of probably 80 percent or more of journalists covering the 2008 election…. [But] of the factors driving coverage of this election…ideological favoritism ranks virtually nil.” – Politico co-founders John Harris and Jim VandeHei in their October 28 column, “Why McCain is getting hosed in the press.”

● SNBC’s Joe Scarborough: “The media has been really, really biased this campaign, I think…. Is the media just in love with history here, Mark, do you think?”…
Time’s Mark Halperin: “I think mistakes have been made and people will regret it…. If Obama wins and goes on to become a hugely successful president, I think, still, people will look back and say it just wasn’t done the right way.”
– MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” October 28.

About the Author: Jason Maoz is the Senior Editor of The Jewish Press.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “The Lingering Intoxication”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Colin H. Kahl, VP Joe Biden's new national security adviser.
Biden’s New NSA Chief Mocked Israeli Nuke Fears
Latest Indepth Stories

There is not even a hint of recognition that Hamas deliberately fires rockets at civilian targets in Israel while storing arms and rocket launchers among its own civilians in Gaza.

No one with any sanity would dream of rationalizing or justifying the depredations perpetrated on the Arab world by ISIS.

With $2 billion on hand the Islamic State is an extremely well-funded terrorist group that may pose a major international crisis for the U.S. and the world. Learn about their rise to power and the toll they’ve taken thus far.

In the recent Gaza war and its aftermath, we saw a totally illogical reaction from the world.

A., a teacher: “I do not know a single Gazan who is pro-Hamas at the moment, except for those on its payroll.”

Is the global community clear in its response to these extremist groups?

Like our fabled character, Don Quixote, President Obama has constantly spawned his own reality.

Boroujerdi was informed that “the pressures and tortures will increase until he has been destroyed.”

Fatah: Hamas stole relief aid for Gaza and distributed it amongst its followers in mosques.

Can teenagers seriously be expected to behave properly when they are surrounded by so much suggestive material? Is it fair to expose them (and ourselves) to so much temptation and then tell them, “Just say no”?

Washington remains ignorant of the need to dismantle alliances with various Muslim countries.

Defeating IS requires bombing its strongholds and recognizing the violent nature of Islam.

Abbas again used the UN to attack Israel, distort history, and undermine prospects for peace.

Israel and the Palestinian Authority cannot even agree to move their clocks back on the same day.

More Articles from Jason Maoz
William Safire

“It’s a lousy column and a dishonest one,” Halberstam wrote. “So close it. Or you will end up just as shabby as Safire.”

Charles Krauthammer

Wye would be seen to have set the groundwork for the creation of a Palestinian state

These are not necessarily the best all-around biographies or studies of the individual presidents listed (though some rank right up there), but the strongest in terms of exploring presidential attitudes and policies toward Israel.

The Clintonan “engagement” liberals remember with such fondness did nothing but embolden Arafat and Hamas and Hizbullah as they witnessed Israel’s only real ally elevate process ahead of policy.

What really makes one wonder about the affinity felt by certain Jews for Grant was the welcome mat he put out for some of the country’s most pernicious anti-Semites.

With 2013 marking half a century since Kennedy’s fateful limousine ride in Dallas, the current revels are exceeding the revisionist frenzies of years past, with a seemingly endless parade of books, articles and television specials designed to assure us that, despite everything that has come to light about him since his death, JFK was a great president, or at least a very good president who would have been great had his life not been so cruelly cut short.

As someone who for the past fifteen years has been writing a column that largely focuses on the news media, I’ve read what is no doubt an altogether unhealthy number of books on the subject. Most of them were instantly forgettable while some created a brief buzz but failed to pass the test of time. And then there were those select few that merited a permanent spot on the bookshelf.

George W. Bush has been getting some positive media coverage lately, with recent polls showing him at least as popular as his successor, Barack Obama, and a big new book about the Bush presidency by New York Times chief White House correspondent Peter Baker (Days of Fire, Doubleday) portraying Bush as a much more hands-on chief executive than his detractors ever imagined.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/media-monitor/the-lingering-intoxication/2008/11/19/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: