web analytics
August 29, 2014 / 3 Elul, 5774
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat (L) visits the JewishPress.com booth at The Event. And the Winners of the JewishPress.com Raffle Are…

Congratulations to all the winners of the JewishPress.com raffle at The Event



Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

A Common-Sense Approach To Global Warming


It comes across as a classic Right-Left dispute. Liberals, led by Al Gore, claim global warming is due mainly to human activity and something must be done before it is too late. Conservatives question that and are quick to accuse the Left of scare tactics fueled by a desire to expand the powers of government. Yet if we put our emotions aside, reasonable discourse can take place and rational conclusions can be drawn.

According to the U.S. National Academy of Science, average surface temperatures on earth have increased by over one degree Fahrenheit over the past 50 years. Some regions in the Arctic and Antarctic have warmed by substantially more (4.5 degrees F) while the portion of the earth covered by ice or snow the year round has declined by 10 percent and glaciers are melting. Since land is not as reflective of the sun’s heat as ice and snow, this sets off a vicious cycle of increased warming. The Inuit peoples of the Arctic have experienced sufficient climate change so as to require unprecedented migration and/or changes in their lifestyle, while polar bears are dying to due lack of ice floes. Every one of the past 13 years is among the 17 warmest years on record. Anyone who would deny these facts might want to consider joining the Flat Earth Society.

The question is, what are the causes of this significant climate change? Conservatives say such change is naturally occurring and that there have been alternating warmer and colder epochs throughout history. They attribute the current warming largely to changes in the amount of heat reaching earth from the sun, naturally occurring variations in the earth’s orbital pattern, and increased volcanic activity. Many of them believe man is simply not powerful enough to have a significant bearing on the earth’s climate.

Liberals, on the other hand, attribute the warming mainly to increased emissions of greenhouse gasses, especially carbon dioxide and methane, due mainly to the burning of fossil fuels (oil and coal) and also to widespread deforestation. The primary greenhouse gas, however, is water vapor, which many scientists say has been increasing due to the increased CO2 and methane.

The greenhouse effect, by which atmospheric gasses keep the earth warm, is necessary. Otherwise, the planet would be uninhabitable. It is the increase in greenhouse gasses that is seen as cause for concern, with atmospheric CO2 having increased by nearly 20 percent over the past 50 years and methane rising at an even higher rate. There are those who say that as the polar icecaps melt, ocean levels will rise and low-lying areas will be permanently flooded.

It clearly appears that the majority of scientists studying the problem attribute most or at least a significant portion of it to human activity. But there are many who insist the changes are natural and man is not to blame. The fact that the majority holds to a certain opinion does not necessarily prove it. However, even if one could absolutely prove that fossil fuels do not cause global warming, that would hardly make them innocent of causing any harm.

For example, fish (and fish oils) constitute an important part of the human diet and it is undeniable that dangerous levels of mercury are now found in some ocean fish, particularly tuna. All that mercury didn’t get there due to people throwing away their old thermometers. Rather the mercury is spewed into the air due to the burning of fossil fuels, particularly coal. From there it is carried by rain and snow into the world’s water systems. It is now increasingly believed that ingesting mercury can cause significant neurological harm, especially to children. In addition, the burning of oil and coal continue to cause acid rain, leading to the loss of fish in our lakes and streams.

Even more dangerous are the vast amounts of carbon monoxide (CO) spewed into our atmosphere, mainly from motor vehicle exhaust. CO is known to harm the central nervous system and is particularly dangerous to those with heart disease. Along with nitrogen oxides, another common pollutant caused by fossil fuels, CO is known to cause the formation of ozone, the most irritating air pollutant and the main component of summertime smog.

About the Author:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “A Common-Sense Approach To Global Warming”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
ISIS in Quneitra
Updates from Kuneitra, Syria [video]
Latest Indepth Stories
IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz reviewing maps on the Golan Heights.

The bad news is that ISIS and Al Qaeda are on the Syrian Golan. The good news is that every terrorist in Syria is killing each other.

TorahScroll AoT17

The congregants, Ethiopians spanning generations, were beaming with joy and pride.

Troodler-082914

The withdrawal from the Gaza Strip nine years ago did not enhance Israel’s security.

Eisenstock-082914

How does a soldier from a religious home fall in love with a soldier from a non- religious kibbutz?

In 19th century entire ancient Jewish communities fled Palestine to escape brutal Muslim authorities

Responsibility lies with both the UN and Hamas, and better commitments should have been demanded from both parties in the ceasefire.

But the world is forever challenging our Jewish principle and our practices.

If this is how we play the game, we will lose. By that I mean we will lose everything.

Reportedly, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates have formed a bloc that seeks to counter Islamist influence in the Middle East.

One wonders how the IDF could be expected to so quickly determine the facts.

While there is no formula that will work for everyone, there are some strategies that if followed carefully and consistently can help our children – and us – gain the most from the upcoming school year.

We risk our lives to help those who do what they can to kill to our people .

Twain grasped amazingly well the pulse of the Jewish people.

The entertainment industry appears divided about the conflict between Israel and Hamas.

More Articles from Harry Eisenberg

A recent Atlanta Journal-Constitution political cartoon depicted Rudy Giuliani attempting to explain his campaign strategy: “The strategy is, lose every primary and become the Republican nominee.” To which his listeners replied: “So far so good.”

Due to term limits, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg stands to be out of office come January 1, 2010, a thought he may not relish. Hence, while he continues to deny it, his aides keep sending out trial balloons alluding to an independent run at the presidency.

In the aftermath of the Six-Day War, Israelis were convinced that peace with the Arabs was finally at hand. That thinking was based on the notion that the war had proven Israel’s invincible presence in the region. If Israel was unbeatable, they reasoned, what choice would the Arabs have other than to make peace?

It comes across as a classic Right-Left dispute. Liberals, led by Al Gore, claim global warming is due mainly to human activity and something must be done before it is too late. Conservatives question that and are quick to accuse the Left of scare tactics fueled by a desire to expand the powers of government. Yet if we put our emotions aside, reasonable discourse can take place and rational conclusions can be drawn.

Nowadays many people claim our situation In Iraq is becoming more and more like it was in Vietnam. One major criticism of our effort in Vietnam was the absence of an exit strategy. In war planning the term “exit strategy” doesn’t necessarily mean cut and run, as some mistakenly believe. Rather, it is simply defining how you plan to bring the war to an end. In Vietnam, it was beyond the capabilities of both the Johnson and Nixon administrations to devise such a strategy.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/a-common-sense-approach-to-global-warming/2007/06/15/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: