Latest update: July 14th, 2013
What happens when the far Right collides with the hard Left? Will the universe explode? Will the laws of physics be distorted by some anti-Newtonian implosion of logic? No, they won’t. Not as long as the two ends of the spectrum are uniting to slam the Jews, that is.
Such a moment arrived when the preeminent journal of the far Right, Pat Buchanan’s American Conservative, opened its pages to Phillip Weiss, a stalwart of the Left. Why would Buchanan lend his bully pulpit to Weiss? Simple: so he could promote him as yet another Jew who opposes Zionism.
Weiss, a liberal New York author and magazine writer who’s been flailing against a variety of Jewish targets for years, has lately found himself in the unlikely position of becoming an honorary member in good standing of the troglodyte Right.
He is also the latest of a growing group of Israel-haters claiming to be victims of the Zionist conspiracy. In Weiss’s case, he ceased writing a blog on the website of the New York Observer because his editor and publishers were no longer willing to support his “right” to use their publication for attacking Israel and its supporters for being disloyal to America and for being, at least indirectly, to blame for the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
In his piece in the American Conservative, he related that his editor at the Observer, Peter Kaplan, urged him to can the paranoia about the Zionists. “As your friend,” he says that Kaplan advised him, “Don’t become a nut.” He thought that Weiss “shouldn’t allow the political crank to crowd out the storyteller and humorist” in him because he had become “unhinged by politics.”
But being a “nut” on the issue of Jews backing Israel is too important to Weiss because, as he wrote in the same piece, “The towers fell [on 9/11] in part because of our support for Israel’s occupation of Arab lands. … Now Israel’s policies toward the Arabs were ours. On my blog, I raised the issue of dual loyalty.”
So now Weiss is finding a new literary home with, as he has put it, his “new friends” – the followers of Patrick Buchanan.
Weiss’s tale of woe is one more example of an Israel-hater, even one with a Jewish background, who finds himself drawn to rhetorical violence against Israel and the Jews.
Norman Finkelstein, who was recently denied tenure at DePaul University after his pseudo-scholarly smearing of Israel as a Nazi, apartheid state brought him some rather strange allies among Holocaust deniers, is another. Finkelstein’s supporters have branded Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz a “bully” and a “McCarthyite” for pointing out Finkelstein’s lies and his unsuitability for tenure.
The irony is that for all of their wailing about the ruthlessness of the “Israel Lobby” in attempting to destroy them, they are far from alone in putting forward the notion that the vast majority of Americans who ardently support the State of Israel are somehow the victims of a nefarious campaign of manipulation by disloyal Zionists.
This theme was championed by John Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago and Stephen Walt of Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government, who co-authored a now famous essay in which they took the sort of conspiracy-theory bigotry long put forward by former presidential candidate and pundit Buchanan and brought it into the mainstream.
The willingness of others on the Left – including prominent Jewish “progressives” like playwright Tony Kushner and New York University professor Tony Judt – to denounce Zionism was the subject of a pamphlet published by the American Jewish Committee last winter.
In it, Indiana University Professor Alvin Rosenfeld wrote of the dangers of allowing such ideas to leach into the political mainstream at a time when such Israel-bashing was fueling a frightening revival of anti-Semitism in Europe, and throughout the Arab and Muslim world.
But the response to Rosenfeld has not been encouraging. He was roundly denounced by many in the secular and Jewish media for unfairly tarring liberals with the brush of anti-Semitism, even though he did no such thing.
Even worse is the notion held by many in positions of influence that somehow the Jewish community’s angry response to Walt, Mearsheimer and even Finkelstein has been over the top.Jonathan S. Tobin
About the Author: Jonathan S. Tobin is senior online editor of Commentary magazine and chief political blogger at www.commentarymagazine.com. He can be reached via e-mail at firstname.lastname@example.org.
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.
If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.