web analytics
May 23, 2013 /14 Sivan, 5773
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
The Tosfos Yomtov was convinced that the death of 300,000 –600,000 Jews during the Chmielnicki massacres of 1648-49 were because of improper Tefila. Communicated: Tefilla

Chillul Tefila Bifarhesia, as well as halachicly challenged verbiage and dress, are external manifestations of a critical lack of personal yiras shomayim which has lethal consequences.



Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

Don’t Risk Israel’s Security On Obama’s Words

tell a friend
Sheldon Adelson

Sheldon Adelson

“Americans who support Israel should take the president at his word.” So wrote Haim Saban recently in The New York Times, claiming President Obama was fully committed to the Jewish state.

But is that true? Should we take Obama at his word?

No, not when Israel confronts the threat of a nuclear Iran.

Not long ago Obama was caught on an open microphone sympathizing with French President Sarkozy’s slurring of the Israeli prime minister. And his public snubbing of the Israeli leader’s request to discuss Iran during a recent U.S. visit was, according to Reuters, “a highly unusual rebuff to a close ally.”

Even more worrying, last month former U.S. State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley, who attended several of Obama’s meetings with Netanyahu, admitted “there are serious differences between our interests and Israel’s own security interests.”

All this raises questions about Obama’s sincerity when he publicly says he’ll “always have Israel’s back.”

Nor are these the only times the president has left American voters wondering where he really stands on foreign relations.

Remember when earlier this year he was inadvertently recorded asking former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev for “space” until his reelection, when he’d have more “flexibility”? Obama was clearly not being forthright with the American people on his plans with missile defense.

What else hasn’t he told us?

Think about Obama’s anti-Israel friends and mentors – radicals like Rashid Khalidi, Frank Marshall Davis, Jeremiah Wright, or the late Edward Said, whom Obama studied under. Has he made anti-Israel promises to them? Is Obama’s campaign rhetoric in support of Israel only creating “space” until after the election?

Even some liberals now complain the president has lost so much Israeli trust that, in the words of Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic, “there is almost no chance of progress [for peace] if Obama wins re-election.”

Given that Obama’s public expressions are not something Israelis can rely upon, we need to take seriously the question: What are his second-term plans when he no longer needs the Jewish vote?

Obama’s supporters tell us there’s nothing to worry about. He can be trusted, they say, because of his record of military aid to Israel and his support for sanctions against Iran.

But the aid was committed in programs that began under previous administrations well before his presidency. He cannot rightly take credit for this aid, just as he cannot take credit for merely signing pro-Israel legislation that had bipartisan congressional support.

Moreover, Obama’s campaign never mentions that in the past few years his budgets have proposed significant cuts in U.S.-Israel missile defense funds. Even worse, the Iranian sanctions contain loopholes that, in the words of the Wall Street Journal, “you could drive a warhead through.” All 20 of Iran’s major trading partners enjoy sanction exemptions. They won’t stop Iran’s nuclear program.

Let’s also not forget that when Obama took office, he admitted his administration sought to put “daylight” between America and Israel. He lectured that the Jewish state needed “to engage in serious self-reflection.” And, in his 2009 address to the Muslim world, he implied a moral equivalence between the Holocaust and Palestinian dislocation.

With a second term, the president won’t have fears of electoral accountability and will act upon his true feelings toward Israel.

This is worrying – especially at a time when Israelis as well as Americans sorely need a president whose words and policies they can rely on.

Not since 1967 has Israel’s security situation been more precarious. Iran is now racing for a nuclear bomb while bragging it only needs “24 hours and an excuse” to destroy the Jewish state. Egypt is lost to the Muslim Brotherhood. Hizbullah is armed to the teeth in Lebanon. Turkey’s government is more foe than friend. The Gulf States use enormous petroleum wealth to fund global anti-Israel propaganda. The “Arab Spring” continues to usher extremists into power. And Hamas rules Gaza.

All the while the United Nations never misses a chance to denounce the Jewish state; Western universities support boycotts of Israel; and a sizable portion of the Democratic Party protests the inclusion of support for Jerusalem as the capital of Israel in their platform. The White House press secretary, Jay Carney, can’t even name Israel’s capital.

In these times of unrest and violence, it is necessary to elect a commander-in-chief whose words we can trust. Mitt Romney, to my mind, is a much safer choice.

To be sure, no one should argue that Jews must support Romney just because he is more reliable on Israel. But neither should they dismiss him because they don’t agree with his every position. When the Jewish homeland is at stake, we must not let ourselves be fooled by Obama’s oratorical skills. Nor can we afford to ignore his poor track record on Israel.

Those who support Obama are asking the rest of us to trust a president who has yet to recognize Israel’s ancient capital, a promise he made in the last election.

So keep in mind Obama’s open microphone comments next time someone says you must take the president at his word. And ask yourself: Should we risk Israel’s security on his campaign rhetoric?

For Obama, the issue is political; for Israel, it’s existential – a matter of survival. JNS.org

Sheldon Adelson and his wife, Miriam, established the Adelson Family Foundation to support programs that benefit the state of Israel and the Jewish people, including Birthright Israel. The CEO and principal owner of the Las Vegas Sands Corp, Adelson has created and developed more than 50 different companies during a six-decade career in the U.S. and Asia as an entrepreneur and venture capitalist. In September, Forbes magazine listed him as the 12th-wealthiest American. In June, he gave the pro-Mitt Romney Super PAC $10 million.

 

tell a friend

About the Author: Sheldon Adelson and his wife, Miriam, established the Adelson Family Foundation to support programs that benefit the state of Israel and the Jewish people, including Birthright Israel. The CEO and principal owner of the Las Vegas Sands Corp, Adelson has created and developed more than 50 different companies during a six-decade career in the U.S. and Asia as an entrepreneur and venture capitalist. In September, Forbes magazine listed him as the 12th-wealthiest American.


You might also be interested in:


no comments

You must log in to post a comment.

No Responses to “Don’t Risk Israel’s Security On Obama’s Words”

  1. Americans who care about Israel and Americans who care about America, should not vote to re-elect President Obama.

    Mr. Adelson presents many facts that prove that President Obama really cannot.
    be trusted in this area.

    There is also the recent statement of Senator Dianne Feinstein, that she would not support a strike against Iran under any circumstance.

    A nuclear Iran is a certainty under a new Obama administration.

  2. Anonymous says:

    I've been reading about the Obama campaign's financial advantage – that Romney has had to cut back on TV ads in many important markets while Obama has flooded those markets with attack ads. I thought Mr. Adelson was going to donate $100 million to the Romney campaign? If so, the time is now!

  3. Anonymous says:

    THE anti-christ obama can not be trusted for any reason, he hates ISRAEL and only fools wound believe other wise, HE plans to DESTROY america so that no one can stop his conquest of the world, WHEN the war starts in america, KNOW ISRAEL is going to BE NEXT, they have given THOUSANDS OF NUCLEAR weapons to the IRANIANS, IF israel attacks IRAN, ISRAEL will BE LEVELED, that's their PLAN, CALL ON THE LORD DEAR ISRAEL, IT WILL BE YOUR ONLY HOPE OF DEFEATING THE ANTI-CHRIST OBAMA and this DEMON SPAWN……………….

  4. Sheldon Adelson has donated ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS [$100,000,000] to the Romney campaign, in an effort to avoid paying TWO BILLION DOLLARS [$2,000,000,000] in taxes, if Obama is elected. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/11/sheldon-adelson-2-billion-tax-cut-mitt-romney_n_1873683.html

    • Anonymous says:

      Did you not read the article? To date, the Adelsons have only donated $10 million to the Romney campaign. And your assumption that Sheldon Adelson would support Romney to save on taxes is total bullshit. He's supporting Romney because Obama is an Islamic terrorist bent on destroying Israel and America.

    • Thank you for bringing that to my attention. It's always good to hear a sane, well thought through, thoroughly researched opinion.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Women and baby at Givat Asaf. A US Embassy officials attended a hearing on a Peace Now petition to story the community
US Implicitly Backs Peace Now Petition to Destroy Outpost
Latest Indepth Stories
Moshe-Feiglin-022213

The importance of the caucus on organ harvesting in China, sponsored recently by the Liberal Lobby in the Knesset, cannot be exaggerated. On the surface, the caucus’s topic seems odd. Knesset members and other VIPs were called together to discuss horrors being perpetrated by the Communist regime in China against what the government there calls “regime opponents.”

Shurin-Dov

My mother, the eldest daughter of Reb Yaakov Kamenetsky, zt”l, was niftar last month at the age of 92. She took her last breath in her home in Efrat, Israel, next door to the shul that was my father’s for 24 years before his passing in 2007.

Louis Rene Beres

Following the Boston Marathon bombing, one crucial point will likely remain overlooked. The most loathsome aspect of this or any other terror bombing attack on civilians will always lie in the inexpressibility of physical pain. While all decent people will abhor the idea of bombs expressly directed at the innocent, whether here or in other countries, none will ever be able to process the very deepest horrors of what has been inflicted.

It’s only natural to see increasing evidence of Jerusalem’s glorious Jewish past being unearthed, quite literally, under modern Israeli sovereignty. The new archaeological finds are also very timely – as the Arab onslaught attempting to detach Jerusalem from its Jewish roots gains steam, the facts on the ground, or “under” the ground, show quite otherwise.

The Talmud (Berachot 26b) says, “tefillot avot tiknum” – “prayer was established by the avot.” The Talmud then uses the following verse (Bereshit 19:27) to prove how Avraham established prayer: “Vayaskem Avraham baboker el hamakom asher amad sham et pnei Hashem” – “And Avraham got up early in the morning to the place where he had stood before God.”

Nearly 13 years ago, then-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak journeyed to Camp David to end the conflict with the Palestinians. With the approval of President Clinton, he offered Yasir Arafat an independent Palestinian state in almost all of the West Bank, Gaza and in part of Jerusalem. Arafat said no.

The news that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative groups has brought renewed spotlight on a 2010 lawsuit filed by the pro-Israel group Z Street, which alleges it was also singled out by the IRS when applying for tax-exempt status.

In an editorial last week (“Circling the Wagons”) we noted the efforts by the administration and its supporters to dismiss allegations that the government’s spin on the Benghazi attack was designed to shield the president and that the IRS was improperly used to stifle opposition to Mr. Obama’s reelection.

As the controversies besetting the Obama administration continue to grow in number and intensity, the prospect that President Obama would seriously consider military action against Iran, should that country continue its drive to become a nuclear power, becomes more and more remote. So we welcome the current enhancement of sanctions against Iran on the federal and New York State levels.

To his parents’ friends, he was “Mrs. Greenberg’s disgrace,” but to sports fans he is one of the greatest – if not the greatest – Jewish baseball players of all time. Long before Sandy Koufax, Hank Greenberg excited Jewish sports fans with his prowess on the baseball diamond.

To eat is to live – to keep our physical bodies alive. For without the body, there is nothing. No experience. No memory. No joy and no hardship. But man, unlike animals, eats to live and to enjoy. So how should a Jew respond when he is challenged as to why he imposes upon himself not just ceremonies dedicated to the enjoyment of eating but even more to the limiting of what he can eat?

Neither Secretary of State Kerry nor the president he serves seem to understand Russia’s goals in the Middle East.

You might think that six Khamenei followers might split the hardline vote but don’t worry as that will be taken care of in the ballot-counting if necessary.

More Articles from Sheldon Adelson
Sheldon Adelson

“Americans who support Israel should take the president at his word.” So wrote Haim Saban recently in The New York Times, claiming President Obama was fully committed to the Jewish state.

But is that true? Should we take Obama at his word?

No, not when Israel confronts the threat of a nuclear Iran.

    Latest Poll

    Which is the most beautiful location in Jerusalem?









    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/dont-risk-israels-security-on-obamas-words/2012/10/11/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online:

Close