web analytics
September 18, 2014 / 23 Elul, 5774
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
Apartment 758x530 Africa-Israel at the Israel Real Estate Exhibition in New York

Africa Israel Residences, part of the Africa Israel Investments Group led by international businessman Lev Leviev, will present 7 leading projects on the The Israel Real Estate Exhibition in New York on Sep 14-15, 2014.



Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

Fatah/Hamas Means No More Concessions To Abbas


Mahmoud Abbas’s Fatah-controlled Palestinian Authority and Hamas, which controls Gaza, have formally signed a unity agreement.

This means Fatah, which calls in its constitution for the destruction of Israel (Article 12) and the use of terrorism as an indispensable element in the struggle to achieve that goal (Article 19), will be united with Hamas, which calls is its charter for the destruction of Israel (Article 15) and the murder of Jews (Article 7).

Just last week Hamas condemned the killing of the arch-terrorist Osama bin Laden. Both Hamas and Fatah have each murdered more than 500 Israelis since Yasir Arafat launched his terrorist wave against Israel in September 2000.

Now that these two movements have seen fit to form a new, unified Palestinian terrorist regime, it should be crystal clear that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu can make no concessions whatsoever.

Because the fact is, with such an agreement the PA need make no concessions to Israel in return for any UN declaration of statehood. As Mideast expert Professor Barry Rubin has observed:

In other words, there will be a widely, or internationally, accepted Palestine without the need to make peace with Israel. No concessions need be made. The Palestinians will get everything and give up nothing. They will not be bound in any way by border changes or security guarantees. The struggle to wipe Israel off the map can continue. It’s Hamas’s dream come true.

We know from recent, bitter experience that the PA is unlikely to accept even the most generous Israeli peace proposals – even ones that would endanger Israel, such as Ehud Barak’s 2000 peace offer or Ehud Olmert’s 2008 offer, both of which offered more than 90 percent of Judea and Samaria and parts of Jerusalem to the PA.

But even if the PA were willing to accept a concessionary Israeli proposal, such a proposal should not be made, because Abbas’s PA has done nothing to suggest its war against Israel will not continue.

To the contrary, by naming schools, streets and sports teams after Jew-killers; by not arresting terrorists or outlawing terrorist groups; and now by initialing an agreement with Hamas, the PA has shown conclusively that it is not only not a peace partner but is an avowed enemy of Jews and the Jewish state.

Why, then, is Israel being urged to make concessions? Such importuning is based on the fallacy that creating a Palestinian state will bring peace. This will remain a delusion until and unless the PA genuinely cleanses itself of terrorism and extremism, fights and jails terrorists, and terminates the culture of hatred and rejection that fuels Palestinian violent rejection of the Jewish state of Israel.

Does any reasonable person sincerely believe these things can even begin to occur when Fatah/PA allies itself with Hamas?

Any withdrawal of Israeli forces from Judea and Samaria would be a strategic and dangerous mistake, one that would imperil Israel’s major population centers. In this context, it is irrelevant that PA forces are being trained by the U.S.; the PA lost Gaza to Hamas in 2007 and may yet lose Judea and Samaria, despite any agreement signed between the two.

The prospect of U.S.-trained PA forces occupying strategic positions in Judea and Samaria should fill one with dread, not reassurance. We have seen in recent weeks Arab regimes murdering their own citizens by the hundreds and a journalist, Lara Logan, sexually assaulted in Egypt, with crowds egging on the attackers with cries of “Jew, Jew.” What might we expect from a Fatah/Hamas state?

In these circumstances, the Netanyahu government should not accede to whatever pressure might be placed on it to produce yet another gesture, yet another retreat, yet another wasteful, dangerous, one-sided concession.

Capitulation would send the world a message of Israeli weakness, a message that says this is really Arab land to which Jews have no claim. And we could end up with an Iranian-armed and supported Hamas-run state in these territories.

Instead of seeking to buy time or breathing space with new concessionary proposals, Israel must speak the truth loudly and clearly: Abbas’s PA is an unreconstructed terror-sponsoring regime that refuses to accept Israel’s existence as a Jewish state and is undeserving of any international support, rewards or concessions until, at the very least, it fulfills its 17-year old commitments to end terrorism and incitement to hatred and murder. By initialing an agreement with Hamas, the PA has done the very opposite.

About the Author: Morton A. Klein is national president of the Zionist Organization of America.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Fatah/Hamas Means No More Concessions To Abbas”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
its a deal
Hamas Denies Arresting Rocket Crew
Latest Indepth Stories

A little less than 10 percent of eligible Democratic voters came out on primary day, which translates into Mr. Cuomo having received the support of 6.2 percent of registered Democrats.

The reality, though, is that the Israeli “war crimes” scenario will likely be played out among highly partisan UN agencies, NGOs, and perhaps even the International Criminal Court.

Peace or the lack of it between Israel and the Palestinians matters not one whit when it comes to the long-term agenda of ISIS and other Islamists, nor does it affect any of the long-running inter-Arab conflicts and wars.

Rather than serving as a deterrent against terrorist attacks, Israel’s military strength and capabilities are instead looked at as an unfair advantage in the asymmetrical war in which it finds itself.

Sisi:”The religious nature of the Middle East creates challenges for the governing authorities.”

For too long the media and international community have been preaching that “Palestinians” bear no responsibility for the consequences of their decisions and they are passive victims of the conflict.

Iron Dome intercepted over 1,000 rockets aimed at Israel with a success rate of over 90% in 2014

We talked about the responsibility that comes with the pen, its potential to influence and inspire.

Amnesty International:The crippling of the power station was “collective punishment of Palestinians”

Originally scheduled to be held elsewhere, the hotel canceled, pressured by local missionary groups

It’s likely that some of the rebel factions, including US clients, have indeed made pacts with ISIS

Imam Tafsirli of the Harlem Islamic center: “You cannot be a Muslim without believing in Jesus”

If simple fuel choice were implemented, the power of petroleum and those who sell it would cease.

More Articles from Morton A. Klein
John Kerry is full of 'nonsense,' says ZOA president Morton A. Klein

John Kerry says an Israeli-Peace peace pact is “important to “regional security and stability.” ZOA says he is full of nonsense: Arab wars on Israel have nothing to do with their own internal problems.

Klein-051812

Imagine if the NAACP had responded with skepticism to the passage of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and urged African Americans to exercise their civil rights cautiously under this law. Title VI was landmark legislation when it was passed in 1964 to remedy racial and ethnic discrimination in programs receiving federal funding.

Mahmoud Abbas’s Fatah-controlled Palestinian Authority and Hamas, which controls Gaza, have formally signed a unity agreement.

Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires that colleges and universities redress racial and ethnic discrimination or risk losing their federal funding. Thus, if African American or Hispanic students are harassed on campus, they can complain to the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR), which is mandated to enforce Title VI and ensure that their schools fix the problem.

Recent polls show that Americans, American Jews and Israelis disapprove of President Obama’s policies toward Israel. They oppose his administration’s condemning Jewish construction in eastern Jerusalem; his UN speech supporting linkage of U.S. support for Israel’s security to Israeli concession to the Palestinians; his comparing Israel’s treatment of Palestinians to the Nazi treatment of Jews in his June 2009 Cairo speech.

Is J Street a pro-Israel group? The lobbying organization never tires of claiming it is.

Yet what pro-Israel group would invite a man to speak at its forthcoming conference who has called for Israel’s destruction, stating that “the establishment by force, violence and terrorism of a Jewish state in Palestine in 1948” was “unjust” and “a crime,” and vowed to “work to overturn the injustice”?

Today, under the Obama administration – as yesterday under the Bush administration – U.S. policy toward the Arab war on Israel is largely based on the notion that Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and his Fatah faction are genuine moderates who reject terrorism and accept Israel’s right to exist, and are therefore committed to building a Palestinian state living in peace alongside Israel.

As New York’s U.S. senator from 2001 to 2009, Hillary Rodham Clinton was a reliable and vocal supporter of Israel. She was especially strong on Jerusalem, stating in a September 2007 position paper, “I believe that Israel’s right to exist in safety as a Jewish state, with defensible borders and an undivided Jerusalem as its capital, must never be questioned.”

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/fatahhamas-means-no-more-concessions-to-abbas/2011/05/11/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: