Photo Credit:

Ex-presidents seldom take an interest in Jewish affairs, with two notable exceptions.

One is Jimmy Carter, who has repeatedly clashed with the Jewish community. Another is Herbert Hoover, an unlikely ally of the Jews who passed away 50 years ago next week (Oct. 20, 1964).

Advertisement

Most ex-presidents have gone quietly into the sunset, and some have taken issue with the few who have chosen to speak out on current affairs.

George W. Bush, for example, last week had some strong words in reaction to fellow ex-president Carter’s public criticism of President Obama’s Mideast policies.

“To have a former president bloviating and second-guessing is, I don’t think, good for the presidency or the country,” Bush said.

Much of Carter’s post-presidential activity has revolved around Israel. He has repeatedly taken controversial stands, such as comparing Israeli policies to apartheid, urging the U.S. to withhold aid from Israel to force it to change its positions, and praising Hamas as “a legitimate political actor.”

Douglas Brinkley’s 1998 book, The Unfinished Presidency: Jimmy Carter’s Journey Beyond the White House, furnished some embarrassing details about Carter’s relationship with the late Palestinian leader Yasir Arafat.

According to Brinkley, Carter “developed a fondness for Arafat” based on his belief “that they were both ordained to be peacemakers by God.” The former president went so far as to personally draft a speech for Arafat that he hoped would “help him to overcome the deficit understanding” for him in the West.

By contrast, Herbert Hoover, as ex-president, repeatedly took positions favorable to the Jewish community, even when it was not in his political interest to do so.

In early 1933, Jewish leaders asked president-elect Franklin D. Roosevelt to join Hoover, the outgoing president, in a joint statement deploring the mistreatment of Jews in Nazi Germany. Hoover agreed to do so; Roosevelt declined.

Before leaving office, Hoover instructed the U.S. ambassador in Germany, Frederic Sackett, “to exert every influence of our government” on the Hitler regime to halt the persecutions. But FDR soon replaced Sackett with William Dodd, and instructed Dodd that while he could “unofficially” take issue with Nazi Germany’s anti-Semitism, he was not to issue any formal protests on the subject, since it was “not a [U.S.] governmental affair.”

Hoover publicly endorsed the 1939 Wagner-Rogers bill to permit 20,000 German Jewish children to enter the U.S. outside the quota system. He also assisted the sponsors of the bill behind the scenes, by pressuring wavering members of the House Immigration Committee to support the measure.

The endorsement of the only living former president gave the bill a significant boost. He likely would have been able to accomplish more for Wagner-Rogers if not for some unfortunate partisan sniping. James G. McDonald, chairman of the President’s Advisory Committee on Political Refugees, believed the ex-president could rally important support for the effort. He suggested “that Mr. Herbert Hoover might assume leadership in raising funds and in administering the work of placing the children in suitable homes.” But Roosevelt administration officials blocked the proposal.

It is worth noting that Hoover’s stance on the bill ran counter to his own political interests, since he hoped to win the GOP presidential nomination in 1940, and most Republicans (like most Democrats) opposed increased immigration. Moreover, since Roosevelt was enormously popular in the Jewish community (he had won about 90 percent of the Jewish vote in the previous election), Hoover had little reason to think that supporting Wagner-Rogers was going to win Jewish votes.

During the Holocaust years, Hoover associated himself with the activist Bergson Group, which lobbied for U.S. action to rescue Jewish refugees. He served on the Sponsoring Committee of Bergson’s protest pageant, “We Will Never Die.” The former president was also honorary chairman of Bergson’s July 1943 Emergency Conference to Save the Jewish People of Europe, and addressed the event via live radio hook-up.

Advertisement

1
2
SHARE
Previous articleYom Tov Challenges
Next articleJewish Lessons I Learned From The NYPD
Dr. Rafael Medoff is founding director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies, and author or editor of 18 books about Jewish history and the Holocaust.

28 COMMENTS

  1. [Surak] God bless Herbert Hoover, who tried to save us from genocide, and curse FDR, who allowed our genocide to continue. Also curse those Jewish leaders who were more loyal to the Dem party than the survival of 6 million Jews – this includes Hank Lukas.

  2. [Surak] God bless Herbert Hoover, who tried to save us from genocide, and curse FDR, who allowed our genocide to continue. Also curse those Jewish leaders who were more loyal to the Dem party than the survival of 6 million Jews – this includes Hank Lukas.

  3. It is almost impossible to address in wise terms these subjects under such a climate found in the comments. Anyway, the first step, I assume, is to grant that religion matters must be kept way from government on all sides. The second step is to acknowledge that the world is facing a crisis that has no other similar in our past. Therefore, resources must be redirected from insane expenditure in defence systems that seems to indicate an economic pathway of recovery for some, in order to keep, at least a minimal level of chance of getting a start of a real recovery period or to prevent irreversible social damage to us all.

  4. It is almost impossible to address in wise terms these subjects under such a climate found in the comments. Anyway, the first step, I assume, is to grant that religion matters must be kept way from government on all sides. The second step is to acknowledge that the world is facing a crisis that has no other similar in our past. Therefore, resources must be redirected from insane expenditure in defence systems that seems to indicate an economic pathway of recovery for some, in order to keep, at least a minimal level of chance of getting a start of a real recovery period or to prevent irreversible social damage to us all.

Comments are closed.

Loading Facebook Comments ...