web analytics
February 1, 2015 / 12 Shevat, 5775
 
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

How Mandela Eased Doubts Among Jewish Leaders

I first met Mandela in Geneva in 1990 as part of a delegation of American Jewish leaders.

Nelson Mandela at Yad Vashem

Nelson Mandela at Yad Vashem

Nelson Mandela will always be remembered as a symbol of courageous resistance to the racist policies of apartheid South Africa. He was a true hero of conscience. But he also will always have a special place in the memory of the Jewish community.

I first met Mandela in Geneva in 1990 as part of a delegation of American Jewish leaders. My colleagues and I spent two and a half memorable hours with the then-newly free African National Congress leader. It was a warm session with good personal feelings on all sides.

Mandela, who died last week at 95, understood far more than we anticipated about the Jewish experience and the meaning of Israel as a Jewish state. He expressed deep appreciation for the Jewish community of South Africa’s support for him during the long years of his imprisonment and expressed a desire to reciprocate that friendship and appreciation.

Over the years, the Jewish community had not always seen eye to eye with Mandela. Many in the community were unhappy with his support for the Palestine Liberation Organization, and particularly his embrace of then-Palestinian leader Yasir Arafat.

Another concern was that Mandela, in repeatedly referring to Israel as a “colonialist” regime, seemed to be questioning the fundamental legitimacy of the Jewish state. It was difficult for American Jewish leaders to consider joining in the welcome for this great freedom fighter without having a better understanding of his views toward Israel and the Jewish community.

There were concerns as well about how Mandela would be received on his first visit to the United States. Clearly he was a hero to the African-American community. But for the Jewish and Cuban communities it was a far different matter. The Cuban community was angry over his close ties to Castro, and the Jewish community had serious concerns because of his ties to Arafat.

The 1990 meeting was pivotal to clear the air and better understand the man. Mandela said to us, “Look, I appreciate what the Jewish community has done for me. On the other hand, if the test of my friendship with you is that I have to be an enemy of your enemy, then I cannot be your friend.”

Referring to his personal struggle and years in imprisonment and isolation, he said, “I needed the support of anybody I could get. And Arafat gave me support. And Castro gave me support.”

At the same time, Mandela understood that while Israel was being boycotted by most of the countries in the world, the white South African government was one of the few countries dealing with it. Mandela said he understood that relationship, too.

“I’m not angry at you and Israel because Israel was dealing with the apartheid South African government,” he told us. “Therefore, don’t be angry at me because I was dealing with Castro and Arafat. If you can understand that, we can go forward.”

This was quintessential Mandela. It was that kind of pragmatic approach to life and to relationships that really explain what he achieved with South Africa’s post-apartheid Truth and Reconciliation Commission. It was not a matter of hatred, or of vengeance or getting even. It was a matter of addressing pragmatic, practical realities.

At our meeting, Mandela spoke not only of his unequivocal support for Israel’s right to exist but also of his profound respect for its leaders, including David Ben-Gurion, Golda Meir and Menachem Begin. He also assured us that he supported Israel’s right to security and to protect itself from terrorism.

We came away from that encounter with no doubt about his recognition of the legitimacy of the Zionist endeavor and the right of the Jewish people to a state in the Middle East.

It was also during the meeting that I first suggested that Mandela should meet with a fellow prisoner of conscience of our generation, Natan Sharansky. To the African-American community, Mandela was their prisoner of conscience. Sharansky was ours. I told Mandela that I believed it would be appropriate for them to meet and exchange their experiences and dialogue toward mutual understanding and common ground. He agreed, having avidly read Sharansky’s book Fear No Evil while in prison.

Through the assistance of Harry Belafonte, we ultimately arranged the meeting, which took place on June 29, 1990 at the Biltmore Hotel in Los Angeles.

It was a very emotional meeting between the two prisoners of conscience and a poignant moment for the African-American and Jewish communities. When I look back on my life’s accomplishments, that moment was among the most deeply meaningful and personally significant.

Nelson Mandela’s strength of character, commitment to justice and abiding passionate belief in the commonality that binds all humanity are the touchstones of every great leader. He will be long remembered in the Jewish community both for his legacy of ending apartheid and building a free and democratic South Africa, and for maintaining close ties of friendship to Israel and the Jewish community.

About the Author:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

4 Responses to “How Mandela Eased Doubts Among Jewish Leaders”

  1. Foxman, you're just a shill for any liberal BS.

  2. Yosef Shomron says:

    More revisionism from status quo "Jewish" organizations. Mandela and his ANC were communists trained and armed by the Soviets. At his trial Mandela didn't deny that the terrorist wing of the ANC ( which he headed), planted over 160 bombs in public places in South Africa killing scores of civilians. Even the ultra left Amnesty International refused to support him at his trial. Lets not forget the hundreds of blacks tortured and killed by the ANC through barbaric "necklacing". Here is a link on youtube showing Mandela singing with his ANC buddies about killing whites: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcOXqFQw2hc. I'm not surprised by Abraham Foxman's moral stigma – he did support the destruction of Gush Katif and 4 Jewish towns in Samaria and the expulsion of 10,000 Jews from their homes.

  3. Roy Neal Grissom says:

    By all means, let's not let a little thing like rabid anti-Zionism get in the way of our deification of another revolutionary atheist.

  4. He was a man of integrity!

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Islamic State flag displayed from Arab residence in Israel.
Cleared for Publication: Another Israeli-Arab ISIS Recruit from Nazareth
Latest Indepth Stories
Eli Weiss

Shepherding in the Shomron isn’t your usual kind of shepherding – despite his business-minded beginnings, Eli has discovered that a strong ideological impetus powers the job.

Resnick-013015-Pilot

I said to myself, “This story has got to be told. We’re losing this generation of World War II and if we don’t listen to them now, we’ve lost it.”

Eller-013015

His entire existence was about spreading simcha and glorifying G-d’s name on a daily basis.

IRAN-US-POLITICS-MILITARY

An Israeli strike could theoretically damage Iran’s nuclear program; only US can terminate program

At some point we need to stop simply defending and promoting Israel and start living in Israel

“We Jews are the only people who when we drop a book on the floor pick it up and kiss it.”

Though Zaide was the publisher of The Jewish Press, a big newspaper,I always remember him learning

Speaker Silver has been an extraordinary public servant since his election to the Assembly in 1975 and has been an exemplary leader of that body since 1994.

He spent the first leg of his daylong visit to the French capital at Hyper Cacher.

Drawing Congress into the Iran nuclear debate is the last thing the White House wants.

Great leaders like Miriam and like Sarah Schenirer possess the capacity to challenge the status quo that confronts them.

Obama’s foreign policy is viewed by both liberals and conservatives as deeply flawed

Many journalists are covertly blaming the Charlie Hebdo writers themselves through self-censorship.

Why does the Times relay different motivations and narratives for jihadists in Europe and Israel?

More Articles from Abraham H. Foxman
Burning_Synagoge_Kristallnacht_1938

In today’s democratic Europe, there’s no risk of a Holocaust. Comparisons to Kristallnacht are apt.

Nelson Mandela at Yad Vashem

I first met Mandela in Geneva in 1990 as part of a delegation of American Jewish leaders.

The trial was a shock to American Jews, as was Frank’s lynching two years later.

Worried about a nuclear Iran? Do you think such a development would not only threaten Israel’s existence but would intimidate the Arab countries of the Gulf, put the radical Islamist regime in position to threaten the West, and lead to unmanageable nuclear proliferation? Have no fear! Kenneth N. Waltz, the highly respected professor of international relations at Columbia University, argues in a recent article of Foreign Affairs magazine that “Iran Should Get the Bomb.”

There was a time when no one living in Israel needed a reminder of what was at stake when the Jewish state was created in 1948 in the aftermath of World War II and the Nazi Holocaust.

The threat of the infiltration of Sharia, or Islamic law, into the American court system is one of the more pernicious conspiracy theories to gain traction in our country in recent years.

On the evening of December 11, 1995, businessman Aaron Feuerstein was with family and friends at a restaurant in Boston. It was his seventieth birthday, and a group of well-wishers had gathered to throw him a surprise party.

So there it was, “perfect proof” of what John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt were saying about the Israeli lobby: the pressure mounted and Charles Freeman, the designated chairman of the National Intelligence Council, decided to withdraw his name from consideration.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/how-mandela-eased-doubts-among-jewish-leaders/2013/12/12/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: