web analytics
June 20, 2013 / 12 Tammuz, 5773
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
Bicycle in South Pioneers of the Periphery: Olim of the South

Got that pioneering spirit? You’re invited to help build Israel’s periphery by planting roots in southern soil with Nefesh B’Nefesh.



Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

In The Middle East, Obama Is The Wild Card


tell a friend

Israel, the Palestinians, the United States. Each party is banking on the other. The Palestinians and the Israelis are banking on the failure of the resumption of direct talks. The United States is banking on the talks to succeed.

Palestinians are banking on the talks failing because of the deadline of the settlement moratorium, banking that Israel will not keep to its end of this agreement. Israelis are banking on the talks failing because of security issues and because the failure to follow through with follow-up has plagued the Palestinians in all previous talks.

The United States is banking on itself, convinced of its own vision for the Middle East in general and the future of the Israelis and Palestinians in particular. The United States continues to plod on, unconcerned and oblivious to the warning pronouncements, dire predictions and palpable pessimism displayed by the real players in this drama.

And that perplexes Israel and the Palestinians.

Neither Israelis nor Palestinians have been able to get inside the head of Barack Obama. They do not understand this president and they cannot comprehend how he comes to his personal point of view vis-à-vis their lives and their future. They know he is not an anti-Semite, they know he is not in the pocket of the Saudis – and that is all they are sure of.

For Israel and the Palestinians, Obama is a wild card.

I think I understand Obama. And here is what I think: this president of the United States is motivated by an overwhelming sense of justice.

This sense of justice permeates everything in Obama’s world. It is the essence of all his policy decisions – foreign and domestic. It feeds his unquenchable thirst for change. For the administration on Pennsylvania Avenue, “change” is not an expression – it is a gestalt. For Barack Obama, “change” is a word that encapsulates the concept of righting past wrongs and transforming reality. The concept is electrifying. It is how he won the election.

Some world leaders are charismatic. Barack Obama is electrified; he is charged.

It makes no difference that Obama’s world philosophy and decision-making run into obstacles. In his mind he has justice behind him, justice propelling him, justice surrounding his every decision. The previous problems in the Middle East do not deter him, the history of the Israeli/Palestinian conflict does not detract from his mission. Righting past wrongs and fighting for a better situation is what defines Barack Obama.

As a result, neither reality nor history factors into Obama’s evaluation process. From his perch, there is no place for history – only the present and the future exist. His own personal history – or more precisely, lack thereof – is the best illustration of the way in which Obama has successfully navigated through life.

Obama sees the good in everyone. He believes people will make the best, most advantageous choice. He believes that when mutually advantageous choices are made, all involved parties will benefit. For Obama, reality only impacts the analysis at the stage of applying his vision. And even then, reality is seen as an obstacle to be overcome – where in normative analysis, reality is the starting point.

Past experience has nothing to do with achieving new ends and implementing new policy. This is the Obama perspective on health care, it is his point of view on international affairs. Iran is not bad and Ahmadinejad is not bad. Ahmadinejad is just misguided, as are Syria and Venezuela. That is the only way we can understand Obama’s handshake with Chavez and his graciously accepting a book given him by the dictator, a book that lists the purported sins of U.S. history.

Obama will extend his hand to everyone and shake the hand of every leader. Obama plays by the rules he himself compiles and adheres to his own time schedule. Right now he is shouting “carpe diem” – seize the moment – and “Don’t let this opportunity slip through our fingers” into the ears of Netanyahu and Abbas. He is repeatedly saying things like “This moment of opportunity may not soon come again” and “They cannot afford to let it slip away” in describing the talks between Israelis and Palestinians.

The reality, however, is that this moment is totally artificial and purely man- made. The meeting was forced on both parties. Actually, the timing is terrible.

The big event at the White House happened the day before the Labor Day weekend. Now comes Rosh Hashanah and after that, from September 10-13, the three-day Muslim holiday called Id al Fitr, followed by Yom Kippur and Sukkot. The reality is that until October, there is no actual time to sit down.

Clearly, there was no burning need to talk just now.

It was Obama’s personal fire that needed to be extinguished; the Middle East has been smoldering for a long time.

So where does that leave the Palestinians and the Israelis? It leaves them in an untenable situation. Nobody wants to upset Washington, nobody wants to be the first to destroy the dream.

Micah D. Halpern is a columnist and a social and political commentator. His latest book, “Thugs: How History’s Most Notorious Despots Transformed the World,” is available at Amazon.com. He maintains The Micah Report at www.micahhalpern.com.

Pages: 1 2 All Pages
tell a friend

About the Author:


You might also be interested in:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

no comments

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
The FBI arrested two upstate New York men who came up with a stranger than fiction X-ray device to 'kill Israel's enemies'
KKK Member Tried to Sell X-Ray Weapon to Kill ‘Israel’s Enemies’
Latest Indepth Stories
Louis Rene Beres

Starting next week, Professor Beres’s column will be on summer hiatus until September. * * * * * In June 1998, Prof. Beres, following publication of an op-ed article in The New York Times, was invited by then-Swiss Ambassador Thomas Borer to present personal testimony before the specially-constituted Swiss Commission on World War II in [...]

Gilor-Dov

Israel is a country that understands security concerns. Many civil rights have been sacrificed in the name of security and Israelis are used to being checked every time they enter a shopping center, a large store or any public building. Americans recently learned that they, too, are subject to many checks on their most private activities.

Moshe-Feiglin-022213

Without a clear worldview, it is impossible to coherently deal with the challenge of the strategic changes taking place throughout the world – and particularly in the Middle East. Before our very eyes, a worldwide and local revolution is unfolding; their significance is greater than both World Wars combined.

No one can envy President Obama’s current dilemma over Syria.

His decision to begin arming the Syrian rebels challenging Bashar Assad’s regime drew charges that the rebel forces are driven by jihad movements, particularly al Qaeda. Further, many rebel spokesmen have regularly denounced Israel and suggested that once in power they will end Mr. Assad’s policy of not rocking the boat with Israel. How, then, critics ask, could the president align the U.S. with the rebels?

In a gushing report on the election of Hassan Rohani as Iran’s new president, The New York Times began with this: “In a striking repudiation of the ultraconservatives who wield power in Iran, voters…overwhelmingly elected a mild-mannered cleric who advocates greater personal freedoms and a more conciliatory approach to the world.”

Last month in this space we noted that the New York State Assembly was considering legislation that would prohibit domestic insurers from including on their financial statements investments in companies that engage in investment activities in Iran. These financial statements are relied upon by the state to determine whether the company is solvent and able to pay claims. That bill has since passed the Assembly, but the New York State Senate is balking at passing it as well.

There is no other candidate running for mayor who supports our community’s values as Salgado does.

If the eyes are the window to the soul, then children’s eyes are the window to the Almighty Himself.

Adding Turkey to the list of volatile states would mean even more uncertainty for Israel.

Making Rouhani the president was a brilliant strategic move for Khamene’i.

Noone, least of all me, wants to see any Arab child suffer, God forbid.

The Sanctuary was built with an ezrat nashim, a separate area for women.

The 686 men who expressed their desire to run in Iran’s presidential election were whittled down to 8.

More Articles from Micah D. Halpern
Halpern-081712

I never watched “Candid Camera” when I was a kid. We only watched The Wonderful World of Disney” and “Mutual of Omaha’s Wild Kingdom.”

My parents enforced strict TV rules. But as an adult, when I can watch whatever I please, I really enjoy those old shows and have made up for lost time when it comes to shows like “Candid Camera.”

Halpern-062212

The world famous economist John Kenneth Galbraith said it best:

“There are few ironclad rules of diplomacy but to one there is no exception. When an official reports that talks were useful, it can safely be concluded that nothing was accomplished.”

It’s called the Viper. It is a computer virus. Open it once and it propagates and grows in every other file that is opened.

And last month it struck Iran.

That’s the third computer virus to hit Iran in the past eighteen months. But this one, the Viper, is different from the others.

Saudi Arabia is, to use a term the royals would, “greatly displeased” with the United States. Displeased with U.S. foreign policy regarding Iran and equally displeased with the decisions the White House is making about Syria.

The real heroes of our age are pencil-protector geeks. They sit at home, behind their keyboards, determining the rules of the game that you and I live by – and we trust them to do so. They love toys. They love games. They enjoy battle. They are at the forefront of the cyber war that is enveloping the world.

The White House was misled by Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak. And that does not surprise me.

Publicly, the White House is saying that nothing in the relationship between Barak, who just this week left the Labor Party to form a new political faction, and the administration has changed. Privately, the White House is expressing disappointment, frustration and even anger.

Israel, the Palestinians, the United States. Each party is banking on the other. The Palestinians and the Israelis are banking on the failure of the resumption of direct talks. The United States is banking on the talks to succeed.

I am an equal opportunity critic. Critique is one of the tools I use to ferret out the truth. I monitor the actions and pay close attention to the words, the deeds and the decrees of world leaders and when I find fault with them, I point it out to the public.

    Latest Poll

    Female, Orthodox, Halachic Deciders and Spiritual Leaders (Maharat)









    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/in-the-middle-east-obama-is-the-wild-card/2010/09/07/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online:

Close