web analytics
December 22, 2014 / 30 Kislev, 5775
 
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
8000 meals Celebrate Eight Days of Chanukah – With 8,000 Free Meals Daily to Israel’s Poor

Join Meir Panim’s campaign to “light up” Chanukah for families in need.



Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

Incorrect And Ill-Advised Assumptions: A Response To Critics Of The Levy Report

Baker-072712

Mr. Peter. A. Joseph, Chairman, Israel Policy Forum Mr. David A. Halperin, Executive Director, Israel Policy Forum Dear Mr. Joseph and Mr. Halperin,

Permit me to introduce myself. I am Ambassador Alan Baker, a member of the Edmond Levy Commission established to examine the status of building in Judea and Samaria and to make recommendations to the government on this and related issues.

As you may know, I am the former ambassador of Israel to Canada and former legal adviser to Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. In the latter capacity, since the early ‘90s I have served as a member in the Israeli delegations to the peace process negotiations with Israel’s neighbors, including the negotiation and drafting of the various agreements between Israel and the PLO.

I read with considerable dismay the letter to Prime Minister Netanyahu, dated July 13, 2012, sponsored by IPF and signed by 41 prominent personalities in the U.S. Jewish community, urging him to reject the Levy Commission’s findings and recommendations.

Rather than responding to each individual signatory directly, I am forwarding this response to you both, as chairman and executive director respectively of IPF, in the hope you will ensure that it is circulated among all the other signatories to the letter.

From the content and tenor of the letter, I suspect the signatories are basing themselves on selective media reports and other sources that in fact bear no relation whatsoever to the actual content of the Levy Commission report itself. This is perhaps understandable because, to the best of my knowledge, no English language version of the report exists (apart from a translation by me of the brief summary of the basic conclusion and recommendations).

Accordingly one may presume that none of the signatories have actually read the content of the report. In this context, one may wonder on what basis 41 prominent, important and responsible leaders of the U.S. Jewish community could seriously proffer criticism of a report that they have not read and presume to advise the prime minister of Israel to reject it.

Permit me, with respect, to presume that had the signatories read the report, they would not find any reason to claim, as stated in the letter, that the report “will place the two-state solution, and the prestige of Israel as a democratic member of the international community, in peril.”

Similarly, the description of the report as “legal maneuverings” and as something that will “add fuel to those who seek to delegitimize Israel’s right to exist,” other than insulting to myself and the other members of the commission in light of our respective contributions to the welfare and prestige of Israel, is totally devoid of any basis.

The central and reasoned conclusion of the report, reaffirming the legal and historic rights and claims of Israel with regard to the area and the nature of Israel’s presence therein, is no different from Israel’s policy statements over the years, including speeches by all of Israel’s leaders and ambassadors in the United Nations, as well as in official policy documents issued over the years by Israel’s Foreign Ministry.

There is nothing in the report that could in any way be interpreted as placing the “two-state solution” in peril. The opposite is in fact the case. The report reiterates, in paragraph 9, that despite Israel’s well-based and solid legal and historical claims to sovereignty over the area and the right of Israelis to settle therein in accordance with the requisite legal norms and requirements, as set out in the body of the report, consecutive Israeli governments have chosen to opt and continue to opt in favor of conducting bone fide and pragmatic negotiations with the representatives of the Palestinian people and the Arab states, with a view to determine the fate of the area.

This is completely compatible with the address by Prime Minister Netanyahu to the U.S. Congress last May, quoted in your letter.

The main body of the Levy Report deals with practical ways of resolving the outstanding issues concerning planning, zoning and building in the area, in light of the confusing situation in this field that has developed over the last few years. The report proffers recommendations for adjudicating land-ownership disputes between Palestinian and Israeli claimants – all with a view to ensuring just, proper and fair administration.

The report stresses the need to ensure that genuine land-ownership rights of the local Palestinian population are respected by all related authorities and individuals. It refers to the need for protection of parks and nature reserves, as well as ensuring that all residents of the area – Palestinians and Israelis – are dealt with by the authorities in a fair and proper manner in accordance with all accepted humanitarian norms and principles of justice and due process.

In light of the above, it is difficult to understand the reasoning, if any exists, behind the fears expressed by the signatories that the report will add fuel to those who seek to delegitimize Israel’s right to exist.

With great respect, it is surely the publication of incorrect and ill-advised assumptions regarding the report, including those echoed in the above-noted letter, that adds the fuel to those who seek to delegitimize Israel’s right to exist.

Without in any way doubting the deep commitment of all the signatories to Israel’s well-being as a Jewish and democratic state, it is to be regretted that they have permitted themselves to be drawn so hastily into criticizing the Levy Report, without justification.

Needless to say I place myself at the disposal of IPF and all the signatories to the letter, in order to assist those interested in understanding the content of the Levy Commission Report.

I am copying this letter to Prime Minister Netanyahu.

Alan Baker is a veteran Israeli diplomat, ambassador and negotiator.

About the Author: Alan Baker is a veteran Israeli diplomat, ambassador and negotiator.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

8 Responses to “Incorrect And Ill-Advised Assumptions: A Response To Critics Of The Levy Report”

  1. James Weir says:

    Please. Help the Jewish people build in their home land It's a Mutch larger country than the world wants them to have thank you

  2. Muriel Coudurier-Curveur says:

    Dear Sir, They don't live there, we do and we approve the Levy report.

  3. Larry Snider says:

    Dear Ambassador Baker,
    It is difficult to be diplomatic with those on all sides of the issue of peace, two states and the legality of the settlements caught in the vortex of good intentions balanced against a history of bad outcomes, mistrust, and terror. The window to achieve an agreement that must be built on the combination of popular and poltiical trust and the guarantee of security is narrow and the international community reached legal and ethical conclusions on the settlements long ago that are in conflict with the results of your Levy Commision. All Jews who beleve in a peaceful solution that includes the negotiation of two states must find enough common ground to merge the abiding security concerns of Prime Minister Netanyahu with the deep sense of justice that compels so many like the signators of the IPF letter to fear further polarization even if the position of the Levy Commision may be legally correct. This is the great challenge. Respectfully.

  4. Alan Kardon says:

    How do you deal with people who do not think Israel has a right to exist? Did you read the report?

  5. Dear Mr. Baker, The problem is that the present English Summary of the Levi Report is so short that it doesn't really summarize the original Hebrew version. This is apparent because nowhere in the English version can I find that "despite Israel’s well-based and solid legal and historical claims to sovereignty over the area and the right of Israelis to settle therein in accordance with the requisite legal norms and requirements, as set out in the body of the report, consecutive Israeli governments have chosen to opt and continue to opt in favor of conducting bone fide and pragmatic negotiations with the representatives of the Palestinian people and the Arab states, with a view to determine the fate of the area." Please comment. Thank you. Rebekah Israel

  6. Eran Spiro says:

    The Levy Commission’s findings and recommendations are not only correct and should be honored. But, should be further expanded to illustrate our people deep roots in the habitation of Yehuda and Shomron which was denied to us for over 2000 years.

  7. The signatories of the chutzpahdikka letter to Israel's P.M. should start taking Torah studies beginning with Parashat Devarim to realise.
    the importance of the eternal bond the People of Israel has with the Land of Israel. It is high time they understood that you can't male peace treaties with people who are divided among themselves, hate each other on tribal and ideological lines and deny Israel the right to exist.

  8. What the Israeli Govt. needs to do urgently is to prepare a full English translation of the Levy report for public and international dissemination.
    and thus put paid to ill-drawn assumptions and baseless conclusions.

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Haredi men cast their votes for the 19th Knesset in Bnei Brak, January 22 2013.
New Poll: Shows Netanyahu Will Lead Next Gov’t with Haredim
Latest Indepth Stories
512px-Jerusalem_Hannukah_021210

Let us become modern day Maccabees and seize the day. Embrace the challenge. Fight for Hashem.

Motta Gur overlooks the Old City with his troops during the Six Day War

Har HaBayit is still Biyadein; Through our actions, its fate is in our hands


What does the way we count the days of Chanukah come to teach us about living in the present?

Knesset and Menorah

Israel projects global material illumination not always the light of “morality” meant by the Navi

“Mr. Prime Minister, declare a unilateral ceasefire! Remember, Blessed is the peacemaker!”

“D-e-t-e-r-m-i-n-a-t-i-o-n!”

Hamas is continuing to prepare its next war against Israel instead of improving conditions in Gaza

If the UN Grants national recognition to Palestine, why stop there? Tibet, Chechnya, Basque…

The decision to not publicly light the Menorah in Sydney, epitomizes the eternal dilemma of Judaism and Jews in the Diaspora.

Am Yisrael is one family, filled with excruciating pain&sorrow for losing the 4 kedoshim of Har Nof

What is its message of the dreidel?” The complexity and hidden nature of history and miracles.

Police play down Arab terrorism as mere “violence” until the truth can no longer be hidden.

The 7 branches of the menorah represent the 7 pillars of secular wisdom, knowledge, and science.

Obama obtained NO verifiable commitments from Cuba it would desist from acts prejudicial to the US

No one would deny that the program subjected detainees to less than pleasant treatment, but the salient point is, for what purpose?

For the past six years President Obama has consistently deplored all Palestinian efforts to end-run negotiations in search of a UN-imposed agreement on Israel.

More Articles from Alan Baker
Baker-072712

Mr. Peter. A. Joseph, Chairman, Israel Policy Forum
Mr. David A. Halperin, Executive Director, Israel Policy Forum
Dear Mr. Joseph and Mr. Halperin,

Permit me to introduce myself. I am Ambassador Alan Baker, a member of the Edmond Levy Commission established to examine the status of building in Judea and Samaria and to make recommendations to the government on this and related issues.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/incorrect-and-ill-advised-assumptions-a-response-to-critics-of-the-levy-report/2012/07/25/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: