web analytics
October 31, 2014 / 7 Heshvan, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
Meir Panim with Soldiers 5774 Roundup: Year of Relief and Service for Israel’s Needy

Meir Panim implements programs that serve Israel’s neediest populations with respect and dignity. Meir Panim also coordinated care packages for families in the South during the Gaza War.



Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

Israeli Left Versus Rabbinic Freedom Of Speech


In recent days, one of the most important domestic controversies in Israel has revolved around rabbinic opinions. The media are representing this as a great debate over “racism.” In reality, it is a great debate over freedom of speech and the rights of Israelis to express opinions disliked by its increasingly anti-democratic Left.
 
The ruckus began when a few dozen Israeli rabbis issued a call for Israeli Jews not rent or sell real estate to Arabs in predominantly Jewish neighborhoods. The background to their call had to do with growing tensions and even violence in several towns, such as Carmiel and Safed, where significant numbers of Arabs have moved into predominantly Jewish neighborhoods.
 
   By and large, the rabbis who signed the statement were not prominent or well-known halachic authorities. Their statement carried neither the weight of civic law nor the authority of a religious decree. The rabbis essentially were expressing an opinion. It might be an opinion you find objectionable, but in democracies people are supposed to be free to say objectionable things.
 
Prime Minister Netanyahu denounced the rabbis who signed the statement. But unlike most of the Israeli Left, he did not demand they be stripped of their freedom of speech. Among others who spoke out against those rabbis were three of Israel’s most respected haredi rabbis – Rabbi Yosef Shalom Elyashiv, Rabbi Aharon Leib Shteinman and Rabbi Ovadia Yosef. They were joined in their opposition by other leading haredi rabbis and even by rabbis living in the West Bank. Following Rabbi Elyashiv’s criticism, at least five of the signatories withdrew their support from the statement.
 
But Israel’s anti-democratic Left did not limit itself to expressing disagreement with or condemnation of the opinions contained in the statement of the rabbis. The Israeli Left was almost unanimous in insisting the rabbis be stripped of their rights to express controversial opinions altogether. Arabs and far leftists in Israel can cheer on Arab terrorists who murder Jews and can demand Israel’s obliteration; that is protected speech. Tenured radicals at the universities can call for Israel to be annihilated and can support worldwide anti-Israel boycotts; that, too, is protected speech. But in the Left’s worldview, rabbis expressing an opinion with which most Israelis probably disagree are not entitled to the same freedom of expression.
 
Several representatives of the far-left Meretz Party petitioned the attorney general to indict the rabbis as criminals. They were joined in that call by a number of Israeli leftist academics, journalists, and public figures.
 
The Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI) – which has never missed a chance to overlook infringements of the freedom of expression of non-leftists in Israel – denounced the rabbis who signed the statement and called on the prime minister to take punitive action against them. Israel’s minority affairs minister, Avishay Braverman, asked the justice minister to begin the process of immediate suspension of one of the signers, Rabbi Shmuel Eliyahu, from his post as municipal rabbi of Safed. (Earlier this year, Braverman demanded that Jews spend Yom Kippur atoning for their “oppression” of Arabs.)
 
Arab Knesset Member Ahmed Tibi took time off from cheering on jihad to denounce the rabbis who had signed the statement as “racists.” He has never gotten around to denouncing as racists any terrorists who murder Jews or Arab arsonists who set forest fires.
 
Spokesmen for the Yad Vashem Holocaust Museum, suddenly seized by an attack of political correctness, released a statement condemning the rabbis’ letter, calling it “a severe blow to the basic values of our lives as Jews and people living in a democratic country.” These same folks have never issued a statement condemning those who demand East Jerusalem be kept judenrein.
 
It’s one thing to disagree with what some rabbis say, and quite another to demand they be indicted as felons for expressing their opinions. Once again, as has happened so often in Israel, expression of non-leftist opinion is being criminalized, and leftists are attempting to use the police and courts to silence their political adversaries. Prosecution has become the favored response of choice by leftists incapable of convincing the Israeli public of the merits of their ideas.
 
I don’t think a single one of those demanding that the rabbis signing the statement be prosecuted has ever spoken out against the summary execution by the Palestinian Authority of Arabs who dare sell their property to Jews. Not a single leftist wringing his hands over the supposed racism in the statement of the rabbis condemned the recent death threats against young Kochav Segal Halevi, a Jew who purchased an apartment in the Arab town of Iblin (not far from Haifa).
 

It’s safe to venture that not a single one had anything to say about the inability of Jews to buy or rent property in Arab towns, villages and neighborhoods because of threats of violence; or that a single one had anything to say about the common practice by Arabs living in Arab towns excluding groups of other Arabs from living with them; or that a single one condemned the racist expulsion of every single Jew living in the Gaza Strip.

 

 

 

Steven Plaut, a frequent contributor to The Jewish Press, is a professor at the University of Haifa. His book “The Scout” is available at Amazon.com. He can be contacted at steveneplaut@yahoo.com.

About the Author: Steven Plaut is a professor at the University of Haifa. He can be contacted at steveneplaut@yahoo.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Israeli Left Versus Rabbinic Freedom Of Speech”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
How would the Peace Process look if Sweden used the IKEA approach?
Can IKEA Put Together a Middle East Peace Package?
Latest Indepth Stories
Which glass has the poison?

The White House wanted to defame Netanyahu, undermine his reputation, impugn him & his policies

Adolf Hitler and the representative of the Palestinian Arabs, the Mufti of Jerusalem, Amin al-Husseini, December, 1941.

Palestinian anti-Semitism in 2014 is more extreme and mainstream than German A/S in the 1930s.

Sheldon Silver

Woven deeply through it all is the Jewish obligation to fight injustice.

Cravatts-Richard--new

Only in the inverted world of academia would Jewish professors denounce the AMCHA Initiative report.

Many poskim were and are adamant about the responsibility of every individual to vote.

Individuals who may have been abused are the “clients” in need and receiving care and protection.

An accomplished Torah scholar and ardent adherent of Bobov chassidus, he was renowned for his self-effacing dedication and skills as an international lawyer and law professor

The fact that the United States government after World War II sought to take advantage of the expertise of German scientists, even those known to have contributed to the Nazi war effort, is well known and largely accepted as having been necessary for America’s national defense. (Wernher von Braun is perhaps the most famous and […]

The New York State comptroller manages the state’s $180.7 billion pension fund, audits the spending practices of all state agencies and local governments, oversees the New York State and Local Retirement System, reviews the New York State and City budgets, and approves billions in State contracts and spending.

Rabinovich is the author of several popular books on Israel’s wars, including The Battle for Jerusalem, The Yom Kippur War, and The Boats of Cherbourg.

To say he was beloved because of the way he loved his students does not sufficiently capture the reality.

The birth I speak about is to give birth to ourselves, to our full potential.

The extreme hypocrisy, contempt & vulgarity of the attacks indicate more than a policy disagreement

More Articles from Steven Plaut
Peace Now Chairman Yariv Oppenheimer

The Israeli left, led by tenured academics, endorses pretty much anything harmful to its own country

Statue of King David

Though secular, Hitman’s CV includes writing music for, recording, and popularizing religious songs.

Emigration from Israel is at an all-time low, far lower than immigration to Israel from Europe.

Israel offered Syria the entire Golan Heights, only to find that the Syrians were demanding MORE!

Why is “Palestine” worthier of “statehood recognition” than ISIS, another terrorist gang seeking it?

The Palestinian terrorists could undergo career reorientation and take to cod fishing.

Israel’s imperious court is comprised of judges who do not live in African-filled neighborhoods.

“Jewish Voices for Peace,” a Hamas lobby created by Jewish anti-Semites.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/israeli-left-versus-rabbinic-freedom-of-speech/2010/12/15/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: