Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons
The Metropolitan Opera House at Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts

The answer to these questions is more than obvious. But if they wouldn’t tolerate a pro-al Qaeda or Klan opera, why is it that they think the Met is right to produce one whose purpose is to put a Jewish victim on the same moral plane as his terrorist murderer whose goal is not some abstract plea for justice for the downtrodden but the destruction of the only Jewish state on the planet?

What the Times doesn’t understand is that the problem with the Klinghoffer opera is not that it is controversial but that it is even-handed about a subject about which no decent person ought to be neutral. Indeed, Adams won a Pulitzer Prize for his “On the Transmigration of Souls,” a choral piece commemorating 9/11 that managed to discuss that atrocity without giving equal time to al Qaeda.

Advertisement

To, as the Times put it, “give voice to all sides in this terrible murder but offer no resolutions” as this opera does, is to implicitly endorse the cause of the murderers and to degrade their victims. Just as no New Yorker thinks it necessary to keep an open mind about 9/11 or the Klan, the rights and wrongs of Klinghoffer’s murder are not a matter of opinion.

But it is hardly surprising that a newspaper whose record of slanted coverage and biased opinion against Israel would think this the sort of issue about which informed people may disagree. The Met had no business producing this amoral piece. It is to be hoped that, by one means or another, it never disgraces the stage of America’s leading opera company.

Advertisement

13 COMMENTS

  1. Abubaker, you’re obviously such an ignorant low life that you’re immune to truth. I’ll just give you this tidbit – Palestine was never an independent country. It never will be either. You’re too consumed by hate and can’t do anything for yourselves. You depend on Israel for everything.

  2. Let us do a little history. The koran was written in the 7th century. No where in the koran does it ever mention palestine, but mentions Israel over 300 times and states that Israel is for the Jews. Furthermore, the only legitimate Palestine is in Texas and its full of Texans.

  3. I agree. So called Palestinians are really disparate Arabs who have decided to be eternal refugees. They tried to run away when the State of Israel came into being but were pushed back by the other Arab stars who have used them as aolotical ploy ever since 1948. They are the world’s eternal beggars, they create nothing, do nothing useful, denuded the area with their goats before Israel greened the land and cleared the malaria ridden swamps and today stand proud and tall, a first world nation. These creatures, should be stricken from the face of the earth. The Aran nations,to whom they belong, did not even have the generosity to take them in, but preferred to keep them, like a running leprous sore in what should be Israel.

Comments are closed.

Loading Facebook Comments ...