web analytics
June 30, 2016 / 24 Sivan, 5776
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

Left’s Critique Of Jewish Settlement Doesn’t Stop At Green Line


The standard critique of Israel’s settlement movement from the Zionist left has been to point out that attempting to assert sovereignty over the West Bank could lead to an Arab majority. The argument is that this would enable the Palestinians to succeed in wiping out the Jewish state using demography rather than invasion or terror. It’s a point of view many Israelis share, but the Palestinian refusal to make peace has continued to frustrate the wishes of most Jews for a two-state solution.

But the dislike of the settlers goes a lot deeper than mere demographic arguments. As Gershom Gorenberg’s piece in The New York Times’s Sunday Review section this week illustrates, the passion to buttress the Jewish presence in any part of the country, whether on the wrong side of the Green Line or not, is what is really bugging the left.

Gorenberg, a veteran Israeli journalist whose animus for the settlers and Israel’s government have made him a regular presence in liberal American publications, takes his familiar attacks on the right to new levels in a piece in which he claims efforts to ensure a Jewish majority in the Israeli city of Acre as well as the Galilee are no more defensible than the settlers’ attempts to establish Israeli beachheads in the West Bank.

For Gorenberg, the push to ensure that parts of pre-June 1967 Israel will not be lost to the Arabs is also “racist.” Indeed, he worries that even if a two-state solution forces some of the Jews currently living in the West Bank to relocate inside the Green Line, they will take their Zionist fervor with them – leading to conflicts that will replicate the “price tag” attacks on Arabs that leftists see as the inevitable product of settler ideology.

This distorted argument not only turns liberal Israeli arguments upside down, it also betrays the mixed feelings some on the left seem to have for Zionism.

As with many accounts of events on the West Bank that treat the rare outbreaks of Jewish violence against Arabs as the only story worth reporting, Gorenberg’s attempt to paint all settlers with the brush of the “price tag” crimes is both factually incorrect as well as unfair.

Anti-Jewish violence in the West Bank is a daily occurrence that liberal journalists either choose to ignore or rationalize as justified, because they see the presence of Israelis in the territories as inherently illegitimate. The same mindset has led the press to treat a regrettable case of arson against a mosque inside Israel as a harbinger of pogroms against Arab citizens.

As with the West Bank, far more numerous incidents – especially in the Galilee – in which Israeli Arabs have targeted Jews are treated as either unimportant or just ignored.

Rather than the malevolent attitudes of West Bank settlers infecting ordinary Israelis, as Gorenberg fears, what has actually happened in the last 18 years since the Oslo Accords empowered Fatah terrorists in the territories is that Israeli Arabs have become radicalized. The political culture of the people who now dub themselves Palestinians with Israeli citizenship has become a reflection of the hatred and rejectionism that characterizes the Palestinian Authority and Hamas.

Gorenberg’s disgust for attempts to reinforce Jewish numbers in the Galilee also contradicts a basic tenant of the Israeli left. For decades, even those who agreed Jews ought to have the right to live in the West Bank because it is the heart of the historic Jewish homeland argued that it made more sense to put more Jewish resources into the battle to maintain a Jewish majority in the Galilee and the Negev.

If such efforts are now to be treated as being as illegitimate as the campaign to restore Jewish life to Judea and Samaria, it is difficult to see how Gorenberg imagines Israel can retain a Jewish majority.

This reflects the cognitive dissonance on the left. Though writers like Gorenberg claim to support the idea of a democratic Israel with a Jewish majority, the anti-Zionist logic that brands the Jewish presence in the West Bank as racist colonialism can just as easily be applied to any spot inside the Green Line.

Israel’s enemies view Tel Aviv as being as much an illegal settlement as the most remote hilltop encampment of right-wing Jewish extremists. The fact that Gorenberg views Jewish community-building in Acre and the Galilee with the same disgust as West Bank settlements illustrates all too clearly just how out of touch he is with both reality and the views of Israel’s moderate Zionist majority.

Jonathan S. Tobin is senior online editor of Commentary magazine with responsibility for managing the editorial content of its Contentions website – where this originally appeared –  as well as serving as chief politics blogger.

Jonathan S. Tobin

About the Author: Jonathan S. Tobin is senior online editor of Commentary magazine and chief political blogger at www.commentarymagazine.com. He can be reached via e-mail at jtobin@commentarymagazine.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

One Response to “Left’s Critique Of Jewish Settlement Doesn’t Stop At Green Line”

  1. Ben II says:

    the left is filled w worthless communists & democrats — their opinion means nothing.

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
The terrorist in Netanya.
Two Injured in Netanya Market Stabbing, Terrorist Eliminated [video]
Latest Indepth Stories
Rabbi Eliyahu Safran

The Meraglim were without tzitzis? The mitzvah of tzitzis is instructive; it teaches the Jew how to look and see.
– or they are a constant reminder of God’s Commandments.

MK Moshe-Feiglin

But why does the Left hate Netanyahu so much – even though he is doing everything to make their policies come true?

Map of the Middle East; Israel surrounded by the neighborhood 'bullies'

Don’t be fooled by Israel’s improved relations with certain Arab states, it is not based on their accepting Israel but fear-of Iran and desertion by US

JewishPress Logo

A legendary and savvy networker, he enjoyed the confidence of many public officials over the years, working with them on many communal issues.

The 27 remaining members of the EU reportedly are already contemplating their own new strategies necessitated by the UK withdrawal.

How strongly will Turkey counter the anti-Israel sentiment that animates the Islamic world of which Turkey is such a prominent part?

The defeat of the Japanese there provided an important foundation for our ultimate victory over Japan, and the battle became a symbol of the great sacrifices made by our fighting forces during the war.

The ADL, supported by naïve Jewish donors, offers assurances of support for Israel and Jewish causes but offered only evasions when asked direct questions

I was not interested at all in going more than a two- or three-hour drive from New York City because my family and my wife’s family both live in New York. The

Concerns over immigration have lately been widespread across the West, evidenced by Britain leaving the EU and the strength of Donald Trump’s campaign

The list of Palestinian “poisoning” claims in recent years is lengthy and colorful and ALL lies.

The Benghazi committee found that the U.S. military made no effort to intervene on behalf of the besieged Americans under attack in Benghazi over the course of that 13-hour assault.

Vic Rosenthal of Abu Yehuda fame has a recent piece entitled simply, Ten Propositions, and I intend to examine each – tackling the first five below

Omar Mateen, the Orlando shooter, was was an armed security guard who had the legal right to pack and carry. And a terrorist. Anti-gun laws would not have mattered.

More Articles from Jonathan S. Tobin
Jonathan S. Tobin is Senior Online Editor of Commentary magazine.

The pool of hypocrisy is deep at The New York Times when it comes to double standards against Jews, especially Observant Jews.

Photo-Op of President Clinton (center) with Prime Minister Barak (L) and Chairman Arafat at Camp David

Bill Clinton’s experience with the Palestinians should be a cautionary tale to the next President.

Whenever one thinks the Palestinian-Israeli conflict can’t get worse, it generally does when negotiations are forced upon the principals.

Those who seek to deny to the Jewish people what they would not think of refusing any other people on earth is bias and the anti-Semitism.

On the surface, the legal case brought against the BDS movement sounds like a nuisance suit but a closer look at the effort shows that this legal attack on the BDS movement is on solid ground.

Sanders is the ONLY presidential candidate to decline an invitation to address the AIPAC conference.

“That Trump was lying isn’t in question. The question is why he would lie about something like this”

Will Trump’s latest outrageous statement undo his bid for the Republican presidential nomination?

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/left%e2%80%99s-critique-of-jewish-settlement-doesn%e2%80%99t-stop-at-green-line/2011/11/30/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: