web analytics
November 23, 2014 / 1 Kislev, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
IDC Herzliya Campus A Day on Campus

To mark IDC Herzliya’s 20th anniversary, we spent a day following Prof. Uriel Reichman, IDC’s founder and president, and Jonathan Davis, VP for External Relations, around its delightful campus.



Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

Liberal Or Biblical Christians?


The ancient Prophets foresaw that as we approached the Messianic era mankind would begin to reject falsehood and turn to the Jewish people for leadership and teaching. Both Isaiah and Zechariah describe many peoples (amim rabbim) turning to the God of Israel in Jerusalem.

        We live in an age many rabbis believe to be the last before the Redemption, so naturally we may expect stirrings among the nations as they begin to question their ancestral beliefs and open themselves to learning from Am Yisrael. We are faced with the spectacle, however, of two distinct movements in Christianity away from classical Christian belief and (supposedly) back to the Torah and traditional Jewish wisdom. These two streams of reform within Christianity are liberalism and biblicism.

For some time now, most Jews have been impressed by and encouraging of liberal Christianity. Its freethinking attitude toward traditional Christian dogmas, its rejection of Christian “triumphalism,” and its condemnations of traditional Christian anti-Semitism received universal praise.

What many do not seem to realize is that its opposite trend, biblical Christianity, condemns traditional Christian anti-Semitism just as unequivocally, has streams that reject Christian triumphalism and proselytization (so far as the Jews are concerned), and is heir to a long tradition of questioning and rejecting the teachings of the Christian Church in the light of Scripture.

Why then is biblical Christianity so unknown to the Jewish community while liberal Christianity is so admired and commended? This is indeed an intriguing and even painful question when one considers that most observant Noachides, including this writer, came to their acknowledgement of Hashem, Torah, and Israel via biblical – not liberal – Christianity. In fact, one wonders if any liberal Christian has become a Noachide, or even if one could.

It is quite natural and logical that liberal Christianity would reject the dogmatism of traditional Christianity – because liberalism, by definition, rejects the very concept of objective truth in religion. This means that liberal Christianity rejects the objective truth claims of Judaism just as vociferously.

Moreover, while they condemn the atrocities of medieval Christianity, liberal Christians also condemn the biblical wars against the Canaanites and other heathen peoples that were commanded by Hashem, insisting that God did not command these wars but that rather the “primitive and bloodthirsty” Israelites imagined that He had because “that’s how people thought back then.”

Meanwhile, biblical Christians have been moving toward Judaism for centuries. There are Christians today who refuse to observe Sunday or traditional Christian holidays but observe Shabbat and the Jewish holidays instead. There are even biblical Christians who, while insisting on proselytizing non-Jews, reject any proselytization of Jews because they acknowledge that the latter are bound by the Torah. Little wonder that most American Noachides come from this tradition.

Compare liberal Christian spokesmen with any number of biblicist leaders who wholeheartedly support Israel not out of an attachment to “democracy” but for purely biblical reasons. Biblicist Christians contribute generously to Jewish charities to help settle Jews in Eretz Yisrael, and a Mississippi preacher, Rev. Clyde Lott, has even attempted to breed a herd of cattle that would provide a ready supply of parot adummot at all times. This is certainly something liberal Christians would have no interest in (since liberal Christians regard the Avodat Hakodesh to be a primitive and superstitious rite long since abandoned in favor of a religion of pure ethics.)

How many Jews have even heard of Rev. Lott?

Another unpleasant fact about liberal Christianity is its ambiguous (at best) and hostile (at worst) attitude toward the state of Israel and its rejection of a literal King-Messiah in favor of a “spiritual” Messiah who fulfills Messianic prophecies allegorically rather than literally.

Biblical Christians, on the other hand, defend the Divine origin of the Torah and refrain from many idolatrous practices of the ancient churches. And biblical Christians overwhelmingly accept the notion of a literal King-Messiah who will reign over a literal Kingdom of God from Jerusalem.

Unfortunately, while some biblical Christians do refuse to proselytize Jews because they interpret the Torah’s claims of eternal validity literally, the vast majority of biblical Christians still insist on missionizing the Jews (as well as everyone else). But this must be measured against the many positives of biblical Christianity and negatives of liberal Christianity.

About the Author: Roy Neal Grissom is an identifying Noachide living in the Bible Belt.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Liberal Or Biblical Christians?”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
US Secretary of State John Kerry with German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier before P5+1 talks. Nov. 22, 2014.
BREAKING: West About to Cave on Key Iranian Demand
Latest Indepth Stories
Dalia Lemkos, HY"D Is this the image you think of when you hear the word "settler?"

The “Media” didn’t want us to know what a kind, giving, loving young woman Dalia was.

A “Palestine” could become another Lebanon, with many different factions battling for control.

Temple_Mount_aerial_from_south_tb_q010703bsr-300x225

Maimonides himself walked and prayed in the permissible areas when he visited Eretz Yisrael in 1165

voting

Having a strong community presence at the polls shows our elected officials we care about the issues

Israel’s Temple Mount policy prefers to blames the Jews-not the attackers-for the crisis.

When Islam conquered the Holy Land, it made its capital in Ramle of all places, not in Jerusalem.

I joined the large crowd but this time it was more personal; my cousin Aryeh was one of the victims.

Terrorists aren’t driven by social, economic, or other grievances, rather by a fanatical worldview.

The phrase that the “Arabs are resorting to violence” is disgraceful and blames the victim.

Tuesday, Yom Shlishi, a doubly good day in the Torah, Esav’s hands tried to silence Yaakov’s voice.

Because of the disparate nature of the perpetrators, who are also relatively young, and given the lack of more traditional targets and the reverence Palestinians have for their homes, one now hears talk of Israel returning to a policy of destroying the houses of terrorists’ families.

In any event, the Constitution gives Congress what is popularly described as the “power of the purse” – that is, the power to raise revenues through taxation and to decide how the money should be sent.

It is difficult to write about such a holy person, for I fear I will not accurately portray his greatness…

There was much to learn from Judge Kramer and the examples he set remains a source of inspiration and a resource from which to learn. He was and remains a great role model.

More Articles from Roy Neal Grissom

The ancient Prophets foresaw that as we approached the Messianic era mankind would begin to reject falsehood and turn to the Jewish people for leadership and teaching. Both Isaiah and Zechariah describe many peoples (amim rabbim) turning to the God of Israel in Jerusalem.

Jews throughout the world recently celebrated the festival of Chanukah. Each year we are told Chanukah represents the quintessential Jewish value of absolute religious freedom: the right to worship anyone or anything – or to worship nothing – according to one’s own personal inclination. This is a strange interpretation of a festival celebrating the victory of religious fundamentalists over modernizers and whose story begins with Matityahu’s beheading of a fellow Jew who was exercising his “fundamental right” to worship as he pleased by sacrificing a pig.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/liberal-or-biblical-christians/2007/04/06/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: