web analytics
March 30, 2015 / 10 Nisan, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

New-Jew Ideology Could Mean End of Zionist Project

Ultimate Zionist ethos meant rejecting all hints of Jewish tradition, even when the wisdom was incontrovertible
Ziad A-wad and his son (R) in Israeli Military court, June 23, 2014.

Ziad A-wad and his son (R) in Israeli Military court, June 23, 2014.
Photo Credit: Yonatan Sindel/Flash90

No part of the secular Zionist ethos is stronger than the idea of building a “new Jew.” From the movement’s earliest days, Zionist thinkers and activists placed as one of the movement’s highest goals the creation of a space for Jews to throw off the “shackles” of mitzvoth and embrace the wider world. Individuals such as Chaim Weizmann, C.N. Bialik, Ahad Haam and others wrote passionately about the Bible as a work of history, perhaps even an inspiring one. But they most definitely rejected the notion of a laws and commandments incumbent on a nation claiming to be a chosen people charged by God to create a “kingdom of priests and a holy nation.”

In contrast to the image of the old, emaciated, bearded Jew, perennially bent over oversized tomes of holy books and terrorized at will by Russian/Polish/Lithuanian peasants (take your pick), Zionism sought to invigorate a new Judaism – devoid of tradition or Divine responsibility. Militant secularism ruled the day, going even so far as to consider a British offer to create a “Jewish territory” in East Africa instead of the Land of Israel. And why not? If the point of Zionism was to separate Jews from Judaism, what better way to go about it than separating Jews from the ancient dream of returning to the cradle of Jewish civilization?

Although the Sixth Zionist Congress in 1905 eventually rejected the “Uganda Plan”, the spriit of radical secularism ruled the Jewish community in Palestine for many decades. Orthodox Jews were routinely barred from jobs if they did not agree to send their children to “right headed” schools. Jewish Agency officials transferred refugee immigrants from Haifa port to ideologically anti-religious communities around the country.

As the State of Israel dawned, the new Jew ideology began to shape the new country’s legislative face. Although domestic political considerations forced the new Jews of the Labor Party to grant Orthodoxy a monopoly over “personal status” issues such as marriage and divorce, Prime Minister Davd Ben Gurion furiously resisted calls to apply halachic considerations to the newly crafted Law of Return.

“If one Jewish grandparent was good enough for HItler, it is good enough for us,” said the Old Man, and the law was set.

Sixty-five years later, Ben Gurion’s words continue to ring clear in light of the ongoing search for Eyal Yifrah, Gil-Ad Shayer and Naftali Frenkel, and the revelation that Ziad Awad, one of the 1,027 terrorists released in exchange for IDF hostage Gilad Shalit, was re-arrested on suspicion that he murdered Baruch Mizrahi on Passover eve.

Many, many Israelis worked hard for years to create a groundswell of public opinion in favor of the lopsided prisoner swap. Jewish wisdom be damned; if the Talmud says we should not pay over-sized ransoms so as not to encourage people to kidnap Jews. Even for those who reject the binding nature of halacha, at the very least the Talmud would seem to have posited solid advice for communal administration in the face of a rash of abductions.

But many Israelis continue to define themselves by what they are not (observant of Halacha), rather than by what they are. Said differently, they seem to operate on the principle of “if Jewish tradition says “A”, we’d better do “B.”

The awful confluence of Israel’s latest hostage “situation” and the arrest of Ziad Awad should bring a painful reality into clear focus: Israel will not survive in the long-run without the mettle to stand up to life in the Middle East, and without the backbone to stand up to pressure exerted by devastated family members.

And so, the question remains for Israel’s new Jews: Which of your two Zionist principles is stronger? Your commitment to maintaining a Jewish Democratic Country in the Land of Israel, or your fanatic commitment to resist all allusions to traditional Judaism?

About the Author: Meir is a news writer for JewishPress.com - and he loves his job.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

3 Responses to “New-Jew Ideology Could Mean End of Zionist Project”

  1. Which Zionism are you talking about ? Zionism is all about about the mitzvot ….To return to G-d and therefore His house Israel which He chose as a dwelling place….House which we were vomited according to the promises concerning the rejecting of the mitzvot….So in the time of grace and forgiveness still according to his promises in the Tanakh Jer 31 the return to Zion the teshuvah to G-d was the big Zionism plan to comeback to G-d Mitzvot not the opposite….Now we understand that the word Zionism had been corrupted distorted to mean other thing than what it really means especially when people only rest their Zionism account on the so called secular Zionism with Theodore Herzl….Who actually did not found Zionism as it’s commonly believed but just made it more apparent on the political scene ….Zionism as we can see in the Bible cannot be separated from politic anyway…So some tend to believe that Zionism is secular…well it’s sometimes hijacked by secular people but it’s not meant to.

  2. I am not even remotely observant. But your comments in the article are so incredibly anti religious I find them horribly offensive. What the young secular zionists did…for instance… to the observant Jews , especially the ones from Yemen, was beyond despicable. They told many parents their children died, stole them, hacked off their payos, and places them in secular schools and kibbutzim? Really? You’re ok with this? The entire tone of your article saddens me. No wonder the Jews can’t get along with each other. The blame is always placed on the orthodox for not respecting everyone else. I think it more often goes the other way.

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Former PM Ehud Olmert at Tel Aviv District Court hears his sentence on May 13, 2014. (archive)
Ehud Olmert Found Guilty of Fraud in ‘Talansky Affair’
Latest Indepth Stories
Auschwitz Entrance

While in Auschwitz I felt a tangible intensity. I could sense that I was in a place of sheer evil.

Bibi and Obama: Head to Head

Obama needs to wake up. The real enemy is not Netanyahu but Iran, Hizbullah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad,IS

Father Gabriel Naddaf with soldiers

My beliefs & actions have led to numerous death threats against me; my excommunication by my church

Islamic Relief Worldwide Logo

In November 2014, Islamic Relief Worldwide was classified as a terrorist organization by the United Arab Emirates.

Too rarely appreciated for its symbolic weight; it can represent freedom and independence.

Erica Pelman is a spiritually-driven woman. She is founder and director of “In Shifra’s Arms” (ISA), an organization that offers aid to pregnant Jewish women of all religious backgrounds practically, financially and emotionally. Its arms are open to any pregnant woman in need whether single, divorced, separated, or from a financially-strapped family. “Presently, we are […]

Many so-called “humanitarian NGOs” frequently abuse Israel by applying false moral equivalencies

Israeli history now has its version of “Dewey Defeats Truman” with headlines from 2 anti-Bibi papers

In God’s plan why was it necessary that Moses be raised by Pharaoh, away from his own family&people?

In their zechus may we all come to appreciate that life is a fleeting gift and resolve to spend every precious moment of it as if it were the last.

In any event, Mr. Netanyahu after the election sought to soften his statement on Palestinian statehood and apologized for what he conceded were remarks that “offended some Israeli citizens and offended members of the Israeli Arab community.”

A worthy idea any way you look at it.

There is something quite distinctive about the biblical approach to time.

The Waqf kept control of the Temple Mount due to Dayan’s “magnanimity in victory” after 6 Day war

More Articles from Meir Halevi Siegel
Economics Minister and Bayit Yehudi chairman Naftali Bennett

Jewish Home leader blocks exhibition of dead bodies citing Jewish tradition to honor the dead; NIF objects.

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu.

Cabinet holds special session in Ashkelon, faces criticism from local residents, officials over lack of aid package

For two-and-a-half years, residents of the Golan Heights understood that domestic interests in Syria would keep war away from them.

4,000 dunams in G’vaot area declared state land, will open door for large construction project.

With Judeophobic attacks spiking around United Kingdom, local Jews say not enough done to enforce hate crime laws

Drug dealers suspected of aiding Hezbollah make inroads into Israel; smuggling attempts also included Jordan, Syria

Only time PLO seems interested in justice for Palestinians is when Israel is involved

For years, Binyamin Netanyahu’s views on negotiating with terrorists, and on negotiating under fire have been clear: In his defining treatise on the subject Terrorism: How the West Can Win, Netanyahu spelled out clear guidelines for dealing with the scourge of attacks on civilians. Amongst other principles, the then up-and-coming Likud leader said clearly that terrorists must […]

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/new-jew-ideology-could-mean-end-of-zionist-project/2014/06/24/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: