Congratulations to all the winners of the JewishPress.com raffle at The Event
I am an equal opportunity critic. Critique is one of the tools I use to ferret out the truth. I monitor the actions and pay close attention to the words, the deeds and the decrees of world leaders and when I find fault with them, I point it out to the public.
Today I find fault with Barack Obama. I do not have an ax to grind with the president of the United States. But I must point out that his Middle East policy and his point of view on Israel are, simply and purely, wrong.
Obama’s stance on Israel does not have its roots in hatred, nor is it predicated on mistrust. It comes from a false sense of reality and from an almost pathological case of optimism.
Obama is not an anti-Semite. He does not hate Israel. Calling the president and his administration anti-Semitic is both counterproductive and insulting.
Calling Obama an anti-Semite, as so many voices have been doing of late, is to misuse the term and to diminish real anti-Semites and true anti-Semitism.
That said, it is certainly possible that current White House policy has hurt Israel and if it does not change it will continue to injure. But the policy is neither perpetrated out of anger nor fueled by hatred.
Is the damage lessened because it’s unintentional? No, but in this case, context is important.
Obama and his advisers come to their understanding of the Middle East through a false assumption. They believe that if you raise the playing field, everyone will be equal. If everyone is equal, there is more potential for resolving issues. It all comes from an overly aggressive sense of social justice.
However, when you apply this thesis to U.S. foreign policy vis-à-vis Israel and the Palestinians or toward the religious extremist dictatorial country of Iran, an enormous chasm is created between your old friends and your new friends.
What this administration still does not realize is that raising the playing field may be a very admirable act but the end game causes serious insult. The parties most hurt by raising the playing field are your old friends, the friends with whom you have a longstanding and special relationship.
By definition, the special relationship is now in question.
That does not mean the United States is no longer friendly with that country. It means the United States now wants a special friendship with someone else as well. That is what stings so much. Israel and Saudi Arabia are getting hurt because the United States is inviting the Palestinians and the Iranians to join their circle.
The U.S. made a gross miscalculation, a colossal mistake – in judgment, in planning, in foreign policy. The calculus made by the administration is wrong and until the president and his policy makers and advisers recognize the importance and significance and dependability of America’s special friend Israel the tension will be there and Israel will suffer.
That said, an ad hominem attack against the Obama administration is downright childish and counterproductive. The administration has a vision, albeit a flawed, rose-colored-glasses vision. It is the vision of a diplomatically immature president and an administration unschooled in history.
But it is not anti Semitic.
There are enough true anti-Semites scattered through history and walking our streets. Every person or organization in disagreement with Israel does not deserve the label of anti-Semite. Not being an especially close friend does not make you the enemy.
Today, any agreement between Israel and the Palestinians will fail for many of the same reasons they’ve always failed. The administration in Washington must be coaxed into understanding and then accepting that reality.
In the U.S., part of the romance of politics is dreaming. Politicians want to make history; they dream of revolutionary change. Americans as a group are romantic. That romance and the optimism that comes along with it are both a strength and a weakness.
The White House will not change its point of view nor will it abandon its optimism. It falls on Israeli leaders and Jewish American leadership to change their message and their method of approach. Serious critique will be heard in the Oval Office – name-calling will not.
Micah D. Halpern is a columnist and a social and political commentator. His latest book, “Thugs: How History’s Most Notorious Despots Transformed the World,” is available at Amazon.com. He maintains The Micah Report at www.micahhalpern.com.
About the Author:
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Comments are closed.
Wye would be seen to have set the groundwork for the creation of a Palestinian state
Blaming Israel for the violence in Gaza, he ends up justifying Hamas’s terrorism.
In the Thirties it was common for anti-Semites to call on Jews to “go to Palestine!”
“This arbitrary ban is an ugly stain on our democracy, and it also undermines the rule of law.”
We take US “aid” for psychological reasons-if we have an allowance, that means we have a father.
ZIM Piraeus isn’t Israeli-owned or flagged, incidentally, it is Greek operated.
Foolish me, thinking the goals were the destruction of Hamas thereby giving peace a real chance.
The free-spirted lifestyle didn’t hold your interest; the needs of your people did.
And why would the U.S. align itself on these issues with Turkey and Qatar, longtime advocates of Hamas’s interests?
Several years ago the city concluded that the metzitzah b’peh procedure created unacceptable risks for newborns in terms of the transmission of neo-natal herpes through contact with a mohel carrying the herpes virus.
The world wars caused unimaginable anguish for the Jews but God also scripted a great glory for our people.
We were quite disappointed with many of the points the secretary-general offered in response.
Judging by history, every time Hamas rebuilds their infrastructure, they are stronger than before.
I never watched “Candid Camera” when I was a kid. We only watched The Wonderful World of Disney” and “Mutual of Omaha’s Wild Kingdom.”
My parents enforced strict TV rules. But as an adult, when I can watch whatever I please, I really enjoy those old shows and have made up for lost time when it comes to shows like “Candid Camera.”
It’s called the Viper. It is a computer virus. Open it once and it propagates and grows in every other file that is opened.
And last month it struck Iran.
That’s the third computer virus to hit Iran in the past eighteen months. But this one, the Viper, is different from the others.
Saudi Arabia is, to use a term the royals would, “greatly displeased” with the United States. Displeased with U.S. foreign policy regarding Iran and equally displeased with the decisions the White House is making about Syria.
The real heroes of our age are pencil-protector geeks. They sit at home, behind their keyboards, determining the rules of the game that you and I live by – and we trust them to do so. They love toys. They love games. They enjoy battle. They are at the forefront of the cyber war that is enveloping the world.
The White House was misled by Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak. And that does not surprise me.
Publicly, the White House is saying that nothing in the relationship between Barak, who just this week left the Labor Party to form a new political faction, and the administration has changed. Privately, the White House is expressing disappointment, frustration and even anger.
Israel, the Palestinians, the United States. Each party is banking on the other. The Palestinians and the Israelis are banking on the failure of the resumption of direct talks. The United States is banking on the talks to succeed.
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/obama-deserves-criticism-not-personal-attacks/2010/08/25/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online: