web analytics
March 27, 2015 / 7 Nisan, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

Playing With Fire


With renewed urgency, the Obama administration seeks to resolve the states of conflict between Israel and the Palestinians and neighboring Muslim states on one hand, and America and the Islamic Republic of Iran on the other.

Everyone of good will supports peace, nowhere more so than in Israel, a country that hasn’t enjoyed a day’s peace since achieving independence 61 years ago. Meanwhile, Washington is now on its third consecutive administration expressing serious national security concerns about Tehran’s nuclear weapons program.

But the twin goals – Israeli-Palestinian peace and an American-Iranian thaw – have, contrary to popular opinion, a paradoxical relationship.

Some Washington power brokers apparently believe that repairing America’s standing among Muslims and Arabs demands progress on the Israeli-Palestinian front. Conventional wisdom dictates that “progress” and the “peace process” itself mean addressing Palestinians’ statehood goals and their grievances against Israel.

There are, however, fundamental questions that must be asked regarding Palestinian demands: Are we empowering those who despise Israel and the United States? Are we purchasing good will for the United States by tossing Israel to the wolves? Do we grasp the Middle East psychology that interprets accommodation and compromise as weakness?

On the last point: Apparently not. Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chair John Kerry told a February 26 hearing that the United States must restore its “moral authority” in the region by returning “to our traditional role as an honest and firm broker in the Middle East peace process.”

America’s failing to do so would “remain a millstone around any effort to reach out to Muslims anywhere,” Kerry continued, alluding, apparently, to the albatross he feels Israel is to America.

“And as we work to empower partners from Morocco to northwest Pakistan, we can’t afford policies that make it unsustainable for locals to be seen as pro-American. We can’t afford to be politically radioactive.”

Better politically radioactive than physically radioactive, Senator Kerry.

Which brings us back to Iran, whose president speaks gleefully of genocide against Israel. The nearly-nuclear-capable Islamic Republic has armed and funded the dangerous folks on Israel’s western and northern borders: Hamas in Gaza and Hizbullah in southern Lebanon.

The Kerry formulation reads like self-fulfilling blackmail. If the price of purchasing American security from extremist Muslims is delivering Israel by weakening its security, what does that say about such demands, the people making them, and those who accommodate such thinking?

Far from engendering good will, pressing Israel into dangerous concessions leading to a Palestinian state run by the rabidly anti-Israel, pro-Iran Hamas leadership assuredly will whet Tehran’s appetite for more.

We in America must understand that the Palestinian territories have become another gymnasium in which Ahmadinejad can flex his muscles. According to Dan Diker, a scholar with the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, “There is a definite linkage between the conduct of the Palestinians and the wishes of the Iranians. The decisions that the Hamas leadership makes in Gaza are coming directly from Tehran via Damascus.”

America must get serious about the Iranian leadership’s mindset, strategic goals and tactics. We were treated to another dose of its rhetorical hubris recently with Ahmadinejad’s anti-Israel, anti-Semitic and anti-America comments at the United Nation’s conference on, yes, racism. All the more reason that waiting for Tehran to confirm the obvious – that its nuclear program is meant for military and not energy use – is playing with fire.

North Korea’s test launch on April 5 of its Taepodong-2 ballistic missile, and the Obama administration’s tepid response to this violation of UN Security Council resolutions, bode ill for Washington’s seriousness about confronting Iran.

As former U.S. ambassador to the UN John Bolton wrote of Pyongyang’s missile launch, “Tehran’s only conclusion can be: It is past time to torque up the pressure on this new crowd in Washington. [Iran] sees an American president so ready to bend his knee for public favor in Europe that the mullahs’ wish list for U.S. concessions will grow by the minute.”

President Obama would do better to increase pressure on Tehran in accordance with his March 12 statement that Iran “continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security of the United States.”

Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, told The Wall Street Journal in an April 6 interview that Iran’s nuclear ambitions represented a “life or death” challenge to Israel.

“The operative word is ‘existential,’ ” he said. Mullen added that the U.S. has “got a problem now” because “the Iranians are on a path to building nuclear weapons.”

Creating a Palestinian state allied with Tehran will worsen an already worrisome Iranian presence in the Middle East, destabilize the region and inevitably threaten the national security interests of the Western world. And it will make Israel the 2009 Sudetenland in our dispute with the Islamic Republic of Iran.

About the Author: Sarah Stern is the founder and president of the Endowment for Middle East Truth, a Washington-based think tank and policy center.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Playing With Fire”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu.
Netanyahu to Release Frozen Palestinian Authority Tax Revenue
Latest Indepth Stories
Islamic Relief Worldwide Logo

In November 2014, Islamic Relief Worldwide was classified as a terrorist organization by the United Arab Emirates.

Safran-032715

Too rarely appreciated for its symbolic weight; it can represent freedom and independence.

Erica Pelman is a spiritually-driven woman. She is founder and director of “In Shifra’s Arms” (ISA), an organization that offers aid to pregnant Jewish women of all religious backgrounds practically, financially and emotionally. Its arms are open to any pregnant woman in need whether single, divorced, separated, or from a financially-strapped family. “Presently, we are […]

Gerstenfeld-032715

Many so-called “humanitarian NGOs” frequently abuse Israel by applying false moral equivalencies

Israeli history now has its version of “Dewey Defeats Truman” with headlines from 2 anti-Bibi papers

In God’s plan why was it necessary that Moses be raised by Pharaoh, away from his own family&people?

In their zechus may we all come to appreciate that life is a fleeting gift and resolve to spend every precious moment of it as if it were the last.

In any event, Mr. Netanyahu after the election sought to soften his statement on Palestinian statehood and apologized for what he conceded were remarks that “offended some Israeli citizens and offended members of the Israeli Arab community.”

A worthy idea any way you look at it.

There is something quite distinctive about the biblical approach to time.

The Waqf kept control of the Temple Mount due to Dayan’s “magnanimity in victory” after 6 Day war

The event promotes “1 state” solution (end of Israel as a Jewish State), BDS, lawfare against Israel

I rescued you?! You’re doing me a favor letting me help you!

“Tzedakah tatzil mi-mavet: Charity saves from death”; No death & a tax break? Where do I sign up?

More Articles from Sarah Stern
Stern-051112

The Koby Mandell Act created the Office of Justice of Victims for Overseas Terrorism in the Department of Justice, to ensure that all American citizens, irrespective of where they were killed or maimed, would get the justice under American law they deserve. I naively thought that the 54 American citizens who had been killed by Palestinian terrorists and the 83 who had been wounded would finally get a crack at the American justice they so richly deserved.

At 5:30 in the morning on a recent Wednesday, my husband was awakened by a phone call from our son, Noam, in Beer Sheba.

“Don’t worry, dad, we’re in our safe rooms at home and we’re OK.”

With renewed urgency, the Obama administration seeks to resolve the states of conflict between Israel and the Palestinians and neighboring Muslim states on one hand, and America and the Islamic Republic of Iran on the other.

I feel as though my people are asleep at the wheel of history. After 2,000 years of yearning for a return to Jerusalem, we have had a mere 40 years – a tiny nanosecond in historical terms – of renewed sovereignty over our ancient, sacred city, and it is now once again on the negotiating table.

In my former life as a school psychologist, I spent a great deal of time doing intelligence testing. Occasionally, I had the agonizing task of breaking the dreadful news to parents that a child was severely developmentally disabled. Whether or not I packaged the term in soft euphemisms like “cognitively depressed” or “mentally deficient,” most parents eventually caught on that I was just searching for other words to mollify that unbearable label.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/playing-with-fire/2009/05/13/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: