In Israel, a new five month scholarship program being offered to young aspiring athletes – one of them could be you.
Threatening civilians is a traditional mode of state terrorism in parts of the Muslim world. A second type of state terrorism – the murderous one – has increased significantly.
A few among many examples: On July 11, Syrian soldiers shot and killed 10 participants in a funeral procession in the town of Homs. During the funeral of Kurdish leader Mashaal Tammo on October 8 in Qamishli, Syrian security forces fired indiscriminately at the crowd and killed five mourners and wounded three. A day later, 24 Copts were killed and more than a hundred wounded by Egyptian security forces in Cairo.
One can add many more examples of homicidal state terrorism in Arab countries, including Libya and Yemen. The principle remains the same: Arab government forces not only threaten their own civilians but also kill them intentionally.
A third type of state terrorism is the attempt to murder foreign civilians abroad. Recent examples were the planned attacks on the Saudi ambassador and the Israeli Embassy in Washington, both ordered by Iran.
Murderous state terrorism has extremely vicious precedents. In 1982, the Syrian regime of President Hafez Assad killed at least ten thousand people – actually, probably a multiple of that – in the town of Hama. The murdered were mainly civilians.
In 1988, Saddam Hussein’s Iraqi air force released poisonous gas over the Kurdish city of Halabja in Northern Iraq, killing thousands. Even more murderous was the Al Anfal campaign that year in which an estimated 100,000 Kurds in Northern Iraq, mainly civilians, were killed by Iraqi forces.
A major case of homicidal terrorism conducted in a foreign country by a Muslim state was that of the 1994 bombing of the Jewish AMIA center in Buenos Aires. Eighty-five people were killed and 300 wounded. It was the largest attack on Jews outside of Israel since World War II. In 1992, there was the bombing of the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires in which 29 people were killed. The attackers were never found.
Only in 2006 were Iran and Hizbullah formally charged with the AMIA murders by the Argentinean prosecutor. Among the eight suspects whose arrests were requested by Argentina was former Iranian president Hashemi Rafsanjani. Another of the accused was Iran’s defense minister, Ahmad Vahidi. After he visited Bolivia this past May, the Bolivian government apologized to Argentina for having invited him.
Threatening to use violence against foreign civilians is yet another type of state terrorism. Syrian President Bashir Assad told Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmad Davotuglu at the beginning of October that if Syria were attacked by NATO, Syria would shoot hundreds of missiles and rockets at Tel Aviv. Assad said he would also call on Hizbullah to launch an intensive rocket and missile attack on Israel.
This also has its precedents in the Muslim world: In 2001, then-Iranian President Rafsanjani threatened to annihilate Israel with an atom bomb.
To deflect attention from the widespread state terrorism in the Muslim world, some Arab leaders attack Israel instead. Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayip Erdogan accused Israel of state terrorism during his trip to Africa in May.
A few weeks ago at the United Nations Human Rights Council meeting, Syrian UN envoy Faisal al-Hamwi said that according to Syria’s state news agency SANA, Israeli human rights violations reported by Palestinians proved “the reality of state terrorism practiced by Israel.”
And two extreme leftist Norwegian doctors, Mads Gilbert and Erik Fosse, published a book claiming Israel had entered Gaza during Operation Cast Lead in order to kill women and children. Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Stoere and former prime minister Kare Willoch lent them credibility by contributing back-cover blurbs.
In contrast to all of these false accusers, Colonel Richard Kemp, a former commander of British forces in Afghanistan, said Israeli troops in Gaza did “more to safeguard the rights of civilians in a combat zone than any other army in the history of warfare.”
Unfortunately, Israel has been lax in publicizing Muslim state terrorism. And whoever remains silent about the criminality of his enemies becomes an easy victim of the inverted truth.
Dr. Manfred Gerstenfeld has published 20 books, several of which address anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism.
About the Author: Dr. Manfred Gerstenfeld is a board member and former chairman of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs (2000-2012). He is a recipient of the Lifetime Achievement Award (2012) of the Journal for the Study of Anti-Semitism.
You must log in to post a comment.
The growing revelations that the Obama State Department watered down public statements on the attack in order to cleanse them of any mention of al Qaeda and terrorism is a travesty.
We must confront Islamist groups with what Prime Minister David Cameron referred to as “muscular liberalism.”
Al-Qaradawi’s visit and statements also serve as a reminder that the Israeli-Arab conflict is centered, more than ever, around religion.
Everyone who reads newspapers should know at least one thing. Threats to annihilate Israel have always been unremarkable. Almost never, it seems, have Israel’s existential enemies sought any reason for concealment.
Mark Treyger, a candidate for city council in New York City’s 47th council district, met recently with the editorial board of The Jewish Press at the newspaper’s Boro Park office.
Israel’s government did not want to liberate Jerusalem. Or to be more specific, the Labor and National Religious Party ministers did not want to liberate Jerusalem. “Who needs that whole Vatican?” Defense Minister Moshe Dayan explained at the time.
Last Friday, the Western Wall underwent an unwelcome transformation from sacred site to media circus as the group known as the Women of the Wall sought to hold a decidedly non-traditional prayer service.
Two recent revelations have raised serious questions about the kind of government President Obama is running.
Readers of my monthly Baseball Insider column may have noticed its absence last week (the column appears in the second issue of every month). The reason for that is I have something more serious and personal to share with you, something that didn’t seem appropriate for a baseball column.
Herbert Romerstein died last week after a long illness. With Herb’s passing, we lose not only a good guy but a vast reservoir of knowledge that is not replaceable.
Freedom House recently released its annual report on press freedom throughout the world at an event sponsored by the Newseum in Washington. But along with the usual and appropriate condemnations of dictatorships and totalitarian states, the group decided to slam the one democracy in the Middle East as well as one of the few states in the region where press freedom actually exists: Israel.
What is the relationship between Pesach and Shavuos?
Rabbi Naftali Jaeger, rosh yeshiva of Sh’or Yoshuv, relates in the name of the Ishbitzer Rebbe a striking metaphor:
Now is the time for Ankara to take some corrective domestic and foreign policy measures consistent with what the country has and continues to aspire for but fails to realize.
Now that several weeks have passed since President Obama’s visit to Israel, it is possible to get a better perspective on many of its aspects. Focus must not only be placed on what was said and done, but also on what was missing.
On February 17, the Dutch Nederland 2 TV station broadcast an interview with Dutch Turkish youth conducted by volunteer youth worker Mehmet Sahin. In the broadcast the youngsters expressed their admiration for Hitler and his role in the murder of Jews during the Holocaust.
On October 15, the Knesset voted unanimously to dissolve itself. Elections will be held on January 22, 2013. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu decided to take the step after realizing he could not obtain a majority for his proposed budget.
When Israelis say, “I worry about my grandchildren’s future,” it has a radically different dimension than similar concerns expressed in many other countries.
Since Oslo we have had some Israeli governments emulate Neville Chamberlain’s foolish position. While the current government has not done so, there certainly is vast room for improvement in the presentation of Israel’s case to the world.
There are few societies where the contradiction between Holocaust distortion and Holocaust commemoration is as pronounced as it is in the Netherlands. This phenomenon came to the fore earlier this month on National Memorial Day, May 4, designated to commemorate the many victims of the German occupier. One hundred thousand Dutch Jews – more than 70 percent of the country’s pre-war community – were by far the largest group of victims.
Last month the IDF responded to rockets being launched from Gaza into southern Israel by bombing Gazan targets. It took little time for some media outlets to equate the Palestinian aggressor with the Israeli aggressed. It took only slightly longer for many other media outlets to highlight Israel’s actions while shoving continued Palestinian aggression into the background.
Let us employ a bit of fantasy and assume that Muslim states were intent on assailing the Netherlands. They would claim in the United Nations Human Rights Council that the hundreds of cases every year of euthanasia in the Netherlands, in which the patient is not asked his or her permission, constitutes a severe breach of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. These states could easily muster a majority to have the UNHRC appoint a commission of inquiry into this matter.
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/staying-silent-about-arab-state-terrorism/2011/11/02/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online:
No related posts.