web analytics
May 24, 2015 / 6 Sivan, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

The Artful Inaccuracies of Iran’s Foreign Minister

The recent op-ed of Iran's foreign minister Javad Zarif is marked by inaccurate assertions, significant omissions, and a threatening tone.
Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif.

Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif.
Photo Credit: ABC News

As we march towards the July 20 deadline for reaching agreement on stopping the Iranian nuclear weapons program, it is worth gauging Iran’s intentions by looking at the words of its foreign minister, Javad Zarif. On June 13, The Washington Post published an op-ed by Zarif entitled Iran is Committed to a Peaceful Nuclear Program. The op-ed is a skillful piece of propaganda aimed at dismissing skeptics of Iran’s peaceful nuclear intentions. However, Zarif’s arguments are marked by inaccurate assertions, significant omissions, and a threatening tone. The central paragraph of Zarif’s op-ed characterizes the concern about Iran’s nuclear weapons program as a “phobia.”

While reaching a realistic deal is the best available option for the West to prevent such a remote possibility, it may be instructive to take that phobia at face value. Let’s put it to a logical test. If Iran ever wanted to break out, all IAEA inspectors would have to be expelled from the country. Iran’s program would then have to be reconfigured to make weapons-grade fissile material, which would have to be converted to metal, be molded into the shape required for a bomb and undergo countless other complex weaponization processes. None of these capabilities exist in Iran and would have to be developed from scratch. This would take several years — not a few months.

In its assessment of breakout times published last October, the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) argued that a breakout time of less than six months would allow Iran to develop a nuclear device undetected:

As in the October 2012 iteration, the estimates in this report do not include the additional time that Iran would need to convert WGU [weapons grade uranium] into weapons components and manufacture a nuclear weapon. This extra time could be substantial, particularly if Iran wanted to build a reliable warhead for a ballistic missile. However, these preparations would most likely be conducted at secret sites and would be difficult to detect. If Iran successfully produced enough WGU for a nuclear weapon, the ensuing weaponization process might not be detectable until Iran tested its nuclear device underground or otherwise revealed its acquisition of nuclear weapons. Therefore, the most practical strategy to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons is to prevent it from accumulating sufficient nuclear explosive material, particularly in secret or without adequate warning. This strategy depends on knowing how quickly Iran could make WGU.

Zarif’s “breakout time” estimate differs from that of ISIS as the former includes activities such as weaponization and the creation of delivery systems, both of which could evade detection. ISIS’s breakout time estimate addresses the production of sufficient fissile material to make a bomb. In an analysis of a dubious study that is apparently the basis for Zarif’s claim of a breakout time of “several years,” ISIS researchers observed that the methodology of the study is so systematically skewed, “that it requires all the breakout estimates to be dismissed as woefully too short” and concluded, “[t]his Iranian study is a political tool for Iranian officials to point to as negotiations unfold.”

Later on, Zarif writes, “For years, small but powerful constituencies have irrationally advanced the idea that Iran can produce enough fissile material for a bomb in months.” Thus Zarif shifts the argument from “Iran cannot produce a nuclear device in a matter of months,” which is true, to “Iran cannot produce enough enriched uranium for a bomb in a matter of months,” which is false.

Furthermore, a “logical test” could be applied the other way too. If Iran’s nuclear program has no military aspect, why is it developing ballistic missiles that could carry a nuclear payload? If Iran’s nuclear program is for civilian purposes only, why is it planning to build a heavy water reactor when a light water reactor would suffice for any civilian needs? If Iran’s nuclear program only has peaceful aims, why did Iran refuse guarantees for a steady supply of enriched uranium and instead insist on mastering fuel cycle technologies (i.e. uranium enrichment)?  And why has Iran not allowed an on site inspection of the Parchin facility, which is believed to have housed experiments for nuclear detonators? In addition, Iran has asphalted the site hiding evidence of its experiments.

About the Author: The Tower and The Tower Magazine are found at TheTower.Org, which was founded in January 2013 as a project of TIP, a nonpartisan 501c3 educational organization based in Washington D.C. that works to provide facts about Israel and the Middle East to press, policy makers and the public.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

29 Responses to “The Artful Inaccuracies of Iran’s Foreign Minister”

  1. And you are surprised how? But America and Europe have swallowed their lies hook line and sinker!

  2. And you are surprised how? But America and Europe have swallowed their lies hook line and sinker!

  3. And you are surprised how? But America and Europe have swallowed their lies hook line and sinker!

  4. And you are surprised how? But America and Europe have swallowed their lies hook line and sinker!

  5. None as blind as those who refuse to see. No Jew as stupid as he who after the Holocaust still thinks he or she can rely on the World for our survival.

  6. None as blind as those who refuse to see. No Jew as stupid as he who after the Holocaust still thinks he or she can rely on the World for our survival.

  7. None as blind as those who refuse to see. No Jew as stupid as he who after the Holocaust still thinks he or she can rely on the World for our survival.

  8. None as blind as those who refuse to see. No Jew as stupid as he who after the Holocaust still thinks he or she can rely on the World for our survival.

  9. This time it is different. Gog and Magog is on the way. and they will all fall by God

  10. This time it is different. Gog and Magog is on the way. and they will all fall by God

  11. This time it is different. Gog and Magog is on the way. and they will all fall by God

  12. This time it is different. Gog and Magog is on the way. and they will all fall by God

  13. Shemaya Shiloh via Facebook says:

    Isn’t international relations a sickening thing? It’s like every scoundrel in town comes to your home for cocktails with soiled pants and we must walk around smiling and greeting and pretending we smell nothing.

  14. Shemaya Shiloh via Facebook says:

    Isn’t international relations a sickening thing? It’s like every scoundrel in town comes to your home for cocktails with soiled pants and we must walk around smiling and greeting and pretending we smell nothing.

  15. Shemaya Shiloh via Facebook says:

    Isn’t international relations a sickening thing? It’s like every scoundrel in town comes to your home for cocktails with soiled pants and we must walk around smiling and greeting and pretending we smell nothing.

  16. Shemaya Shiloh via Facebook says:

    Isn’t international relations a sickening thing? It’s like every scoundrel in town comes to your home for cocktails with soiled pants and we must walk around smiling and greeting and pretending we smell nothing.

  17. Embarrassed to have a person like Mr. O at the helm. He’s wearing blinders or he’s on their side.

  18. Embarrassed to have a person like Mr. O at the helm. He’s wearing blinders or he’s on their side.

  19. Embarrassed to have a person like Mr. O at the helm. He’s wearing blinders or he’s on their side.

  20. Embarrassed to have a person like Mr. O at the helm. He’s wearing blinders or he’s on their side.

  21. It’s not Iran but Egypt. Why they had to get Qaddafi out of the way. Why Benghazi happened. They are building the missiles in the Libyan desert at night and traveling in parts one by one and assembled in Egypt. What Benghazi was about. Hillary was told about the missiles but shushed it up because bill was involved. And she clearly stated in her interview last week she wouldn’t testify against her husband under no circumstances. Meaning she knew about he attack why she didn’t answer her phone. She sent the call straight to her voicemail. It’s a good thing that phone she owns is stolen. Now the #NSA can legally tap her phone

  22. It’s not Iran but Egypt. Why they had to get Qaddafi out of the way. Why Benghazi happened. They are building the missiles in the Libyan desert at night and traveling in parts one by one and assembled in Egypt. What Benghazi was about. Hillary was told about the missiles but shushed it up because bill was involved. And she clearly stated in her interview last week she wouldn’t testify against her husband under no circumstances. Meaning she knew about he attack why she didn’t answer her phone. She sent the call straight to her voicemail. It’s a good thing that phone she owns is stolen. Now the #NSA can legally tap her phone

  23. It’s not Iran but Egypt. Why they had to get Qaddafi out of the way. Why Benghazi happened. They are building the missiles in the Libyan desert at night and traveling in parts one by one and assembled in Egypt. What Benghazi was about. Hillary was told about the missiles but shushed it up because bill was involved. And she clearly stated in her interview last week she wouldn’t testify against her husband under no circumstances. Meaning she knew about he attack why she didn’t answer her phone. She sent the call straight to her voicemail. It’s a good thing that phone she owns is stolen. Now the #NSA can legally tap her phone

  24. It’s not Iran but Egypt. Why they had to get Qaddafi out of the way. Why Benghazi happened. They are building the missiles in the Libyan desert at night and traveling in parts one by one and assembled in Egypt. What Benghazi was about. Hillary was told about the missiles but shushed it up because bill was involved. And she clearly stated in her interview last week she wouldn’t testify against her husband under no circumstances. Meaning she knew about he attack why she didn’t answer her phone. She sent the call straight to her voicemail. It’s a good thing that phone she owns is stolen. Now the #NSA can legally tap her phone

  25. we hate iran please if u really hate them stop making games ..and destroy iran :)

    hahaa btw iran is ur best friend back to cyrus the great …

  26. we hate iran please if u really hate them stop making games ..and destroy iran :)

    hahaa btw iran is ur best friend back to cyrus the great …

  27. we hate iran please if u really hate them stop making games ..and destroy iran :)

    hahaa btw iran is ur best friend back to cyrus the great …

  28. we hate iran please if u really hate them stop making games ..and destroy iran :)

    hahaa btw iran is ur best friend back to cyrus the great …

  29. Why can't anyone in our government see the ridiculous double talk of Iranian government officials.. If a snake tells you it now a frog,do you just blindly believe it?

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Tzipi Hotovely, new Deputy Foreign Minister.
Foreign Minister Hotovely: Tell the World ‘God Gave Israel to the Jews’
Latest Indepth Stories
Harris-052215

We take a whole person approach, giving our people assistance with whatever they need.

Shalev and Rabbi Levinger

During my spiritual journey I discovered G-d spoke to man only once, to the Jewish people at Sinai

MK Moshe-Feiglin

20 years after the great Ethiopian aliyah, we must treat them like everyone else; no better or worse

Sprecher-052215

Connecting Bamidbar&Shavuot is simple-A world without Torah is midbar; with Torah a blessed paradise

Many Black protesters compared Baltimore’s unrest to the Palestinian penchant of terrorism & rioting

She credited success to “mini” decisions-Small choices building on each other leading to big changes

Shavuot 1915, 200000 Jews were expelled; amongst the largest single expulsions since Roman times

Realizing there was no US military threat, Iran resumed, expanded & accelerated its nuclear program

“Enlightened Jews” who refuse to show chareidim the tolerance they insist we give to Arabs sicken me

Somewhat surprisingly, the Vatican’s unwelcome gesture was diametrically at odds with what President Obama signaled in an interview with the news outlet Al Arabiya.

The recent solid victory of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud Party produced something very different.

The reaction is so strong that nine times out of ten, parents engage in some form of coping mechanism before arriving at a level of acceptance of a special-needs diagnosis.

“…his neshamah reached out to us to have the zechus of Torah learning to take with him on his final journey.”

The gap isn’t between Israeli and American Jews-it’s between American Jews and the rest of the world

More Articles from The Tower
Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif.

Iran is developing ballistic missiles that can carry a nuclear payload, so its program is non-military?

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/the-artful-inaccuracies-of-irans-foreign-minister/2014/06/23/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: