web analytics
July 30, 2015 / 14 Av, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

The Interview Netanyahu Didn’t Give

While in the U.S. last month, Prime Minister Netanyahu gave a number of interviews. The following is one he did not give, though I wish he would have.
 
Interviewer: In your recent talks in Washington, Obama administration officials, including Secretary of State Clinton, repeatedly stressed their view that only a “two-state solution,” one in which a Palestinian state is erected alongside Israel, can create a lasting peace in the Middle East. What is your position and that of your government on the idea of a two-state solution?
 
Netanyahu: We prefer a solution based on time travel in a time machine at speeds faster than light.
 
Interviewer: What does that mean? There are no time machines or anything that can produce speeds faster than that of light.
 
Netanyahu: Yes, exactly like the two-state solution. No two-state solution exists or is possible, just like time machines are not possible. One can perhaps imagine a situation in which two states, Israel and “Palestine,” exist, just like you can imagine a time machine, but this represents no solution at all.
 
People can sit around and concoct fictional imaginary worlds in which there do exist two-state solutions to the Arab-Israeli conflict. But no such solution exists in our galaxy. I have never much liked science fiction and prefer to restrict my thinking about political solutions to the realm of non-fiction.
 
Interviewer: So if the two-state solution is out, what is the alternative?
 
Netanyahu: I call it the 23-state solution. The Arabs get to keep the 22 states they already have and the Jews keep the one state they have. The Palestinians get no state. They are welcome to move to any of the 22 Arabs states if they are unhappy with that idea.
 
Interviewer: Well, you still must have some thoughts on the overall parameters within which any resolution of the conflict must be pursued.
 
Netanyahu: Yes. The right way to begin to think about resolving the conflict is to start from the end and first rule out what will not and cannot happen – ideas and proposals with which there will be no compromise and no negotiations. We are willing to take under consideration any program or proposal for peace that is formulated within those structural parameters, and there are quite a few conceivable such ones.
 
Interviewer: So what are those ironclad parameters?
 
Netanyahu: There are two, and no negotiations of any sort and no solution will ever be possible unless everyone understands that these must serve as the starting points for any resolution of the Middle East conflict: There will be no new independent Palestinian state west of the Jordan river, and the Palestinian population in the West Bank and Gaza will not be granted citizenship in Israel.
 
Any idea or plan that accepts those two axioms as its points of departure is one we are willing to take under consideration.
 
Interviewer: Explain.
 
Netanyahu: A Palestinian state is out because its raison d’etre would be aggression and terror against Israel, and we are not willing to grant the Palestinians a new base from which to launch war. No Palestinian state in any form, no matter its borders or the group serving as its leadership or ruling class, will coexist with Israel. Any Palestinian state will seek war.
 
            Anyone with any doubts that “Palestine” would be nothing more than a rocket-launching base and terrorist dispatch point need only look at what happened in Gaza after Israel foolishly abandoned it. There is no doubt or question about what such a “state” would pursue. Therefore there will be no such state.
 
Interviewer: That still leaves Israel’s own Arab minority. What do you propose for those Israeli Arabs who are unwilling to live peacefully as an ethnic minority within a Jewish state with a dominant Jewish majority?
 
Netanyahu: A one-way plane ticket, coach, to the destination of their choice outside of Israel.
 
Interviewer: What about the problem of all the Jewish settlers and settlements?
 
Netanyahu: I do not see any problem. In any resolution of the conflict, Jews will have to be as free to move and live among Arabs as Arabs already are free to move and live among Jews. A “peace plan” that requires that Jews be ethnically cleansed out of areas with Arab majorities is no peace plan at all.
 
I have already ruled out a Palestinian state in Gaza and the West Bank. We are willing to consider alternative plans that satisfy the two axioms I discussed above. But I expect we would refuse to agree to any scenario in which Jews are prevented from living among Arabs the same way Arabs live among Jews. The Arab states may remain apartheid regimes, but we will not have ethnic cleansing of Jews in a Palestinian apartheid state in our own back yards.
 
Interviewer: So what exactly do you propose doing about the Jewish settlements?
 
Netanyahu: Build lots more of them. The settlers are Israel’s mine canaries. The attitude of the Arabs toward Jewish settlers is a litmus test and a warning sign of Arab attitudes toward Jews in general. Until the Arabs are willing to make their peace with the idea of Jewish settlers living in their midst, there is no reason to believe they are willing to come to terms with Israel existing as a state within their midst. And until the Arabs come to terms with the existence of a Jewish state in their midst, the search for “peace solutions” is a complete waste of everyone’s time.
 
Interviewer: Many people think Jerusalem is the hardest issue of all to solve. Do you agree?
 
Netanyahu: No. Jerusalem is the easiest. We have a very simple and clear position on Jerusalem. It is this: They can’t have it. That is our solution. We offer them nothing at all. Absolutely nothing. Muslims who wish to pray in the Jerusalem mosques can do so, same as members of other religions are free to attend their houses of worship. In terms of sovereignty and political or administrative control, we agree to grant them nothing at all.
 
Interviewer: Do you think the Arabs will agree to that?
 
Netanyahu: No. In fact, let me be even more blunt. If the Arabs offer us a choice between 1,000 years of war, bloodshed and strife or immediate peace in exchange for Israel giving up Jerusalem, we choose the 1,000 years of war.
 
Interviewer: But a lot of people around the world will be unhappy with that approach and denounce you for it.
 

Netanyahu: Tough.

 

 

Steven Plaut, a frequent contributor to The Jewish Press, is a professor at Haifa University. His book “The Scout” is available at Amazon.com. He can be contacted at steveneplaut@yahoo.com

About the Author: Steven Plaut is a professor at the University of Haifa. He can be contacted at steveneplaut@yahoo.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “The Interview Netanyahu Didn’t Give”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Dore Gold.
Foreign Ministry Calls Sunni Arab Nations ‘Israel’s Allies’
Latest Indepth Stories
Tobin-073115

Hillary should THANK Trump; By dominating the news he’s overshadowed the implosion of her campaign

Rabbi Yaakov Spivak

Hard to remember when Jewish youth were so hostile to their heritage as they are on campuses today.

Talks between Iran and the P5+1 were likely to be extended beyond Obama's self-imposed deadline.

Names of the enablers of Iran’s Nuclear weapons will be added next to Hitler’s on the list of infamy

By most accounts, the one person with the political muscle to swing enough Democratic votes to override a veto is Sen. Schumer.

The next day, in a speech in New York to the Council on Foreign Relations, Mr. Kerry substantially upped the ante.

In Israel, the judiciary has established itself as superior to ALL other branches of the government.

The Fifteenth Day of the month of Av became a day of national rejoicing. The moment that had seemed hopeless became the moment of Redemption.

I think the melodies in our religious services have a haunting sound to them that just permeates your guts and gets into your soul. If you have any musical inclination, I think they inspire you to compose.

Cavalier analogies to the Holocaust are unacceptable, but Huckabee’s analogy was very appropriate.

Pollard was a Jewish-head-on-a-pike for all American Jews to see and to learn the explicit lesson.

If the Iran deal passes, Obama’s WH becomes world’s leading financier of terrorism against Americans

{Originally posted to the author’s website, FirstOne Through} Some passionate and eloquent liberals have bemoaned the state of inclusiveness among Jews today. Leon Wieseltier, editor of the New Republic penned an angry piece “J Street’s Rejection Is a Scandal” about the exclusion in 2014 of J Street from the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations. […]

Magnanimity by Moshe Dayan, allowing Muslim control of the Temple Mount, led to today’s situation.

It was modeled upon a similar fund that had been set up by Sephardic Jews in Venice. But Amsterdam’s Dotar was initially more ambitious in scope.

More Articles from Steven Plaut
Tel Aviv University Insignia

Ronen Shamir’s just the latest tenured Leftist convicted of sexual misconduct with his own student

The Vatican

It is time to acknowledge Alaric I and his descendents, as the true & rightful rulers of the Vatican

“If I were a Shaheed, yababa-deidledie, all day long I’d detonate for fun, if I were a Shaheed guy”

British archeologists just uncovered a statement from 1938 supporting BDS of Czechoslovakia (humor)

Israel’s media waged jihad against Bibi before the election, nakedly promoting Herzog and Labor

No matter what rick or contrivance the Left tried, it didn’t help. And tried they did!

– When income becomes too equitable, there are no incentives to work hard and take risks and innovate.

The Israel Prize, the nation’s premier prize, is awarded in a range of areas for various disciplines

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/the-interview-netanyahu-didnt-give/2009/06/03/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: