Student Union opens ‘hasbara’ room in effort to fill public diplomacy vacuum.
Last week The Jewish Press published “PETA’s Position,” a letter to the editor authored by Benjamin Goldsmith, campaign coordinator for the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), based in Norfolk, VA. The letter vividly illustrated why further debate with the radical animal rights group is not only impossible, but also grossly irresponsible.
It is certainly not an easy position to take when one suggests that an open marketplace of ideas cannot and should not take place on any issue. But PETA has long ago crossed the line of earning the right of being debated, as any fair-minded person with knowledge of the facts would conclude. The letter itself illustrates just how deceptive PETA is. It is an example of “spin” that is enmeshed in lies, distortions, disinformation, and, worst of all, harmful conjectures.
Goldsmith’s letter – in an Orthodox publication, bear in mind – begins by lauding the position on shechita (only that portion with which he agrees) of Rabbi Menachem Genack, rabbinic administrator of the Orthodox Union, but quickly introduces into evidence the criticism of shechita at AgriProcessors in Postville, Iowa, by leaders of the Conservative and Reform movements. When did they become experts on standards for glatt kosher shechita? When did their movements even recognize the validity of glatt kosher? Who among their rabbis and constituents is eating glatt kosher anyway?
But that deception and mixing of rabbis and standards into one bowl to make it appear that they have the backing of “rabbis” is only the beginning of the deception. From the day PETA released the video it surreptitiously filmed at Agri, the organization practiced deplorable libelous and slanderous spin. Haifa Chief Rabbi Shar Yoshuv Cohen, for example, was never told the real background or context of the video. He, in fact, later demanded that PETA remove from its website his initial comment to a PETA leader who had deceived him into believing he was a baal teshuva interested in shechita. Israel’s Chief Rabbinate was duped into equating its position – not to make an immediate second cut so as not to make it appear that two Jewish shochtim performed the shechita – with a condemnation of second-cut practices at Agri performed by a non-Jew. And so it went.
Never mind that PETA regularly uses Jewish spokesmen who have to this day refused to repudiate the organization’s equation of slaughter of animals to the Holocaust. Could there be a bigger insult to our six million martyrs than to have Jews speak in the name of an organization that compares their death al kiddush Hashem (sanctification of the Lord’s name) to that of the slaughter of animals? How grotesque.
Never mind that PETA is mum about its letter to Yasir Arafat protesting the use of a donkey to blow up Jews. In other words, it would seem that as long as an animal is not used, it is permissible to kill Jews. For this alone, no Jewish publication should allow PETA a voice.
The viciousness of the PETA campaign is perhaps best recognized in that they refuse to accept that Agri itself has vowed to continue to upgrade its humane standards, not because the animals were ever mishandled or that they endured pain (as Rabbi Dr. I.M. Levinger, internationally recognized veterinary surgeon and animal welfare expert, pointed out following his visit to Agri) but because it wants to remove even the slightest perception that any animal is not treated humanely.
The USDA, which monitors humane practices at the plant, never closed Agri for even one minute, as it would surely do for any infraction. Rather than acknowledge the plant’s reaffirmation of its policy of improving conditions when even the slightest concern is raised, PETA continues its vicious campaign – because its motive, as everyone knows by now, is not only to end shechita as we know it in the U.S., but to put the kibosh on all slaughter of animals in this country (and, of late, fishing as well).
About the Author:
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Comments are closed.
The residents of Gaza were not occupied by the Hamas; they voted for the terror organization in democratic elections, by a huge majority, by virtue of its uncompromising struggle against Israel. For this reason, the separation between the armed Hamas terrorists and those ‘not involved’ or ‘innocents’ is false. The Gazans are now paying for […]
As Peres retires, Israel fights sour legacy: Insistence on setting policy in line with hopes, rather than with reality.
Our capital was not arbitrarily chosen, as capitals of some other nations were.
Rabbi Kahane spoke of transfer, because it was what the Torah spoke of.
There is much I can write you about what is going here, but I am wondering what I should not write. I will start by imagining that I am you, sitting at home in the Los Angeles area and flipping back and forth between the weather, traffic reports, the Ukraine, Mexican illegals and Gaza. No […]
Should Jews in Europe take more responsibility in self-defense of community and property?
Germany’s The Jewish Faith newspaper ominously noted, “We Jews are in for a war after the war.”
The truth is we seldom explore with kids what prayer is supposed to be about.
Almost as one, Jews around the world are acknowledging the day-to-day peril facing ordinary Jews in Israel and the extraordinary service of the IDF in protecting them.
So on the one hand Secretary Kerry makes no bones about who is at fault for the current hostilities: he clearly blames Hamas.
King Solomon said it long ago: “Cast your bread upon the waters” because you don’t know when you’ll hit something. Our job is to do.
The anti-Israel camp does not need to win America fully to its side. Merely to neutralize it would radically alter the balance of power and put Israel in great jeopardy.
We already know what happens when the Arabs control our holy sites. The Jordanians, who should never have been awarded part of Jerusalem in the first place, did not allow access to Har Hazeisim or for that matter the Kosel despite signing the Armistice Agreement of 1948 which explicitly provided access to Jews.
“I believe that there are still 60,000 more graves that have to be rehabilitated,” he says. If he is correct, it would mean that the Jordanians destroyed 75,000 graves, a number impossible to imagine and probably unprecedented in history, including the Nazi period.
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/there-can-be-no-debate-with-peta/2005/01/12/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online: