web analytics
August 1, 2015 / 16 Av, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

Was an Israeli Strike on Iran Preempted by the Geneva Agreement?

With the conclusion of the Syrian fiasco, the Obama administration had to turn it’s attention to a more imminent threat.
What Obama does not say but write on personal emails now is known to Russian hackers.

What Obama does not say but write on personal emails now is known to Russian hackers.

Since it was signed a month ago in Geneva, the pact with Iran received much attention in the media, it’s many shortcomings and it’s few (if any) upsides have been rehashed and analyzed over and over again. The open rift between President Barak Obama and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has received the full attention it deserved, and there are even speculations about a new alliance between Israel, Saudi Arabia. As it turns out, the US and Iran have been engaged in secrete negotiation for many months, and when one strips away the bells and whistles all that the agreement with Iran really accomplished was buying some time. A six months delay to be exact. But what was the urgency? Why the hurry? Why not continue the secret talks and allow the sanctions more time to work and soften Iranian resistance?

The answer may reside in the timeline of the recent events in Washington, Geneva, Jerusalem, Cairo, and Riyadh

On Dec. 22 2012 a story published in Egypt’s Rose El-Youssef An Egyptian magazine, claimed that six American Islamist activists who work with the Obama administration are Muslim Brotherhood operatives who enjoy strong influence over U.S. policy and suggested the six turned the White House “from a position hostile to Islamic groups and organizations in the world to the largest and most important supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood.” The six include Arif Alikhan, assistant secretary of Homeland Security for policy development; Mohammed Elibiary, a member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council; Rashad Hussain, the U.S. special envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference; Salam al-Marayati , co-founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC); Imam Mohamed Magid, president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA); and Eboo Patel, a member of President Obama’s Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships. This rapprochement between the US and the Muslim Brotherhood was, to say the least not the liking of Saudi Arabia. By mid to late 2013, the events in Libya, the White House’s support of Muslim Brotherhood President Morsi in Egypt, and the opposition to the subsequent military take over in Egypt, made it clear to the Saudis that they can not count on US support.

If there was any doubt left, about the deep penetration of the Muslim Brotherhood of the White House, the recent revelations by Seymour Hersh puts any remaining doubts to rest. Hersh reported that the White House knew that the sarin nerve gas attack of August 21st in Damascus was perpetrated by al-Nusra (an Al-Qaida affiliated group), and not by Syria’s President Bashar Assad, as was claimed by the administration. The White House knowingly lied to the American people about the perpetrator of the attack in order to use it as pretext to attack the Assad regime. By late September of 2013 Obama was readying to go to war in support of the Muslim Brotherhood affiliated rebels. At the very last moment (perhaps realizing that the truth is bound to come out at some point), Obama decide to seek congressional approval and the American effort in support of Al-Qaida in Syria was ultimately foiled by Russia’s President Vladimir Putin’s agreement with Assad.

With the conclusion of the Syrian fiasco, the Obama administration had to turn it’s attention to a more imminent threat. While the US and and Iran have been negotiating in secret for quite some time, so were Israel and Saudi Arabia. Israel and the Saudis (bound by their opposition to both nuclear armed Shia Iran and the Muslim Brotherhood) have been discussing mutual concerns regarding the events in the Middle East. Feeling betrayed by America’s support of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, and being kept out of the negotiating loop between the US and Iran, the two countries have been exploring mutually beneficial options since at least as far back as March of 2013 when a prominent Israeli politician (her name is yet to be officially revealed) visited Abu Dhabi. Since then multiple other meeting between the two countries are rumored to have taken place, including a most recent one in November of 2013 in Geneva, Switzerland. It is reported that during these meetings an understanding was forged whereby in return for some Israeli concessions with regard to the Palestinian issue, the Saudis have given Israel a green light (or at least a yellow one) for a fly over Saudi air space to attack Iran (the Saudis were of course quick to deny any such meetings or understandings).

Netanyahu in his UN address of October 1st 2013 was unequivocal about Israel’s intentions, and just in case the White House was not paying attention, he repeated it three times, “Ladies and gentlemen, Israel will never acquiesce to nuclear arms in the hands of a rogue regime that repeatedly promises to wipe us off the map. Against such a threat, Israel will have no choice but to defend itself. I want there to be no confusion on this point. Israel will not allow Iran to get nuclear weapons. If Israel is forced to stand alone, Israel will stand alone.“ Then he went on to allude to newly forged alliances and common understandings, “Yet, in standing alone, Israel will know that we will be defending many, many others. The dangers of a nuclear-armed Iran and the emergence of other threats in our region have led many of our Arab neighbors to recognize, finally recognize, that Israel is not their enemy. And this affords us the opportunity to overcome the historic animosities and build new relationships, new friendships, new hopes. Israel welcomes engagement with the wider Arab world. We hope that our common interests and common challenges will help us forge a more peaceful future.“

By November of 2013 the heat was on. On November seventh Israel voiced strong opposition to reported American concession to Iran’s demands for continued enrichment of uranium. After that it became a race to reach an agreement as quickly as possible in order to prevent Israel from striking first. On November 21st a top White House official sounded the alarm and warned that Israel’s proposals and demands would likely lead to war. Tree days later, on November 24th, not leaving any room for further maneuvering by Israel, and preempting any possible Israeli action, the Geneva agreement was signed. Preemption of Israel by capitulation to Iran’s demands is the only plausible explanation for the rushed signing of what is by all accounts is a bad agreement. It bought the Obama administration 6 months, unless Israel turns up a smoking gun and attacks Iran when the world and the Iranians least expect it.

About the Author:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

2 Responses to “Was an Israeli Strike on Iran Preempted by the Geneva Agreement?”

  1. Leigh Gold says:

    Who cares about Obama and his Muslim cronies? When Israel determines her existence is threatened by the Islamofascist Ayatollahs, she will attack. 'If I am not for myself, who WILL be for me?' is a tenet of Judaism learned the hard way. I hope and trust that Israel gives the Ayatollahs and their goose-stepping armed forces the biggest hiding of their worthless lives and, once again, show the knee-bending, cringeing apologists of The White House, and their lapdogs how to face up to Fascism.

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Matt Lee of the Associated Press at the State Department press briefing.
ObameDeal Exposed: It’s not ‘Secret’ from Congress but not in Writing
Latest Indepth Stories
Silhouette of "hilltop settler."

“Yesha” and Binyamin Regional Council leaders said the attack “is not the path of Jews in Judea and Samaria.”

Schwartz-073115

The occasion? The rarely performed mitzvah of pidyon peter chamor: Redemption of a firstborn donkey.

Rabbi YY Rubinstein

American leftists have a pathological self-inflicted blindness to the dangers of political Islam

Tobin-073115

Hillary should THANK Trump; By dominating the news he’s overshadowed the implosion of her campaign

Hard to remember when Jewish youth were so hostile to their heritage as they are on campuses today.

Names of the enablers of Iran’s Nuclear weapons will be added next to Hitler’s on the list of infamy

By most accounts, the one person with the political muscle to swing enough Democratic votes to override a veto is Sen. Schumer.

The next day, in a speech in New York to the Council on Foreign Relations, Mr. Kerry substantially upped the ante.

In Israel, the judiciary has established itself as superior to ALL other branches of the government.

The Fifteenth Day of the month of Av became a day of national rejoicing. The moment that had seemed hopeless became the moment of Redemption.

I think the melodies in our religious services have a haunting sound to them that just permeates your guts and gets into your soul. If you have any musical inclination, I think they inspire you to compose.

Cavalier analogies to the Holocaust are unacceptable, but Huckabee’s analogy was very appropriate.

Pollard was a Jewish-head-on-a-pike for all American Jews to see and to learn the explicit lesson.

If the Iran deal passes, Obama’s WH becomes world’s leading financier of terrorism against Americans

More Articles from Igal Zuravicky MD FACC
superpowers

To comprehend the Middle East one must consider the convoluted, and often counterproductive role the super powers have played in the region.

U.S. Secretary of State John "Apartheid" is too smart to use the "A" word when referring to Israel, or isn't he?

The Kerry approach appears to follow the pattern of other recent pacts of the Obama administration in the region.

I looks like European antisemitism is becoming more and more inventive.

The post WW II era ushered in many new forms of idolatry, but none compares to the Idolatry of Peace.

The Palestinians have been gambling with somebody else’s money.

Hezbollah, Hamas, and Al Qaeda are now physically surrounding Israel.

We live in a world where a people returning to it’s ancestral home is accused of occupation, and redemption has become colonialism.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/was-an-israeli-strike-on-iran-preempted-by-the-geneva-agreement/2013/12/11/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: