Congratulations to all the winners of the JewishPress.com raffle at The Event
Why do the mainstream media keep tacking on the term “Israeli-Palestinian crisis” where it does not belong? This has become a mindless mantra meant to inflame, not inform – and, more important, to affirm the “goodness” and “fairness” of the journalists who espouse such rank propaganda.
The New York Times recently included the above phrase in an editorial titled “Selling America.” The editors believe they know how – and how not – to “sell” America. In their view, President Bush’s “waging preventive war in Iraq, redefining torture, repudiating the Geneva Conventions, establishing illegal detention camps, and refusing to grapple with the Israeli-Palestinian crisis” has created “new enemies every minute” and has “soured allies.”
What universe do Times editors inhabit? My universe is one in which Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is already perceived to be leaning on Israel to give more in return for less at the Annapolis conference. Diplomatically, Israel is already expected to do all the heavy lifting for Arab and Muslim states (such as Jordan and Turkey) who are gravely concerned with the Iranian threat.
And it was Israel – not Jordan and not even America – that carried out the recent bombing operation in Syria against an apparent nuclear facility.
According to political expert Dan Diker, who works with Ambassador Dore Gold in Jerusalem, Mahmoud Abbas and Fatah are not even asking for the Arab neighborhoods in Jerusalem, but, Oslo-style, Israeli politicians and pundits nevertheless are offering them up as sacrificial lambs.
In his experience, dealing with the Fatah leadership is like dealing with a vacuum – with the exception of a few strong and honorable individuals, “there is no there there.” The Palestinian Authority, he notes, consists of “warring clans, families, and warlords” and is threatened by a well-funded Hamas.
In Diker’s view, fewer suicide bombings have occurred in recent years largely because of the much-maligned security fence (as well as good old-fashioned Israeli intelligence-gathering).
But still the Kassam rockets continue to rain down on Sderot and the international community barely notices. The mainstream media mainly pay attention when Israel does something – anything – to defend itself from this non-stop onslaught and when it contemplates measures like reducing electricity and fuel to the hostile, parasitic residents of Hamas’s Gaza. (Why won’t the wealthy Arab states pick up the slack here to avoid the impending humanitarian crisis?)
Diker shared an important anecdote. It seems that on his visits to Ramallah, which he makes every few weeks, he had been hiding his yarmulke. His host, a religious Muslim whom Diker describes as a good man, stopped their ongoing negotiations to pray, in full view of the Israelis. Diker finally decided it was time for him to do likewise. He donned his yarmulke and asked his host to point him in the direction of the Western Wall for his afternoon prayers. His host immediately and respectfully did so.
“From now on” Diker quietly vowed, “I will not hide my religion or fail to pray” simply because Jews (and all non-Muslims) are endangered in Arab and Muslim territories.
Diker observed to me that “Israel behaves like a battered woman. She keeps coming back for more mistreatment.” Said I: “But when battered women kill in self-defense in America, they receive life sentences, often with no parole.” We both stood together in momentary silence.
Do the reporters and editors of mainstream media ever stand in silence before tragic and complicated realities? Do they ever entertain the possibility that Israel is being falsely blamed in order to serve the cause of Arab, Muslim, and Palestinian imperialism?
Do they ever contemplate the possibility that anti-Americanism might not be caused by American failure or even by American crimes – but by American virtues and strengths?
Perhaps America, too (at least its media elite), has begun to behave like a battered woman, and has come to perversely enjoy being demeaned and mistreated.
About the Author: Dr. Phyllis Chesler is a professor emerita of psychology, a Middle East Forum fellow, and the author of fifteen books including “Women and Madness” (1972), “The New Anti-Semitism” (2003), and her latest, “An American Bride in Kabul” (2013). Her articles are archived at www.phyllis-chesler.com.
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Comments are closed.
Wye would be seen to have set the groundwork for the creation of a Palestinian state
Blaming Israel for the violence in Gaza, he ends up justifying Hamas’s terrorism.
In the Thirties it was common for anti-Semites to call on Jews to “go to Palestine!”
“This arbitrary ban is an ugly stain on our democracy, and it also undermines the rule of law.”
We take US “aid” for psychological reasons-if we have an allowance, that means we have a father.
ZIM Piraeus isn’t Israeli-owned or flagged, incidentally, it is Greek operated.
Foolish me, thinking the goals were the destruction of Hamas thereby giving peace a real chance.
The free-spirted lifestyle didn’t hold your interest; the needs of your people did.
And why would the U.S. align itself on these issues with Turkey and Qatar, longtime advocates of Hamas’s interests?
Several years ago the city concluded that the metzitzah b’peh procedure created unacceptable risks for newborns in terms of the transmission of neo-natal herpes through contact with a mohel carrying the herpes virus.
The world wars caused unimaginable anguish for the Jews but God also scripted a great glory for our people.
We were quite disappointed with many of the points the secretary-general offered in response.
Judging by history, every time Hamas rebuilds their infrastructure, they are stronger than before.
Few of the volunteers were experienced sailors, (Greenfield had been in the Merchant Marine). Few were Zionists.
My good colleague Kay is wrong about the early demise of conspiracy theories and blood libels against the Jews.
“I am surprised those Zionists are not outside protesting,” says one woman.
“Miral” is a film that has garnered an inordinate amount of media attention. In interviews, the director, Julian Schnabel, defends his right to tell the Palestinian “narrative” for what he claims is the first time. He seems not to know that many others before him have specialized in this particular line of work.
Our beloved, miraculous Jewish state is under siege.
It was assumed that the ceaseless persecution of the Jews in exile would cease once we again had our own sovereign homeland, our own army, navy, and air force.
In 1947-1948 I lived in Boro Park where, against parental and rabbinic advice, I joined a Zionist group. By 1950 I was packing machine-gun parts for Israel in a home not far from the Young Israel. But what I did as a child does not compare to what my friend and colleague David Gutmann did for love of Zion at that very time on the dangerous open seas.
Reality has become somewhat Scandinavian. It grows dark early and it is bitterly cold here in New York City and over a good portion of our fair land. Our Prince of Peace (The Norwegian Nobel, not the noble variety) is not yet asking whether “to be or not to be.” Perhaps he is not entirely convinced that “that is the question.”
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/when-nations-suffer-from-battered-womans-syndrome/2007/11/14/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online: