Congratulations to all the winners of the JewishPress.com raffle at The Event
When in the spring of 2006 two professors from distinguished institutions, the University of Chicago and the Harvard School of Government, published a paper in the London Review of Books called “The Israel Lobby,” it raised alarm bells about the spread and impact of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories in America.
As part of our agenda at the Anti-Defamation League to combat anti-Semitism and extremism, we are all too familiar with racist and extremist groups who engage in conspiracy theories about Jews. Accusing Jews of controlling America (ZOG = Zionist Occupied Government) is a stock-in-trade for groups like the Ku Klux Klan, Aryan Nations, the National Alliance.
We don’t underestimate the dangers from such groups – remember, it was such influences that produced the terrorism in Oklahoma City. Still, if these theories remain in the domain of the extremists, we can contend with them because the haters have no credibility with the American people and our exposure of their views and intentions brings widespread condemnation of them.
It is quite another matter when conspiracy views about Jews come from the mainstream, from the establishment. Then the challenge is far greater. There is a tendency by the public to give them much more of a hearing and, if the writers are smart in how they go about their work, the whole enterprise can gain legitimacy.
That is essentially what deeply concerned me about with the paper by the two aforementioned professors, John Mearsheimer of Chicago and Stephen Walt of Harvard. When their article appeared, I hoped there would be widespread rejection and condemnation of it and their views.
Despite their respectability, their bias toward Israel and American Jews was transparent. I pointed out at the time that one didn’t even have to be pro-Israel to recognize that their assessment of the Arab-Israeli conflict over the years was completely flawed. For them, Israel is, in effect, to blame for every event in the conflict. Far worse, they saw control by the Israel lobby as the reason why America supports what they consider a wayward country to the detriment of American interests.
Unfortunately, there was little condemnation – and it came mostly from Jewish voices. One that stood out amidst the general silence was that of Ned Walker, longtime State Department Middle East hand and former U.S. Ambassador to Egypt and Israel. He pointed out that he had been involved in the making of U.S. Middle East policy for years and there was nothing in the paper he could recognize in how policy is actually made. This was biting criticism from an insider, but was one of too few critiques.
Instead, I began to hear that Mearsheimer and Walt had made an important contribution to the discussion on U.S. Middle East policy, that they had spoken “truths” that others had not said, and that this would be a welcome addition to curricula on campuses around the country.
At that stage, I concluded that there was a need to provide students, journalists, activists and the general public a more comprehensive and integrated perspective as to the dangers of their thesis and how it fits into some broader challenges to Jewish life in America.
I saw the works of Mearsheimer and Walt, Jimmy Carter, Tony Judt and others surfacing in America, the place of the greatest comfort level for Jews in the history of the Diaspora, at a time when dangerous anti-Semitic conspiracy theories were growing overseas, as was violence against Jews. The last thing we needed, I concluded, was to have the spreading legitimacy of the Mearsheimer-Walt-Carter thesis about U.S. Middle East policy and the Jews be left to responses on op-ed pages and in blogs.
So when I was approached about doing a follow-up to my first book on anti-Semitism, Never Again? The Threat of the New Anti-Semitism, I said that what was truly needed and what I wanted to do was write a serious critique of the American-style conspiracy theorists.
The Deadliest Lies: The Israel Lobby and the Myth of Jewish Control (Palgrave Macmillan), is, I believe, a reasoned, temperate critique of dangerous works that masquerade themselves as legitimate criticism of Israel and American Jews.
Meanwhile, Mearsheimer and Walt expanded their original article into a book of their own, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy. Nothing truly new here. While they have toned down some of their more extreme statements from their article about Jewish lobbying activities and intention – now insisting they never were questioning the right of Jews to lobby for Israel – their efforts to appear more innocuous are for naught.
The old expression “If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and looks like a duck, it’s a duck” applies here. In the end, their conclusion remains the same – Jews are responsible for all the “bad” decisions of American Middle East policy.
The war in Iraq? It was American Jews who got us into it for the sake of Israel. Islamic extremism? It is the Jewish insistence on U.S. support for Israel that has brought us to this point. American public support for Israel? It is Jewish control and stifling of debate on campus, in the media and in Congress that misleads the public into support for Israel.
It is my hope that The Deadliest Lies will give chizuk (strength) not only to our young Jews but to individuals all over this country to make sure these anti-Semitic lies – which have caused so much pain and suffering to the Jewish people through the centuries – will not take root in America.
We will not be intimidated and paralyzed by Mearsheimer, Walt or Carter. We will continue to speak out for Israel because it is in the right, because it seeks peace and because America and Israel are on the front lines in the great globe fight against Islamic extremism and terrorism.
About the Author:
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Comments are closed.
Wye would be seen to have set the groundwork for the creation of a Palestinian state
Blaming Israel for the violence in Gaza, he ends up justifying Hamas’s terrorism.
In the Thirties it was common for anti-Semites to call on Jews to “go to Palestine!”
“This arbitrary ban is an ugly stain on our democracy, and it also undermines the rule of law.”
We take US “aid” for psychological reasons-if we have an allowance, that means we have a father.
ZIM Piraeus isn’t Israeli-owned or flagged, incidentally, it is Greek operated.
Foolish me, thinking the goals were the destruction of Hamas thereby giving peace a real chance.
The free-spirted lifestyle didn’t hold your interest; the needs of your people did.
And why would the U.S. align itself on these issues with Turkey and Qatar, longtime advocates of Hamas’s interests?
Several years ago the city concluded that the metzitzah b’peh procedure created unacceptable risks for newborns in terms of the transmission of neo-natal herpes through contact with a mohel carrying the herpes virus.
The world wars caused unimaginable anguish for the Jews but God also scripted a great glory for our people.
We were quite disappointed with many of the points the secretary-general offered in response.
Judging by history, every time Hamas rebuilds their infrastructure, they are stronger than before.
I first met Mandela in Geneva in 1990 as part of a delegation of American Jewish leaders.
Worried about a nuclear Iran? Do you think such a development would not only threaten Israel’s existence but would intimidate the Arab countries of the Gulf, put the radical Islamist regime in position to threaten the West, and lead to unmanageable nuclear proliferation? Have no fear! Kenneth N. Waltz, the highly respected professor of international relations at Columbia University, argues in a recent article of Foreign Affairs magazine that “Iran Should Get the Bomb.”
There was a time when no one living in Israel needed a reminder of what was at stake when the Jewish state was created in 1948 in the aftermath of World War II and the Nazi Holocaust.
The threat of the infiltration of Sharia, or Islamic law, into the American court system is one of the more pernicious conspiracy theories to gain traction in our country in recent years.
On the evening of December 11, 1995, businessman Aaron Feuerstein was with family and friends at a restaurant in Boston. It was his seventieth birthday, and a group of well-wishers had gathered to throw him a surprise party.
So there it was, “perfect proof” of what John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt were saying about the Israeli lobby: the pressure mounted and Charles Freeman, the designated chairman of the National Intelligence Council, decided to withdraw his name from consideration.
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/why-i-wrote-the-deadliest-lies/2007/10/02/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online: