Congratulations to all the winners of the JewishPress.com raffle at The Event
Many people who are informed about what’s actually happening in the Middle East constantly wonder why Israel fares so badly in the information wars. The following example gives us a pretty good idea why.
Jawaher Abu Rahmah, a Palestinian “activist,” died on January 1. Palestinian spokesmouth Saeb Erekat, who once was the right fork of Yasir Arafat’s tongue, claimed she died during a demonstration in the Palestinian town of Bil’in, killed by “poison” contained in tear gas fired at the demonstration by Israeli soldiers after it deteriorated into what could best be termed a riot.
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas called Abu Rahmah’s death a “new Israeli crime carried out by the occupation army against our helpless nation.” She was given a martyr’s funeral, with crowds of mourners, as a victim an Israeli “war crime.”
The story was almost instantaneously reported around the world as fact, with Time’s resident Israel basher Tony Karon getting off a piece celebrating it as the occasion of an alliance between Palestinian activists and Israeli leftists.
The real story? According to the IDF, there’s no evidence Abu Rahmah was even at the Bil’in demonstration, nor does she show up on any of the videos. There’s no evidence she died from inhaling tear gas (if it was in fact poisonous, why weren’t there other deaths?) and the death certificate shows the cause of death as “inhaling gas of an Israeli soldier according to the family.”
That’s an indication that no doctor actually examined Abu Rahmah but that the death certificate was simply filled out by a nurse or orderly. And the accounts of her actual state of health are contradictory.
Was Abu Rahmah the victim of an honor killing exploited by the PA? It certainly wouldn’t be the first Pallywood production we’ve seen.
And really, none of the facts matter at this point.
Run with me for a second. Let’s say evidence surfaces that Abu Rahmah was never at the demo, and that this was an honor killing rather than death by tear gas. What changes?
By the time the truth comes out, the Palestinian propaganda machine and its allies have already publicized their version, it’s gone around the world and the media have already moved on to the next story. The Muslim world will certainly never hear the truth, and Israel’s enemies in the West will simply take the Palestinian version as factual.
And that’s the core of the problem.
Jews culturally are geared toward parsing facts and evidence, which is one reason so many of them are attracted to the legal profession. Anyone studying the Talmud essentially receives a legal education in miniature.
But what happens when you’re up against people who care nothing for facts and everything about impact and propaganda? What happens when you fight an information war against people who care nothing for the truth and merely want to consume your flesh?
In today’s media climate, you’re left foundering, trying to decipher the facts while the other side has already made its impact.
This is the sort of thing that happens when you play defense instead of offense -the other side controls the game and you’re limited to reacting.
That’s why Israel has been losing the information war.
Israel would be far better off going on offense by publicizing the Palestinian Authority’s inherent corruption, its official endorsements of terrorism against Israeli civilians, and its refusal to make a single concession in any negotiations.
Instead of constantly reacting to the “Palestinian narrative” with frantic attempts to dredge up facts, Israel would be far better off simply calling out people like Erekat and Abbas for lying, challenging them to prove their vicious allegations, and reminding the world of all the other fairy tales the Palestinians have spun over the years.
Rob Miller blogs at JoshuaPundit (www.joshuapundit.blogspot.com).
About the Author: Rob Miller blogs at JoshuaPundit (www.Joshuapundit.blogspot.com).
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Comments are closed.
Wye would be seen to have set the groundwork for the creation of a Palestinian state
Blaming Israel for the violence in Gaza, he ends up justifying Hamas’s terrorism.
In the Thirties it was common for anti-Semites to call on Jews to “go to Palestine!”
“This arbitrary ban is an ugly stain on our democracy, and it also undermines the rule of law.”
We take US “aid” for psychological reasons-if we have an allowance, that means we have a father.
ZIM Piraeus isn’t Israeli-owned or flagged, incidentally, it is Greek operated.
Foolish me, thinking the goals were the destruction of Hamas thereby giving peace a real chance.
The free-spirted lifestyle didn’t hold your interest; the needs of your people did.
And why would the U.S. align itself on these issues with Turkey and Qatar, longtime advocates of Hamas’s interests?
Several years ago the city concluded that the metzitzah b’peh procedure created unacceptable risks for newborns in terms of the transmission of neo-natal herpes through contact with a mohel carrying the herpes virus.
The world wars caused unimaginable anguish for the Jews but God also scripted a great glory for our people.
We were quite disappointed with many of the points the secretary-general offered in response.
Judging by history, every time Hamas rebuilds their infrastructure, they are stronger than before.
Dear Mr. Brisbane,
Your newspaper recently published an op-ed written by Mahmoud Abbas, the unelected president of the Palestinian Authority.
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/why-israel-is-losing-the-information-war/2011/04/13/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online: