web analytics
April 19, 2015 / 30 Nisan, 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Backfired Lesson

Business-Halacha-logo

Yisrael, Shlomi, and some other teenage friends swam regularly at the local pool, which had special men’s hours. They all brought locks with them to secure the lockers, except Shlomi. He would simply put his clothes in the locker, with the wallet in his pants pocket, and shut the locker door.

“Really, Shlomi, you shouldn’t leave your wallet unlocked,” Yisrael reproached him. “You know there have been thefts before.”

“I’m not worried about that,” replied Shlomi. “It’s not likely. Anyway, if someone really wants to steal, he’ll do so whether there’s a lock or not.”

Finally, Yisrael decided he was going to teach Shlomi a lesson. He called over two other friends. “When swim is over, keep Shlomi occupied for a few minutes,” he said to them. “I’m going to take his wallet; I’ll return it to him tomorrow in school. Hopefully, he’ll learn his lesson.”

When swim was over, Yisrael headed promptly for the locker room and removed the wallet from Shlomi’s pants. By the time Shlomi returned to the locker room, Yisrael was already heading home.

When Shlomi checked his pocket and saw his wallet missing, he turned white. “I don’t believe it,” he said. “Someone actually stole my wallet.”

“We’ve been telling you for weeks that this could happen,” said the other friends.

When Yisrael got home, he put the wallet securely in his desk. “I wonder what Shlomi will say tomorrow,” he thought.

During the night Shlomi was awakened by the buzz of the fire alarm. He woke abruptly and smelled smoke. He cried out “fire!” to awaken the rest of his family and ran outside.

The fire department arrived within ten minutes, but Yisrael’s desk, with Shlomi’s wallet inside, was burned.

The following morning Yisrael met Shlomi in school. “Guess what happened yesterday at the pool,” Shlomi said. “Someone stole my wallet!”

“And we had a fire in our house last night,” said Yisrael. “Actually, I took your wallet yesterday, and it got burned.”

“So you’re the thief,” said Shlomi.

“I didn’t ‘steal’ it,” protested Yisrael. “I did it for your good, to teach you a lesson.”

“Nonetheless, you had no right to touch my wallet,” argued Shlomi. “You’re responsible for it.”

“I put away the wallet safely,” said Yisrael. “The fire was an oness, an uncontrolled circumstance.”

“What’s the difference,” argued Shlomi. “You’re a thief and responsible even for oness!”

“I don’t think I qualify as a ‘thief,’ though,” insisted Yisrael. “I never took it for myself.”

“To me it’s all the same; you had no right to touch my wallet,” responded Shlomi. “Ask Rabbbi Dayan, but I have no doubt!”

The two of them went to Rabbi Dayan. “Was I allowed to take Shlomi’s wallet in order to teach him to be more careful?” asked Yisrael. “Am I liable for it?”

“You were wrong to take the wallet; it’s a form of stealing,” answered Rabbi Dayan. “However, since the wallet was destroyed through uncontrollable circumstances, you are not liable to pay for it.”

“Really?!” exclaimed Shlomi. “Can you please explain?”

“The Gemara [B.M. 61b] extends the prohibition, ‘Do not steal,’ also to one who steals l’meikat,” explained Rabbi Dayan. “Rashi explains this to mean one who wants to cause his fellow temporary anguish. However, a number of Rishonim explain this to mean in order to teach the owner a lesson, such as if he is not careful with his property. Thus, you were not allowed to take Shlomi’s wallet even though you are trying to teach him a lesson.” (Rabbeinu Yona, Shaarei Teshuvah 3:85; She’eltos, Noach #4)

“Is this really the same as actual stealing?” asked Yisrael.

“The extent of this prohibition is the subject of a dispute among the authorities,” replied Rabbi Dayan. “Many understand that stealing to teach a lesson is prohibited from the Torah, whereas some understand the Rambam’s position that the prohibition is rabbinic, ‘so that one should not accustom himself to stealing.'” (Hil. Geneivah 1:2)

“Then why is Yisrael not liable for the wallet?” asked Shlomi.

“Ketzos [348:1] questions whether there is full liability of a thief in such a case,” answered Rabbi Dayan. “He brings proof that one is not liable for oness since he did not take it with intention of keeping the wallet or of benefitting from it. Although some argue, Aruch Hashulchan [348:4] also rules this way, but he does maintain that you would be liable if the wallet was lost or stolen from you.” See, however Chazon Ish B.K. 20:5 nir’eh.)

“But every thief could exempt himself in this manner,” objected Yisrael. “He’ll say he did it with good intentions.”

“You are only exempt in such a case if you announced your intention ahead of time to two witnesses before taking the item,” concluded Rabbi Dayan. “Otherwise, you are presumed to have stolen for your benefit and not believed.” (Yad Hamelech, Geneivah 1:2)

About the Author: Rabbi Meir Orlian is a faculty member of the Business Halacha Institute, headed by HaRav Chaim Kohn, a noted dayan. To receive BHI’s free newsletter, Business Weekly, send an e-mail to subscribe@businesshalacha.com. For questions regarding business halacha issues, or to bring a BHI lecturer to your business or shul, call the confidential hotline at 877-845-8455 or e-mail ask@businesshalacha.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Backfired Lesson”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
ISIS affiliates murdering Christian Africans in Libya
African Christians Slaughtered by ISIS-Affiliates
Latest Judaism Stories
Hertzberg-041715

Lincoln was not a perfect man. But he rose above his imperfections to do what he thought was right not matter the obstacles.

Arch of Titus

Adon Olam: An Erev Shabbat Musical Interlude Courtesy of David Herman

Daf-Yomi-logo

Oh My, It’s Copper!
‘…And One Who Is A Coppersmith’
(Kethubboth 77a)

Grunfeld-Raphael-logo

The omer sacrifice of loose barley flour was more fitting for animal consumption than human consumption and symbolizes the depths to which the Jewish slaves had sunk.

Question: If Abraham was commanded to circumcise his descendants on the eighth day, why do Arabs – who claim to descend from Abraham through Yishmael – wait until their children are 13 to circumcise them? I am aware that this is a matter of little consequence to our people. Nevertheless, this inconsistency is one that piques my curiosity.

M. Goldman
(Via E-mail)

When Chazal call not eating treif food a chok, that refers to how it functions.

His mother called “Yoni, Yoni!” Her eyes, a moment earlier dark with pain, shone with joy and hope

Kashrut reminds us that in the end, God is the arbiter of right and wrong.

In a cab with Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach & Rav Elayshiv discussing if/when to say tefillas haderech

The successful student listens more than speaks out; wants his ideas critiqued, not just appreciated

Why would it not be sufficient to simply state lehoros from which we derive that in such a state one may not issue any psak?

What do we learn about overcoming loss from the argument between Moses and Aaron’s remaining 2 sons?

Each of the unique roles attributed to Moshe share the common theme that they require of and grant higher sanctity to the individual filling the role.

Because of the way the piece of my finger had been severed, the doctors at the hospital were not able to reattach it. They told me I’d have to see a specialist.

“The problem is that the sum total is listed is $17,000. However, when you add the sums mentioned, it is clear that the total of $17,000 is an error. Thus, Mr. Broyer owes me $18,000, not $17,000.”

More Articles from Rabbi Meir Orlian
Business-Halacha-logo

“The problem is that the sum total is listed is $17,000. However, when you add the sums mentioned, it is clear that the total of $17,000 is an error. Thus, Mr. Broyer owes me $18,000, not $17,000.”

Business-Halacha-logo

“The guiding principle regarding work terms is: hakol keminhag hamidina – everything in accordance with the common practice,” replied Rabbi Dayan.

“No, I can’t take more than $65,” protested Mrs. Fleisher. “You may not owe me more than that.”

“If I notify people, nobody will buy the matzos!” exclaimed Mr. Mandel. “Once the halachic advisory panel ruled leniently, why can’t I sell the matzos regularly?”

“Do we have to donate again?” some people asked. “Is it fair that we should have to pay twice?”

“This sounds like a question for Rabbi Dayan,” said Mr. Cohen. He took out his cell phone and called Rabbi Dayan.

“We really appreciate your efforts in straightening the shul,” said Mr. Reiss. “How is it going?”

“Halacha differentiates between giving a gift, forgoing a debt [mechila], and granting permission to take something,” answered Rabbi Dayan.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/halacha-hashkafa/backfired-lesson/2013/10/10/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: