web analytics
January 26, 2015 / 6 Shevat, 5775
 
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Backfired Lesson

Business-Halacha-logo

Yisrael, Shlomi, and some other teenage friends swam regularly at the local pool, which had special men’s hours. They all brought locks with them to secure the lockers, except Shlomi. He would simply put his clothes in the locker, with the wallet in his pants pocket, and shut the locker door.

“Really, Shlomi, you shouldn’t leave your wallet unlocked,” Yisrael reproached him. “You know there have been thefts before.”

“I’m not worried about that,” replied Shlomi. “It’s not likely. Anyway, if someone really wants to steal, he’ll do so whether there’s a lock or not.”

Finally, Yisrael decided he was going to teach Shlomi a lesson. He called over two other friends. “When swim is over, keep Shlomi occupied for a few minutes,” he said to them. “I’m going to take his wallet; I’ll return it to him tomorrow in school. Hopefully, he’ll learn his lesson.”

When swim was over, Yisrael headed promptly for the locker room and removed the wallet from Shlomi’s pants. By the time Shlomi returned to the locker room, Yisrael was already heading home.

When Shlomi checked his pocket and saw his wallet missing, he turned white. “I don’t believe it,” he said. “Someone actually stole my wallet.”

“We’ve been telling you for weeks that this could happen,” said the other friends.

When Yisrael got home, he put the wallet securely in his desk. “I wonder what Shlomi will say tomorrow,” he thought.

During the night Shlomi was awakened by the buzz of the fire alarm. He woke abruptly and smelled smoke. He cried out “fire!” to awaken the rest of his family and ran outside.

The fire department arrived within ten minutes, but Yisrael’s desk, with Shlomi’s wallet inside, was burned.

The following morning Yisrael met Shlomi in school. “Guess what happened yesterday at the pool,” Shlomi said. “Someone stole my wallet!”

“And we had a fire in our house last night,” said Yisrael. “Actually, I took your wallet yesterday, and it got burned.”

“So you’re the thief,” said Shlomi.

“I didn’t ‘steal’ it,” protested Yisrael. “I did it for your good, to teach you a lesson.”

“Nonetheless, you had no right to touch my wallet,” argued Shlomi. “You’re responsible for it.”

“I put away the wallet safely,” said Yisrael. “The fire was an oness, an uncontrolled circumstance.”

“What’s the difference,” argued Shlomi. “You’re a thief and responsible even for oness!”

“I don’t think I qualify as a ‘thief,’ though,” insisted Yisrael. “I never took it for myself.”

“To me it’s all the same; you had no right to touch my wallet,” responded Shlomi. “Ask Rabbbi Dayan, but I have no doubt!”

The two of them went to Rabbi Dayan. “Was I allowed to take Shlomi’s wallet in order to teach him to be more careful?” asked Yisrael. “Am I liable for it?”

“You were wrong to take the wallet; it’s a form of stealing,” answered Rabbi Dayan. “However, since the wallet was destroyed through uncontrollable circumstances, you are not liable to pay for it.”

“Really?!” exclaimed Shlomi. “Can you please explain?”

“The Gemara [B.M. 61b] extends the prohibition, ‘Do not steal,’ also to one who steals l’meikat,” explained Rabbi Dayan. “Rashi explains this to mean one who wants to cause his fellow temporary anguish. However, a number of Rishonim explain this to mean in order to teach the owner a lesson, such as if he is not careful with his property. Thus, you were not allowed to take Shlomi’s wallet even though you are trying to teach him a lesson.” (Rabbeinu Yona, Shaarei Teshuvah 3:85; She’eltos, Noach #4)

“Is this really the same as actual stealing?” asked Yisrael.

“The extent of this prohibition is the subject of a dispute among the authorities,” replied Rabbi Dayan. “Many understand that stealing to teach a lesson is prohibited from the Torah, whereas some understand the Rambam’s position that the prohibition is rabbinic, ‘so that one should not accustom himself to stealing.’” (Hil. Geneivah 1:2)

“Then why is Yisrael not liable for the wallet?” asked Shlomi.

“Ketzos [348:1] questions whether there is full liability of a thief in such a case,” answered Rabbi Dayan. “He brings proof that one is not liable for oness since he did not take it with intention of keeping the wallet or of benefitting from it. Although some argue, Aruch Hashulchan [348:4] also rules this way, but he does maintain that you would be liable if the wallet was lost or stolen from you.” See, however Chazon Ish B.K. 20:5 nir’eh.)

“But every thief could exempt himself in this manner,” objected Yisrael. “He’ll say he did it with good intentions.”

“You are only exempt in such a case if you announced your intention ahead of time to two witnesses before taking the item,” concluded Rabbi Dayan. “Otherwise, you are presumed to have stolen for your benefit and not believed.” (Yad Hamelech, Geneivah 1:2)

About the Author: Rabbi Meir Orlian is a faculty member of the Business Halacha Institute, headed by HaRav Chaim Kohn, a noted dayan. To receive BHI’s free newsletter, Business Weekly, send an e-mail to subscribe@businesshalacha.com. For questions regarding business halacha issues, or to bring a BHI lecturer to your business or shul, call the confidential hotline at 877-845-8455 or e-mail ask@businesshalacha.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Backfired Lesson”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Hassnain Aliamin , one of four Muslim teenagers who attacked a Jew in Gateshead.
‘Let’s Go Jew-Bashing’ Muslims Hauled into British Court
Latest Judaism Stories
Tissot_The_Waters_Are_Divided

Leading by example must be visible, regarding where, when and how-like Nachshon entering the Red Sea

Torah-Hakehillah-121914

Rabbi Yaakov Nagen, a Ram at Yeshivat Otniel, notes that the verse is suggesting that retelling the story of the Exodus is so important that Hashem is performing ever-greater miracles specifically so that parents can tell their stories to future generations.

Parshat Bo

Before performing the 10th plague God makes a fundamental argument about the ultimate nature of justice.

Daf-Yomi-logo

Life Before The Printed Word
‘A Revi’is Of Blood’
(Yevamos 114a-b)

How is it possible that the clothing was more valuable to them than gold or silver?

Question: If Abraham was commanded to circumcise his descendants on the eighth day, why do Arabs – who claim to descend from Abraham through Yishmael – wait until their children are 13 to circumcise them? I am aware that this is a matter of little consequence to our people. Nevertheless, this inconsistency is one that piques my curiosity.

M. Goldman
(Via E-mail)

“It means that the disqualification of relatives as witnesses is a procedural issue, not a question of honesty,” explained Rabbi Dayan.

Property ownership is an extremely important and fundamental right and principle according to the Torah.

The tenderest description of the husband/wife relationship is “re’im v’ahuvim/loving, kind friends”

And if a person can take steps to perform the mitzvah, he should do so (even if he won’t be held accountable for not performing it due to circumstances beyond his control).

Suddenly, she turns to me and says, “B’emet, I need to thank you, you made me excited to come back to Israel.”

Pesach is called “zikaron,” a Biblical term used describing an object eliciting a certain memory

Recouping $ and assets from Germans and Swiss for their Holocaust actions is rooted in the Exodus

Pharaoh perverted symbols of life (the Nile and midwives) into agents of death.

I think that we have to follow the approach of the Tannaim and Amoraim. They followed the latest scientific developments of their time.

More Articles from Rabbi Meir Orlian
Business-Halacha-logo

“It means that the disqualification of relatives as witnesses is a procedural issue, not a question of honesty,” explained Rabbi Dayan.

Business-Halacha-logo

“The issue is not just logistical,” replied Mr. Kahn. “I thought that halacha requires that the beginning of the adjudication and acceptance of testimony be during daytime.” (C.M. 5:2; 28:24)

A few days, Mrs. Feldman called back. “I would prefer a nice cake rather than the chocolate.”

He sent out a memo to the tenants: “In light of the recent burglaries, we’ve decided to implement additional security measures, including hiring a doorman for the weekends.”

“I’m still not sure we have a right to damage his property,” said Mrs. Schloss. “Can you ask someone?”

He stepped outside, and, to his dismay, the menorah was missing. It had been stolen.

“I do not owe anything,” Mr. Feder replied. “However, if I must come – I will.”

Mr. Weiss refused to listen and sued Mr. Cohen in civil court.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/halacha-hashkafa/backfired-lesson/2013/10/10/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: