web analytics
May 30, 2015 / 12 Sivan, 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Borrowed Car

Business-Halacha-logo

“Boruch’s vort [engagement celebration] is tonight,” Chaim said to his friend, Yoni. “How are you getting there?”

“I’m not sure,” said Yoni. “I’m looking for a ride with someone. Any chance you’re driving?”

“I wasn’t planning on it,” said Chaim. “I prefer not to take my parents’ car. Let me know if you hear of something.”

Toward evening, Yoni approached Chaim. “There are four other people trying to arrange a ride,” he said, “but no one has a car available. Any chance of borrowing your parents’ car?”

“I’ll check with them,” said Chaim.

Chaim called his father. “Five of us want to go to Boruch’s vort,” he said, “but we need a car. Could we go in your car?”

“Who will be driving?” asked Chaim’s father.

“I’ll drive there,” said Chaim, “but I expect to be tired on the way back. Someone else will probably drive.”

“Do you know the other fellows?” asked Chaim’s father. “Have you seen them drive?”

“Yes, I’ve gone places with them,” Chaim answered. “All four are responsible drivers.”

“I guess you can have the car,” said his father. “Please drive carefully, though.”

Chaim called Yoni back. “My father gave the OK,” he said. “Meet me at 7:30 p.m.”

When they arrived at the vort, Chaim parked the car on one of the side streets. He locked the car and checked the doors to make sure they were closed.

When they returned to the car after the vort, they saw that it had been broken into. The brand new disc-player had been stolen.

“I can’t believe it!” exclaimed Chaim. “My father just had it installed. It cost him $200.”

An argument broke out among the group about whether the boys were responsible. “We locked the doors,” said Benny. “What more could we do?”

“That still doesn’t mean we’re not responsible,” said Chaim. “A borrower is liable for theft even if he was not negligent.” (C.M. 340:1)

“I don’t mean to be rude, but you chose to park here,” said Reuven. “You could have parked in the lot, or on a main street. It’s less likely it would have been stolen from there. So, if anything, you’re liable.”

“This street is also not deserted,” replied Chaim. “There was nothing wrong with parking here, and we all borrowed the car.”

“I’m not sure of that,” argued Reuven. “You borrowed the car from your father. We just came along for the ride. Anyway, you drove here so you carry responsibility.”

“But I borrowed the car on behalf of everyone,” protested Chaim. “So you should all share the damage.”

“I think Rabbi Dayan hasn’t left the vort yet,” said Yoni. “We can ask him!”

The five of them returned inside. Chaim related the whole story. “Who is liable for the disc-player?” he asked. “Me or the whole group?”

“This is a bit of a judgment call, whether you accepted personal responsibility for the car, or you were the representative of the group to borrow it on their behalf,” answered Rabbi Dayan. “This could depend on whether you said ‘Could I borrow?’ or ‘Could we borrow?’ It could also depend on whether you were going to be the sole driver, or whether the driving would be shared among the group. In the usual case – that the one who takes the car is also the sole driver – it would seem he alone is the borrower. However, in this case the group was trying to organize a ride and you were going to share the driving, so it seems you are all borrowers.”

“If we are all considered borrowers, then what?” asked Chaim.

“Two people who borrowed together are jointly responsible and mutual guarantors for each other,” answered Rabbi Dayan. “Therefore, each of you should pay an equal share in the loss. If one is unable to pay his share, the others remain liable as guarantors for that amount. They are entitled to collect reimbursement from him later, when he is able to pay.” (C.M. 77:1; Machane Ephraim, Shomrim #27)

“What if one person was negligent?” asked Chaim. “For example, if I had forgotten to lock the doors?”

“Then you would be liable for the full amount,” said Rabbi Dayan. “If you were unable to pay, the other borrowers would still remain liable as guarantors but would be entitled to reimbursement from the negligent party when you are able to pay. (See Shach 77:1; Nesivos 77:1; Pischei Choshen, Pikadon 1:16 33)

About the Author: Rabbi Meir Orlian is a faculty member of the Business Halacha Institute, headed by HaRav Chaim Kohn, a noted dayan. To receive BHI’s free newsletter, Business Weekly, send an e-mail to subscribe@businesshalacha.com. For questions regarding business halacha issues, or to bring a BHI lecturer to your business or shul, call the confidential hotline at 877-845-8455 or e-mail ask@businesshalacha.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Borrowed Car”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz.
Ted Cruz Calls for Financial Boycott of Universities Backing BDS Israel
Latest Judaism Stories
Rebbetzin Esther Jungreis

Simple source of Jewish power: Hashem. “Simple” because we need only recognize it and it will appear

Torat-Hakehillah-logo-NEW

What if someone would come to you and offer you everything that is desirable in this world, but with one condition: you have to give up your essence.

Rabbi Avi Weiss

Torah learning is valueless unless it enhances personal morality, fostering closer connection to God

Grunfeld-Raphael-logo

Why did so many of our great sages from the Rambam to Rabbi Moshe Feinstein live outside Israel?

Casting A Doubt
‘Shall We Say [They] Are Not Valid?’
(Nedarim 5a-7a)

I was about six years old at the time and recall that very special occasion so well.

Question: Should we wash our hands in the bathroom with soap and water, or by pouring water from a vessel with handles three times, alternating hands? I have heard it said that a vessel is used only in the morning upon awakening. What are the rules pertaining to young children? What is the protocol if no vessel is available? Additionally, may we dry our hands via an electric dryer?

Harry Koenigsberg
(Via E-Mail)

Why was Samson singled out as the only Shofet required to be a nazir from cradle to grave?

“What do you mean?” asked the secretary. “We already issued a ruling and closed the case.”

Tosafos suggests several answers as to how a minor can own an item, m’d’Oraisa.

This week’s video discusses the important connection between the Priestly Blessing and parenting.

Many of us simply don’t get the need for the Torah to list the exact same gift offering, 12 times!

There is a great debate as to whether this story actually took place or is simply a metaphor, a prophetic vision shown to Hoshea by Hashem.

Every person is presented with moments when he/she must make difficult decisions about how to proceed.

One does not necessarily share the opinions of one’s brother. One may disapprove of his actions, values, and/or beliefs. However, with brothers there is a bond of love and caring that transcends all differences.

More Articles from Rabbi Meir Orlian
Business-Halacha-NEW

“What do you mean?” asked the secretary. “We already issued a ruling and closed the case.”

Business-Halacha-NEW

“A person who borrowed without a written loan document, even in the presence of witnesses, is believed with a heses – rabbinic – oath to say that he repaid,”

During the course of the year, though, political events in the Persian Gulf caused the cost of gasoline to rise. Prices climbed from $2.50 a gallon to $4.00.

“There is a diamond necklace that I wear on special occasions,” Mrs. Miller told her husband. “It was recently appraised at $6,000. If need be, we can give that as collateral.”

“I accept the ruling,” said Mr. Broyer, “but would like to understand the reasoning.”

“The problem is that the sum total is listed is $17,000. However, when you add the sums mentioned, it is clear that the total of $17,000 is an error. Thus, Mr. Broyer owes me $18,000, not $17,000.”

“The guiding principle regarding work terms is: hakol keminhag hamidina – everything in accordance with the common practice,” replied Rabbi Dayan.

“No, I can’t take more than $65,” protested Mrs. Fleisher. “You may not owe me more than that.”

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/halacha-hashkafa/borrowed-car/2014/01/02/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: