web analytics
April 19, 2015 / 30 Nisan, 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Cleaners Confusion

Business-Halacha-logo

Yaakov had spent Shabbos at his yeshiva for a few weeks running. “Don’t forget to bring your suit in to the cleaners,” said his mother, before he returned home. “It’s been a while since it was cleaned.”

During the lunch break, Yaakov went to the closet and took out the Shabbos suit. He brought it to the cleaners, and asked, “Can you have it ready by tomorrow?”

“We can have it ready by 11 a.m.,” the store manager replied.

“Fine,” said Yaakov. “How much does it cost?”

“A suit costs $13,” answered the manager. He entered Yaakov’s name and telephone number in the computer and gave him the receipt.

In the evening, Yaakov’s roommate, Elisha, asked him: “Did you see my Shabbos suit? It’s missing from the closet!”

“I took my suit to the cleaners,” replied Yaakov, “but yours should be there.”

“Come take a look,” said Elisha. “Maybe you took mine by mistake?”

Yaakov looked at the suit hanging in the closet. Sure enough, it was his suit. “You’re right!” he exclaimed. “I was rushing and the two suits look very similar.”

Yaakov took out the ticket and gave it to Elisha. “Look at the bright side,” he said. “I saved you the effort of bringing your suit in. They said it would be ready by 11:00 tomorrow and it costs $13.”

Elisha looked at the ticket skeptically. “You should pay the bill,” he said.

“But they cleaned your suit,” replied Yaakov. “Why should I pay? You got the benefit from this work, not me.”

“I didn’t ask them to do the work, though,” said Elisha. “I wasn’t planning on bringing my suit to the cleaners.”

“It was dirty, though,” said Yaakov. “You’ve worn it for the past month. Do you remember I pointed out a few stains on the jacket last week, which you tried to spot-wash?”

“Still, I wasn’t planning on taking it in yet,” said Elisha. “I was going to wait another two weeks. Anyway, I’m extremely low on cash, and don’t have the $13. I must have the suit back for Shabbos, though.”

“No problem, I can loan you the money,” said Yaakov. “You’ll pay me back when you can.”

“I’m not interested in borrowing,” said Elisha. “You brought the suit in; you have the responsibility to pay!”

“But it was a mistake, a mekach taus,” argued Yaakov, “I didn’t realize it was your suit.”

“Rabbi Dayan is still downstairs in the beis midrash,” said Elisha. “We can ask him.”

The two went downstairs. “If I mistakenly brought Elisha’s suit, partially dirty, to the cleaners – who has to pay?” asked Yaakov.

“The Gemara [B.M. 118a] addresses the case of a person who hired a laborer for himself, but instructed him to work in his friend’s property instead,” replied Rabbi Dayan. “The one who hired the laborer has to pay him the full salary, since he accepted responsibility for the employment. However, he can then claim reimbursement from his friend for the benefit that he provided him.” (C.M. 336:1)

“What does ‘the benefit’ mean?” asked Elisha.

“If his friend needed the work to be done anyway, it means the cost of the job,” answered Rabbi Dayan. “However, if there is a range of costs among laborers, he would only have to pay the lower end of the range, unless the job was clearly of superior quality. Thus, if there are other local cleaners who charge only $10 and do comparable work, you would only have to reimburse Yaakov $10.” (See C.M. 332:1)

“What if I wasn’t planning on cleaning the suit?” asked Elisha. “The work didn’t need to be done yet.”

“A suit needs a cleaning every so often, especially if there were already some stains,” replied Rabbi Dayan. “We would have to estimate the relative benefit of having the suit cleaned already now. Even if the suit had no stains, there is still a benefit in having a freshly cleaned and pressed suit, but that would be a much smaller sum.” (See C.M. 375:1-3)

“Why isn’t this considered a mekach ta’us, though?” asked Yaakov. “The employment agreement was a mistake!”

Mekach taus is when there was some mistake in the nature of the work – e.g., the customer asked for pressing and the store did cleaning – or in the price agreement. Here the nature of the work and price were clear, so the customer is responsible to pay the cleaners even if he gained nothing from the work.” (See C.M. 335:3)

“What if, from the very beginning, the person told the laborer to work in the friend’s property?” asked Yaakov. “For example, if someone told me to shovel the snow for his neighbor, who is responsible to pay?”

“That is a fascinating question,” replied Rabbi Dayan, “but let’s leave it for next time.”

About the Author: Rabbi Meir Orlian is a faculty member of the Business Halacha Institute, headed by HaRav Chaim Kohn, a noted dayan. To receive BHI’s free newsletter, Business Weekly, send an e-mail to subscribe@businesshalacha.com. For questions regarding business halacha issues, or to bring a BHI lecturer to your business or shul, call the confidential hotline at 877-845-8455 or e-mail ask@businesshalacha.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Cleaners Confusion”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
ISIS affiliates murdering Christian Africans in Libya
African Christians Slaughtered by ISIS-Affiliates
Latest Judaism Stories
Hertzberg-041715

Lincoln was not a perfect man. But he rose above his imperfections to do what he thought was right not matter the obstacles.

Arch of Titus

Adon Olam: An Erev Shabbat Musical Interlude Courtesy of David Herman

Daf-Yomi-logo

Oh My, It’s Copper!
‘…And One Who Is A Coppersmith’
(Kethubboth 77a)

Grunfeld-Raphael-logo

The omer sacrifice of loose barley flour was more fitting for animal consumption than human consumption and symbolizes the depths to which the Jewish slaves had sunk.

Question: If Abraham was commanded to circumcise his descendants on the eighth day, why do Arabs – who claim to descend from Abraham through Yishmael – wait until their children are 13 to circumcise them? I am aware that this is a matter of little consequence to our people. Nevertheless, this inconsistency is one that piques my curiosity.

M. Goldman
(Via E-mail)

When Chazal call not eating treif food a chok, that refers to how it functions.

His mother called “Yoni, Yoni!” Her eyes, a moment earlier dark with pain, shone with joy and hope

Kashrut reminds us that in the end, God is the arbiter of right and wrong.

In a cab with Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach & Rav Elayshiv discussing if/when to say tefillas haderech

The successful student listens more than speaks out; wants his ideas critiqued, not just appreciated

Why would it not be sufficient to simply state lehoros from which we derive that in such a state one may not issue any psak?

What do we learn about overcoming loss from the argument between Moses and Aaron’s remaining 2 sons?

Each of the unique roles attributed to Moshe share the common theme that they require of and grant higher sanctity to the individual filling the role.

Because of the way the piece of my finger had been severed, the doctors at the hospital were not able to reattach it. They told me I’d have to see a specialist.

“The problem is that the sum total is listed is $17,000. However, when you add the sums mentioned, it is clear that the total of $17,000 is an error. Thus, Mr. Broyer owes me $18,000, not $17,000.”

More Articles from Rabbi Meir Orlian
Business-Halacha-logo

“The problem is that the sum total is listed is $17,000. However, when you add the sums mentioned, it is clear that the total of $17,000 is an error. Thus, Mr. Broyer owes me $18,000, not $17,000.”

Business-Halacha-logo

“The guiding principle regarding work terms is: hakol keminhag hamidina – everything in accordance with the common practice,” replied Rabbi Dayan.

“No, I can’t take more than $65,” protested Mrs. Fleisher. “You may not owe me more than that.”

“If I notify people, nobody will buy the matzos!” exclaimed Mr. Mandel. “Once the halachic advisory panel ruled leniently, why can’t I sell the matzos regularly?”

“Do we have to donate again?” some people asked. “Is it fair that we should have to pay twice?”

“This sounds like a question for Rabbi Dayan,” said Mr. Cohen. He took out his cell phone and called Rabbi Dayan.

“We really appreciate your efforts in straightening the shul,” said Mr. Reiss. “How is it going?”

“Halacha differentiates between giving a gift, forgoing a debt [mechila], and granting permission to take something,” answered Rabbi Dayan.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/halacha-hashkafa/cleaners-confusion/2012/12/19/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: