web analytics
December 27, 2014 / 5 Tevet, 5775
 
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post
8000 meals Celebrate Eight Days of Chanukah – With 8,000 Free Meals Daily to Israel’s Poor

Join Meir Panim’s campaign to “light up” Chanukah for families in need.



Cleaners Confusion

Business-Halacha-logo

Yaakov had spent Shabbos at his yeshiva for a few weeks running. “Don’t forget to bring your suit in to the cleaners,” said his mother, before he returned home. “It’s been a while since it was cleaned.”

During the lunch break, Yaakov went to the closet and took out the Shabbos suit. He brought it to the cleaners, and asked, “Can you have it ready by tomorrow?”

“We can have it ready by 11 a.m.,” the store manager replied.

“Fine,” said Yaakov. “How much does it cost?”

“A suit costs $13,” answered the manager. He entered Yaakov’s name and telephone number in the computer and gave him the receipt.

In the evening, Yaakov’s roommate, Elisha, asked him: “Did you see my Shabbos suit? It’s missing from the closet!”

“I took my suit to the cleaners,” replied Yaakov, “but yours should be there.”

“Come take a look,” said Elisha. “Maybe you took mine by mistake?”

Yaakov looked at the suit hanging in the closet. Sure enough, it was his suit. “You’re right!” he exclaimed. “I was rushing and the two suits look very similar.”

Yaakov took out the ticket and gave it to Elisha. “Look at the bright side,” he said. “I saved you the effort of bringing your suit in. They said it would be ready by 11:00 tomorrow and it costs $13.”

Elisha looked at the ticket skeptically. “You should pay the bill,” he said.

“But they cleaned your suit,” replied Yaakov. “Why should I pay? You got the benefit from this work, not me.”

“I didn’t ask them to do the work, though,” said Elisha. “I wasn’t planning on bringing my suit to the cleaners.”

“It was dirty, though,” said Yaakov. “You’ve worn it for the past month. Do you remember I pointed out a few stains on the jacket last week, which you tried to spot-wash?”

“Still, I wasn’t planning on taking it in yet,” said Elisha. “I was going to wait another two weeks. Anyway, I’m extremely low on cash, and don’t have the $13. I must have the suit back for Shabbos, though.”

“No problem, I can loan you the money,” said Yaakov. “You’ll pay me back when you can.”

“I’m not interested in borrowing,” said Elisha. “You brought the suit in; you have the responsibility to pay!”

“But it was a mistake, a mekach taus,” argued Yaakov, “I didn’t realize it was your suit.”

“Rabbi Dayan is still downstairs in the beis midrash,” said Elisha. “We can ask him.”

The two went downstairs. “If I mistakenly brought Elisha’s suit, partially dirty, to the cleaners – who has to pay?” asked Yaakov.

“The Gemara [B.M. 118a] addresses the case of a person who hired a laborer for himself, but instructed him to work in his friend’s property instead,” replied Rabbi Dayan. “The one who hired the laborer has to pay him the full salary, since he accepted responsibility for the employment. However, he can then claim reimbursement from his friend for the benefit that he provided him.” (C.M. 336:1)

“What does ‘the benefit’ mean?” asked Elisha.

“If his friend needed the work to be done anyway, it means the cost of the job,” answered Rabbi Dayan. “However, if there is a range of costs among laborers, he would only have to pay the lower end of the range, unless the job was clearly of superior quality. Thus, if there are other local cleaners who charge only $10 and do comparable work, you would only have to reimburse Yaakov $10.” (See C.M. 332:1)

“What if I wasn’t planning on cleaning the suit?” asked Elisha. “The work didn’t need to be done yet.”

“A suit needs a cleaning every so often, especially if there were already some stains,” replied Rabbi Dayan. “We would have to estimate the relative benefit of having the suit cleaned already now. Even if the suit had no stains, there is still a benefit in having a freshly cleaned and pressed suit, but that would be a much smaller sum.” (See C.M. 375:1-3)

“Why isn’t this considered a mekach ta’us, though?” asked Yaakov. “The employment agreement was a mistake!”

Mekach taus is when there was some mistake in the nature of the work – e.g., the customer asked for pressing and the store did cleaning – or in the price agreement. Here the nature of the work and price were clear, so the customer is responsible to pay the cleaners even if he gained nothing from the work.” (See C.M. 335:3)

“What if, from the very beginning, the person told the laborer to work in the friend’s property?” asked Yaakov. “For example, if someone told me to shovel the snow for his neighbor, who is responsible to pay?”

“That is a fascinating question,” replied Rabbi Dayan, “but let’s leave it for next time.”

About the Author: Rabbi Meir Orlian is a faculty member of the Business Halacha Institute, headed by HaRav Chaim Kohn, a noted dayan. To receive BHI’s free newsletter, Business Weekly, send an e-mail to subscribe@businesshalacha.com. For questions regarding business halacha issues, or to bring a BHI lecturer to your business or shul, call the confidential hotline at 877-845-8455 or e-mail ask@businesshalacha.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Cleaners Confusion”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Ayala Shapira, 11, is fighting for her life after suffering burn wounds when an Arab terrorist threw a Molotov cocktail at the car in which she was riding.
‘Slight Improvement’ in Life-threatening Condition of Firebomb Victim
Latest Judaism Stories
Torah-Hakehillah-121914

Why is the tzitzis reminder on our clothing? How does it remind us that there are 613 mitzvos?

Grunfeld-Raphael-logo

The court cannot solely rely on death certificates issued by non-Jewish institutions without conducting its own investigation into the facts of the case.

Business-Halacha-logo

“I’m still not sure we have a right to damage his property,” said Mrs. Schloss. “Can you ask someone?”

Rabbi Sacks

Jacob’s blessing of Ephraim over Manasseh had nothing to do with age and everything to do with names

Slavery was universal; So, why was Egypt targeted in this object lesson?

Rav Akiva Eiger is assuming that the logic of the halacha that both the son and his mother are obligated to honor his father and therefore he must honor his fathers wishes first, is a mathematical equation.

The first requirement is a king must admit when he is wrong.

Reward And Punishment
‘Masser Rishon For The levi’im’
(Yevamos 86a)

Question: If Abraham was commanded to circumcise his descendants on the eighth day, why do Arabs – who claim to descend from Abraham through Yishmael – wait until their children are 13 to circumcise them? I am aware that this is a matter of little consequence to our people. Nevertheless, this inconsistency is one that piques my curiosity.

M. Goldman
(Via E-mail)

Reb Shlomo Zalman could not endure honorifics applied to him because of his enormous humility

Because we see these events as world changing, as moments in history, they become part of us forever.

They stammer “I’m not Orthodox,” as if that absolves them from the responsibility of calling to G-d

It’s fascinating how sources attain the status “traditional,” or its equivalent level of kashrus.

She was determined that the Law class was Dina’s best chance of finding a husband, and that was the real reason she wanted her to go to college.

But who would have ever guessed that Hashem would unlock the key to the birth on same day as the English anniversary of our wedding.

More Articles from Rabbi Meir Orlian
Business-Halacha-logo

“I’m still not sure we have a right to damage his property,” said Mrs. Schloss. “Can you ask someone?”

Business-Halacha-logo

He stepped outside, and, to his dismay, the menorah was missing. It had been stolen.

“I do not owe anything,” Mr. Feder replied. “However, if I must come – I will.”

Mr. Weiss refused to listen and sued Mr. Cohen in civil court.

In the afternoon, he reached into his pocket to check for the money, but it was empty. “The $50 bill must have fallen out,” Alex exclaimed. “It’s got to be in one of the rooms I was just at.”

Dovid turned to the other people sitting at his table. “I’m revoking my hefker of the Chumash,” he announced. “I want to keep it.”

“That’s what I thought, so I returned the money to Aharon,” said Reuven. “But this morning, Shimon, who owes me $70, told me he left $70 for me under the table last week! Now I don’t know whether the $70 was connected to the note, and was Aharon’s for the purchase of sefarim, or was repayment to me from Shimon, unrelated to the note.”

On Tuesday, Mr. Ross picked up the bris kit. While driving home, he was stopped by armed thugs. They forced him out of the car and drove off with the bris kit inside.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/halacha-hashkafa/cleaners-confusion/2012/12/19/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: