web analytics
August 28, 2015 / 13 Elul, 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Confused Cell Phone

Business-Halacha-logo

Yossi and Ezra shared an apartment. They had many things in common, which made them good roommates. One thing they shared that sometimes caused problems, though, was identical cell phones.

Yossi was rushing home for Yom Kippur; he had to catch a train. He packed up quickly, stuffed his wallet in his pocket, and headed out. He locked the door and started downstairs.

Before leaving the building, he reached into his pocket to check that he had taken his cell phone. He didn’t find it and realized that he had left it in the apartment. He ran upstairs and grabbed the phone, which was sitting on the table, and headed back down.

On the way to the train, Yossi was confronted by some thugs, armed with knives. “Give us your wallet,” they demanded. Yossi complied.

“Give us your phone also,” they demanded. Yossi gave it to them and they ran off.

Yossi continued on, shaking, to the train. When he got home, he immediately cancelled all his credit cards.

Shortly afterward, he received a phone call from his roommate, Ezra, on the house phone. “You accidentally left your phone in the apartment,” said Ezra. “And I can’t find mine. Did you take it by mistake?”

“You’re kidding!” exclaimed Yossi. “Did I really take your phone?!”

“It seems so,” said Ezra. “Haven’t you tried using the phone since you left?”

“You’ll never believe what happened,” Yossi said. “On the way to the train I got mugged! They took my cell phone; I guess that means yours is gone.”

“Wow! Sorry to hear,” said Ezra. “Are you OK? What else did they take?”

Baruch Hashem I’m OK,” replied Yossi. “Just a bit shaken. They also took my wallet; I had to cancel all the credit cards. Really sorry about your phone.”

“What should I do with your phone?” asked Ezra.

“Use it meanwhile,” said Yossi. “I guess I’ll have to buy you a new one after Yom Tov.”

“It’s not your fault,” said Ezra. “You were mugged.”

“Still, I took your phone without permission, and it’s gone,” said Yossi. “It’s my responsibility, isn’t it?”

“I’m not convinced you’re liable,” said Ezra. “I suggest we raise this with Rabbi Dayan when you return.

After Yom Kippur, Yossi and Ezra met with Rabbi Dayan. “Am I liable for Ezra’s cell phone?” Yossi asked.

“There are a number of factors to consider here,” replied Rabbi Dayan. “A thief is liable for the stolen item, even if subsequently lost through uncontrollable circumstances. Thus, had you knowingly stolen Ezra’s cell phone, you would be liable even if lost later through armed robbery.” (See C.M. 303:3; Nesivos 182:2; Pischei Choshen, Geneivah 4:5[18])

“What difference does it make, then, whether I knowingly stole the phone or by mistake?” asked Yossi. “Either way, I took Ezra’s phone without permission! Doesn’t that make me liable?”

“There is an extensive discussion about this in the achronim,” said Rabbi Dayan, “whether someone who mistakenly stole is considered a thief.”

“I don’t understand,” said Yossi. “Whether someone stole on purpose or by mistake – he has to return the item if it’s not his!”

“Of course; there’s no question about that if the item is intact,” responded Rabbi Dayan. “The question is: Does the person have the liability of a thief when the item cannot be returned, such as in your case?”

“Oh, I understand,” asked Yossi. “So what is the halacha?”

“The Ketzos Hachoshen (25:1) addresses this question explicitly,” explained Rabbi Dayan. “He discusses the case of a judge who mistakenly handed money from the innocent party to the other litigant. He argues that the judge does not carry the liability of a thief if did not intend to steal.”

“But isn’t a person who damages liable whether he did so accidentally or not?” asked Ezra.

“Yes; the Gemara [B.K. 26b] derives from the verse ‘petza tachas petza‘ that even one who injured or damaged unintentionally is liable,” answered Rabbi Dayan. “However, there is no parallel source to impose the absolute liability of a thief on one who stole unintentionally.”

“You mentioned that there was a discussion about this,” noted Ezra. “Do other achronim argue?”

“Other achronim disagree in the case of the judge,” replied Rabbi Dayan. “There, when he mistakenly took the item, he willingly handed it over to another and it cannot be retrieved. They also argue when a person intends to acquire a new item for himself, mistakenly thinking he had permission to do so. However, if the person had no intention of acquiring the item – in other words, he thought it was his already – and it was subsequently lost through uncontrollable circumstances, many exempt him from liability.” (See Nesivos 25:1; Machaneh Efraim, Gezeilah #7)

“Thus,” concluded Rabbi Dayan, “Yossi is not liable for the cell phone.”

About the Author: Rabbi Meir Orlian is a faculty member of the Business Halacha Institute, headed by HaRav Chaim Kohn, a noted dayan. To receive BHI’s free newsletter, Business Weekly, send an e-mail to subscribe@businesshalacha.com. For questions regarding business halacha issues, or to bring a BHI lecturer to your business or shul, call the confidential hotline at 877-845-8455 or e-mail ask@businesshalacha.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Confused Cell Phone”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Swiss Amb. to Iran Giulo Haas presents his credentials to Iranian Pres. Rouhani
‘US and Iranian Cartoon Doves’ Shown Defecating on Bibi by Swiss Amb to Iran
Latest Judaism Stories
Torat-Hakehillah-logo-NEW

The common translation of the opening words of this week’s parsha, Ki Seitzei, is: “When you go out to war against your enemy.” Actually the text reads “al oyvecha” upon your enemy. The Torah is saying that when Israel goes out to war, they will be over and above their enemy. The reason why Bnei […]

Rabbi Avi Weiss

The love between Gd & Israel is deeper than marriage; beyond the infinite love of parent for child

Q-A-Klass-logo

Question: When a stranger approaches a congregant in shul asking for tzedakah, should the congregant verify that the person’s need is genuine? Furthermore, what constitutes tzedakah? Is a donation to a synagogue, yeshiva, or hospital considered tzedakah?

Zvi Kirschner
(Via E-Mail)

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

Since giving the machatzis hashekel will not change his financial situation, he is obligated to do so even though it is more than a fifth of his income.

Today, few people fast during the Days of Selichot, but the custom is to rise early to recite Selichot.

Each month is associated with a particular tribe. The month of Elul is matched up with Gad. What makes Gad unique?

Sanctions and indictment of the Jew, holding him to a higher standard, is as common and misplaced as ever.

To allow for free will, there are times when Hashem will allow a person the “opportunity to be the messenger.”

“There is a mitzvah to pay the worker on that day,” answered Mr. Lerner.

Be happy. Be grateful. God knows what he is doing. It is all happening for a reason.

We get so busy living our lives, handling our day-to-day little crises that we forget to go that one step deeper and appreciate our lives.

The promise for long life only comes from 2 commandments; What’s the connection between them?

Mighty Amalek deliberately attacked enemy’s weakest members, despicable even by ancient standards

If we parents fail to honor responsibilities then society’s children will pay the price for our sins

Consider how our Heavenly Father feels when He sees His children adopting all other parents but Him

More Articles from Rabbi Meir Orlian
Business-Halacha-NEW

“There is a mitzvah to pay the worker on that day,” answered Mr. Lerner.

Business-Halacha-NEW

Mr. Steinberg ran downstairs to the ground floor. He saw that the table had fallen onto one of the cars sitting in the parking lot below.

“I don’t understand, though,” objected Mr. Weiss. “If the Torah states that the loan should be remitted, how can Hillel institute that the creditor can collect, against Torah law?”

“So there’s no way to lend past the shemittah year?” asked Eli.

The director picked up the phone to Rabbi Dayan. “One of our counselors lost his check,” he said. “Do we have to issue a new one or is it his loss?”

The two decided to approach Rabbi Dayan. “What is the halachic status of conquered territory?” asked Shalom.

“Does that mean a person can simply renege after payment was made?” asked Benjy incredulously.

“But I’m already dwelling in the apartment,” said Mr. Gold. “Shouldn’t that count? I’m no worse than a neighbor!”

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/halacha-hashkafa/confused-cell-phone/2013/09/12/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: