web analytics
April 26, 2015 / 7 Iyar, 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Confused Cell Phone

Business-Halacha-logo

Yossi and Ezra shared an apartment. They had many things in common, which made them good roommates. One thing they shared that sometimes caused problems, though, was identical cell phones.

Yossi was rushing home for Yom Kippur; he had to catch a train. He packed up quickly, stuffed his wallet in his pocket, and headed out. He locked the door and started downstairs.

Before leaving the building, he reached into his pocket to check that he had taken his cell phone. He didn’t find it and realized that he had left it in the apartment. He ran upstairs and grabbed the phone, which was sitting on the table, and headed back down.

On the way to the train, Yossi was confronted by some thugs, armed with knives. “Give us your wallet,” they demanded. Yossi complied.

“Give us your phone also,” they demanded. Yossi gave it to them and they ran off.

Yossi continued on, shaking, to the train. When he got home, he immediately cancelled all his credit cards.

Shortly afterward, he received a phone call from his roommate, Ezra, on the house phone. “You accidentally left your phone in the apartment,” said Ezra. “And I can’t find mine. Did you take it by mistake?”

“You’re kidding!” exclaimed Yossi. “Did I really take your phone?!”

“It seems so,” said Ezra. “Haven’t you tried using the phone since you left?”

“You’ll never believe what happened,” Yossi said. “On the way to the train I got mugged! They took my cell phone; I guess that means yours is gone.”

“Wow! Sorry to hear,” said Ezra. “Are you OK? What else did they take?”

Baruch Hashem I’m OK,” replied Yossi. “Just a bit shaken. They also took my wallet; I had to cancel all the credit cards. Really sorry about your phone.”

“What should I do with your phone?” asked Ezra.

“Use it meanwhile,” said Yossi. “I guess I’ll have to buy you a new one after Yom Tov.”

“It’s not your fault,” said Ezra. “You were mugged.”

“Still, I took your phone without permission, and it’s gone,” said Yossi. “It’s my responsibility, isn’t it?”

“I’m not convinced you’re liable,” said Ezra. “I suggest we raise this with Rabbi Dayan when you return.

After Yom Kippur, Yossi and Ezra met with Rabbi Dayan. “Am I liable for Ezra’s cell phone?” Yossi asked.

“There are a number of factors to consider here,” replied Rabbi Dayan. “A thief is liable for the stolen item, even if subsequently lost through uncontrollable circumstances. Thus, had you knowingly stolen Ezra’s cell phone, you would be liable even if lost later through armed robbery.” (See C.M. 303:3; Nesivos 182:2; Pischei Choshen, Geneivah 4:5[18])

“What difference does it make, then, whether I knowingly stole the phone or by mistake?” asked Yossi. “Either way, I took Ezra’s phone without permission! Doesn’t that make me liable?”

“There is an extensive discussion about this in the achronim,” said Rabbi Dayan, “whether someone who mistakenly stole is considered a thief.”

“I don’t understand,” said Yossi. “Whether someone stole on purpose or by mistake – he has to return the item if it’s not his!”

“Of course; there’s no question about that if the item is intact,” responded Rabbi Dayan. “The question is: Does the person have the liability of a thief when the item cannot be returned, such as in your case?”

“Oh, I understand,” asked Yossi. “So what is the halacha?”

“The Ketzos Hachoshen (25:1) addresses this question explicitly,” explained Rabbi Dayan. “He discusses the case of a judge who mistakenly handed money from the innocent party to the other litigant. He argues that the judge does not carry the liability of a thief if did not intend to steal.”

“But isn’t a person who damages liable whether he did so accidentally or not?” asked Ezra.

“Yes; the Gemara [B.K. 26b] derives from the verse ‘petza tachas petza‘ that even one who injured or damaged unintentionally is liable,” answered Rabbi Dayan. “However, there is no parallel source to impose the absolute liability of a thief on one who stole unintentionally.”

“You mentioned that there was a discussion about this,” noted Ezra. “Do other achronim argue?”

“Other achronim disagree in the case of the judge,” replied Rabbi Dayan. “There, when he mistakenly took the item, he willingly handed it over to another and it cannot be retrieved. They also argue when a person intends to acquire a new item for himself, mistakenly thinking he had permission to do so. However, if the person had no intention of acquiring the item – in other words, he thought it was his already – and it was subsequently lost through uncontrollable circumstances, many exempt him from liability.” (See Nesivos 25:1; Machaneh Efraim, Gezeilah #7)

“Thus,” concluded Rabbi Dayan, “Yossi is not liable for the cell phone.”

About the Author: Rabbi Meir Orlian is a faculty member of the Business Halacha Institute, headed by HaRav Chaim Kohn, a noted dayan. To receive BHI’s free newsletter, Business Weekly, send an e-mail to subscribe@businesshalacha.com. For questions regarding business halacha issues, or to bring a BHI lecturer to your business or shul, call the confidential hotline at 877-845-8455 or e-mail ask@businesshalacha.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Confused Cell Phone”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
USAID recipient Tarek Abbas, son of Palestinian Authority chairman Mahmoud.
Abbas’ Son Loses $10 Million Libel Suit in US Court
Latest Judaism Stories
Torat-Hakehillah-logo-NEW

In her diary, Anne Frank wrote words that provided hope for a humanity faced with suffering.

Leff-042415

The Arizal taught this same approach, making the point that the Torah would never mention wicked people and their sins if there was not great depth involved from which we are to learn from.

Staum-042415

Humility is not achieved when all is well and life is peachy but rather when times are trying and challenging.

In order to be free of the negative consequences of violating a shvu’ah or a neder, the shvu’ah or neder themselves must be annulled.

“I accept the ruling,” said Mr. Broyer, “but would like to understand the reasoning.”

He feared the people would have a change of heart and support Rechavam.

Ramifications Of A Printers Error
‘The Note Holder’s Burden of Proof’
(Kesubos 83b)

Question: If Abraham was commanded to circumcise his descendants on the eighth day, why do Arabs – who claim to descend from Abraham through Yishmael – wait until their children are 13 to circumcise them? I am aware that this is a matter of little consequence to our people. Nevertheless, this inconsistency is one that piques my curiosity.

M. Goldman
(Via E-mail)

In this case one could reason that by applying halach achar harov we could permit the forbidden bird as well.

“What a way to spend a Sunday afternoon,” my husband remarked. “Well, baruch Hashem we are safe, there was no accident, and I’m sure there is a good reason for everything that happened to us,” I mused.

The answer to this question is based on one of the greatest shortcomings of man – self-limiting beliefs.

Myth that niddah=dirty stopped many women from accepting laws of family purity and must be shattered

In every generation is the challenge to purge the culture of our exile from our minds and our hearts

Rabbi Fohrman connects the metzora purification process with the korban pesach.

The day after Israel was declared a State, everyone recited Hallel and people danced in the streets.

More Articles from Rabbi Meir Orlian
Business-Halacha-logo

“I accept the ruling,” said Mr. Broyer, “but would like to understand the reasoning.”

Business-Halacha-logo

“The problem is that the sum total is listed is $17,000. However, when you add the sums mentioned, it is clear that the total of $17,000 is an error. Thus, Mr. Broyer owes me $18,000, not $17,000.”

“The guiding principle regarding work terms is: hakol keminhag hamidina – everything in accordance with the common practice,” replied Rabbi Dayan.

“No, I can’t take more than $65,” protested Mrs. Fleisher. “You may not owe me more than that.”

“If I notify people, nobody will buy the matzos!” exclaimed Mr. Mandel. “Once the halachic advisory panel ruled leniently, why can’t I sell the matzos regularly?”

“Do we have to donate again?” some people asked. “Is it fair that we should have to pay twice?”

“This sounds like a question for Rabbi Dayan,” said Mr. Cohen. He took out his cell phone and called Rabbi Dayan.

“We really appreciate your efforts in straightening the shul,” said Mr. Reiss. “How is it going?”

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/halacha-hashkafa/confused-cell-phone/2013/09/12/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: