web analytics
August 2, 2015 / 17 Av, 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Daf Yomi

Daf-Yomi-logo

An Art Collector’s Dilemma!
‘Rabban Gamaliel Had The Form Of Various Moon Shapes…’
(Rosh Hashanah 24a)

The Gemara reports that Rabban Gamliel kept images of the moon on a tablet, which he used when interrogating unlearned witnesses who came to testify regarding the new moon. He would show them various shapes and positions of the moon and ask them to describe how the new moon appeared in the sky, in order to determine the veracity of their testimony.

‘You Shall Not Make With Me’

The Gemara questions the permissibility of making images of the moon since Shemos 20:20 states, “You shall not make with me,” which teaches us that it is forbidden to form or sculpt celestial images – even if not for the purposes of idol worship.

The Gemara answers that Rabban Gamliel did not make the images himself, but rather used images that were formed by a non-Jew.

The Gemara is not satisfied with this answer, though, because there is a rabbinic issur against keeping celestial images in one’s possession, even if made by a non-Jew, because people may suspect the owner of practicing idolatry.

Living In A Fishbowl

The Gemara answers that since Rabban Gamliel was a nasi whose house was always full of visitors, the concern of suspicion did not apply because people would not suspect a person of worshiping idols publicly.

Different Views As To What Is Forbidden

The Rambam (Hilchos Avodas Kochavim u’Mazzalos, end of chapter 3) writes that it is only forbidden to manufacture (and maintain) the images mentioned in the Gemara, which include the sun, moon and stars; the four faces that are on the heavenly chariot as described in Yecheskel 1:10 (i.e., of a man, lion, ox and eagle); and the mazalos and angels. Images of other things, such as animals and trees, are permitted.

The Ramban (as cited by Tur, Yoreh De’ah 141) disagrees and asserts that the concern of suspicion applies to all types of images (Taz, Yoreh De’ah, ad loc., opines that one should be stringent in light of the Ramban’s view). The Ran (R.H. loc. cit.), while agreeing with the Ramban, limits the concern of suspicion to images that gentiles sometimes worship.

Images: Protruding Vs. Recessed

The Gemara distinguishes between an image that protrudes and an image that is recessed. The Rambam (Hilchos Avodas Kochavim, ad loc.) writes that it is prohibited to make or maintain a protruding image of a man, but it is permitted to engrave or paint a recessed picture of a man. This distinction, however, does not apply to images of celestial beings. Tosafot (43b, s.v. “Veha Rabban Gamaliel”) explain that since the sun and moon always appear to us as two-dimensional figures, it is prohibited to paint even a two-dimensional picture of them. However, it is permitted to maintain a two-dimensional picture of a human being since its appearance is different from that of an actual human (which is viewed in real life as three-dimensional).

Maintaining Art In The Home

The Ramban contends that one is permitted to maintain any type of picture in one’s home, even one of the sun and moon, as long as it is not one that protrudes.

The Ramban asserts, though, that the distinction between raised and recessed images pertains only to the rabbinic issur of maintaining images due to suspicion, but the biblical issur to form celestial images applies even to recessed images.

In any event, we see from the above that producing and maintaining non-protruding pictures or paintings of non-celestial images is permitted according to everyone.

Synagogue Art, Public Art

The Mabit (vol. 1:30) rules that due to the concern of suspicion, it is forbidden to have paintings of celestial beings in a synagogue. Even though the Gemara says that we need not be so concerned about such images in public places, a synagogue is different because one must be particularly careful to avoid the appearance of idolatry in our houses of worship (Orach Chayim 90:23).

About the Author: RABBI YAAKOV KLASS, rav of Congregation K’hal Bnei Matisyahu in Flatbush, Brooklyn, is Torah Editor of The Jewish Press. He can be contacted at yklass@jewishpress.com. RABBI GERSHON TANNENBAUM, rav of Congregation Bnai Israel of Linden Heights, Boro Park, Brooklyn, is the Director of Igud HaRabbanim – The Rabbinical Alliance of America.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Daf Yomi”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Jonathan Pollard.
Dear Jonathan: A Letter of Concern
Latest Judaism Stories
Torat-Hakehillah-logo-NEW

By internalizing the Exodus, it is as if we ourselves were redeemed from Egypt.

Neihaus-073115

Each Shabbos we add the tefilla of “Ritzei” to Birchas HaMazon. In it we ask Hashem that on this day of Shabbos He should be pleased with us and save us. What exactly do we want to be saved from? Before we answer this question, let’s talk about this Friday, the 15th of Av. Many […]

Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks

Amongst the greatest disagreements in Judaism is the understanding of the 1st of the 10 Commandments

Daf-Yomi-logo

The Day He Heard
‘One May Seek Revocation Of A Confimation’
(Nedarim 69a)

The director picked up the phone to Rabbi Dayan. “One of our counselors lost his check,” he said. “Do we have to issue a new one or is it his loss?”

Six events occurred on Tu B’Av, the 15th of Av, making it a festive day in the Jewish calendar.

Why would Moshe Rabbeinu have thought that the vow that disallowed him to enter Eretz Yisrael was annulled simply because he was allowed to conquer and enter the land of Sichon and Og?

Question: When a stranger approaches a congregant in shul asking for tzedakah, should the congregant verify that the person’s need is genuine? Furthermore, what constitutes tzedakah? Is a donation to a synagogue, yeshiva, or hospital considered tzedakah?

Zvi Kirschner
(Via E-Mail)

Snow in Jerusalem! For many New Englanders like me, snow pulls at our nostalgic heartstrings like nothing else can.

Man has conflicting wishes and desires. Man has forces pulling him in competing directions.

Perhaps the admonition here is that we should not trivialize the events of the past by saying that they are irrelevant to the modern Jew.

One must view the settlement of Israel in a positive light. Thinking otherwise is a grievous sin.

Reaching a stronger understanding of what Moses actually did to prevent him from entering the land

Anti-Zionism, today’s anti-Semitism, has gone viral, tragically supported globally & by many Jews

More Articles from Rabbi Yaakov Klass and Rabbi Gershon Tannenbaum
Daf-Yomi-logo

The Day He Heard
‘One May Seek Revocation Of A Confimation’
(Nedarim 69a)

Daf-Yomi-logo

‘Older’ By A Month
‘…Until The Beginning Of Adar’
(Nedarim 63a)

The Plucked Apple
‘…Which Cannot Become Permitted’
(Nedarim 58a)

Going Public
‘From A Wealthy Roman Lady’
(Nedarim 50a)

This Land Is ‘My’ Land
‘[If The Vow Was Imposed] In The Seventh Year…’
(Nedarim 42b)

My Plate, My Food
‘My Loaf Is Forbidden To You’
(Nedarim 34b)

Not As An Asmachta?
“An Asmachta [In Beis Din] Does Acquire”
(Nedarim 27b)

Ulla’s Murderous Companion
‘Yes! Cut Him Even Deeper’
(Nedarim 22a)

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/halacha-hashkafa/daf-yomi-130/2014/05/22/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: