web analytics
May 21, 2013 /12 Sivan, 5773
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post
jumping Following a Passion for Sports to Israel

In Israel, a new five month scholarship program being offered to young aspiring athletes – one of them could be you.



Daf Yomi

tell a friend
Daf-Yomi-logo

A Matter Of Intention?
‘The Primary Labors Are Forty Less One…’
(Shabbos 73a)

Two of the 39 forbidden melachos listed in our mishnah are zore’a (sowing) and ofeh (baking). Some authorities note that there is a significant distinction between these two melachos and the other 37. With regard to other melachos, the intended result occurs immediately at the moment the labor is performed. In contrast, sowing and baking each involve a prolonged process. In other words, it takes time for a seed to germinate and for bread to bake. (See Rosh Hashana 10b, where the Gemara states that it takes a minimum of three days for seeds to take root. Also see Menachos 69, where the Gemara views freshly-sown seeds as if they are merely sitting in a vase.)

The Gemara (supra 3b) states that if one places bread in an oven on Shabbos and removes it before it bakes, one is exempt from a chattas offering because the melachah did not come to fruition.

Viewing The Interrupted Act

The Rashash (novella to our daf) makes two observations. First, he contends – based on this Gemara that one is exempt if one removes the bread before it bakes – that if one sows on Shabbos and subsequently removes the sown seeds before they take root, one should be exempt from a chattas. Second, based on the fact that one who sows on Shabbos is liable even though the seeds did not take root on Shabbos, the Rashash deduces that one who placed bread in an oven – even though it will not finish baking on Shabbos – is immediately liable provided one does not remove the bread before it is baked. In other words, one is liable at the moment one performs a melachah even if the melachah is one that comes to fruition at a later time.

What Constitutes Completion

The Minchas Chinuch (mitzvah 298) disagrees on both counts. He maintains that the very fact that one is patur if one places bread in an oven and then removes it before it finishes baking is proof that only upon completion of the baking process do we consider the melachah completed. One is not immediately liable as the Rashash suggests. It also follows that there is no chattas liability if one placed bread in an oven on Shabbos afternoon which will not finish baking until after Shabbos since the melachah was not completed on Shabbos.

Sowing, on the other hand is different, says the Minchas Chinuch. One is immediately liable for sowing seeds (unlike baking bread) – even before the seeds germinate.

The Iglei Tal (to the Minchas Chinuch) disagrees with this last point. He asserts that even though the melachah is complete when one plants the seeds, there still must be intention for them to germinate. In other words, if one places them in the ground with the intent to remove them, one is patur because temporarily placing seeds in the ground does not constitute an act of sowing.

tell a friend

About the Author: RABBI YAAKOV KLASS, rav of Congregation K’hal Bnei Matisyahu in Flatbush, Brooklyn, is Torah Editor of The Jewish Press. He can be contacted at yklass@jewishpress.com. RABBI GERSHON TANNENBAUM, rav of Congregation Bnai Israel of Linden Heights, Boro Park, Brooklyn, is the Director of Igud HaRabbanim – The Rabbinical Alliance of America.


You might also be interested in:


no comments

You must log in to post a comment.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Entire neighborhoods were flattened by the tornado that struck outside Oklahoma City, OK on May 20, 2013
Chabad to the Rescue for Oklahoma Residents
Latest Judaism Stories
Torah-Anytime-logo

I watch my children use blocks to build a large structure, observing the trepidation with which they add each block. As the structure becomes larger there is a greater risk of it collapsing, thus bringing an end to an hour of playful labor. I anticipate what will happen when one child adds a block to the top floor, compromising the integrity of the building and resulting in the collapse of the entire structure. The argument that ensues is predictable, as each child blames the other for “ruining” the fun. As an adult, I wonder about the need to attribute blame. Will assigning blame be instrumental in rebuilding the structure?

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

In this week’s parshah the Torah discusses the halachos of when one steals from another and when confronted in beis din, the thief swears falsely with his denial that he stole. This parshah was already taught in parshas Vayikra; however, there are two halachos that the Torah adds in this parshah to this topic.

In order to carry from one’s home into the street (even when the area is enclosed by a properly constructed eruv), the eruvin ceremony must be performed. This ceremony involves the placing of food in one designated home on behalf of all Sabbath observers in the enclosed area. In order for the eruvin ceremony to be valid, however, it must be performed on behalf of all owners of streets and homes in the enclosed area.

Business-Halacha-logo

Hymie was visiting Israel and enjoying an afternoon with his grandchildren in the park. After pushing them on the swings and watching them slither down the slides, he went to sit down on a bench in the corner of the park.

Question: On Friday night the chazzan in many shuls ascends the bimah for Kabbalat Shabbos but goes to the amud starting for Barchu. Why?

Question: As Shavuot is fast approaching – a holiday on which we dwell on the story of Ruth and the origins of the royal house of David – I was wondering if you could help me resolve something. Some people say that Rabbi Yehudah HaNassi, the redactor of the six orders of the Mishnah and a scion of King David, purposely kept any mention of Chanukah and the Hasmonean kings out of the Mishnah because the Hasmoneans improperly crowned themselves and ignored the rule that all Jewish kings are supposed to come from the tribe of Yehudah. Is this true?

Menachem
(Via E-Mail)

The Rema writes (Ohr Hachaim, 494:4), “It is customary to spread branches of trees in our synagogues and homes [on Shavuos] in order to commemorate that which the sages say [Rosh Hashanah 16a] that on Shavuos the world is judged concerning [how many] fruits the trees will produce [that year].”

Summer Eruvin
‘A Separate Contribution From Each’
(Eruvin 72b)

If a man suspects his wife of infidelity, he is to bring witnesses and warn her not to go into private quarters with the man in question. If she violates that warning, he is to bring her to the kohen, who will give her the “bitter waters” to drink. If she was falsely accused and was innocent, she will be blessed with children. If she was guilty, she will die a gruesome death.

A flash of red caught my eye, and I looked up and saw a cardinal perched on the picnic table on my deck. What a miracle, I marveled. You’re beautiful. Thanks, Hashem. And then my mind’s wheels began to roll, and it struck me that several miracle stories had come my way this week. The stories prodded me to think of and feel Hashem’s presence as a more tangible and vivid reality.

Over the years I’ve received letters from all over the world in which people share feelings and thoughts they’ve experienced upon becoming became Torah observant. Usually these letters arrive not long after the writers had heard one of my speeches. No matter where a particular speech took place, and no matter whether I spoke the language or had to use a translator, the magic always works. In reality, it’s not magic at all but a little voice in the soul – the “Pintele Yid,” that spark of G-d’s Word engraved on all our neshamahs. Here is one recent letter.

By the time these words are printed, there will be only a few more days left before Shavuos. We hope that up until that point, we will still have been counting the days of Sefiras Ha’Omer with a bracha, but we also know that too often, despite our best efforts, we drop out of counting with a bracha some time before the count is complete.

In this week’s parshah the Torah tells us that the bechorim were replaced by the levi’im to serve in the Mikdash. The Torah says that there were 273 more bechorim than levi’im. Those bechorim could not simply be replaced, and had to be redeemed. Hashem told Moshe that each bechor should give five shekalim to Moshe, who, in turn, should give them to Aharon and his sons. With that, they would be redeemed.

Question: Is there anything special that one should do on Yom Yerushalayim?

Question: As the shamash in a small community shul with an aging population, I am faced with numerous challenges. The following is only one of them. During sefirah, different people daven for the amud for Ma’ariv. Once, a bar mitzvah was one of them. On another occasion, a very recent ger lead the service. Were these individuals allowed to lead the congregation in counting sefirah? I also wonder, in general, if everyone should be trusted to lead the counting. What if someone forgot to count on one of the previous nights but does not inform anyone of this?

No Name
(Via E-Mail)

More Articles from Rabbi Yaakov Klass and Rabbi Gershon Tannenbaum
Daf-Yomi-logo

Summer Eruvin
‘A Separate Contribution From Each’
(Eruvin 72b)

Daf-Yomi-logo

Spreading the Wealth
‘Giving to Only One Poor Person’
(Eruvin 63a)

A Sage View
‘It Needs A Partition To Divide It’
(Eruvin 47b-48a)

Twin Cities
‘A City Is Given A Karpif’
(Eruvin 57a)

An Early Navigational Instrument
‘Rabbi Gamliel Used His Tube To Measure…’
(Eruvin 43b)

Just Like Carrying In A Karmelis
‘Tithing When Night Falls’
(Eruvin 36a)

Ready And Able
‘Unripe Dates Are Unsuitable For An Eruv’
(Eruvin 28)

    Latest Poll

    Which is the most beautiful location in Jerusalem?









    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/halacha-hashkafa/daf-yomi-55/2012/12/12/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online:

Close