web analytics
April 25, 2015 / 6 Iyar, 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Glistening Glass

Business-Halacha-logo

Yair was always looking for spare jobs to earn some extra money. Before Pesach he would clean houses, before Sukkos he would build sukkahs, in the summer he would drive people to the mountains.

One evening he received a call from Mrs. Glazer. “Our fridge and oven have gotten really filthy over the summer and need a serious cleaning,” she said. “I heard that you have experience doing this kind of cleaning.”

“Sure, usually Pesach time,” he replied, “but I’ll do it for you.” He arranged to come the following afternoon.

Yair showed up the next day with his cleaning supplies. He removed the parts that could be easily taken off for more effective cleaning, including the doors of the oven. He sprayed and scrubbed and washed until the fridge and oven were shining again.

When everything was clean, he began to reassemble the pieces he had removed. As he picked up one of the oven doors, the metal guard holding the glass fell off. The glistening glass fell to the floor and shattered.

Yair stood there stunned. “How did that happen?” he asked himself.

He saw that he had picked up the door upside down. “That shouldn’t make a difference,” he thought. “I’ve done this many times with other ovens.” He picked up the other door and carefully turned it upside down. The glass remained securely in its place.

Yair gathered the shattered glass and the metal piece. He looked for the screws that held the metal piece in place and found that they were rusty and corroded. “My rotten luck that the screws failed now,” said Yair.

Yair called over Mr. Glazer and showed him what happened. “I picked up the oven door to return it to its place, but the screws fell out,” he apologized. “The glass slipped out and broke.”

“How could it have fallen out?” asked Mr. Glazer. “I see that the bottom guard is in place.”

“The top guard was loose, and I accidentally picked up the door up upside down,” explained Yair. “It usually doesn’t make a difference, though. I’ll show you.” He picked up the other door upside down, and the glass remained held fast in place.

“You’re right about that,” acknowledged Mr. Glazer. “But had you picked up the door the right way, it also wouldn’t have happened. You are partly to blame.”

“Well, you didn’t warn me that the oven had loose, rusty parts,” countered Yair.

“We need to consult with someone on this,” said Mr. Glazer. “Would you like to ask Rabbi Dayan?”

“Sure, that would be great,” said Yair.

The two went to Rabbi Dayan and asked: “Is Yair liable for the glass that broke?”

“In principle, a worker who is entrusted to work on an item is considered equivalent to a shomer sachar,” replied Rabbi Dayan. “He is not liable for loss due to circumstances beyond his control (oness), but is liable for preventable loss (geneivah v’aaveidah).”

“What is our case considered?” asked Yair.

“Yair is not completely free of blame, since he held the door upside down,” said Rabbi Dayan. “On the other hand, he wasn’t negligent in any way, since picking up the door upside down is not supposed to be a problem. Furthermore, he was entrusted with a defective door that had corroded screws, without being warned.

“Similarly, we find that Chazal instituted that a porter who stumbles and damages his load is exempt, unless he was negligent, such as if he tried to carry a heavy load that requires two people. If the porter tried carrying a load that was somewhat heavy for one person, but doesn’t usually require two people, he is liable for half the amount. It can’t be called negligence, since often a single person does carry it, but cannot be called uncontrollable, since the load was somewhat heavy for an individual.” (C.M. 304:1-4)

“This isn’t quite a case of porters,” commented Mr. Glazer.

“This was said about porters, but perhaps a similar idea could be applied to our case, since it’s difficult to ascertain clear responsibility in this case,” said Rabbi Dayan. “Considering also that the door was defective, it would seem best to compromise that he cover approximately a third of the cost of the glass.”

“What about Yair’s salary?” asked Mr. Glazer. “Do I have to pay for the cleaning that caused damage?”

“In the case of the porters, the SM”A (304:1) indicates that he is entitled to his wages, even though the job proved pointless,” replied Rabbi Dayan. “The Taz disagrees, unless the worker is poor, in which case righteous people go beyond the letter of the law and provide his wages. Here, in any case, most of the salary is for the cleaning of the fridge and the rest of the oven.”

About the Author: Rabbi Meir Orlian is a faculty member of the Business Halacha Institute, headed by HaRav Chaim Kohn, a noted dayan. To receive BHI’s free newsletter, Business Weekly, send an e-mail to subscribe@businesshalacha.com. For questions regarding business halacha issues, or to bring a BHI lecturer to your business or shul, call the confidential hotline at 877-845-8455 or e-mail ask@businesshalacha.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Glistening Glass”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Car - A-Tor
Updated: Three Injured in Jerusalem Terror Attack, Ambulances and Mayor’s Car also Attacked
Latest Judaism Stories
Torat-Hakehillah-logo-NEW

In her diary, Anne Frank wrote words that provided hope for a humanity faced with suffering.

Leff-042415

The Arizal taught this same approach, making the point that the Torah would never mention wicked people and their sins if there was not great depth involved from which we are to learn from.

Staum-042415

Humility is not achieved when all is well and life is peachy but rather when times are trying and challenging.

In order to be free of the negative consequences of violating a shvu’ah or a neder, the shvu’ah or neder themselves must be annulled.

“I accept the ruling,” said Mr. Broyer, “but would like to understand the reasoning.”

He feared the people would have a change of heart and support Rechavam.

Ramifications Of A Printers Error
‘The Note Holder’s Burden of Proof’
(Kesubos 83b)

Question: If Abraham was commanded to circumcise his descendants on the eighth day, why do Arabs – who claim to descend from Abraham through Yishmael – wait until their children are 13 to circumcise them? I am aware that this is a matter of little consequence to our people. Nevertheless, this inconsistency is one that piques my curiosity.

M. Goldman
(Via E-mail)

In this case one could reason that by applying halach achar harov we could permit the forbidden bird as well.

“What a way to spend a Sunday afternoon,” my husband remarked. “Well, baruch Hashem we are safe, there was no accident, and I’m sure there is a good reason for everything that happened to us,” I mused.

The answer to this question is based on one of the greatest shortcomings of man – self-limiting beliefs.

Myth that niddah=dirty stopped many women from accepting laws of family purity and must be shattered

In every generation is the challenge to purge the culture of our exile from our minds and our hearts

Rabbi Fohrman connects the metzora purification process with the korban pesach.

The day after Israel was declared a State, everyone recited Hallel and people danced in the streets.

More Articles from Rabbi Meir Orlian
Business-Halacha-logo

“I accept the ruling,” said Mr. Broyer, “but would like to understand the reasoning.”

Business-Halacha-logo

“The problem is that the sum total is listed is $17,000. However, when you add the sums mentioned, it is clear that the total of $17,000 is an error. Thus, Mr. Broyer owes me $18,000, not $17,000.”

“The guiding principle regarding work terms is: hakol keminhag hamidina – everything in accordance with the common practice,” replied Rabbi Dayan.

“No, I can’t take more than $65,” protested Mrs. Fleisher. “You may not owe me more than that.”

“If I notify people, nobody will buy the matzos!” exclaimed Mr. Mandel. “Once the halachic advisory panel ruled leniently, why can’t I sell the matzos regularly?”

“Do we have to donate again?” some people asked. “Is it fair that we should have to pay twice?”

“This sounds like a question for Rabbi Dayan,” said Mr. Cohen. He took out his cell phone and called Rabbi Dayan.

“We really appreciate your efforts in straightening the shul,” said Mr. Reiss. “How is it going?”

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/halacha-hashkafa/glistening-glass/2013/08/15/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: