web analytics
March 6, 2015 / 15 Adar , 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Half The Truth!

Business-Halacha-logo

“Today we will continue learning about oaths,” Rabbi Dayan began his shiur. “Does anyone remember what we learned last lesson? How many cases are there in which the Torah imposes an oath in beis din?”

Sruli raised his hand. “You taught us that there are three cases,” he answered, “but we only discussed one.”

“Very good,” said Rabbi Dayan. “The first case we discussed was an oath to contradict the testimony of a single witness. Can anybody tell me another case in which the Torah imposes an oath?”

Dani raised his hand. “There’s also something called modeh b’miktzas,” he replied, “but I’m not exactly sure what that case is.”

“That’s correct; let’s explain,” said Rabbi Dayan. “Modeh b’miktzas is a case in which there is a partial admission.”

“What do you mean by a partial admission?” asked Sruli. “Either you admit or you don’t!”

“There’s also a possibility of a partial admission,” explained Rabbi Dayan. “Let’s say that someone claims he loaned you $500. You admit he loaned you $200, but deny the remaining $300, and there are no witnesses. This is called a partial admission, since you admit $200 out of the $500. What is the ruling here? Can you help us, Dani?”

“Since you admit the claim partially,” answered Dani, “you require an oath to exonerate yourself from the remaining $300.”

“Beautiful,” said Rabbi Dayan. “We suspect that you might have borrowed the full amount, but can only pay part and are trying to buy time to pay the remainder. The oath will force you to admit the full truth or confirm your claim.” (B.M. 3b)

“And if I don’t want to take the oath?” asked Sruli.

“Then you have to come to a compromise agreement with the plaintiff or pay the $300,” said Rabbi Dayan.

Sruli sank into thought for a moment. He recalled something that just happened. Before Purim, a seforim store had given him some boxes of Megillas Esther with commentaries to sell in his shul and yeshiva. He had picked up the seforim and taken then home in friend’s car. He then moved them to a room in the yeshiva, and from there to the shul. The seforim store owner said there were ten boxes, 200 seforim in all, but Sruli could only account for nine boxes.

“It seems one box is missing,” he told the storeowner. “Are you sure that you gave me all 200 copies?”

“Absolutely,” said the storeowner. “Why do you ask?”

“One box is missing. I’m not sure whether you made a mistake or I lost it somewhere along the way,” said Sruli. He tried to remember whether he had taken the right number of boxes, but couldn’t.

The storeowner wanted him to pay for all 200 copies, but Sruli had refused to pay for more than the nine boxes. “Prove to me that you gave me all 200 copies,” he had insisted. “You have no evidence at all; it’s your word alone. You can’t make me pay just based on your word.”

Sruli now wondered whether he was correct. After all, he acknowledged having received nine out the ten boxes.

“What happens if the borrower can’t swear because he doesn’t remember whether he borrowed $500 or $200?” Sruli finally asked Rabbi Dayan. “Can he swear that he remembers only $200?”

“That touches on a fascinating concept: mitoch she’aino yachol lishava – meshalem (since he is unable to swear, he must pay),” replied Rabbi Dayan. “The partial admission gives credence to the plaintiff’s claim, if not countered with an oath, so the defendant must pay. The same applies when there is a single witness; if the defendant cannot swear to contradict his testimony, he must pay.” (C.M. 75:12-13)

“I guess I’m going to have to pay for all the boxes,” Sruli said to himself.

“What if the defendant doesn’t remember whether he borrowed at all?” asked Dani. “I know the sages imposed an oath (shevuas heses) even if the person denies having received the loan entirely. Would we also say here that since I don’t remember I have to pay?”

“No, this is one of the differences between a Torah-imposed oath and one imposed by the sages,” answered Rabbi Dayan. “The rule of mitoch she’aino yachol lishava meshalem is applied only to a Torah-imposed oath. Thus, a person who admits partially but does not remember clearly enough to swear about the remainder must pay, whereas a person who does remember whether he borrowed does not have to pay. The sages allowed him to swear that he does not remember.” (C.M. 75:13-14)

About the Author: Rabbi Meir Orlian is a faculty member of the Business Halacha Institute, headed by HaRav Chaim Kohn, a noted dayan. To receive BHI’s free newsletter, Business Weekly, send an e-mail to subscribe@businesshalacha.com. For questions regarding business halacha issues, or to bring a BHI lecturer to your business or shul, call the confidential hotline at 877-845-8455 or e-mail ask@businesshalacha.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Half The Truth!”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Policemen on the scene after Arab terrorist rammed his car into a crowd of people Friday morning.
Update 10:20 AM: Guard Shoots Terrorist in Jerusalem Terror Attack
Latest Judaism Stories
Rebbetzin Esther Jungreis

To the glee of all Israel haters it was Netanyahu who was accused of endangering US-Israel relations

Ki Tisa_lecture

Over and over, the text tells us about “keeping” Shabbat, about holiness, and a covenant – but why?

Aaron and  The Golden Calf by James Tissot

Aharon’s guilt with the golden calf is not clear-cut. What if Moshe were in his brother’s place?

The Sabbath is a full dress rehearsal for an ideal society that has not yet come to pass-but will

When Hashem told Moshe of the option to destroy the people and make him and his descendants into a great nation, Hashem was telling Moshe that it is up to him.

Just like Moses and Aaron, Mordechai decides to ruin the party…

An Auto Accident
‘All Agree That They Are Exempt’
(Kesubbos 35a)

Question: If Abraham was commanded to circumcise his descendants on the eighth day, why do Arabs – who claim to descend from Abraham through Yishmael – wait until their children are 13 to circumcise them? I am aware that this is a matter of little consequence to our people. Nevertheless, this inconsistency is one that piques my curiosity.

M. Goldman
(Via E-mail)

Why would the exemption of women from donating the half shekel exempt them from davening Musaf?

This concept should be very relevant to us as we, too, should be happy beyond description.

The Holocaust was the latest attempt of Amalek to destroy the special bond that we enjoy with God.

One can drink up to the Talmud’s criterion to confuse Mordechai and Haman-but not beyond.

“The voice is the voice of Yaakov, but the hands are the hands of Esav” gives great insight to Purim

Purim is the battleground of extremes, Amalek and Yisrael, with Zoroastrian Persia in between.

More Articles from Rabbi Meir Orlian
Business-Halacha-logo

“We really appreciate your efforts in straightening the shul,” said Mr. Reiss. “How is it going?”

Business-Halacha-logo

“Halacha differentiates between giving a gift, forgoing a debt [mechila], and granting permission to take something,” answered Rabbi Dayan.

“I don’t accept this,” said Mr. Zummer. “I want you to finish! You’re not allowed to just stop in the middle!”

“That’s what you’re wondering?” laughed Mr. Rubin. “That ring is not mine at all. A relative gave me money to buy it for him.”

“How could you have expected my glasses to be there?” argued Mr. Weiss. “You shouldn’t have to pay.”

“It means that the disqualification of relatives as witnesses is a procedural issue, not a question of honesty,” explained Rabbi Dayan.

“The issue is not just logistical,” replied Mr. Kahn. “I thought that halacha requires that the beginning of the adjudication and acceptance of testimony be during daytime.” (C.M. 5:2; 28:24)

A few days, Mrs. Feldman called back. “I would prefer a nice cake rather than the chocolate.”

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/halacha-hashkafa/half-the-truth/2013/02/21/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: