web analytics
April 18, 2015 / 29 Nisan, 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Missing Fifty

Business-Halacha-logo

The day camp was ready to go home for the night. “Remember that tomorrow we are having an overnight trip,” the head counselor announced to the campers. “Make sure that you all bring the necessary clothes and items listed on the permission slip.”

He then turned to the counselor, Yoram. “We want three extra counselors to help supervise,” he said. “We already have two. If you have a friend who wants to come for the trip, we will pay him $200 for the trip.”

“I have a friend, Effy, who I think would be interested,” said Yoram. “I’ll ask him when I get home.”

When Yoram got home that evening, he went over to Effy: “My day camp is looking for extra supervision for an overnight trip,” he said. “Would you like to come? They’re paying $250 for the trip.”

“Let me think about it,” Effy replied. “I also have to check with my parents that we don’t have anything planned for the family. I’ll give you a call in an hour.”

Effy called back an hour later. “It’s fine,” he said. “I’m happy to come.”

“Great,” said Yoram. “I’ll let the head counselor know.”

At the end of the trip, the three additional counselors went into the office to pick up their payment from the director. Effy received a check for $200. He looked at the director funny. “When Yoram asked me about coming,” he said, “he told me that I would get $250!”

“Absolutely not,” the director replied. “We said $200.That’s what we gave the other two counselors also.”

“But Yoram told me $250,” he said. “You asked him to procure my services, so that’s what you have to pay.”

“He did?” said the director. “Let’s call him in.”

The director announced over the loudspeaker: “Yoram, please come the office now.”

Yoram came two minutes later. “How much did you tell Yoram we would give him?” asked the director.

“I told him $250,” Yoram said. “I forgot what you said.”

“We never agreed to that,” the director said to Effy. “We asked Yoram to find a friend, but never authorized him to decide the salary.”

Effy then turned to Yoram. “If they pay me only $200, then you owe me the remaining $50!”

“I never accepted any responsibility for payment,” argued Yoram. “You knew you would get paid by the camp. You should have confirmed the salary with the camp.”

“We’ve got an issue here,” said the director. “We said $200, but Yoram told Effy $250, which he was not authorized to do.”

“I’m not going home till we settle this,” said Effy. “I came to work and am entitled to my proper salary.”

“I suggest we call Rabbi Dayan,” said the director. “Let him decide what we should do.”

The director picked up the phone and dialed Rabbi Dayan. “We asked a counselor to hire a friend for a trip for $200, but he told him $250. How much do we owe? Does the counselor owe him anything?”

“You owe the friend the going rate for the job,” replied Rabbi Dayan. “The counselor who misled him does not owe him anything, but the friend has rightful complaints against him.”

“Can you expand a little on this?” asked the director.

“The Gemara [B.M. 76a] teaches that when an agent overstates salary terms to an employee, the employer pays the going market rate,” explained Rabbi Dayan. “This is because the agent, who had no authority to negotiate the terms and misrepresented the employer, loses his status as an agent. Since you only agreed to pay $200, whereas the friend accepted the job with the understanding of $250, there was no valid contractual agreement between you. Thus, the employee gets paid as a worker who did not make any arrangement with the employer, which is the going market rate.” (C.M. 332:1)

“What if the worker who expected to get paid a higher salary did a better job?” asked the director. “Similar to, for example, a contractor who used higher quality materials or put more effort into the finishing. It’s not fair that he should get the going rate for a standard job.”

“That is true,” replied Rabbi Dayan. “If the quality of his job is clearly worth more, then the employer – who received the benefit of superior quality – would have to pay the value of such work.” (Shach 332:8)

“Why does the counselor not owe anything?” asked the director. “And what did you say about ‘rightful complaints?’ ”

“The counselor does not owe anything, since he clearly indicated he takes no personal responsibility for the salary,” concluded Rabbi Dayan. “However, the friend has a rightful complaint against him, since he could have sought a higher paying job had he known the true salary.” (SM”A 332:4)

About the Author: Rabbi Meir Orlian is a faculty member of the Business Halacha Institute, headed by HaRav Chaim Kohn, a noted dayan. To receive BHI’s free newsletter, Business Weekly, send an e-mail to subscribe@businesshalacha.com. For questions regarding business halacha issues, or to bring a BHI lecturer to your business or shul, call the confidential hotline at 877-845-8455 or e-mail ask@businesshalacha.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

2 Responses to “Missing Fifty”

  1. Get off our Jewish site

  2. As far as I’m concerned you are just another ****ing idiot whose arguments don’t hold water. So do the world a favour and go preach your rubbish in west Africa where the Ebola grows.

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Daniel Lubetzky  president of V15 and CEO of Kind "healthy" bars
No Victory for V15 and Not Healthy ‘Healthy’ Snack Bars
Latest Judaism Stories
Hertzberg-041715

Lincoln was not a perfect man. But he rose above his imperfections to do what he thought was right not matter the obstacles.

Arch of Titus

Adon Olam: An Erev Shabbat Musical Interlude Courtesy of David Herman

Daf-Yomi-logo

Oh My, It’s Copper!
‘…And One Who Is A Coppersmith’
(Kethubboth 77a)

Grunfeld-Raphael-logo

The omer sacrifice of loose barley flour was more fitting for animal consumption than human consumption and symbolizes the depths to which the Jewish slaves had sunk.

Question: If Abraham was commanded to circumcise his descendants on the eighth day, why do Arabs – who claim to descend from Abraham through Yishmael – wait until their children are 13 to circumcise them? I am aware that this is a matter of little consequence to our people. Nevertheless, this inconsistency is one that piques my curiosity.

M. Goldman
(Via E-mail)

When Chazal call not eating treif food a chok, that refers to how it functions.

His mother called “Yoni, Yoni!” Her eyes, a moment earlier dark with pain, shone with joy and hope

Kashrut reminds us that in the end, God is the arbiter of right and wrong.

In a cab with Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach & Rav Elayshiv discussing if/when to say tefillas haderech

The successful student listens more than speaks out; wants his ideas critiqued, not just appreciated

Why would it not be sufficient to simply state lehoros from which we derive that in such a state one may not issue any psak?

What do we learn about overcoming loss from the argument between Moses and Aaron’s remaining 2 sons?

Each of the unique roles attributed to Moshe share the common theme that they require of and grant higher sanctity to the individual filling the role.

Because of the way the piece of my finger had been severed, the doctors at the hospital were not able to reattach it. They told me I’d have to see a specialist.

“The problem is that the sum total is listed is $17,000. However, when you add the sums mentioned, it is clear that the total of $17,000 is an error. Thus, Mr. Broyer owes me $18,000, not $17,000.”

More Articles from Rabbi Meir Orlian
Business-Halacha-logo

“The problem is that the sum total is listed is $17,000. However, when you add the sums mentioned, it is clear that the total of $17,000 is an error. Thus, Mr. Broyer owes me $18,000, not $17,000.”

Business-Halacha-logo

“The guiding principle regarding work terms is: hakol keminhag hamidina – everything in accordance with the common practice,” replied Rabbi Dayan.

“No, I can’t take more than $65,” protested Mrs. Fleisher. “You may not owe me more than that.”

“If I notify people, nobody will buy the matzos!” exclaimed Mr. Mandel. “Once the halachic advisory panel ruled leniently, why can’t I sell the matzos regularly?”

“Do we have to donate again?” some people asked. “Is it fair that we should have to pay twice?”

“This sounds like a question for Rabbi Dayan,” said Mr. Cohen. He took out his cell phone and called Rabbi Dayan.

“We really appreciate your efforts in straightening the shul,” said Mr. Reiss. “How is it going?”

“Halacha differentiates between giving a gift, forgoing a debt [mechila], and granting permission to take something,” answered Rabbi Dayan.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/halacha-hashkafa/missing-fifty/2014/07/31/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: