web analytics
February 28, 2015 / 9 Adar , 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


More Than Enough

Business-Halacha-logo

Mr. Goodman was the gabbai tzedakah of his shul. A month before Pesach, he was approached by one of the congregants, Mr. Solomon, who poured out his heart. He had suffered a serious financial setback, and had no remaining money to purchase food and supplies for Pesach, in addition to various loans that he had to repay.

“How much money do you need?” Mr. Goodman asked him.

“I need to raise $10,000 to cover the Pesach expenses and loans,” replied Mr. Solomon.

“Please God, we will help you,” Mr. Goodman said. “I will send out a special notice of kimcha d’pischa [Pesach collection] to the shul membership.”

“I ask that you not mention my name,” said Mr. Solomon. “I would not like my circumstances publicized.”

“Of course,” said Mr. Goodman. “The notice will simply state that we are collecting kimcha d’pischa for one of our community members who is in financial need.”

“I very much appreciate your help,” Mr. Solomon thanked him.

The community responded very generously to the special appeal. During two weeks’ time, Mr. Goodman was able to raise $15,000 of kimcha d’pischa for Mr. Solomon.

Meanwhile, before the money was handed over, another person from the community approached Rabbi Goodman for support.

“I’ll try to help as we can,” said Mr. Goodman, “but we already made a special appeal this year. Let me see what other funds we have. I’ll be in touch with you in a day or two.”

After the person left, Mr. Goodman began wondering. “Mr. Solomon only asked for $10,000,” he thought to himself. “I wonder if I can give the excess $5,000 to this other person? On the other hand, maybe I had no right to accept more than $10,000 in the first place.”

Mr. Goodman called Rabbi Dayan and explained the situation. “What should I do with the excess $5,000?” he asked. “Should I give it to Mr. Solomon, use it for the other needy person, or return it to the donors?”

“This issue depends on a number of factors,” replied Rabbi Dayan. “The Mishnah (Shekalim 2:5) teaches that excess collection for needy people goes to the needy people. Similarly, Shaarei Teshuvah [O.C. 429:3] writes that excess kimcha d’pischa money shouldn’t be used for other purposes, but rather given to the needy for other Pesach expenses. Excess collection for a specific, needy individual goes to him. This Mishnah is cited in Shulchan Aruch [Y.D. 253:6]. ”

“It’s simple, then,” said Mr. Goodman. “The extra money goes to Mr. Solomon.”

“It might seem simple, but it actually isn’t,” said Rabbi Dayan. “According to many authorities, this halacha depends on whether the donors were aware of the identity of the recipient and whether the collector was a regular gabbai tzedakah.”

“Why is that?” asked Mr. Goodman.

“When money is donated for a certain individual, the collector accepts it on his behalf,” explained Rabbi Dayan. “However, by rights, he should not acquire the excess amount. Nonetheless, the Talmud Yerushalmi states that Chazal granted him it on account of the embarrassment he suffers through having his name publicized. Thus, when the collection was done anonymously, Mr. Solomon does not necessarily acquire the excess; the money can be used for a similar purpose and given to another needy family. (Mishpetai haTorah, Tzedakah #22)

“What difference does it make whether I am a regular gabbai tzedakah or not?” asked Mr. Goodman.

“When a regular person collects, the donor’s intent is for the current case,” explained Rabbi Dayan. “However, when a regular gabbai tzedakah collects, the donor’s intent is that any excess money should be distributed at his discretion. Moreover, some authorities maintain that a regular gabbai tzedakah can divert the excess amount when needed, even if the collection was for a specified, named individual, since the money is donated at his discretion.” (Shach Y.D. 256:7; Aruch Hashulchan Y.D. 253:13; Shevet Halevi 8:212; 9:204)

“Is there a case in which the excess money should be returned to the donors?” asked Mr. Goodman.

“When the money was not needed at all,” replied Rabbi Dayan, “such as money collected for a wedding that was cancelled. Ideally, the money should be returned to the donors; if difficult to do, it should be used for a similar purpose of hachnassas kallah.” (See Y.D. 253:7; Tzedakah Umishpat 9:4-6)

About the Author: Rabbi Meir Orlian is a faculty member of the Business Halacha Institute, headed by HaRav Chaim Kohn, a noted dayan. To receive BHI’s free newsletter, Business Weekly, send an e-mail to subscribe@businesshalacha.com. For questions regarding business halacha issues, or to bring a BHI lecturer to your business or shul, call the confidential hotline at 877-845-8455 or e-mail ask@businesshalacha.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “More Than Enough”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu prays at the Western Wall ahead of his speech next week at the US Congress.
Netanyahu Visits Western Wall before Leaving for US
Latest Judaism Stories
Niehaus-022715

One should not give the money before Purim morning or after sunset.

Mendlowitz-022715-Basket

The mishloach manos of times gone by were sometimes simple and sometimes elaborate, but the main focus was on the preparation of the delicious food they contained.

Winiarz-022715-Kids

Does Hashem ever go away and not pay attention to us?

Torat-Hakehillah-logo-NEW

In other words, the Torah is an expression of the Way that we must follow in order to live a divine-like life and to bond in the highest way possible with God or Being Itself.

The Chasam Sofer answers that one of only prohibited from wearing a garment that contains shatnez if he does so while wearing the garment for pleasure purposes.

The avodah (service) of the kohen gadol is vital and highly sensitive; the world’s very existence depends on it.

Moreover, even if the perpetrator of the capital offense is never actually executed, such as when the fatal act was unintentional, Kam Lei applies and the judge cannot award damages.

Forever After?
‘Obligated for Challahh and Not Terumah’
(Kesubos 25a)

Question: If Abraham was commanded to circumcise his descendants on the eighth day, why do Arabs – who claim to descend from Abraham through Yishmael – wait until their children are 13 to circumcise them? I am aware that this is a matter of little consequence to our people. Nevertheless, this inconsistency is one that piques my curiosity.

M. Goldman
(Via E-mail)

“We really appreciate your efforts in straightening the shul,” said Mr. Reiss. “How is it going?”

This was a spontaneous act of rest after the miracle of vanquishing their respective foes. The following year they celebrated on the same days as a minhag.

The way we must to relate to our young adult children is to communicate with genuine loving-kindness

Jewish prayer is a convergence of 2 modes of biblical spirituality, exemplified by Moses and Aaron

In holy places it’s important to maintain a level of silence permitting people to dialogue with God

Eventually, after some trial and error, including an experience with a prima donna and one with a thief, I baruch Hashem ultimately found a fine, honest and reliable household helper.

More Articles from Rabbi Meir Orlian
Business-Halacha-logo

“We really appreciate your efforts in straightening the shul,” said Mr. Reiss. “How is it going?”

Business-Halacha-logo

“Halacha differentiates between giving a gift, forgoing a debt [mechila], and granting permission to take something,” answered Rabbi Dayan.

“I don’t accept this,” said Mr. Zummer. “I want you to finish! You’re not allowed to just stop in the middle!”

“That’s what you’re wondering?” laughed Mr. Rubin. “That ring is not mine at all. A relative gave me money to buy it for him.”

“How could you have expected my glasses to be there?” argued Mr. Weiss. “You shouldn’t have to pay.”

“It means that the disqualification of relatives as witnesses is a procedural issue, not a question of honesty,” explained Rabbi Dayan.

“The issue is not just logistical,” replied Mr. Kahn. “I thought that halacha requires that the beginning of the adjudication and acceptance of testimony be during daytime.” (C.M. 5:2; 28:24)

A few days, Mrs. Feldman called back. “I would prefer a nice cake rather than the chocolate.”

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/halacha-hashkafa/more-than-enough/2014/04/14/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: