web analytics
January 31, 2015 / 11 Shevat, 5775
 
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Home » Judaism » Parsha »

Accidental Mitzvos

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

Parshas Terumah begins with Hashem informing Moshe to tell the Bnei Yisrael to take for Him (Hashem) terumah from anyone whose heart desires to do so. Rashi says that the money must be given lishmah – for the sake of giving to Hashem.

Many meforshim were bothered by the following point and questions: we know that there is a machlokes in the Gemara whether mitzvos require kavanah (see Rosh Hashanah 28a). According to the opinion that mitzvos are not required to be performed with kavanah, why does this mitzvah of giving to the Mishkan require kavanah that it be given lishmah? Additionally, even the dissenting opinion that requires kavanah in the performance of mitzvos agrees that for the mitzvah of tzedakah one does not need to have kavanah to fulfill the mitzvah. For example, if one drops money that ends up in a poor man’s hands he has fulfilled the mitzvah of tzedakah – without even knowing it. So why, regarding the mitzvah of donating to the Mishkan, does the pasuk require lishmah?

Some Acharonim differentiated between kavanah and lishmah. In this view, kavanah is the intention to perform a mitzvah and that the person wants to fulfill his obligation. Lishmah is the act of doing the mitzvah for the correct intentions. Although a mitzvah may not require kavanah, it may nevertheless require lishmah.

Perhaps we can answer the second question. The opinion that requires kavanah agrees that it is not required regarding the mitzvah of giving tzedakah. However, the mitzvah of donating to the Mishkan differs from the general mitzvah of tzedakah. The purpose of the mitzvah of giving tzedakah is that the poor man will have money. Once that is accomplished, the mitzvah is fulfilled. Thus, even if one does not have kavanah to perform the mitzvah, once its purpose is accomplished he has fulfilled his obligation.

But the purpose of the mitzvah of donating to the Mishkan was not so the Mishkan has enough money. Hashem would ensure that the Mishkan has enough money even without this donation. The purpose of this mitzvah was to give us the opportunity to give toward the Mishkan. In such a scenario the opinion requiring kavanah in the performance of mitzvos requires that one have kavanah.

Another mitzvah whereby the opinion requiring kavanah is in agreement with the view that one can fulfill a mitzvah without having kavanah is the mitzvah of p’ru u’revu (bearing offspring). This mitzvah is accomplished when one brings children into the world. Thus, even if one does not have kavanah when performing this mitzvah, he will have fulfilled his obligation.

In order to answer the original question, I believe that we need to understand the opinion that does not generally require kavanah. The underlying machlokes as to whether mitzvos require kavanah is based on what makes a mitzvah. There is no dispute that a transgression has occurred (albeit b’shogeig) when one eats a forbidden food. Why? Because once the Torah forbade the eating of pig, it is forbidden to eat pigs. We need not have kavanah to render a pig a pig; it exists as a pig without our intentions. Consequently, when one eats a pig he has transgressed.

Similarly, regarding mitzvos, what makes the act of shaking a lulav a mitzvah? It is not an existing item; rather, it is a palm branch – not a mitzvah. The opinion requiring mitzvos to be performed with kavanah holds this way because in order to turn a palm branch into a mitzvah, one must intend to use it for the purpose of fulfilling a mitzvah.

The opinion not requiring that mitzvos be performed with kavanah follows this logic: once Hashem commands us to do something it becomes a reality. For instance, palm branches are now items of mitzvos – even without our intention to have it this way. Accordingly, if one shakes a lulav without intending to use it for the purpose of fulfilling a mitzvah he has, according to this opinion, fulfilled his obligation.

The mitzvah of donating to the Mishkan or to the Beis HaMikdah was different than other mitzvos. As mentioned earlier, Hashem does not need our money; the sole purpose of this mitzvah was to give Klal Yisrael the opportunity to give to Hashem. It is an integral part of this mitzvah that one has the desire and intention to do so. Otherwise, if one’s money somehow ends up in the Mishkan or Beis HaMikdash, he would not have accomplished this mitzvah’s goal.

About the Author: For questions or comments, e-mail RabbiRFuchs@gmail.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

One Response to “Accidental Mitzvos

  1. I don’t understand, i’ve heard of mitvah, what is kavanah? Also please tell me what lishmah is? And why is this important?

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Jeremy Bird, working for Israeli campaign outfit V15, shown at Ted Talk, May 20, 2014.
V15 US Political Operative Marinated in Hate-Israel Activism
Latest Judaism Stories
Staum-013015

People often think that all they are missing is “just a little more” and then they can be truly happy.

Torah-Hakehillah-121914

The Midrash is teaching a fundamental message of what it means to be a religious person.

Rabbi Sacks

Torah opposes slavery; G-d desires the free worship of free human beings, yet slavery’s permitted-?!

Rebbetzin Esther Jungreis

France allowed Islamists to flourish despite their loyalty to Islamic sharia law not French values

Approximately 18 years ago, my uncle called me into his office saying he had an urgent matter to discuss. I didn’t know what he had in mind.

“Where is God?” asked the Kotzker Rebbe “God is not everywhere but only where you let Him enter”

An Explosion In The Trench
‘With A Glowing Hot Knife’
(Yevamos 120b)

Her first tactic was tefillah; she immediately began to recite one perek after another of Tehillim.

When a miracle occurs that transcends nature, Hashem has broken the laws of nature to create the miracle.

“How could you have expected my glasses to be there?” argued Mr. Weiss. “You shouldn’t have to pay.”

Rather than submit to this fate and suffer torture and humiliation, Shaul decided to fall on his sword.

How can the Da’as Zekeinim say this was Hashem’s plan to allow them to become the Torah Nation? We know it was actually a punishment.

A strange midrash of fruit trees surrounding the Nation of Israel as they walked to freedom

Leading by example must be visible, regarding where, when and how-like Nachshon entering the Red Sea

Rabbi Yaakov Nagen, a Ram at Yeshivat Otniel, notes that the verse is suggesting that retelling the story of the Exodus is so important that Hashem is performing ever-greater miracles specifically so that parents can tell their stories to future generations.

More Articles from Rabbi Raphael Fuchs
Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

Rather than submit to this fate and suffer torture and humiliation, Shaul decided to fall on his sword.

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

And if a person can take steps to perform the mitzvah, he should do so (even if he won’t be held accountable for not performing it due to circumstances beyond his control).

The Brisker Rav suggests that the barad, in fact, only fell on people, animals, and vegetation.

Why is it necessary to perform an aveirah punishable by lashes in order to be deemed a legal rashah and be pasul l’eidus m’d’Oraisa?

Why was Yaakov not afraid that granting Yosef’s sons the status of shevatim would cause jealousy among his children?

Rav Akiva Eiger is assuming that the logic of the halacha that both the son and his mother are obligated to honor his father and therefore he must honor his fathers wishes first, is a mathematical equation.

It is clear that Tosafos maintains that only someone who lives in a house must light Chanukah candles.

But how could there have been any validity to Yosef’s allegations?

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/parsha/accidental-mitzvos/2014/01/30/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: