web analytics
April 21, 2015 / 2 Iyar, 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Home » Judaism » Parsha »

Accidental Mitzvos

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

Parshas Terumah begins with Hashem informing Moshe to tell the Bnei Yisrael to take for Him (Hashem) terumah from anyone whose heart desires to do so. Rashi says that the money must be given lishmah – for the sake of giving to Hashem.

Many meforshim were bothered by the following point and questions: we know that there is a machlokes in the Gemara whether mitzvos require kavanah (see Rosh Hashanah 28a). According to the opinion that mitzvos are not required to be performed with kavanah, why does this mitzvah of giving to the Mishkan require kavanah that it be given lishmah? Additionally, even the dissenting opinion that requires kavanah in the performance of mitzvos agrees that for the mitzvah of tzedakah one does not need to have kavanah to fulfill the mitzvah. For example, if one drops money that ends up in a poor man’s hands he has fulfilled the mitzvah of tzedakah – without even knowing it. So why, regarding the mitzvah of donating to the Mishkan, does the pasuk require lishmah?

Some Acharonim differentiated between kavanah and lishmah. In this view, kavanah is the intention to perform a mitzvah and that the person wants to fulfill his obligation. Lishmah is the act of doing the mitzvah for the correct intentions. Although a mitzvah may not require kavanah, it may nevertheless require lishmah.

Perhaps we can answer the second question. The opinion that requires kavanah agrees that it is not required regarding the mitzvah of giving tzedakah. However, the mitzvah of donating to the Mishkan differs from the general mitzvah of tzedakah. The purpose of the mitzvah of giving tzedakah is that the poor man will have money. Once that is accomplished, the mitzvah is fulfilled. Thus, even if one does not have kavanah to perform the mitzvah, once its purpose is accomplished he has fulfilled his obligation.

But the purpose of the mitzvah of donating to the Mishkan was not so the Mishkan has enough money. Hashem would ensure that the Mishkan has enough money even without this donation. The purpose of this mitzvah was to give us the opportunity to give toward the Mishkan. In such a scenario the opinion requiring kavanah in the performance of mitzvos requires that one have kavanah.

Another mitzvah whereby the opinion requiring kavanah is in agreement with the view that one can fulfill a mitzvah without having kavanah is the mitzvah of p’ru u’revu (bearing offspring). This mitzvah is accomplished when one brings children into the world. Thus, even if one does not have kavanah when performing this mitzvah, he will have fulfilled his obligation.

In order to answer the original question, I believe that we need to understand the opinion that does not generally require kavanah. The underlying machlokes as to whether mitzvos require kavanah is based on what makes a mitzvah. There is no dispute that a transgression has occurred (albeit b’shogeig) when one eats a forbidden food. Why? Because once the Torah forbade the eating of pig, it is forbidden to eat pigs. We need not have kavanah to render a pig a pig; it exists as a pig without our intentions. Consequently, when one eats a pig he has transgressed.

Similarly, regarding mitzvos, what makes the act of shaking a lulav a mitzvah? It is not an existing item; rather, it is a palm branch – not a mitzvah. The opinion requiring mitzvos to be performed with kavanah holds this way because in order to turn a palm branch into a mitzvah, one must intend to use it for the purpose of fulfilling a mitzvah.

The opinion not requiring that mitzvos be performed with kavanah follows this logic: once Hashem commands us to do something it becomes a reality. For instance, palm branches are now items of mitzvos – even without our intention to have it this way. Accordingly, if one shakes a lulav without intending to use it for the purpose of fulfilling a mitzvah he has, according to this opinion, fulfilled his obligation.

The mitzvah of donating to the Mishkan or to the Beis HaMikdah was different than other mitzvos. As mentioned earlier, Hashem does not need our money; the sole purpose of this mitzvah was to give Klal Yisrael the opportunity to give to Hashem. It is an integral part of this mitzvah that one has the desire and intention to do so. Otherwise, if one’s money somehow ends up in the Mishkan or Beis HaMikdash, he would not have accomplished this mitzvah’s goal.

About the Author: For questions or comments, e-mail RabbiRFuchs@gmail.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

One Response to “Accidental Mitzvos

  1. I don’t understand, i’ve heard of mitvah, what is kavanah? Also please tell me what lishmah is? And why is this important?

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Rav Aharon Lichtenstein
Republished: My Rebbe Rav Aharon Lichtenstein Is Awarded the Israel Prize 2014
Latest Judaism Stories
Torah scroll. (illustrative only)

For humans, reducing flesh is generally a good thing whereas its expansion is generally a bad thing

Hertzberg-041715

Lincoln was not a perfect man. But he rose above his imperfections to do what he thought was right not matter the obstacles.

Arch of Titus

Adon Olam: An Erev Shabbat Musical Interlude Courtesy of David Herman

Daf-Yomi-logo

Oh My, It’s Copper!
‘…And One Who Is A Coppersmith’
(Kethubboth 77a)

The omer sacrifice of loose barley flour was more fitting for animal consumption than human consumption and symbolizes the depths to which the Jewish slaves had sunk.

Question: If Abraham was commanded to circumcise his descendants on the eighth day, why do Arabs – who claim to descend from Abraham through Yishmael – wait until their children are 13 to circumcise them? I am aware that this is a matter of little consequence to our people. Nevertheless, this inconsistency is one that piques my curiosity.

M. Goldman
(Via E-mail)

When Chazal call not eating treif food a chok, that refers to how it functions.

His mother called “Yoni, Yoni!” Her eyes, a moment earlier dark with pain, shone with joy and hope

Kashrut reminds us that in the end, God is the arbiter of right and wrong.

In a cab with Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach & Rav Elayshiv discussing if/when to say tefillas haderech

The successful student listens more than speaks out; wants his ideas critiqued, not just appreciated

Why would it not be sufficient to simply state lehoros from which we derive that in such a state one may not issue any psak?

What do we learn about overcoming loss from the argument between Moses and Aaron’s remaining 2 sons?

Each of the unique roles attributed to Moshe share the common theme that they require of and grant higher sanctity to the individual filling the role.

Because of the way the piece of my finger had been severed, the doctors at the hospital were not able to reattach it. They told me I’d have to see a specialist.

“The problem is that the sum total is listed is $17,000. However, when you add the sums mentioned, it is clear that the total of $17,000 is an error. Thus, Mr. Broyer owes me $18,000, not $17,000.”

More Articles from Rabbi Raphael Fuchs
Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

Why would it not be sufficient to simply state lehoros from which we derive that in such a state one may not issue any psak?

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The Netziv answered that there is a difference between a piece of bread that was cut already in front of you, and one that was cut from beforehand.

Why is it necessary to invite people to eat from the korban Pesach?

The Ran asks why the Gemara concludes that since we are unsure which two of the four we must recline for, that we must recline for all four.

The Chasam Sofer answers that one of only prohibited from wearing a garment that contains shatnez if he does so while wearing the garment for pleasure purposes.

The Aruch Laner asks: How can Rashi say that the third Beis Hamikdash will descend as fire from heaven when every Jew prays several times a day for the rebuilding of the Beis Hamikdash?

The Ohr Hachayim rules that one may not manipulate the system; rather he must state his opinion as he see the ruling in the case; not as he would like the outcome of the verdict to become.

He suggests that the general admonition only dictates that a father may not actively enable his son to perform an aveirah.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/parsha/accidental-mitzvos/2014/01/30/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: