web analytics
January 28, 2015 / 8 Shevat, 5775
 
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Home » Judaism » Parsha »

Bentching On The Mon

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

This column is dedicated to the refuah sheleimah of Shlomo Eliezer ben Chaya Sarah Elka.

In this week’s parshah we derive the mitzvah of birchas hamazon from the pasuk of “v’achalta v’savata u’veirachta” (Devarim 8:10). This mitzvah is to recite three berachos mi’de’oraisa and one mi’de’rabbanan after one eats bread made from the five grains (wheat, spelt, oats, rye, and barley).

There are several questions regarding this mitzvah. The Gemara in Berachos 48b says that Moshe Rabbeinu instituted the first berachah of bentching when the Bnei Yisrael ate the mon in the midbar. The Chazon Ish quotes from the Gemara in Berachos 51b that says that one can only bentch if the food has not yet completely been digested. Once the food has been completely digested one can no longer bentch. The Gemara in Yuma 75b says that the mon was absorbed into the Bnei Yisrael’s bodies; there was no digestion necessary. How then, the Chazon Ish asks, were they able to bentch after eating the mon – if it was always after it was already digested?

Another question regarding the Bnei Yisrael’s bentching on the mon was asked to Rabbi Avraham, the son of the Rambam. The question was, how could the Bnei Yisrael have bentched after eating the mon when the mon was not comprised of one of the five grains? Even if one will say that the mon was treated as if it was bread made from the five grains, the chachamim and Rabban Gamliel disagree about this in Berachos 37b. Even Rabban Gamliel only grants that on such a food the berachah recited is “al hamichyah,” not bentching. So how could the Bnei Yisrael have bentched on the mon?

Yet another question that is asked is this: the indication from the pasuk from which we derive this mitzvah is that the mitzvah of bentching only became applicable once the Bnei Yisrael entered into Eretz Yisrael. The pasuk speaks about the mailos of Eretz Yisrael when it commands us to bentch. Additionally, the Gemara in Berachos 20b discusses whether women are obligated mi’de’oraisa in the mitzvah of bentching – or only mi’de’rabbanan. Rashi explains that the reason why women would be exempt mi’de’oraisa is because they did not receive a portion of land in Eretz Yisrael. How is this reconciled with the Gemara in Berachos 48b that says that Moshe Rabbeinu instituted the first berachah of bentching when the mon began to fall? At that point, the Bnei Yisrael had not yet entered Eretz Yisrael.

To answer all of these questions we look at a Rabbeinu Bichaya in Parshas Beshalach on the pasuk,u’vaboker tisbe’u lechem, vidatem ki ani Hashem(Shemos 16:12). Rabbeinu Bichaya explains that at that time, when the mon fell, Hashem commanded the Bnei Yisrael to bentch and thank Him for the mon. This was not the general mitzvah of bentching that is derived from the pasuk in this week’s parshah; this was when Moshe Rabbeinu instituted the first berachah of bentching. Although Moshe instituted it for the specific obligation to bentch on the mon, we use the same berachah for our obligation to bentch as well.

Based on this we can answer that while it is true that the mon was not comprised of one of the five grains, and that it was immediately absorbed into their bodies without digestion (which would not obligate one in the mitzvah of bentching that is derived from the pasuk in this week’s parshah), the Bnei Yisrael were not bentching out of the obligation derived in our parshah. They were commanded in a similar mitzvah that applied only to the mon. Therefore they had to bentch, even though their food did not meet the requirements of the general mitzvah to bentch.

With this we can also explain why the Bnei Yisrael bentched after eating the mon even though the general mitzvah of bentching was not applicable until they entered Eretz Yisrael. Additionally, we can explain another question. The mon began to fall in Marah, before mattan Torah. Bnei Yisrael were not yet even commanded to bentch. How could Moshe have instituted a berachah for the general mitzvah of bentching if it wasn’t yet a mitzvah? Furthermore, why did Moshe not institute the berachah on the matzos that the Bnei Yisrael brought out of Mitzrayim?

The answer is as Rabbeinu Bichaya says: the bentching that the Bnei Yisrael were commanded to perform after eating the mon was a different obligation than the general one. That obligation was specifically to be recited after eating the mon. Thus Moshe did not institute it prior to the falling of the mon, and that is why he instituted it before mattan Torah.

About the Author: For questions or comments, e-mail RabbiRFuchs@gmail.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Bentching On The Mon

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
The IAF reportedly hit a Syrian military target in Damascus around midnight.
IDF Retaliates Against Syrian Military Targets, Sets Off Rocket Alarms on the Golan
Latest Judaism Stories
Tissot_The_Waters_Are_Divided

Leading by example must be visible, regarding where, when and how-like Nachshon entering the Red Sea

Torah-Hakehillah-121914

Rabbi Yaakov Nagen, a Ram at Yeshivat Otniel, notes that the verse is suggesting that retelling the story of the Exodus is so important that Hashem is performing ever-greater miracles specifically so that parents can tell their stories to future generations.

Parshat Bo

Before performing the 10th plague God makes a fundamental argument about the ultimate nature of justice.

Daf-Yomi-logo

Life Before The Printed Word
‘A Revi’is Of Blood’
(Yevamos 114a-b)

How is it possible that the clothing was more valuable to them than gold or silver?

Question: If Abraham was commanded to circumcise his descendants on the eighth day, why do Arabs – who claim to descend from Abraham through Yishmael – wait until their children are 13 to circumcise them? I am aware that this is a matter of little consequence to our people. Nevertheless, this inconsistency is one that piques my curiosity.

M. Goldman
(Via E-mail)

“It means that the disqualification of relatives as witnesses is a procedural issue, not a question of honesty,” explained Rabbi Dayan.

Property ownership is an extremely important and fundamental right and principle according to the Torah.

The tenderest description of the husband/wife relationship is “re’im v’ahuvim/loving, kind friends”

And if a person can take steps to perform the mitzvah, he should do so (even if he won’t be held accountable for not performing it due to circumstances beyond his control).

Suddenly, she turns to me and says, “B’emet, I need to thank you, you made me excited to come back to Israel.”

Pesach is called “zikaron,” a Biblical term used describing an object eliciting a certain memory

Recouping $ and assets from Germans and Swiss for their Holocaust actions is rooted in the Exodus

Pharaoh perverted symbols of life (the Nile and midwives) into agents of death.

I think that we have to follow the approach of the Tannaim and Amoraim. They followed the latest scientific developments of their time.

More Articles from Rabbi Raphael Fuchs
Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

And if a person can take steps to perform the mitzvah, he should do so (even if he won’t be held accountable for not performing it due to circumstances beyond his control).

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The Brisker Rav suggests that the barad, in fact, only fell on people, animals, and vegetation.

Why is it necessary to perform an aveirah punishable by lashes in order to be deemed a legal rashah and be pasul l’eidus m’d’Oraisa?

Why was Yaakov not afraid that granting Yosef’s sons the status of shevatim would cause jealousy among his children?

Rav Akiva Eiger is assuming that the logic of the halacha that both the son and his mother are obligated to honor his father and therefore he must honor his fathers wishes first, is a mathematical equation.

It is clear that Tosafos maintains that only someone who lives in a house must light Chanukah candles.

But how could there have been any validity to Yosef’s allegations?

If one converts for the sole purpose of marrying a Jew the conversion is invalid.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/parsha/bentching-on-the-mon/2013/07/25/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: