web analytics
April 25, 2015 / 6 Iyar, 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Home » Judaism » Parsha »

Bringing Korbanos Today

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

This week’s parshah continues the discussion of the halachos of korbanos. Before describing the halachos of a certain korban, the words often used in pesukim are “zos Toras hachatas, zos Toras ha’asham” (these are the laws of this korban).

Rabbi Yitzchak, in the Gemara (Menachos 110a), derives from these pesukim that anyone who learns about a korban from the Torah is considered to have actually sacrificed that korban. Similarly, the Gemara in Ta’anis 27b says that during the times of the Beis HaMikdash one would bring a korban to receive atonement. When there is no Beis HaMikdash, one can learn the halachos of korbanos and Hashem will consider the person to have brought that korban.

The Tur (Orach Chaim 1) says that one should try to recite the parshiyos of the korbanos during the daytime, since that is when the korbanos were brought. He also says that after reciting the parshah of each korban one should recite a short prayer, asking Hashem to consider his recitation of the parshah as fulfillment of having brought the korban. (This tefillah is found in most siddurim.) The Tur, however, says that this tefillah should not be recited after reading the parshah of the korban chatas, since a korban chatas may not be brought as a nedavah (voluntary korban). The rest of the korbanos may be brought voluntarily; thus, even if one is not obligated to bring a korban, he can recite the parshah and the tefillah.

The Maharshal (Teshuvos 64) disagrees with the Tur; he personally says the tefillah after the parshah of the korban chatas. To facilitate the issue that the Tur raised – that the korban chatas may not be brought as a nedavah – the Maharshal suggests saying the following prior to reciting the tefillah: “If I am obligated to bring a korban chatas, let this reading be considered before You as if I have actually brought a korban chatas.”

The Taz (Orach Chaim 1:7) is dissatisfied with the Maharshal’s suggestion. He asks: since a chatas cannot be brought as a nedavah, how can one say that his recitation of the parshah should only be accepted as a chatas if he is obligated to bring one? That is, by definition a nedavah since if one is not obligated to bring a chatas the korban will be a voluntary korban.

The Pri Megadim (Mishbetzos Zahav to the Taz there) says that Acharonim have answered the Taz’s question by explaining that the Maharshal did not mean that if he was not obligated to bring a korban, the recitation should then be considered a korban chatas nedavah. The flip side of the recitation – if one is not obligated to bring a korban chatas – is that the recitation should not be considered as if he brought a korban; rather, it should just be as if he read a parshah in the Torah.

I think that another point must be clarified. If a korban chatas cannot be brought as a nedavah, how can one read the parshah of the korban chatas if he is not certain that he is obligated to bring one? Doesn’t the actual reading of the parshah render it as if he has brought the korban? The later tefillah does not transform it into a korban, as the Gemaras quoted earlier say that the learning of the parshiyos is considered as if one has brought the korban. The tefillah is merely a prayer that compliments the recitation of the parshah.

Additionally, the Magen Avraham says in the name of the Shalah that on Shabbos one should not recite the tefillah after the recitation of the parshiyos of the korbanos because a korban nedavah may not be brought on Shabbos. The Har Tzvi (Orach Chaim 1) asks this: If a korban nedavah may not be brought on Shabbos, how can we recite the parshiyos of the korbanos in the first place? Even without the recitation of the tefillah, the recitation of the parshiyos serves the purpose of one actually bringing a korban.

It seems that the Gemaras that say that the learning of the parshiyos of the korbanos is considered as if one has brought those korbanos is contingent on the person’s intentions. If one reads the parshah without thinking that his learning of the parshah should be considered as if he has brought a korban, it will not be considered as though he did. The tefillah that was instituted to be recited after one reads the parshah was established to ensure that one’s intentions are to render the reading as if he has brought the korban.

I believe that if one was not required to bring a certain korban and still recited the parshah of that korban, Hashem will not consider that recitation to have been to his detriment. Thus, in a scenario whereby bringing a korban could be problematic, we do not recite the tefillah; we leave it up to Hashem to decide whether this recitation should be considered as if the individual had brought a korban. Consequently, both on Shabbos and according to the Tur regarding a korban chatas, the tefillah should be omitted.

About the Author: For questions or comments, e-mail RabbiRFuchs@gmail.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Bringing Korbanos Today”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Car - A-Tor
Updated: Three Injured in Jerusalem Terror Attack, Ambulances and Mayor’s Car also Attacked
Latest Judaism Stories
Torat-Hakehillah-logo-NEW

In her diary, Anne Frank wrote words that provided hope for a humanity faced with suffering.

Leff-042415

The Arizal taught this same approach, making the point that the Torah would never mention wicked people and their sins if there was not great depth involved from which we are to learn from.

Staum-042415

Humility is not achieved when all is well and life is peachy but rather when times are trying and challenging.

In order to be free of the negative consequences of violating a shvu’ah or a neder, the shvu’ah or neder themselves must be annulled.

“I accept the ruling,” said Mr. Broyer, “but would like to understand the reasoning.”

He feared the people would have a change of heart and support Rechavam.

Ramifications Of A Printers Error
‘The Note Holder’s Burden of Proof’
(Kesubos 83b)

Question: If Abraham was commanded to circumcise his descendants on the eighth day, why do Arabs – who claim to descend from Abraham through Yishmael – wait until their children are 13 to circumcise them? I am aware that this is a matter of little consequence to our people. Nevertheless, this inconsistency is one that piques my curiosity.

M. Goldman
(Via E-mail)

In this case one could reason that by applying halach achar harov we could permit the forbidden bird as well.

“What a way to spend a Sunday afternoon,” my husband remarked. “Well, baruch Hashem we are safe, there was no accident, and I’m sure there is a good reason for everything that happened to us,” I mused.

The answer to this question is based on one of the greatest shortcomings of man – self-limiting beliefs.

Myth that niddah=dirty stopped many women from accepting laws of family purity and must be shattered

In every generation is the challenge to purge the culture of our exile from our minds and our hearts

Rabbi Fohrman connects the metzora purification process with the korban pesach.

The day after Israel was declared a State, everyone recited Hallel and people danced in the streets.

More Articles from Rabbi Raphael Fuchs
Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

In this case one could reason that by applying halach achar harov we could permit the forbidden bird as well.

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

Why would it not be sufficient to simply state lehoros from which we derive that in such a state one may not issue any psak?

The Netziv answered that there is a difference between a piece of bread that was cut already in front of you, and one that was cut from beforehand.

Why is it necessary to invite people to eat from the korban Pesach?

The Ran asks why the Gemara concludes that since we are unsure which two of the four we must recline for, that we must recline for all four.

The Chasam Sofer answers that one of only prohibited from wearing a garment that contains shatnez if he does so while wearing the garment for pleasure purposes.

The Aruch Laner asks: How can Rashi say that the third Beis Hamikdash will descend as fire from heaven when every Jew prays several times a day for the rebuilding of the Beis Hamikdash?

The Ohr Hachayim rules that one may not manipulate the system; rather he must state his opinion as he see the ruling in the case; not as he would like the outcome of the verdict to become.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/parsha/bringing-korbanos-today/2014/03/13/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: