web analytics
May 27, 2015 / 9 Sivan, 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Home » Judaism » Parsha »

Chametz After Pesach

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

A Jew is prohibited to own chametz on Pesach. Thus, he must destroy all his chametz beforehand. If he doesn’t and owns chametz on Pesach, the Mishnah in Pesachim 28a says that the chametz cannot be eaten after Pesach mi’de’rabbanan. (Chametz that belonged to a non-Jew, however, can be eaten after Pesach.)

There seems to be conflicting reasons for this prohibition. The Gemara in Pesachim 29a clearly states that Chazal imposed a k’nas for transgressing bal yeira’eh u’bal yimatzei. However, the Rambam (Hilchos Chametz U’Matzah 1:4) adds that even if a Jew unintentionally or completely by accident (an oneis) owned chametz during Pesach, the food is still prohibited after Pesach so that he will be more be more careful in the future.

In other words, as the Maggid Mishnah points out, even if someone has not transgressed the bal yeira’eh u’bal yimatzei, the chametz is still prohibited. According to the Rambam, the k’nas applies to any chametz on Pesach with which one could, in theory, transgress the aveirah – even if no transgression actually occurred.

Similarly, the Ramban, in Pesachim 31, states explicitly that a person need not actually transgress the prohibition of bal yeira’eh u’bal yimatzei in order for the chametz to become prohibited. This is evident from the fact that chametz owned by a Jew on Pesach is forbidden to everyone afterwards – even though only one person sinned.

The Meiri, in Pesachim, quotes the Chachmei Luneil’s opinion that chametz which a Jew nullified before Pesach is permitted after Pesach since he has not transgressed bal yeira’eh u’bal yimatzei. The Chachmei Luneil stress that one must be certain that the nullification was sincere.

The Meiri, however, disagrees, ruling that the chametz is forbidden after Pesach. He says this is not because the owner violated the rule that one must burn one’s chametz and not rely on nullification alone. Even if the owner was not negligent and merely forgot to burn his chametz in addition to nullifying it, the chametz is still forbidden since one could, in theory, transgress the aveirah with it (which is not the case, for example, if a non-Jew owns the chametz for Pesach).

The Rambam would agree with the Meiri as he also maintains that one need not actually violate bal yeira’eh u’bal yimatzei for the k’nas of Chazal to apply.

Interestingly, even some of the Rishonim who argue that the k’nas only applies to people who transgress bal yeira’eh u’bal yimatzei agree that chametz that was mafkir is forbidden after Pesach. Why? These Rishonim explain that we are concerned that a person won’t be sincere when he is mafkir his chametz.

This is not comparable to someone who sells his chametz to a non-Jew. In that situation, we are not as concerned about that person’s sincerity. Even if a person is not completely sincere regarding a kinyan, the kinyan is still valid and binding. The same cannot be said regarding being mafkir something. There, sincerity matters.

About the Author: For questions or comments, e-mail RabbiRFuchs@gmail.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Chametz After Pesach

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
PA's soccer chief Jibril Rajoub, a member of the Fatah Central Committee.
Mass Arrests of FIFA Officials Omit PA Terrorist Rajoub
Latest Judaism Stories
Leff-052215

There is a great debate as to whether this story actually took place or is simply a metaphor, a prophetic vision shown to Hoshea by Hashem.

Staum-052215

Every person is presented with moments when he/she must make difficult decisions about how to proceed.

Torat-Hakehillah-logo-NEW

One does not necessarily share the opinions of one’s brother. One may disapprove of his actions, values, and/or beliefs. However, with brothers there is a bond of love and caring that transcends all differences.

Torah

This Shavuot let’s give G-d a gift too: Let’s make this year different by doing just 1 more mitzvah

Question: Should we wash our hands in the bathroom with soap and water, or by pouring water from a vessel with handles three times, alternating hands? I have heard it said that a vessel is used only in the morning upon awakening. What are the rules pertaining to young children? What is the protocol if […]

God and the divine origin of His Torah are facts even though we do not fully comprehend them.

So if we basically live the same life, why should he get eternal reward and not me?”

The question is: What about pidyon haben? Can one give the five sela’im required for pidyon haben to a kohen’s daughter?

In Parshas Pinchas the Torah introduces the Mussaf for Shavuos by describing it as Yom HaBikurim when we bring the new offering.

Rachel was thrown by the sight and began to caringly think whom this person might be.

The desert, with its unearthly silence & emptiness, is the condition in which the Word can be heard

The census focused on the individual, proving each is created as irreplaceable, unique images of God

Jewish survival in a dysfunctional world requires women assuming the role Hashem gave them at Sinai

The Honor Of Reading The Kesubah
‘Witnesses Sign Only After Reading…’
(Kesubos 109a)

Why does the Torah use two different words for “to count,” and what does each indicate?

From Bemidbar on and in Nevi’im, the nation is viewed primarily by its component parts, the tribes

More Articles from Rabbi Raphael Fuchs
Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The question is: What about pidyon haben? Can one give the five sela’im required for pidyon haben to a kohen’s daughter?

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The mitzvah that parents must give their son a bris milah is a mitzvah that they must perform for someone else – namely their son.

The Bach writes that he mentioned his insights to many of the leading gedolim and no one disproved him.

The Bais Halevi answers that we must properly define what is considered to be “in the middle of a mitzvah.”

In this case one could reason that by applying halach achar harov we could permit the forbidden bird as well.

Why would it not be sufficient to simply state lehoros from which we derive that in such a state one may not issue any psak?

The Netziv answered that there is a difference between a piece of bread that was cut already in front of you, and one that was cut from beforehand.

Why is it necessary to invite people to eat from the korban Pesach?

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/parsha/chametz-after-pesach/2014/04/14/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: