web analytics
October 21, 2014 / 27 Tishri, 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post
Meir Panim with Soldiers 5774 Roundup: Year of Relief and Service for Israel’s Needy

Meir Panim implements programs that serve Israel’s neediest populations with respect and dignity. Meir Panim also coordinated care packages for families in the South during the Gaza War.



Home » Judaism » Parsha »

Dividing The Tochacha

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The Mishnah in Megillah 31a states that one may not divide the tochacha of Parshas Bechukosai into more than one aliyah. This is codified in Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chaim,428:6).

The Gemara in Megillah 31b gives two reasons for this rule. One is based on Mishlei 3:11, “Mussar Hashem, b’ni al timas – My son, don’t be disgusted with Hashem’s mussar.” Rashi explains that if we divide the tochacha, it will appear as if we stopped in the middle because the first oleh was disgusted with it.

The second reason is offered by Reish Lakish who explains that one should not recite a berachah on puraniyos (punishments). Therefore, we begin the aliyah a few pesukim before the tochacha and don’t stop reading until a few pesukim after it is completed. If we would separate it, the second oleh would invariably have to recite a berachah on puraniyos.

The Gemara states that the halacha not to break up the tochacha only applies to the tochacha in Vayikra, not to the tochacha in Devarim. The Gemara’s distinction: the tochacha in Vayikra was addressed to Israel in the plural and said by Moshe in the name of Hashem, while the tochacha in Devarim was addressed to Israel in the singular and said by Moshe in his own name.

The Rambam (Hilchos Tefillah,13) codifies this rule in halacha seven. In halacha five the Rambam writes that one should always make sure to begin and end with a positive subject. It is apparent from the fact that the Rambam wrote these two halachos separately that the halacha to begin and end with something positive is distinct from the halacha not to divide the tochacha.

The Rema (Orach Chaim, 138) writes that one should always make certain that the reading of the Torah begins and ends with something positive. However, the Rama cites the halacha in 428:6 – that one may not divide the tochacha – as the reference for this rule. Apparently the Rema is following Reish Lakish’s explanation that the reason we don’t the tochacha is because we shouldn’t make a berachah on puraniyos – in other words, the rules about the tochacha and beginning and ending with a positive subject are linked.

And yet, the Gemara in Megillah clearly states that the halacha about the tochacha only applies to the tochacha in Vayikra, not to the tochacha in Devarim. This despite the fact that both tochachos are full of dire punishments. Perhaps we can say that Reish Lakish’s rule that we shouldn’t make a berachah on “puraniyos” only refers to the severest punishments (the ones in Devarim, we explained, are slightly less harsh), but the Rema clearly writes that we should always begin with something good. The tochacha is clearly not good (in the ordinary sense of the word). What then is the source of his statement that one must always begin with something positive?

The Vilna Gaon, on the Rama, cites a Yerushalmi that seemingly disagrees with the Bavli, saying that an additional reason why we should not divide the tochacha is because we should always begin with something positive.

The sefer Hararei Kedem suggests that the halacha not to divide the tochacha in Vayikra is m’akeiv. In other words, if a person does divide it, he must read it again. If he doesn’t, he will not have fulfilled his obligation. On the other hand, the halacha to begin and end with something positive is not m’akeiv.

That’s why the Rambam writes that one may divide the tochacha in Devarim – for this is the ikar halacha. However, based on the rule that one should always begin with something positive, the Rambam says that the minhag is not to divide either tochacha.

About the Author: For questions or comments, e-mail RabbiRFuchs@gmail.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Dividing The Tochacha

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu at a government meeting.
Proposed Conversion Bill, Change in Local Rabbinate Power Nixed by Netanyahu
Latest Judaism Stories
God-and the world

The creation of the world is described twice. Each description serves a unique purpose.

Questions-Answers-logo

Question: I recently loaned money to a friend who has been able to repay only part of it. This was an interest-free loan. We exchanged a signed IOU, not a proper shtar with witnesses, since I have always trusted her integrity and only wanted a document that confirms what was loaned and what was repaid. Now that shemittah is approaching, what should I do? Should I forgive the loan? And if my friend is not able to repay it, may I deduct the unpaid money from my ma’aser requirement?

Name Withheld

Lessons-in-Emunah-new

To the surprise of our protectzia-invested acquaintances, my family has thrived in our daled amos without that amenity, b’ezras Hashem.

Business-Halacha-logo

Shimon started adjusting the branches on the roof. In doing so, a branch fell off the other side of the car and hit the side-view mirror, cracking it.

I, the one who is housed inside this body, am completely and utterly spiritual.

Should we sit in the sukkah on a day that may be the eighth day when we are not commanded to sit in the sukkah at all?

For Appearance’s Sake
‘Shammai Did Not Follow Their Own Ruling’
(Yevamos 13b 14a)

If one hurts another human being, God is hurt; if one brings joy to another, God is more joyous.

I’m grateful to Hashem for everything; Just the same, I’d love a joyous Yom Tov without aggravation.

Bereshit: Life includes hard choices that challenge our decisions, leaving lingering complications.

Rabbi Fohrman:” Great evils are often wrought by those who are blithely unaware of the power they wield.”

The emphasis on choice, freedom and responsibility is a most distinctive features of Jewish thought.

The Torah emphasizes the joy of Sukkot, for after a season of labor, we celebrate our prosperity.

The encounter with the timeless stability of the divine occurs within the Sukkot.

Hashem created all human beings and it should sadden us when Hashem, their Father, does not see nachas from them.

More Articles from Rabbi Raphael Fuchs
Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

Others suggest that one cannot separate Shabbos from Yom Kippur by accepting Shabbos early.

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

While women are exempt from actually learning Torah, they are obligated in a different aspect of the mitzvah.

The Chafetz Chaim answered that there are two forms of teshuvah; teshuvah m’ahava and teshuvah m’yirah.

Since it is a Rabbinic prohibition we may follow the more lenient opinion.

They ask, how can Rabbeinu Gershom forbid marrying more than one wife, when the Torah explicitly permits it in this parshah?

First, how could a beis din of 23 judges present a guilty verdict in a capital punishment case? After all, only a majority of the 23 judges ruled in favor of his verdict.

According to Rabbi Yishmael one was not permitted to eat such an animal prior to entering Eretz Yisrael, while according to Rabbi Akiva one was permitted to eat animals if he would perform nechirah.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/parsha/dividing-the-tochacha/2014/05/14/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: