web analytics
January 30, 2015 / 10 Shevat, 5775
 
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Home » Judaism » Parsha »

Dividing The Tochacha

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The Mishnah in Megillah 31a states that one may not divide the tochacha of Parshas Bechukosai into more than one aliyah. This is codified in Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chaim,428:6).

The Gemara in Megillah 31b gives two reasons for this rule. One is based on Mishlei 3:11, “Mussar Hashem, b’ni al timas – My son, don’t be disgusted with Hashem’s mussar.” Rashi explains that if we divide the tochacha, it will appear as if we stopped in the middle because the first oleh was disgusted with it.

The second reason is offered by Reish Lakish who explains that one should not recite a berachah on puraniyos (punishments). Therefore, we begin the aliyah a few pesukim before the tochacha and don’t stop reading until a few pesukim after it is completed. If we would separate it, the second oleh would invariably have to recite a berachah on puraniyos.

The Gemara states that the halacha not to break up the tochacha only applies to the tochacha in Vayikra, not to the tochacha in Devarim. The Gemara’s distinction: the tochacha in Vayikra was addressed to Israel in the plural and said by Moshe in the name of Hashem, while the tochacha in Devarim was addressed to Israel in the singular and said by Moshe in his own name.

The Rambam (Hilchos Tefillah,13) codifies this rule in halacha seven. In halacha five the Rambam writes that one should always make sure to begin and end with a positive subject. It is apparent from the fact that the Rambam wrote these two halachos separately that the halacha to begin and end with something positive is distinct from the halacha not to divide the tochacha.

The Rema (Orach Chaim, 138) writes that one should always make certain that the reading of the Torah begins and ends with something positive. However, the Rama cites the halacha in 428:6 – that one may not divide the tochacha – as the reference for this rule. Apparently the Rema is following Reish Lakish’s explanation that the reason we don’t the tochacha is because we shouldn’t make a berachah on puraniyos – in other words, the rules about the tochacha and beginning and ending with a positive subject are linked.

And yet, the Gemara in Megillah clearly states that the halacha about the tochacha only applies to the tochacha in Vayikra, not to the tochacha in Devarim. This despite the fact that both tochachos are full of dire punishments. Perhaps we can say that Reish Lakish’s rule that we shouldn’t make a berachah on “puraniyos” only refers to the severest punishments (the ones in Devarim, we explained, are slightly less harsh), but the Rema clearly writes that we should always begin with something good. The tochacha is clearly not good (in the ordinary sense of the word). What then is the source of his statement that one must always begin with something positive?

The Vilna Gaon, on the Rama, cites a Yerushalmi that seemingly disagrees with the Bavli, saying that an additional reason why we should not divide the tochacha is because we should always begin with something positive.

The sefer Hararei Kedem suggests that the halacha not to divide the tochacha in Vayikra is m’akeiv. In other words, if a person does divide it, he must read it again. If he doesn’t, he will not have fulfilled his obligation. On the other hand, the halacha to begin and end with something positive is not m’akeiv.

That’s why the Rambam writes that one may divide the tochacha in Devarim – for this is the ikar halacha. However, based on the rule that one should always begin with something positive, the Rambam says that the minhag is not to divide either tochacha.

About the Author: For questions or comments, e-mail RabbiRFuchs@gmail.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Dividing The Tochacha

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Jeremy Bird, working for Israeli campaign outfit V15, shown at Ted Talk, May 20, 2014.
V15 US Political Operative Marinated in Hate-Israel Activism
Latest Judaism Stories
Staum-013015

People often think that all they are missing is “just a little more” and then they can be truly happy.

Torah-Hakehillah-121914

The Midrash is teaching a fundamental message of what it means to be a religious person.

Rabbi Sacks

Torah opposes slavery; G-d desires the free worship of free human beings, yet slavery’s permitted-?!

Rebbetzin Esther Jungreis

France allowed Islamists to flourish despite their loyalty to Islamic sharia law not French values

Approximately 18 years ago, my uncle called me into his office saying he had an urgent matter to discuss. I didn’t know what he had in mind.

“Where is God?” asked the Kotzker Rebbe “God is not everywhere but only where you let Him enter”

An Explosion In The Trench
‘With A Glowing Hot Knife’
(Yevamos 120b)

Her first tactic was tefillah; she immediately began to recite one perek after another of Tehillim.

When a miracle occurs that transcends nature, Hashem has broken the laws of nature to create the miracle.

“How could you have expected my glasses to be there?” argued Mr. Weiss. “You shouldn’t have to pay.”

Rather than submit to this fate and suffer torture and humiliation, Shaul decided to fall on his sword.

How can the Da’as Zekeinim say this was Hashem’s plan to allow them to become the Torah Nation? We know it was actually a punishment.

A strange midrash of fruit trees surrounding the Nation of Israel as they walked to freedom

Leading by example must be visible, regarding where, when and how-like Nachshon entering the Red Sea

Rabbi Yaakov Nagen, a Ram at Yeshivat Otniel, notes that the verse is suggesting that retelling the story of the Exodus is so important that Hashem is performing ever-greater miracles specifically so that parents can tell their stories to future generations.

More Articles from Rabbi Raphael Fuchs
Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

Rather than submit to this fate and suffer torture and humiliation, Shaul decided to fall on his sword.

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

And if a person can take steps to perform the mitzvah, he should do so (even if he won’t be held accountable for not performing it due to circumstances beyond his control).

The Brisker Rav suggests that the barad, in fact, only fell on people, animals, and vegetation.

Why is it necessary to perform an aveirah punishable by lashes in order to be deemed a legal rashah and be pasul l’eidus m’d’Oraisa?

Why was Yaakov not afraid that granting Yosef’s sons the status of shevatim would cause jealousy among his children?

Rav Akiva Eiger is assuming that the logic of the halacha that both the son and his mother are obligated to honor his father and therefore he must honor his fathers wishes first, is a mathematical equation.

It is clear that Tosafos maintains that only someone who lives in a house must light Chanukah candles.

But how could there have been any validity to Yosef’s allegations?

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/parsha/dividing-the-tochacha/2014/05/14/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: