web analytics
April 26, 2015 / 7 Iyar, 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Home » Judaism » Parsha »

Dividing The Tochacha

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The Mishnah in Megillah 31a states that one may not divide the tochacha of Parshas Bechukosai into more than one aliyah. This is codified in Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chaim,428:6).

The Gemara in Megillah 31b gives two reasons for this rule. One is based on Mishlei 3:11, “Mussar Hashem, b’ni al timas – My son, don’t be disgusted with Hashem’s mussar.” Rashi explains that if we divide the tochacha, it will appear as if we stopped in the middle because the first oleh was disgusted with it.

The second reason is offered by Reish Lakish who explains that one should not recite a berachah on puraniyos (punishments). Therefore, we begin the aliyah a few pesukim before the tochacha and don’t stop reading until a few pesukim after it is completed. If we would separate it, the second oleh would invariably have to recite a berachah on puraniyos.

The Gemara states that the halacha not to break up the tochacha only applies to the tochacha in Vayikra, not to the tochacha in Devarim. The Gemara’s distinction: the tochacha in Vayikra was addressed to Israel in the plural and said by Moshe in the name of Hashem, while the tochacha in Devarim was addressed to Israel in the singular and said by Moshe in his own name.

The Rambam (Hilchos Tefillah,13) codifies this rule in halacha seven. In halacha five the Rambam writes that one should always make sure to begin and end with a positive subject. It is apparent from the fact that the Rambam wrote these two halachos separately that the halacha to begin and end with something positive is distinct from the halacha not to divide the tochacha.

The Rema (Orach Chaim, 138) writes that one should always make certain that the reading of the Torah begins and ends with something positive. However, the Rama cites the halacha in 428:6 – that one may not divide the tochacha – as the reference for this rule. Apparently the Rema is following Reish Lakish’s explanation that the reason we don’t the tochacha is because we shouldn’t make a berachah on puraniyos – in other words, the rules about the tochacha and beginning and ending with a positive subject are linked.

And yet, the Gemara in Megillah clearly states that the halacha about the tochacha only applies to the tochacha in Vayikra, not to the tochacha in Devarim. This despite the fact that both tochachos are full of dire punishments. Perhaps we can say that Reish Lakish’s rule that we shouldn’t make a berachah on “puraniyos” only refers to the severest punishments (the ones in Devarim, we explained, are slightly less harsh), but the Rema clearly writes that we should always begin with something good. The tochacha is clearly not good (in the ordinary sense of the word). What then is the source of his statement that one must always begin with something positive?

The Vilna Gaon, on the Rama, cites a Yerushalmi that seemingly disagrees with the Bavli, saying that an additional reason why we should not divide the tochacha is because we should always begin with something positive.

The sefer Hararei Kedem suggests that the halacha not to divide the tochacha in Vayikra is m’akeiv. In other words, if a person does divide it, he must read it again. If he doesn’t, he will not have fulfilled his obligation. On the other hand, the halacha to begin and end with something positive is not m’akeiv.

That’s why the Rambam writes that one may divide the tochacha in Devarim – for this is the ikar halacha. However, based on the rule that one should always begin with something positive, the Rambam says that the minhag is not to divide either tochacha.

About the Author: For questions or comments, e-mail RabbiRFuchs@gmail.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Dividing The Tochacha

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Car - A-Tor
Updated: Three Injured in Jerusalem Terror Attack, Ambulances and Mayor’s Car also Attacked
Latest Judaism Stories
Torat-Hakehillah-logo-NEW

In her diary, Anne Frank wrote words that provided hope for a humanity faced with suffering.

Leff-042415

The Arizal taught this same approach, making the point that the Torah would never mention wicked people and their sins if there was not great depth involved from which we are to learn from.

Staum-042415

Humility is not achieved when all is well and life is peachy but rather when times are trying and challenging.

In order to be free of the negative consequences of violating a shvu’ah or a neder, the shvu’ah or neder themselves must be annulled.

“I accept the ruling,” said Mr. Broyer, “but would like to understand the reasoning.”

He feared the people would have a change of heart and support Rechavam.

Ramifications Of A Printers Error
‘The Note Holder’s Burden of Proof’
(Kesubos 83b)

Question: If Abraham was commanded to circumcise his descendants on the eighth day, why do Arabs – who claim to descend from Abraham through Yishmael – wait until their children are 13 to circumcise them? I am aware that this is a matter of little consequence to our people. Nevertheless, this inconsistency is one that piques my curiosity.

M. Goldman
(Via E-mail)

In this case one could reason that by applying halach achar harov we could permit the forbidden bird as well.

“What a way to spend a Sunday afternoon,” my husband remarked. “Well, baruch Hashem we are safe, there was no accident, and I’m sure there is a good reason for everything that happened to us,” I mused.

The answer to this question is based on one of the greatest shortcomings of man – self-limiting beliefs.

Myth that niddah=dirty stopped many women from accepting laws of family purity and must be shattered

In every generation is the challenge to purge the culture of our exile from our minds and our hearts

Rabbi Fohrman connects the metzora purification process with the korban pesach.

The day after Israel was declared a State, everyone recited Hallel and people danced in the streets.

More Articles from Rabbi Raphael Fuchs
Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

In this case one could reason that by applying halach achar harov we could permit the forbidden bird as well.

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

Why would it not be sufficient to simply state lehoros from which we derive that in such a state one may not issue any psak?

The Netziv answered that there is a difference between a piece of bread that was cut already in front of you, and one that was cut from beforehand.

Why is it necessary to invite people to eat from the korban Pesach?

The Ran asks why the Gemara concludes that since we are unsure which two of the four we must recline for, that we must recline for all four.

The Chasam Sofer answers that one of only prohibited from wearing a garment that contains shatnez if he does so while wearing the garment for pleasure purposes.

The Aruch Laner asks: How can Rashi say that the third Beis Hamikdash will descend as fire from heaven when every Jew prays several times a day for the rebuilding of the Beis Hamikdash?

The Ohr Hachayim rules that one may not manipulate the system; rather he must state his opinion as he see the ruling in the case; not as he would like the outcome of the verdict to become.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/parsha/dividing-the-tochacha/2014/05/14/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: