web analytics
January 29, 2015 / 9 Shevat, 5775
 
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Home » Judaism » Parsha »

Is A Human Kosher?


Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

This column is dedicated to the refuah sheleimah of Shlomo Eliezer ben Chaya Sarah Elka.

In this week’s parshah the Torah teaches us which animals are kosher and which are not. There is a machlokes Rishonim whether one may eat human meat. The Rambam derives from a pasuk in this week’s parshah that says that from any animal that has split hooves and chews its cud, “osah tocheilu – that one you may eat” – that it is forbidden to eat human meat. However, the Rambam says that it is not a lo sa’asei but rather it is only an issur asei (a prohibition derived from something the Torah commands us to do, i.e. the Torah commanded us to eat from kosher animals; thus we can draw from this that we should not eat from anything else).

The Ra’uh (Kesubos 60a) is of the opinion that human meat is forbidden to eat by means of a lo sa’asei. The Ramban, the Rashba and the Ritvah opine that it is permitted to eat human meat.

The Ramban asks the following question on the Rambam and the Ra’uh: The Gemara, in Krisus 21b, says that human blood and milk is permitted to be consumed. If the meat of a human is indeed prohibited, we should apply the rule of kol hayotzei min hatamei, tamei – anything that comes out of a forbidden thing is also forbidden. Since it is forbidden to eat human meat it should also be forbidden to eat anything that comes out of a human – namely his blood and milk.

The Maggid Mishneh suggests two solutions to this question. He says that there is a special drasha that the Gemara made that permits the consumption of a human’s milk and blood. The fact that the Torah needed to write an extra drasha is a proof to the opinion of the Rambam. So if the meat of a human were indeed permitted to be consumed, why would the Torah need to write an extra drasha permitting human blood and milk? It should be permitted without a drasha, since if human meat is permitted human milk and blood should be as well. From this drasha we see that human meat is indeed forbidden; thus the Torah needed to write a special drasha to permit a human’s blood and milk.

Reb Chaim Soloveitchik explains that the Rishonim who asked this question knew that there is a special drasha that permits the blood and milk of a human. However, they learned that the drasha was not needed to permit the blood and milk from the issur of kol hayotzei min hatamei, tamei. Rather they understood the drasha was needed so that we would not consider milk and blood to be just like human flesh and prohibit the flesh, milk and blood all in the same prohibition. The drasha, in their view, permits not only milk and blood, but also permits human meat. This is their source that the meat of a human is permitted.

The second answer of the Maggid Mishneh is that the rule of kol hayotzei min hatamei, tamei only applies to something that is prohibited by a lo sa’asei. Something that is only prohibited by means of an asei does not have the ability to prohibit anything that comes out of it.

Some Acharonim explain the opinion of the Rambam based on the following Toras Kohanim in this week’s parshah: The Toras Kohanim says that Adam ha’rishon was originally prohibited from eating any animals; he was only permitted to eat fruits and vegetables. After the mabul, Hashem permitted Noach to eat animals. Hashem says that the bnei Yisrael cannot eat any animal except only kosher animals. We see from this that every living thing was originally prohibited, and needs a specific heter to permit it to be eaten. Since the Torah never explicitly permitted human meat, it should remain forbidden.

Based on this the Acharonim answer another question. The Zera Avraham asks how Adam and Noach, prior to being permitted to eat animals, could bring animals as korbanos. After all, anything that is forbidden to be eaten cannot be brought as a korban. The Oneg Yom Tov answers that the prohibition to eat animals prior to the mabul (and the existing prohibition to eat humans today) was not forbidden as a non-kosher animal. Rather they were kosher animals that the people were prohibited to eat – similar to a fast day whereby people cannot eat but the food remains kosher. On a fast day one may bring korbanos even though he may not eat them at that time. Therefore, the animals were fit to be brought as korbanos even though they were not fit for consumption at that time.

About the Author: For questions or comments, e-mail RabbiRFuchs@gmail.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Is A Human Kosher?”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Avigdor Lieberman, chairman of the crumbling Yisrael Beiteinu party.
Lieberman so Frantic for Votes He Calls for ‘Disproportionate Response’
Latest Judaism Stories
Tissot_The_Waters_Are_Divided

Leading by example must be visible, regarding where, when and how-like Nachshon entering the Red Sea

Torah-Hakehillah-121914

Rabbi Yaakov Nagen, a Ram at Yeshivat Otniel, notes that the verse is suggesting that retelling the story of the Exodus is so important that Hashem is performing ever-greater miracles specifically so that parents can tell their stories to future generations.

Parshat Bo

Before performing the 10th plague God makes a fundamental argument about the ultimate nature of justice.

Daf-Yomi-logo

Life Before The Printed Word
‘A Revi’is Of Blood’
(Yevamos 114a-b)

How is it possible that the clothing was more valuable to them than gold or silver?

Question: If Abraham was commanded to circumcise his descendants on the eighth day, why do Arabs – who claim to descend from Abraham through Yishmael – wait until their children are 13 to circumcise them? I am aware that this is a matter of little consequence to our people. Nevertheless, this inconsistency is one that piques my curiosity.

M. Goldman
(Via E-mail)

“It means that the disqualification of relatives as witnesses is a procedural issue, not a question of honesty,” explained Rabbi Dayan.

Property ownership is an extremely important and fundamental right and principle according to the Torah.

The tenderest description of the husband/wife relationship is “re’im v’ahuvim/loving, kind friends”

And if a person can take steps to perform the mitzvah, he should do so (even if he won’t be held accountable for not performing it due to circumstances beyond his control).

Suddenly, she turns to me and says, “B’emet, I need to thank you, you made me excited to come back to Israel.”

Pesach is called “zikaron,” a Biblical term used describing an object eliciting a certain memory

Recouping $ and assets from Germans and Swiss for their Holocaust actions is rooted in the Exodus

Pharaoh perverted symbols of life (the Nile and midwives) into agents of death.

I think that we have to follow the approach of the Tannaim and Amoraim. They followed the latest scientific developments of their time.

More Articles from Rabbi Raphael Fuchs
Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

And if a person can take steps to perform the mitzvah, he should do so (even if he won’t be held accountable for not performing it due to circumstances beyond his control).

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The Brisker Rav suggests that the barad, in fact, only fell on people, animals, and vegetation.

Why is it necessary to perform an aveirah punishable by lashes in order to be deemed a legal rashah and be pasul l’eidus m’d’Oraisa?

Why was Yaakov not afraid that granting Yosef’s sons the status of shevatim would cause jealousy among his children?

Rav Akiva Eiger is assuming that the logic of the halacha that both the son and his mother are obligated to honor his father and therefore he must honor his fathers wishes first, is a mathematical equation.

It is clear that Tosafos maintains that only someone who lives in a house must light Chanukah candles.

But how could there have been any validity to Yosef’s allegations?

If one converts for the sole purpose of marrying a Jew the conversion is invalid.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/parsha/is-a-human-kosher/2013/04/04/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: