web analytics
January 26, 2015 / 6 Shevat, 5775
 
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Home » Judaism » Parsha »

May One Look At The Aron?

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The Torah states at the end of this week’s parshah that when Bnei Yisrael travel in the midbar, the kohanim must take the paroches and cover the aron with it. Other items from the Mishkan also had to be covered.

This was necessary so that the levi’im wouldn’t accidentally touch one of the vessels or look at the aron while it was being inserted into its place and die as a result.

Rishonim debate whether the prohibitions against looking at the aron and touching holy vessels are included among the 613 mitzvos. Rabbeinu Sadya Gaon (Lavim 212), the Behag, and the Yereim (329) believe they are while the Rambam and Sefer HaChinuch believe they are not. (This does not mean that looking at the aron or touching the vessels is okay according to these Rishonim; many acts are prohibited mi’de’oraisa but not included among the 613 mitzvos.)

The Rambam doesn’t include these prohibitions because he maintains that they only applied while Bnei Yisrael were traveling in the midbar, and any prohibition that does not apply to every generation cannot be counted among the 613 mitzvos (as the Rambam writes in his third shoresh).

The Rambam adds that although the Gemara (Sanhedrin 82b) derives from this lav that one who steals a holy vessel may be killed by a kana’i, the prohibition is nevertheless not explicit in the pasuk. Only mitzvos that are clearly stated in the pasuk may be counted as one of the 613 mitzvos.

The Gemara (Yoma 54a) says that when Klal Yisrael were oleh regel, the kohanim would remove the paroches and allow them to see the aron and the keruvim embracing in order to show them that Hashem loves them. The Gemara wonders why this was permitted. It explains that the Jews in the desert were like a kalah who is modest around her fiancé in her parents’ house. Rashi explains that in the midbar, Klal Yisrael were still not “comfortable” with the shechinah; therefore, they were not allowed to see the aron. But later on, they were permitted to look.

However, the Gemara then reports a story that implies that Beni Yisrael were never allowed to look. A kohen in the time of the second Beis HaMikdash noticed a strange floor and wished to inform his peers of this. But he died before he could tell anyone. The Gemara explains that the aron was buried there and states that we can infer from this story that the prohibition against looking at the aron applies even after the Bnei Yisrael left the midbar, which is why the kohen died.

So were Jews who lived after the dor hamidbar allowed to look or not? The Gemara answer: The prohibition applies in every generation. The only exception was the era of the first Beis Hamikdash. In that era, Jews were allowed to see the keruvim embracing

Rav Yerucham Fishel Perlow, in his commentary on Rabbeinu Sadya Gaon, asks how the Rambam can exclude this prohibition base on the theory that it only applied to the generation of the midbar when the Gemara, as we’ve just seen, explicitly states that it applies to all generations (with the exception of the era of the first Beis Hamikdash).

Rav Perlow suggests that the Rambam based his position on a different Gemara – Sota 35a – that disagrees with the Gemara in Yoma. Shmuel Aleph 6:19 records that Hashem killed some of Beis Shemesh’s inhabitants because they “looked at the aron” when the Philistines returned it to their city. Examining this story, the Gemara in Sotah asks why they deserved death for looking at the aron. Rabbi Avahu and Rabbi Elazar answer that they acted in a disrespectful manner.

About the Author: For questions or comments, e-mail RabbiRFuchs@gmail.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “May One Look At The Aron?”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Amazon drone delivers to the door..
Drone Found on White House Lawn
Latest Judaism Stories
Tissot_The_Waters_Are_Divided

Leading by example must be visible, regarding where, when and how-like Nachshon entering the Red Sea

Torah-Hakehillah-121914

Rabbi Yaakov Nagen, a Ram at Yeshivat Otniel, notes that the verse is suggesting that retelling the story of the Exodus is so important that Hashem is performing ever-greater miracles specifically so that parents can tell their stories to future generations.

Parshat Bo

Before performing the 10th plague God makes a fundamental argument about the ultimate nature of justice.

Daf-Yomi-logo

Life Before The Printed Word
‘A Revi’is Of Blood’
(Yevamos 114a-b)

How is it possible that the clothing was more valuable to them than gold or silver?

Question: If Abraham was commanded to circumcise his descendants on the eighth day, why do Arabs – who claim to descend from Abraham through Yishmael – wait until their children are 13 to circumcise them? I am aware that this is a matter of little consequence to our people. Nevertheless, this inconsistency is one that piques my curiosity.

M. Goldman
(Via E-mail)

“It means that the disqualification of relatives as witnesses is a procedural issue, not a question of honesty,” explained Rabbi Dayan.

Property ownership is an extremely important and fundamental right and principle according to the Torah.

The tenderest description of the husband/wife relationship is “re’im v’ahuvim/loving, kind friends”

And if a person can take steps to perform the mitzvah, he should do so (even if he won’t be held accountable for not performing it due to circumstances beyond his control).

Suddenly, she turns to me and says, “B’emet, I need to thank you, you made me excited to come back to Israel.”

Pesach is called “zikaron,” a Biblical term used describing an object eliciting a certain memory

Recouping $ and assets from Germans and Swiss for their Holocaust actions is rooted in the Exodus

Pharaoh perverted symbols of life (the Nile and midwives) into agents of death.

I think that we have to follow the approach of the Tannaim and Amoraim. They followed the latest scientific developments of their time.

More Articles from Rabbi Raphael Fuchs
Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

And if a person can take steps to perform the mitzvah, he should do so (even if he won’t be held accountable for not performing it due to circumstances beyond his control).

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The Brisker Rav suggests that the barad, in fact, only fell on people, animals, and vegetation.

Why is it necessary to perform an aveirah punishable by lashes in order to be deemed a legal rashah and be pasul l’eidus m’d’Oraisa?

Why was Yaakov not afraid that granting Yosef’s sons the status of shevatim would cause jealousy among his children?

Rav Akiva Eiger is assuming that the logic of the halacha that both the son and his mother are obligated to honor his father and therefore he must honor his fathers wishes first, is a mathematical equation.

It is clear that Tosafos maintains that only someone who lives in a house must light Chanukah candles.

But how could there have been any validity to Yosef’s allegations?

If one converts for the sole purpose of marrying a Jew the conversion is invalid.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/parsha/may-one-look-at-the-aron/2014/05/22/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: