web analytics
July 5, 2015 / 18 Tammuz, 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Home » Judaism » Parsha »

May One Look At The Aron?

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The Torah states at the end of this week’s parshah that when Bnei Yisrael travel in the midbar, the kohanim must take the paroches and cover the aron with it. Other items from the Mishkan also had to be covered.

This was necessary so that the levi’im wouldn’t accidentally touch one of the vessels or look at the aron while it was being inserted into its place and die as a result.

Rishonim debate whether the prohibitions against looking at the aron and touching holy vessels are included among the 613 mitzvos. Rabbeinu Sadya Gaon (Lavim 212), the Behag, and the Yereim (329) believe they are while the Rambam and Sefer HaChinuch believe they are not. (This does not mean that looking at the aron or touching the vessels is okay according to these Rishonim; many acts are prohibited mi’de’oraisa but not included among the 613 mitzvos.)

The Rambam doesn’t include these prohibitions because he maintains that they only applied while Bnei Yisrael were traveling in the midbar, and any prohibition that does not apply to every generation cannot be counted among the 613 mitzvos (as the Rambam writes in his third shoresh).

The Rambam adds that although the Gemara (Sanhedrin 82b) derives from this lav that one who steals a holy vessel may be killed by a kana’i, the prohibition is nevertheless not explicit in the pasuk. Only mitzvos that are clearly stated in the pasuk may be counted as one of the 613 mitzvos.

The Gemara (Yoma 54a) says that when Klal Yisrael were oleh regel, the kohanim would remove the paroches and allow them to see the aron and the keruvim embracing in order to show them that Hashem loves them. The Gemara wonders why this was permitted. It explains that the Jews in the desert were like a kalah who is modest around her fiancé in her parents’ house. Rashi explains that in the midbar, Klal Yisrael were still not “comfortable” with the shechinah; therefore, they were not allowed to see the aron. But later on, they were permitted to look.

However, the Gemara then reports a story that implies that Beni Yisrael were never allowed to look. A kohen in the time of the second Beis HaMikdash noticed a strange floor and wished to inform his peers of this. But he died before he could tell anyone. The Gemara explains that the aron was buried there and states that we can infer from this story that the prohibition against looking at the aron applies even after the Bnei Yisrael left the midbar, which is why the kohen died.

So were Jews who lived after the dor hamidbar allowed to look or not? The Gemara answer: The prohibition applies in every generation. The only exception was the era of the first Beis Hamikdash. In that era, Jews were allowed to see the keruvim embracing

Rav Yerucham Fishel Perlow, in his commentary on Rabbeinu Sadya Gaon, asks how the Rambam can exclude this prohibition base on the theory that it only applied to the generation of the midbar when the Gemara, as we’ve just seen, explicitly states that it applies to all generations (with the exception of the era of the first Beis Hamikdash).

Rav Perlow suggests that the Rambam based his position on a different Gemara – Sota 35a – that disagrees with the Gemara in Yoma. Shmuel Aleph 6:19 records that Hashem killed some of Beis Shemesh’s inhabitants because they “looked at the aron” when the Philistines returned it to their city. Examining this story, the Gemara in Sotah asks why they deserved death for looking at the aron. Rabbi Avahu and Rabbi Elazar answer that they acted in a disrespectful manner.

About the Author: For questions or comments, e-mail RabbiRFuchs@gmail.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “May One Look At The Aron?”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Iranian FM Javad Zarif and US Secy of State Kerry on the Fourth of July.
Report: Iran Deal Reached — on Sanctions Relief
Latest Judaism Stories
17th_of_Tammuz_(medium)_(english)

17th of Tammuz: Beginning 3 weeks of mourning for the destruction of the Holy Temple in Jerusalem.

Rabbi Avi Weiss

With Ruth, The Torah seems to be stating that children shouldn’t be punished for the sins of parents

Neihaus-070315

Without a foundation, one cannot hope to build a structure.

Torat-Hakehillah-logo-NEW

Why do we have a parsha in Sefer Shemos named after Yisro who was not only a former idolater, but actually served as a priest for Avodah Zarah!

Question: Should we wash our hands in the bathroom with soap and water, or by pouring water from a vessel with handles three times, alternating hands? I have heard it said that a vessel is used only in the morning upon awakening. What are the rules pertaining to young children? What is the protocol if no vessel is available? Additionally, may we dry our hands via an electric dryer?

Harry Koenigsberg
(Via E-Mail)

This Land Is ‘My’ Land
‘[If The Vow Was Imposed] In The Seventh Year…’
(Nedarim 42b)

The Shulchan Aruch in the very first siman states that one should rise in the morning like a lion, implying that simply rising form bed requires strength of a lion, in line with the Midrash.

Attempts to interpret the message of Hashem in the absence of divine prophecy ultimately may twist that message in unintended ways that can lead to calamitous events.

Suddenly, the pilot’s voice could be heard. He explained that this was a special day for those passengers on board who lived in Israel.

If the sick person is thrust into a situation where he is compelled to face his sickness head on, we who are not yet sick can encourage him by facing it with him.

All agree that Jews ARE different. How? Why? The Bible’s answer is surprising and profound.

What’s the nation of Israel’s purpose in the world? How we can bring God’s blessings into the world?

“Is there a difference between rescuing and other services?” asked Ploni.

To my dismay, I’ve seen that shidduch candidates with money become ALL desirable traits for marriage

Bil’am’s character is complex and nuanced; neither purely good nor purely evil.

More Articles from Rabbi Raphael Fuchs
Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The Shulchan Aruch in the very first siman states that one should rise in the morning like a lion, implying that simply rising form bed requires strength of a lion, in line with the Midrash.

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

Tosafos answers that nevertheless the sprinkling is a part of his taharah process.

Performing ketores outside the Beis Hamikdash, and at the wrong time is an aveirah.

Ten of the twelve spies returned with a negative report, stating that this would be impossible.

The flavor of the mon was not artificial; the mon would now consist of the actual flavors from the desired food.

Tosafos suggests several answers as to how a minor can own an item, m’d’Oraisa.

The question is: What about pidyon haben? Can one give the five sela’im required for pidyon haben to a kohen’s daughter?

The mitzvah that parents must give their son a bris milah is a mitzvah that they must perform for someone else – namely their son.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/parsha/may-one-look-at-the-aron/2014/05/22/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: