web analytics
October 23, 2014 / 29 Tishri, 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post
Meir Panim with Soldiers 5774 Roundup: Year of Relief and Service for Israel’s Needy

Meir Panim implements programs that serve Israel’s neediest populations with respect and dignity. Meir Panim also coordinated care packages for families in the South during the Gaza War.



Home » Judaism » Parsha »

May One Look At The Aron?

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The Torah states at the end of this week’s parshah that when Bnei Yisrael travel in the midbar, the kohanim must take the paroches and cover the aron with it. Other items from the Mishkan also had to be covered.

This was necessary so that the levi’im wouldn’t accidentally touch one of the vessels or look at the aron while it was being inserted into its place and die as a result.

Rishonim debate whether the prohibitions against looking at the aron and touching holy vessels are included among the 613 mitzvos. Rabbeinu Sadya Gaon (Lavim 212), the Behag, and the Yereim (329) believe they are while the Rambam and Sefer HaChinuch believe they are not. (This does not mean that looking at the aron or touching the vessels is okay according to these Rishonim; many acts are prohibited mi’de’oraisa but not included among the 613 mitzvos.)

The Rambam doesn’t include these prohibitions because he maintains that they only applied while Bnei Yisrael were traveling in the midbar, and any prohibition that does not apply to every generation cannot be counted among the 613 mitzvos (as the Rambam writes in his third shoresh).

The Rambam adds that although the Gemara (Sanhedrin 82b) derives from this lav that one who steals a holy vessel may be killed by a kana’i, the prohibition is nevertheless not explicit in the pasuk. Only mitzvos that are clearly stated in the pasuk may be counted as one of the 613 mitzvos.

The Gemara (Yoma 54a) says that when Klal Yisrael were oleh regel, the kohanim would remove the paroches and allow them to see the aron and the keruvim embracing in order to show them that Hashem loves them. The Gemara wonders why this was permitted. It explains that the Jews in the desert were like a kalah who is modest around her fiancé in her parents’ house. Rashi explains that in the midbar, Klal Yisrael were still not “comfortable” with the shechinah; therefore, they were not allowed to see the aron. But later on, they were permitted to look.

However, the Gemara then reports a story that implies that Beni Yisrael were never allowed to look. A kohen in the time of the second Beis HaMikdash noticed a strange floor and wished to inform his peers of this. But he died before he could tell anyone. The Gemara explains that the aron was buried there and states that we can infer from this story that the prohibition against looking at the aron applies even after the Bnei Yisrael left the midbar, which is why the kohen died.

So were Jews who lived after the dor hamidbar allowed to look or not? The Gemara answer: The prohibition applies in every generation. The only exception was the era of the first Beis Hamikdash. In that era, Jews were allowed to see the keruvim embracing

Rav Yerucham Fishel Perlow, in his commentary on Rabbeinu Sadya Gaon, asks how the Rambam can exclude this prohibition base on the theory that it only applied to the generation of the midbar when the Gemara, as we’ve just seen, explicitly states that it applies to all generations (with the exception of the era of the first Beis Hamikdash).

Rav Perlow suggests that the Rambam based his position on a different Gemara – Sota 35a – that disagrees with the Gemara in Yoma. Shmuel Aleph 6:19 records that Hashem killed some of Beis Shemesh’s inhabitants because they “looked at the aron” when the Philistines returned it to their city. Examining this story, the Gemara in Sotah asks why they deserved death for looking at the aron. Rabbi Avahu and Rabbi Elazar answer that they acted in a disrespectful manner.

About the Author: For questions or comments, e-mail RabbiRFuchs@gmail.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “May One Look At The Aron?”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Chaye Zisel Braun
Funeral for Chaye Zisel Braun Underway [photos]
Latest Judaism Stories
Rebbetzin Esther Jungreis

Boundaries must be set in every home. Parents and children are not pals. They are not equals.

Rabbi Avi Weiss, head of theYeshivat Chovevei Torah. Rabbi Asher Lopatin will be replacing him as head of the school.

Noah and his wife could not fathom living together as husband and wife and continuing the human race

Rabbi Sacks

The Babel story is the 2nd in a 4-act drama that’s unmistakably a connecting thread of Bereishit

Bible1

Our intentions are critical in raising children because they mimic everything we parents do & think

A humble person who achieves a position of prominence will utilize the standing to benefit others.

Myth #1: It is easy to be a B’nai Noach. It is extraordinarily hard to be a B’nai Noach.

The creation of the world is described twice. Each description serves a unique purpose.

Question: I recently loaned money to a friend who has been able to repay only part of it. This was an interest-free loan. We exchanged a signed IOU, not a proper shtar with witnesses, since I have always trusted her integrity and only wanted a document that confirms what was loaned and what was repaid. Now that shemittah is approaching, what should I do? Should I forgive the loan? And if my friend is not able to repay it, may I deduct the unpaid money from my ma’aser requirement?

Name Withheld

To the surprise of our protectzia-invested acquaintances, my family has thrived in our daled amos without that amenity, b’ezras Hashem.

Shimon started adjusting the branches on the roof. In doing so, a branch fell off the other side of the car and hit the side-view mirror, cracking it.

I, the one who is housed inside this body, am completely and utterly spiritual.

Should we sit in the sukkah on a day that may be the eighth day when we are not commanded to sit in the sukkah at all?

For Appearance’s Sake
‘Shammai Did Not Follow Their Own Ruling’
(Yevamos 13b 14a)

If one hurts another human being, God is hurt; if one brings joy to another, God is more joyous.

I’m grateful to Hashem for everything; Just the same, I’d love a joyous Yom Tov without aggravation.

Bereshit: Life includes hard choices that challenge our decisions, leaving lingering complications.

More Articles from Rabbi Raphael Fuchs
Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

Others suggest that one cannot separate Shabbos from Yom Kippur by accepting Shabbos early.

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

While women are exempt from actually learning Torah, they are obligated in a different aspect of the mitzvah.

The Chafetz Chaim answered that there are two forms of teshuvah; teshuvah m’ahava and teshuvah m’yirah.

Since it is a Rabbinic prohibition we may follow the more lenient opinion.

They ask, how can Rabbeinu Gershom forbid marrying more than one wife, when the Torah explicitly permits it in this parshah?

First, how could a beis din of 23 judges present a guilty verdict in a capital punishment case? After all, only a majority of the 23 judges ruled in favor of his verdict.

According to Rabbi Yishmael one was not permitted to eat such an animal prior to entering Eretz Yisrael, while according to Rabbi Akiva one was permitted to eat animals if he would perform nechirah.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/parsha/may-one-look-at-the-aron/2014/05/22/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: