web analytics
March 6, 2015 / 15 Adar , 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Home » Judaism » Parsha »

May One Look At The Aron?

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The Torah states at the end of this week’s parshah that when Bnei Yisrael travel in the midbar, the kohanim must take the paroches and cover the aron with it. Other items from the Mishkan also had to be covered.

This was necessary so that the levi’im wouldn’t accidentally touch one of the vessels or look at the aron while it was being inserted into its place and die as a result.

Rishonim debate whether the prohibitions against looking at the aron and touching holy vessels are included among the 613 mitzvos. Rabbeinu Sadya Gaon (Lavim 212), the Behag, and the Yereim (329) believe they are while the Rambam and Sefer HaChinuch believe they are not. (This does not mean that looking at the aron or touching the vessels is okay according to these Rishonim; many acts are prohibited mi’de’oraisa but not included among the 613 mitzvos.)

The Rambam doesn’t include these prohibitions because he maintains that they only applied while Bnei Yisrael were traveling in the midbar, and any prohibition that does not apply to every generation cannot be counted among the 613 mitzvos (as the Rambam writes in his third shoresh).

The Rambam adds that although the Gemara (Sanhedrin 82b) derives from this lav that one who steals a holy vessel may be killed by a kana’i, the prohibition is nevertheless not explicit in the pasuk. Only mitzvos that are clearly stated in the pasuk may be counted as one of the 613 mitzvos.

The Gemara (Yoma 54a) says that when Klal Yisrael were oleh regel, the kohanim would remove the paroches and allow them to see the aron and the keruvim embracing in order to show them that Hashem loves them. The Gemara wonders why this was permitted. It explains that the Jews in the desert were like a kalah who is modest around her fiancé in her parents’ house. Rashi explains that in the midbar, Klal Yisrael were still not “comfortable” with the shechinah; therefore, they were not allowed to see the aron. But later on, they were permitted to look.

However, the Gemara then reports a story that implies that Beni Yisrael were never allowed to look. A kohen in the time of the second Beis HaMikdash noticed a strange floor and wished to inform his peers of this. But he died before he could tell anyone. The Gemara explains that the aron was buried there and states that we can infer from this story that the prohibition against looking at the aron applies even after the Bnei Yisrael left the midbar, which is why the kohen died.

So were Jews who lived after the dor hamidbar allowed to look or not? The Gemara answer: The prohibition applies in every generation. The only exception was the era of the first Beis Hamikdash. In that era, Jews were allowed to see the keruvim embracing

Rav Yerucham Fishel Perlow, in his commentary on Rabbeinu Sadya Gaon, asks how the Rambam can exclude this prohibition base on the theory that it only applied to the generation of the midbar when the Gemara, as we’ve just seen, explicitly states that it applies to all generations (with the exception of the era of the first Beis Hamikdash).

Rav Perlow suggests that the Rambam based his position on a different Gemara – Sota 35a – that disagrees with the Gemara in Yoma. Shmuel Aleph 6:19 records that Hashem killed some of Beis Shemesh’s inhabitants because they “looked at the aron” when the Philistines returned it to their city. Examining this story, the Gemara in Sotah asks why they deserved death for looking at the aron. Rabbi Avahu and Rabbi Elazar answer that they acted in a disrespectful manner.

About the Author: For questions or comments, e-mail RabbiRFuchs@gmail.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “May One Look At The Aron?”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
PA/PLO Chairman Mahmoud Abbas addresses Central Committee convention in Ramallah.
PA Deciding to End Security Cooperation with IDF
Latest Judaism Stories
Rebbetzin Esther Jungreis

To the glee of all Israel haters it was Netanyahu who was accused of endangering US-Israel relations

Ki Tisa_lecture

Over and over, the text tells us about “keeping” Shabbat, about holiness, and a covenant – but why?

Aaron and  The Golden Calf by James Tissot

Aharon’s guilt with the golden calf is not clear-cut. What if Moshe were in his brother’s place?

Rabbi Sacks

The Sabbath is a full dress rehearsal for an ideal society that has not yet come to pass-but will

When Hashem told Moshe of the option to destroy the people and make him and his descendants into a great nation, Hashem was telling Moshe that it is up to him.

Just like Moses and Aaron, Mordechai decides to ruin the party…

An Auto Accident
‘All Agree That They Are Exempt’
(Kesubbos 35a)

Question: If Abraham was commanded to circumcise his descendants on the eighth day, why do Arabs – who claim to descend from Abraham through Yishmael – wait until their children are 13 to circumcise them? I am aware that this is a matter of little consequence to our people. Nevertheless, this inconsistency is one that piques my curiosity.

M. Goldman
(Via E-mail)

Why would the exemption of women from donating the half shekel exempt them from davening Musaf?

This concept should be very relevant to us as we, too, should be happy beyond description.

The Holocaust was the latest attempt of Amalek to destroy the special bond that we enjoy with God.

One can drink up to the Talmud’s criterion to confuse Mordechai and Haman-but not beyond.

“The voice is the voice of Yaakov, but the hands are the hands of Esav” gives great insight to Purim

Purim is the battleground of extremes, Amalek and Yisrael, with Zoroastrian Persia in between.

One should not give the money before Purim morning or after sunset.

More Articles from Rabbi Raphael Fuchs
Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The Chasam Sofer answers that one of only prohibited from wearing a garment that contains shatnez if he does so while wearing the garment for pleasure purposes.

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The Aruch Laner asks: How can Rashi say that the third Beis Hamikdash will descend as fire from heaven when every Jew prays several times a day for the rebuilding of the Beis Hamikdash?

The Ohr Hachayim rules that one may not manipulate the system; rather he must state his opinion as he see the ruling in the case; not as he would like the outcome of the verdict to become.

He suggests that the general admonition only dictates that a father may not actively enable his son to perform an aveirah.

Rather than submit to this fate and suffer torture and humiliation, Shaul decided to fall on his sword.

And if a person can take steps to perform the mitzvah, he should do so (even if he won’t be held accountable for not performing it due to circumstances beyond his control).

The Brisker Rav suggests that the barad, in fact, only fell on people, animals, and vegetation.

Why is it necessary to perform an aveirah punishable by lashes in order to be deemed a legal rashah and be pasul l’eidus m’d’Oraisa?

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/parsha/may-one-look-at-the-aron/2014/05/22/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: