web analytics
April 18, 2015 / 29 Nisan, 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Home » Judaism » Parsha »

Rov Vs. Chazakah

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The beginning of this week’s parshah discusses the halachos of a parah adumah (red heifer). The parah adumah is shechted and burnt, and its ashes are sprinkled on one who is tamei meis on the third and seventh days. The individual thereby becomes pure.

The Gemara in Chullin 11a seeks a source in the Torah for the halacha that one may follow a rov (majority) found in nature or tendencies (ruba d’lessa kaman). For example, most animals in the world are not treifos. Therefore, we can assume that the animal before us is not a treifah – even without checking. One of several suggestions the Gemara makes is that we can derive this from the parah adumah. The Gemara explains that we learn from the pasuk, “veshachat vesaraf – and you shall slaughter and burn it,” that just as a cow must be intact when it is slaughtered, so too the cow must be intact when it is burnt. Thus the cow may not be opened and checked to determine whether it is a treifah. The Gemara says that since the Torah refers to the parah adumah as a chatas, it is not allowed to be a treifah. The Gemara asks how we can be certain that the cow is not a treifah considering that it must be intact and cannot have its insides checked to determine whether it is a treifah. This is proof that the Torah intended for us to rely on the fact that the majority of cows is not treifah.

Tosafos (Chullin 11a, d”h minah) quotes from the Ba’alei Tosafos Rabbeinu Chaim that we learn another halacha – as it regards following a rov – from parah adumah. He says that we draw from this that in a situation that has a rov but has a chazakah that states the opposite, we follow the rov. This is known as ruba v’chazakah, ruba adif. We see that despite the fact that a chazakah is standing against the rov, the Gemara says that we follow the rov. The chazakah here is that the individual was certainly tamei prior to the sprinkling of the ashes, but now a doubt arises as to whether the cow was a treifah and fit to be a parah adumah. The chazakah of the person indicates that he should remain in his current status, namely to remain tamei. But since the rov says that the animal is not a treifah, we follow the rov – and the person is tahor.

Rav Akiva Eiger (Teshuvos Tinyanah 129) asks the following question on Tosafos: We know that a rov that has already been relied upon for other halachic matters takes on a stronger status. For example, in order for an animal to be counted toward ma’asar beheimah it must be certain – without any doubts. However, an animal that is a treifah is disqualified. How can we be certain that any animal can be counted toward ma’asar beheimah when perhaps it is a treifah? And even if we rely on the fact that the animal belongs to the rov of animals that are not treifah, this is only a majority; one still cannot be certain. Says Rav Akiva Eiger: Since we have relied on the rov and already assumed that the animal was not a treifah for other halachic matters, the animal is now certainly believed to not be a treifah.

Another example of this concerns the halacha that one who is a safek mamzer may marry another person who is also a safek mamzer. If a mamzer is a safek and there is a rov that says that he is not a mamzer, he remains permitted to marry another safek mamzer even though it is a safek. Asks Rav Akiva Eiger: Every person in the world is known to not be a safek mamzer because we apply the principle of rov, namely that the majority of women have children from their husbands. Since we only know this by means of a rov, every person should be permitted to marry a safek mamzer. Rav Akiva Eiger answers that since we have already relied on the rov for other matters, it takes on the status of certainty.

About the Author: For questions or comments, e-mail RabbiRFuchs@gmail.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Rov Vs. Chazakah”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
S300
Putin Warns Israel Against Weapons Sales to Ukraine as it Lifts Ban on S300 Sale to Iran
Latest Judaism Stories
Hertzberg-041715

Lincoln was not a perfect man. But he rose above his imperfections to do what he thought was right not matter the obstacles.

Arch of Titus

Adon Olam: An Erev Shabbat Musical Interlude Courtesy of David Herman

Daf-Yomi-logo

Oh My, It’s Copper!
‘…And One Who Is A Coppersmith’
(Kethubboth 77a)

Grunfeld-Raphael-logo

The omer sacrifice of loose barley flour was more fitting for animal consumption than human consumption and symbolizes the depths to which the Jewish slaves had sunk.

Question: If Abraham was commanded to circumcise his descendants on the eighth day, why do Arabs – who claim to descend from Abraham through Yishmael – wait until their children are 13 to circumcise them? I am aware that this is a matter of little consequence to our people. Nevertheless, this inconsistency is one that piques my curiosity.

M. Goldman
(Via E-mail)

When Chazal call not eating treif food a chok, that refers to how it functions.

His mother called “Yoni, Yoni!” Her eyes, a moment earlier dark with pain, shone with joy and hope

Kashrut reminds us that in the end, God is the arbiter of right and wrong.

In a cab with Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach & Rav Elayshiv discussing if/when to say tefillas haderech

The successful student listens more than speaks out; wants his ideas critiqued, not just appreciated

Why would it not be sufficient to simply state lehoros from which we derive that in such a state one may not issue any psak?

What do we learn about overcoming loss from the argument between Moses and Aaron’s remaining 2 sons?

Each of the unique roles attributed to Moshe share the common theme that they require of and grant higher sanctity to the individual filling the role.

Because of the way the piece of my finger had been severed, the doctors at the hospital were not able to reattach it. They told me I’d have to see a specialist.

“The problem is that the sum total is listed is $17,000. However, when you add the sums mentioned, it is clear that the total of $17,000 is an error. Thus, Mr. Broyer owes me $18,000, not $17,000.”

More Articles from Rabbi Raphael Fuchs
Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

Why would it not be sufficient to simply state lehoros from which we derive that in such a state one may not issue any psak?

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The Netziv answered that there is a difference between a piece of bread that was cut already in front of you, and one that was cut from beforehand.

Why is it necessary to invite people to eat from the korban Pesach?

The Ran asks why the Gemara concludes that since we are unsure which two of the four we must recline for, that we must recline for all four.

The Chasam Sofer answers that one of only prohibited from wearing a garment that contains shatnez if he does so while wearing the garment for pleasure purposes.

The Aruch Laner asks: How can Rashi say that the third Beis Hamikdash will descend as fire from heaven when every Jew prays several times a day for the rebuilding of the Beis Hamikdash?

The Ohr Hachayim rules that one may not manipulate the system; rather he must state his opinion as he see the ruling in the case; not as he would like the outcome of the verdict to become.

He suggests that the general admonition only dictates that a father may not actively enable his son to perform an aveirah.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/parsha/rov-vs-chazakah/2014/06/26/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: