web analytics
September 3, 2015 / 19 Elul, 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Home » Judaism » Parsha »

Rov Vs. Chazakah

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The beginning of this week’s parshah discusses the halachos of a parah adumah (red heifer). The parah adumah is shechted and burnt, and its ashes are sprinkled on one who is tamei meis on the third and seventh days. The individual thereby becomes pure.

The Gemara in Chullin 11a seeks a source in the Torah for the halacha that one may follow a rov (majority) found in nature or tendencies (ruba d’lessa kaman). For example, most animals in the world are not treifos. Therefore, we can assume that the animal before us is not a treifah – even without checking. One of several suggestions the Gemara makes is that we can derive this from the parah adumah. The Gemara explains that we learn from the pasuk, “veshachat vesaraf – and you shall slaughter and burn it,” that just as a cow must be intact when it is slaughtered, so too the cow must be intact when it is burnt. Thus the cow may not be opened and checked to determine whether it is a treifah. The Gemara says that since the Torah refers to the parah adumah as a chatas, it is not allowed to be a treifah. The Gemara asks how we can be certain that the cow is not a treifah considering that it must be intact and cannot have its insides checked to determine whether it is a treifah. This is proof that the Torah intended for us to rely on the fact that the majority of cows is not treifah.

Tosafos (Chullin 11a, d”h minah) quotes from the Ba’alei Tosafos Rabbeinu Chaim that we learn another halacha – as it regards following a rov – from parah adumah. He says that we draw from this that in a situation that has a rov but has a chazakah that states the opposite, we follow the rov. This is known as ruba v’chazakah, ruba adif. We see that despite the fact that a chazakah is standing against the rov, the Gemara says that we follow the rov. The chazakah here is that the individual was certainly tamei prior to the sprinkling of the ashes, but now a doubt arises as to whether the cow was a treifah and fit to be a parah adumah. The chazakah of the person indicates that he should remain in his current status, namely to remain tamei. But since the rov says that the animal is not a treifah, we follow the rov – and the person is tahor.

Rav Akiva Eiger (Teshuvos Tinyanah 129) asks the following question on Tosafos: We know that a rov that has already been relied upon for other halachic matters takes on a stronger status. For example, in order for an animal to be counted toward ma’asar beheimah it must be certain – without any doubts. However, an animal that is a treifah is disqualified. How can we be certain that any animal can be counted toward ma’asar beheimah when perhaps it is a treifah? And even if we rely on the fact that the animal belongs to the rov of animals that are not treifah, this is only a majority; one still cannot be certain. Says Rav Akiva Eiger: Since we have relied on the rov and already assumed that the animal was not a treifah for other halachic matters, the animal is now certainly believed to not be a treifah.

Another example of this concerns the halacha that one who is a safek mamzer may marry another person who is also a safek mamzer. If a mamzer is a safek and there is a rov that says that he is not a mamzer, he remains permitted to marry another safek mamzer even though it is a safek. Asks Rav Akiva Eiger: Every person in the world is known to not be a safek mamzer because we apply the principle of rov, namely that the majority of women have children from their husbands. Since we only know this by means of a rov, every person should be permitted to marry a safek mamzer. Rav Akiva Eiger answers that since we have already relied on the rov for other matters, it takes on the status of certainty.

About the Author: For questions or comments, e-mail RabbiRFuchs@gmail.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Rov Vs. Chazakah”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Keeping-Jerusalem
Marching On Toward Full Unification
Latest Judaism Stories
Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks

Happiness is not the central value of the Torah. Occurring ten times more is the word “simcha,” JOY

Torat-Hakehillah-logo-NEW

The common translation of the opening words of this week’s parsha, Ki Seitzei, is: “When you go out to war against your enemy.” Actually the text reads “al oyvecha” upon your enemy. The Torah is saying that when Israel goes out to war, they will be over and above their enemy. The reason why Bnei […]

Rabbi Avi Weiss

The love between Gd & Israel is deeper than marriage; beyond the infinite love of parent for child

Question: When a stranger approaches a congregant in shul asking for tzedakah, should the congregant verify that the person’s need is genuine? Furthermore, what constitutes tzedakah? Is a donation to a synagogue, yeshiva, or hospital considered tzedakah?

Zvi Kirschner
(Via E-Mail)

Since giving the machatzis hashekel will not change his financial situation, he is obligated to do so even though it is more than a fifth of his income.

Today, few people fast during the Days of Selichot, but the custom is to rise early to recite Selichot.

Each month is associated with a particular tribe. The month of Elul is matched up with Gad. What makes Gad unique?

Sanctions and indictment of the Jew, holding him to a higher standard, is as common and misplaced as ever.

To allow for free will, there are times when Hashem will allow a person the “opportunity to be the messenger.”

“There is a mitzvah to pay the worker on that day,” answered Mr. Lerner.

Be happy. Be grateful. God knows what he is doing. It is all happening for a reason.

We get so busy living our lives, handling our day-to-day little crises that we forget to go that one step deeper and appreciate our lives.

The promise for long life only comes from 2 commandments; What’s the connection between them?

Mighty Amalek deliberately attacked enemy’s weakest members, despicable even by ancient standards

If we parents fail to honor responsibilities then society’s children will pay the price for our sins

More Articles from Rabbi Raphael Fuchs
Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

Since giving the machatzis hashekel will not change his financial situation, he is obligated to do so even though it is more than a fifth of his income.

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

We can suggest that since Hashem Himself appointed Dovid there is no question. The rules are only in place for when we must chose a king ourselves.

Perhaps a careful reading of the pesukim in the parsha will shed light on this dilemma.

The second parshah of Shema is referring to keeping the rest of the mitzvos, and there the Torah does not require that one spend all of his money in order to perform the mitzvos.

Why would Moshe Rabbeinu have thought that the vow that disallowed him to enter Eretz Yisrael was annulled simply because he was allowed to conquer and enter the land of Sichon and Og?

In addition to the restrictions of Tisha B’Av, there are several restrictions that one may not perform during the week that Tisha B’Av falls in.

We do not find that Pinchas was chastised for what he did; on the contrary he was greatly rewarded.

The Shulchan Aruch in the very first siman states that one should rise in the morning like a lion, implying that simply rising form bed requires strength of a lion, in line with the Midrash.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/parsha/rov-vs-chazakah/2014/06/26/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: