web analytics
December 26, 2014 / 4 Tevet, 5775
 
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post
8000 meals Celebrate Eight Days of Chanukah – With 8,000 Free Meals Daily to Israel’s Poor

Join Meir Panim’s campaign to “light up” Chanukah for families in need.



Home » Judaism » Parsha »

The Korbanos Of Noach

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The Rambam writes in Hilchos Melachim 9:1 that Adam HaRishon was commanded in six mitzvos, and Noach was commanded in a seventh. Adam was commanded to not do the following: worship avodah zarah, curse Hashem, kill, gilui arayos, and steal. He was also commanded to set up a court system. In addition to those commands, Noach was commanded not to eat from ever min hachai (a limb detached from a live animal).

The Gemara in Sanhedrin 59b says that Adam was forbidden to eat any of the animals. He was only permitted to eat fruits and vegetables. He was therefore not commanded to not eat ever min hachai since he was not allowed to eat animals at all. The reason why the Rambam did not mention this prohibition is because it was not intended to last forever. Only after the mabul did Hashem permit Noach to eat animals, as the pasuk in this week’s parshah says: “kol remes asher hu chai lachem yiheyeh le’achlah” (Bereishis 9:3). Prior to this it was forbidden to kill an animal in order to eat it.

We find that Noach brought korbanos immediately after he exited the teivah, prior to being allowed to eat animals. Additionally, we find that in Parshas Bereishis, Hevel brought korbanos from animals although he was not allowed to eat them. The Gemara in Avodah Zarah 8a says that Adam brought korbanos as well.

Several Acharonim were bothered by a question (see Zera Avraham, end of siman 13). The Gemara in Menachos 6a says that a korban must be brought of something that may be eaten. This is referred to as “mashkeh Yisrael.” How could Noach, Adam, and Hevel have brought korbanos from animals that they themselves were forbidden to eat?

According to Tosafos (Sanhedrin 56b d”h achal), Adam was allowed to eat animals; he only was forbidden to kill an animal in order to eat it. However, if an animal would die on its own, he would be permitted to eat the animal. Based on this opinion, the question does not start because the meat of an animal was not forbidden to be eaten; rather it was only forbidden to kill an animal in order to eat it. But the Acharonim point out that the Rambam seems to disagree with Tosafos with his belief that Adam was forbidden to eat an animal even if it would die on its own. They imply this from the fact that the Rambam says that ever min hachai was only first commanded to Noach. The reason why it was not commanded to Adam is because he was forbidden to eat all animals. According to Tosafos, Adam was already forbidden to eat ever min hachai.

Some Acharonim suggest that the halacha of mashkeh Yisrael does not apply to a ben Noach who is bringing a korban. Thus Noach and Hevel did not have to bring korbanos from items that they could have eaten themselves. Others suggest that the halacha of mashkeh Yisrael only applies to korbanos brought on the Mizbeach. Even according to the opinion that Noach brought his korbanos on the place where the Mizbeach would later be built, it did not have the status of the actual Mizbeach.

I would like to suggest another answer. The halacha of mashkeh Yisrael requires that all items brought as a korban must be fit for consumption. However, if one ate hard cheese and cannot eat meat for six hours, he would nonetheless be permitted to bring a korban of animal meat. Similarly, one would be permitted to bring a korban on a fast day, when it is forbidden to eat anything. The reason for this is because in these cases the food is not forbidden in and of itself; rather, it is the person who cannot eat the food at that time.

I believe that the prohibition that existed prior to Hashem allowing Noach to eat animals was similar to that of a fast day, whereby the food was not intrinsically prohibited – only that the people could not eat it at that time. We do not find that Hashem changed something from being a non-kosher or forbidden food to becoming one that is permitted anywhere else. It is therefore likely that this prohibition was not intrinsic. Animals were never deemed as non-kosher for bnei Noach. They were simply not allowed to eat them, for it was as if it were a fast day regarding eating animals.

About the Author: For questions or comments, e-mail RabbiRFuchs@gmail.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “The Korbanos Of Noach”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Ayala Shapira, 11, is fighting for her life after suffering burn wounds when an Arab terrorist threw a Molotov cocktail at the car in which she was riding.
‘Slight Improvement’ in Life-threatening Condition of Firebomb Victim
Latest Judaism Stories
Grunfeld-Raphael-logo

The court cannot solely rely on death certificates issued by non-Jewish institutions without conducting its own investigation into the facts of the case.

Business-Halacha-logo

“I’m still not sure we have a right to damage his property,” said Mrs. Schloss. “Can you ask someone?”

Rabbi Sacks

Jacob’s blessing of Ephraim over Manasseh had nothing to do with age and everything to do with names

The Glory of Joseph

Slavery was universal; So, why was Egypt targeted in this object lesson?

Rav Akiva Eiger is assuming that the logic of the halacha that both the son and his mother are obligated to honor his father and therefore he must honor his fathers wishes first, is a mathematical equation.

The first requirement is a king must admit when he is wrong.

Reward And Punishment
‘Masser Rishon For The levi’im’
(Yevamos 86a)

Question: If Abraham was commanded to circumcise his descendants on the eighth day, why do Arabs – who claim to descend from Abraham through Yishmael – wait until their children are 13 to circumcise them? I am aware that this is a matter of little consequence to our people. Nevertheless, this inconsistency is one that piques my curiosity.

M. Goldman
(Via E-mail)

Reb Shlomo Zalman could not endure honorifics applied to him because of his enormous humility

Because we see these events as world changing, as moments in history, they become part of us forever.

They stammer “I’m not Orthodox,” as if that absolves them from the responsibility of calling to G-d

It’s fascinating how sources attain the status “traditional,” or its equivalent level of kashrus.

She was determined that the Law class was Dina’s best chance of finding a husband, and that was the real reason she wanted her to go to college.

But who would have ever guessed that Hashem would unlock the key to the birth on same day as the English anniversary of our wedding.

Rabbi Fohrman explores the question of how God communicates with us today.

More Articles from Rabbi Raphael Fuchs
Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

Rav Akiva Eiger is assuming that the logic of the halacha that both the son and his mother are obligated to honor his father and therefore he must honor his fathers wishes first, is a mathematical equation.

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

It is clear that Tosafos maintains that only someone who lives in a house must light Chanukah candles.

But how could there have been any validity to Yosef’s allegations?

If one converts for the sole purpose of marrying a Jew the conversion is invalid.

Rashi in Shabbos 9b writes that the reason why the tefillah of Ma’ariv is a reshus is because it was instituted corresponding to the burning of the eimurim from the korbanos – which was performed at night.

We find that in certain circumstances before the Torah was actually given, people were permitted to make calculations as to what would better serve Hashem, even if it were against a mitzvah or aveirah.

It is difficult to write about such a holy person, for I fear I will not accurately portray his greatness…

The implication of the Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chaim 233:2) is that one may not daven Minchah before six and one half hours into the day.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/parsha/the-korbanos-of-noach/2013/10/03/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: