The articles in this column are transcriptions and adaptations of shiurim by Rav Joseph Ber Soloveitchik, zt”l. The Rav’s unique perspective on Chumash permeated many of the shiurim and lectures he presented at various venues over a 40 plus year period. His words add an important perspective that makes the Chumash in particular, and our tradition in general, vibrant and relevant to our generation.
Brachos U’klalos (blessings and curses referred to also as the Tochecha) are found in Vayikra (Parshas Bechukosai) and Devarim (Parshas Ki Tavo). The Gemara (Megillah 31b) comments that when reading these sections of the Torah, one is permitted to pause in the middle of the Brachos U’klalos in Ki Tavo while one may not do so when reading the Brachos U’klalos in Bechukosai. The Gemara explains that the Brachos U’klalos in Bechukosai were given to Knesses Yisrael in the plural form and Moshe repeated them to the people as relayed mipi Hagevurah, via a direct transmission from Hashem. The Brachos U’klalos in Ki Tavo were given in the singular form and Moshe stated them on his own, mipi atzmo. Tosfos immediately comments that mipi Atzmo means that they were given through ruach Hakodesh.
Why distinguish between parts of the Torah to say that this part came from pi Hagevurah while the other part came from pi Moshe? All of Torah is mipi Hagevurah, divinely given by Hashem, so why distinguish between the sources of both sets of the Brachos U’klalos? How was Moshe’s role different in Parshas Ki Tavo relative to Parshas Bechukosai?
In the Tochecha in Bechukosai, Moshe was given the Brachos U’klalos as the representative, as well as a member, of Knesses Yisrael. Moshe’s role was that of a messenger, to transmit the message from Hashem to Bnei Yisrael. Hence the plural form is used to include all of Bnei Yisrael, including himself. In Parshas Ki Tavo, Hashem wanted Moshe to speak to the people in his own name and warn them of the consequences of their actions if they do not follow the Torah. However, in both Bechukosai and Ki Tavo, the Brachos U’klalos were determined and ordained by Hashem.
There were two parties involved in the covenant in Parshas Bechukosai: Hashem and Knesses Yisrael, and there is one messenger who is also a member of the second party: Moshe. In the covenant of Parshas Ki Tavo, the role of Moshe changed. That covenant was established with each individual of Bnei Yisrael. For example it says “V’hayisa meshuga” (and you will become depraved) in singular form. Hashem wanted Moshe to be the mashbia, the one who administers the oath, to Bnei Yisrael. In Parshas Ki Tavo, there were three parties involved in the covenant: Hashem, Moshe and Knesses Yisrael.
Why was Moshe’s role different in each of the sets of Brachos and Klalos? The first Tochecha was given by Hashem to Moshe prior to the breaking of the first Luchos Habris. In Parshas Mishpatim, Moshe sprinkled blood on the people and said that Hashem made a covenant with Bnei Yisrael on all these things, “Al kal hadevarim ha’ayleh.” This covenant included the reading of the Brachos U’klalos from Parshas Bechukosai. According to Rashi, this ceremony took place right before Bnei Yisrael received the Torah at Sinai, on the fourth day of Sivan. That is why we read Parshas Bechukosai prior to Shavuos, as its contents were part of the covenant that Hashem made with Knesses Yisrael at Sinai. The second set of Brachos and Klalos was given after the breaking of the first set of Luchos and the receipt of the second Luchos, in fact 38 years later in Arvos Moav. What changed in this time?
About the Author: Rabbi Joshua Rapps attended the Rav's shiur at RIETS from 1977 through 1981 and is a musmach of Yeshivas Rabbeinu Yitzchak Elchanan. He and his wife Tzipporah live in Edison, N.J. Rabbi Rapps can be contacted at email@example.com.
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.
If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.