web analytics
March 5, 2015 / 14 Adar , 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Home » Judaism » Parsha »

What Is Darkness?

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The ninth makkah that the Mitzriyim were plagued with was darkness. The pasuk says: “And there was darkness over the land of Mitzrayim, and they felt the darkness” (Shemos 10:21). Rashi explains that this plague’s darkness was darker than the night’s darkness. The pasuk says that people were unable to move from their places for three days, while the Bnei Yisrael enjoyed light.

There is a question as to whether darkness is its literal meaning, or if it is simply the absence of light. The fact that light overcomes darkness is not an indication that darkness is merely a lack of light. The reason that light shines in darkness is because that is how Hashem set the laws of nature. Even if darkness is a creation of its own making, it will still have to allow for light to shine through.

The Vilna Gaon, in Kol Eliyahu, says that there is a creation of darkness. He cites the pasuk in Yeshayah (45:7) that we recite every morning at the start of birchas kerias Shema: Hashem created light “u’vorei choshech” – and created darkness. The Vilna Gaon says that this implies that darkness was created, and is not merely the absence of light.

The Bach (Orach Chaim, siman 6) writes that the term “created” cannot connote something that is simply an absence or a cavity. He is discussing the berachah of “asher yatzar” in which we say “u’vara vo nekavim nekavim, chalulim chalulim – and created in him holes and holes and cavities and cavities. The Bach explains that the Tur had a different version of the berachah, whereby he did not say that Hashem created cavities, since a cavity is not created; the organ is created and a cavity is formed as a result. According to this explanation, the pasuk in Yeshayah is a clear indication that darkness is a creation.

However, the Ramban (Parshas Shemos 4:11) says that the term “created” can be appropriately used for things that are mere absences of other things. He says that a proof to such an idea is from the pasuku’vorei choshech,” which says that Hashem created darkness, something that is only the absence of light. This is the opinion of the Rambam in Moreh Nevuchim, volume 1 73:7, as well.

The Even Ezra and the Radak, on the pasuk in Yeshayah, explain that the use of the word “u’vorei” (referring to the creation of darkness) is not to be understood by its literal translation; rather, the word u’vorei” means he issued a decree as found to be used elsewhere. They explain that it cannot be translated as “created,” for darkness is merely the absence of light.

The Gemara, in Pesachim 2a, explains the pasuk in Bereishis, “And Hashem called the light day, and the darkness night” this way: Hashem told the light to rule by day and the darkness to reign at night. Why would Hashem have to tell darkness to reign at night? If darkness were merely the absence of light, by telling the light not to rule in the night it would be dark by default. This too indicates that darkness is a creation.

The Netziv explains that According to those who opine that darkness is a creation, there are two types of darkness. One is the darkness of the night; the other is the absence of light during the daytime. The darkness of the night is the creation of darkness, while during the day the darkness in a room is only the absence of light. The darkness of the night is darker than the dark caused by the absence of light during the daytime.

About the Author: For questions or comments, e-mail RabbiRFuchs@gmail.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

One Response to “What Is Darkness?”

  1. Sandra Schneider says:

    Parashah Bo

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
US Secretary of State John Kerry with German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier before P5+1 talks. (Nov. 22, 2014.)
Fears Over US Iran Deal Trigger Mideast Nuclear Race, Saudi-South Korea Deal
Latest Judaism Stories
Rebbetzin Esther Jungreis

To the glee of all Israel haters it was Netanyahu who was accused of endangering US-Israel relations

Ki Tisa_lecture

Over and over, the text tells us about “keeping” Shabbat, about holiness, and a covenant – but why?

Aaron and  The Golden Calf by James Tissot

Aharon’s guilt with the golden calf is not clear-cut. What if Moshe were in his brother’s place?

Rabbi Sacks

The Sabbath is a full dress rehearsal for an ideal society that has not yet come to pass-but will

When Hashem told Moshe of the option to destroy the people and make him and his descendants into a great nation, Hashem was telling Moshe that it is up to him.

Just like Moses and Aaron, Mordechai decides to ruin the party…

An Auto Accident
‘All Agree That They Are Exempt’
(Kesubbos 35a)

Question: If Abraham was commanded to circumcise his descendants on the eighth day, why do Arabs – who claim to descend from Abraham through Yishmael – wait until their children are 13 to circumcise them? I am aware that this is a matter of little consequence to our people. Nevertheless, this inconsistency is one that piques my curiosity.

M. Goldman
(Via E-mail)

Why would the exemption of women from donating the half shekel exempt them from davening Musaf?

This concept should be very relevant to us as we, too, should be happy beyond description.

The Holocaust was the latest attempt of Amalek to destroy the special bond that we enjoy with God.

One can drink up to the Talmud’s criterion to confuse Mordechai and Haman-but not beyond.

“The voice is the voice of Yaakov, but the hands are the hands of Esav” gives great insight to Purim

Purim is the battleground of extremes, Amalek and Yisrael, with Zoroastrian Persia in between.

One should not give the money before Purim morning or after sunset.

More Articles from Rabbi Raphael Fuchs
Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The Chasam Sofer answers that one of only prohibited from wearing a garment that contains shatnez if he does so while wearing the garment for pleasure purposes.

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The Aruch Laner asks: How can Rashi say that the third Beis Hamikdash will descend as fire from heaven when every Jew prays several times a day for the rebuilding of the Beis Hamikdash?

The Ohr Hachayim rules that one may not manipulate the system; rather he must state his opinion as he see the ruling in the case; not as he would like the outcome of the verdict to become.

He suggests that the general admonition only dictates that a father may not actively enable his son to perform an aveirah.

Rather than submit to this fate and suffer torture and humiliation, Shaul decided to fall on his sword.

And if a person can take steps to perform the mitzvah, he should do so (even if he won’t be held accountable for not performing it due to circumstances beyond his control).

The Brisker Rav suggests that the barad, in fact, only fell on people, animals, and vegetation.

Why is it necessary to perform an aveirah punishable by lashes in order to be deemed a legal rashah and be pasul l’eidus m’d’Oraisa?

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/parsha/what-is-darkness/2014/01/02/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: