web analytics
August 1, 2015 / 16 Av, 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Home » Judaism » Parsha »

When A Judge Can Recuse Himself

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

In this week’s parshah, Parshas Devarim, the Torah includes several halachos concerning dayanim. The Torah commands a judge to judge righteously, and to not show favoritism. The pasuk also says that a judge must hear a case regardless of whether its magnitude is small or large. Then the Torah instructs a judge not to fear any man, for the judgment is God’s (Devarim 1:17).

The Gemara in Sanhedrin 6b discusses when a judge may recuse himself from a case. The Gemara says that just because one of the litigants is powerful and difficult to deal with, causing the judge to fear that this litigant will harass him if he rules against him, the judge may not recuse himself from the case. In order to recuse himself from a case, the judge must have either not yet heard the arguments of the case or, having heard the arguments, has not yet seen where the case is heading. Under these circumstances he may recuse himself from the case. However, once he sees in what direction the case is going, he may not recuse himself due to his fear as outlined earlier. As the source for this halacha, the Gemara cites the pasuk in this week’s parshah (see above) about not fearing any man when judging.

The same is said about a talmid who, sitting by his rebbe who is paskening, knows a zechus for one of the litigants. The talmid is not allowed to speak up due to any fear. If he remains silent, he is in violation of this prohibition.

The Rambam brings this halacha in Mishneh Torah, Hilchos Sanhedrin 22:1. There, he adds that a judge should not say (once he has heard arguments and understands the direction the case is heading) that since one of the litigants is a rasha he fears that if he rules against him, this litigant will perhaps harm his children or damage his property. If one of the litigants is a public figure, the judge may not recuse himself under any circumstances.

But Rashi, on the Gemara, explains that the only concern a judge may have in recusing himself is if he thinks that one of the litigants will harass him and cause him to change the verdict. The Bach (Choshen Mishpat 12) explains that the problem this will cause is that ultimately beis din will not look good. Based on this, the Bach says that if both litigants are difficult to deal with and are powerful individuals, a judge will not be allowed to recuse himself from the case – even before hearing arguments. This is so because the only reason why a judge is permitted to recuse himself is due to the fear that he may overturn his judgment if one of the litigants is difficult and powerful. However, if both litigants are equally difficult and powerful, there is no fear that the judge will overturn his verdict – for the other litigant would not allow it.

According to the Rambam, one is not obligated to take a case before he has heard arguments, even if both litigants are equally difficult and powerful.

It is evident that one must risk financial losses, and even risk the lives of his relatives, in order to not violate this prohibition. The Shulchan Aruch (Yoreh De’ah 157:1) says that one must risk losing all of his money in order to not violate a lo sa’aseh. There is a machlokes, though, as to whether this applies to all lo sa’aseh or only those requiring action. The Pri Megadim (Orach Chaim 656, Eishel Avraham 8) and the Chavos Yair (Teshuvos Yoreh De’ah 4) say that one only need risking the loss of all of his money if the lo sa’aseh that he would be transgressing requires an action. If the lo sa’aseh is violated passively, one need not lose money in order to not be in violation of it.

About the Author: For questions or comments, e-mail RabbiRFuchs@gmail.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “When A Judge Can Recuse Himself”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Matt Lee of the Associated Press at the State Department press briefing.
ObameDeal Exposed: It’s not ‘Secret’ from Congress but not in Writing
Latest Judaism Stories
Torat-Hakehillah-logo-NEW

By internalizing the Exodus, it is as if we ourselves were redeemed from Egypt.

Neihaus-073115

Each Shabbos we add the tefilla of “Ritzei” to Birchas HaMazon. In it we ask Hashem that on this day of Shabbos He should be pleased with us and save us. What exactly do we want to be saved from? Before we answer this question, let’s talk about this Friday, the 15th of Av. Many […]

Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks

Amongst the greatest disagreements in Judaism is the understanding of the 1st of the 10 Commandments

Daf-Yomi-logo

The Day He Heard
‘One May Seek Revocation Of A Confimation’
(Nedarim 69a)

The director picked up the phone to Rabbi Dayan. “One of our counselors lost his check,” he said. “Do we have to issue a new one or is it his loss?”

Six events occurred on Tu B’Av, the 15th of Av, making it a festive day in the Jewish calendar.

Why would Moshe Rabbeinu have thought that the vow that disallowed him to enter Eretz Yisrael was annulled simply because he was allowed to conquer and enter the land of Sichon and Og?

Question: When a stranger approaches a congregant in shul asking for tzedakah, should the congregant verify that the person’s need is genuine? Furthermore, what constitutes tzedakah? Is a donation to a synagogue, yeshiva, or hospital considered tzedakah?

Zvi Kirschner
(Via E-Mail)

Snow in Jerusalem! For many New Englanders like me, snow pulls at our nostalgic heartstrings like nothing else can.

Man has conflicting wishes and desires. Man has forces pulling him in competing directions.

Perhaps the admonition here is that we should not trivialize the events of the past by saying that they are irrelevant to the modern Jew.

One must view the settlement of Israel in a positive light. Thinking otherwise is a grievous sin.

Reaching a stronger understanding of what Moses actually did to prevent him from entering the land

Anti-Zionism, today’s anti-Semitism, has gone viral, tragically supported globally & by many Jews

More Articles from Rabbi Raphael Fuchs
Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

Why would Moshe Rabbeinu have thought that the vow that disallowed him to enter Eretz Yisrael was annulled simply because he was allowed to conquer and enter the land of Sichon and Og?

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

In addition to the restrictions of Tisha B’Av, there are several restrictions that one may not perform during the week that Tisha B’Av falls in.

We do not find that Pinchas was chastised for what he did; on the contrary he was greatly rewarded.

The Shulchan Aruch in the very first siman states that one should rise in the morning like a lion, implying that simply rising form bed requires strength of a lion, in line with the Midrash.

Tosafos answers that nevertheless the sprinkling is a part of his taharah process.

Performing ketores outside the Beis Hamikdash, and at the wrong time is an aveirah.

Ten of the twelve spies returned with a negative report, stating that this would be impossible.

The flavor of the mon was not artificial; the mon would now consist of the actual flavors from the desired food.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/parsha/when-a-judge-can-recuse-himself/2014/07/31/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: