web analytics
February 2, 2015 / 13 Shevat, 5775
 
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Home » Judaism » Parsha »

Who Did The Redemption?


Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

This column is dedicated to the refuah sheleimah of Shlomo Eliezer ben Chaya Sarah Elka.

In this week’s parshah the Torah tells us that the bechorim were replaced by the levi’im to serve in the Mikdash. The Torah says that there were 273 more bechorim than levi’im. Those bechorim could not simply be replaced, and had to be redeemed. Hashem told Moshe that each bechor should give five shekalim to Moshe, who, in turn, should give them to Aharon and his sons. With that, they would be redeemed.

The sefer, Yehuda Ya’aleh, comments on this episode. The Rivash and the Rema, in Shulchan Aruch Yoreh De’ah 305:10, rule that a father cannot appoint a shaliach to perform pidyon ha’ben. The Yehuda Ya’aleh says that it seems that there is an open parshah in the Torah – the parshah of pidyon bechorim – that says that one may appoint a shaliach to perform pidyon. In this parshah Moshe Rabbeinu served as a shaliach for the bechorim, having delivered the money to Aharon and his sons.

Although this parshah is discussing pidyon bechorim and not pidyon ha’ben, the two are comparable. In fact we learn several halachos from this parshah: from the pidyon of the bechorim to the halachos of pidyon ha’ben. For example, the Rambam says that we derive that the money of pidyon ha’ben can only be given to male kohanim – not to females. This results from a pasuk in this week’s parshah that is discussing the pidyon bechorim.

Another example of a halacha derived from the pidyon bechorim that is applied to pidyon ha’ben is that a baby can have a pidyon ha’ben before his bris (if his bris was pushed off until after he is 30 days old). We draw this from the fact that the bechorim in the midbar performed pidyon even though none had a bris milah.

Another point that the Yehuda Ya’aleh makes is on the Chasam Sofer. The Chasam Sofer quotes a Ran in Pesachim that explicitly says that one can appoint a shaliach to perform pidyon ha’ben. The Chasam Sofer says that this shaliach can only be a kohen or a yisrael. A levi cannot be a shaliach for pidyon ha’ben because in order for one to be a shaliach, he must be able to perform that action himself. So since a levi cannot perform pidyon ha’ben he cannot serve as a shaliach. The Yehuda Ya’aleh says that we should derive from this parshah that a levi can serve as a shaliach from the fact that Moshe Rabbeinu – who was a levi – served as a shaliach on behalf of the bechorim.

There is a machlokes whether the opinion of the Rivash and the Rema, who rule that one cannot become a shaliach, applies even if the shaliach is using the father’s money or only if he uses his own money. The Chasam Sofer opines that the Rivash would permit one to be the father’s shaliach if he uses the father’s money. Therefore, this question from Moshe Rabbeinu – who was a levi and served as a shaliach – is not as difficult, according to the Chasam Sofer himself, because Moshe used the money of the bechorim.

The Panim Yafos suggests that Moshe served as a shaliach only to deliver the money, not to perform the pidyon. The Rivash and the Rema only restricted the father from appointing a shaliach to perform the actual pidyon. However, they never restricted a father from sending the money with a shaliach if the father himself would actually recite the pidyon statement. Based on this, we must suggest that each bechor – individually – went to Aharon and his sons and recited the pidyon statement.

The Brisker Rav says that it is implicit from the pesukim that the bechorim were redeemed when they gave the money to Moshe Rabbeinu – before he gave it to Aharon and his sons. This is difficult to understand. How could the pidyon have been accomplished when the money got to Moshe’s hands? One cannot suggest that Moshe served as a shaliach of Aharon and his sons to accept the money because there is a halacha that one can only be a shaliach of the ba’al hamamon (one who owns the money).

We indeed find that a woman can appoint a shaliach to accept her get from her husband or from his shaliach. Rav Baruch Ber Leibowitz explains that although she is not the ba’alat hamamon (she does not own the get) she can appoint a shaliach because the type of shaliach that she appoints is of a higher level of shlichus. Her shaliach is in her place; his hand is like her hand. For such a level of shlichus one can appoint a shaliach even if he is not the ba’al hamamon. Based on this we can suggest that when Hashem told Moshe to become a shaliach for Aharon and his sons and accept the redemption money, Hashem made Moshe the highest-level shaliach, which can work even when he is not the ba’al hamamon.

We can now answer that there is no question on the Rivash and the Rema because they only prohibit the father – not the kohen – from appointing a shaliach.

About the Author: For questions or comments, e-mail RabbiRFuchs@gmail.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Who Did The Redemption?”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Handout photo of texted message sent by a fearful Christopher Cramer from Saudi Arabia before his death.
Saudis Hold Body of U.S. Elbit Subcontractor After Mysterious Death in Tabuk
Latest Judaism Stories
Staum-013015

People often think that all they are missing is “just a little more” and then they can be truly happy.

Torah-Hakehillah-121914

The Midrash is teaching a fundamental message of what it means to be a religious person.

Rabbi Sacks

Torah opposes slavery; G-d desires the free worship of free human beings, yet slavery’s permitted-?!

Rebbetzin Esther Jungreis

France allowed Islamists to flourish despite their loyalty to Islamic sharia law not French values

Approximately 18 years ago, my uncle called me into his office saying he had an urgent matter to discuss. I didn’t know what he had in mind.

“Where is God?” asked the Kotzker Rebbe “God is not everywhere but only where you let Him enter”

An Explosion In The Trench
‘With A Glowing Hot Knife’
(Yevamos 120b)

Her first tactic was tefillah; she immediately began to recite one perek after another of Tehillim.

When a miracle occurs that transcends nature, Hashem has broken the laws of nature to create the miracle.

“How could you have expected my glasses to be there?” argued Mr. Weiss. “You shouldn’t have to pay.”

Rather than submit to this fate and suffer torture and humiliation, Shaul decided to fall on his sword.

How can the Da’as Zekeinim say this was Hashem’s plan to allow them to become the Torah Nation? We know it was actually a punishment.

A strange midrash of fruit trees surrounding the Nation of Israel as they walked to freedom

Leading by example must be visible, regarding where, when and how-like Nachshon entering the Red Sea

Rabbi Yaakov Nagen, a Ram at Yeshivat Otniel, notes that the verse is suggesting that retelling the story of the Exodus is so important that Hashem is performing ever-greater miracles specifically so that parents can tell their stories to future generations.

More Articles from Rabbi Raphael Fuchs
Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

Rather than submit to this fate and suffer torture and humiliation, Shaul decided to fall on his sword.

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

And if a person can take steps to perform the mitzvah, he should do so (even if he won’t be held accountable for not performing it due to circumstances beyond his control).

The Brisker Rav suggests that the barad, in fact, only fell on people, animals, and vegetation.

Why is it necessary to perform an aveirah punishable by lashes in order to be deemed a legal rashah and be pasul l’eidus m’d’Oraisa?

Why was Yaakov not afraid that granting Yosef’s sons the status of shevatim would cause jealousy among his children?

Rav Akiva Eiger is assuming that the logic of the halacha that both the son and his mother are obligated to honor his father and therefore he must honor his fathers wishes first, is a mathematical equation.

It is clear that Tosafos maintains that only someone who lives in a house must light Chanukah candles.

But how could there have been any validity to Yosef’s allegations?

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/parsha/who-did-the-redemption/2013/05/09/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: