web analytics
September 16, 2014 / 21 Elul, 5774
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post
Apartment 758x530 Africa-Israel at the Israel Real Estate Exhibition in New York

Africa Israel Residences, part of the Africa Israel Investments Group led by international businessman Lev Leviev, will present 7 leading projects on the The Israel Real Estate Exhibition in New York on Sep 14-15, 2014.



Home » Judaism » Parsha »

Who Did The Redemption?


Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

This column is dedicated to the refuah sheleimah of Shlomo Eliezer ben Chaya Sarah Elka.

In this week’s parshah the Torah tells us that the bechorim were replaced by the levi’im to serve in the Mikdash. The Torah says that there were 273 more bechorim than levi’im. Those bechorim could not simply be replaced, and had to be redeemed. Hashem told Moshe that each bechor should give five shekalim to Moshe, who, in turn, should give them to Aharon and his sons. With that, they would be redeemed.

The sefer, Yehuda Ya’aleh, comments on this episode. The Rivash and the Rema, in Shulchan Aruch Yoreh De’ah 305:10, rule that a father cannot appoint a shaliach to perform pidyon ha’ben. The Yehuda Ya’aleh says that it seems that there is an open parshah in the Torah – the parshah of pidyon bechorim – that says that one may appoint a shaliach to perform pidyon. In this parshah Moshe Rabbeinu served as a shaliach for the bechorim, having delivered the money to Aharon and his sons.

Although this parshah is discussing pidyon bechorim and not pidyon ha’ben, the two are comparable. In fact we learn several halachos from this parshah: from the pidyon of the bechorim to the halachos of pidyon ha’ben. For example, the Rambam says that we derive that the money of pidyon ha’ben can only be given to male kohanim – not to females. This results from a pasuk in this week’s parshah that is discussing the pidyon bechorim.

Another example of a halacha derived from the pidyon bechorim that is applied to pidyon ha’ben is that a baby can have a pidyon ha’ben before his bris (if his bris was pushed off until after he is 30 days old). We draw this from the fact that the bechorim in the midbar performed pidyon even though none had a bris milah.

Another point that the Yehuda Ya’aleh makes is on the Chasam Sofer. The Chasam Sofer quotes a Ran in Pesachim that explicitly says that one can appoint a shaliach to perform pidyon ha’ben. The Chasam Sofer says that this shaliach can only be a kohen or a yisrael. A levi cannot be a shaliach for pidyon ha’ben because in order for one to be a shaliach, he must be able to perform that action himself. So since a levi cannot perform pidyon ha’ben he cannot serve as a shaliach. The Yehuda Ya’aleh says that we should derive from this parshah that a levi can serve as a shaliach from the fact that Moshe Rabbeinu – who was a levi – served as a shaliach on behalf of the bechorim.

There is a machlokes whether the opinion of the Rivash and the Rema, who rule that one cannot become a shaliach, applies even if the shaliach is using the father’s money or only if he uses his own money. The Chasam Sofer opines that the Rivash would permit one to be the father’s shaliach if he uses the father’s money. Therefore, this question from Moshe Rabbeinu – who was a levi and served as a shaliach – is not as difficult, according to the Chasam Sofer himself, because Moshe used the money of the bechorim.

The Panim Yafos suggests that Moshe served as a shaliach only to deliver the money, not to perform the pidyon. The Rivash and the Rema only restricted the father from appointing a shaliach to perform the actual pidyon. However, they never restricted a father from sending the money with a shaliach if the father himself would actually recite the pidyon statement. Based on this, we must suggest that each bechor – individually – went to Aharon and his sons and recited the pidyon statement.

The Brisker Rav says that it is implicit from the pesukim that the bechorim were redeemed when they gave the money to Moshe Rabbeinu – before he gave it to Aharon and his sons. This is difficult to understand. How could the pidyon have been accomplished when the money got to Moshe’s hands? One cannot suggest that Moshe served as a shaliach of Aharon and his sons to accept the money because there is a halacha that one can only be a shaliach of the ba’al hamamon (one who owns the money).

We indeed find that a woman can appoint a shaliach to accept her get from her husband or from his shaliach. Rav Baruch Ber Leibowitz explains that although she is not the ba’alat hamamon (she does not own the get) she can appoint a shaliach because the type of shaliach that she appoints is of a higher level of shlichus. Her shaliach is in her place; his hand is like her hand. For such a level of shlichus one can appoint a shaliach even if he is not the ba’al hamamon. Based on this we can suggest that when Hashem told Moshe to become a shaliach for Aharon and his sons and accept the redemption money, Hashem made Moshe the highest-level shaliach, which can work even when he is not the ba’al hamamon.

We can now answer that there is no question on the Rivash and the Rema because they only prohibit the father – not the kohen – from appointing a shaliach.

About the Author: For questions or comments, e-mail RabbiRFuchs@gmail.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Who Did The Redemption?”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Finance Minister Yair Lapid, chairman of the Yesh Atid party.
Lapid Won’t Let Defense Demands Turn Into ‘Turkish Bazaar’
Latest Judaism Stories
15th century Book of the Torah

This week’s parsha offers a new covenant; a covenant that speaks to national life unlike any other

Leff-091214

All Jews are inherently righteous and that is why we all have a portion in the World to Come.

Grunfeld-Raphael-logo

If mourning is incompatible with Yom Tov, why is it not incompatible with Shabbat?

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

Since it is a Rabbinic prohibition we may follow the more lenient opinion.

How can the Torah expect me today, thousands of years after the mitzvahs were given, to view each mitzvah as if I’m fulfilling it for the first time?

Torah isn’t a theological treatise or a metaphysical system but a series of stories linked over time

In contrast to her Eicha-like lamentations of the previous hour or more, however, my youngest was now grinning from ear-to-ear.

An Astonishing Miracle
‘Why Bring the Infants to Hakhel?’
(Chagigah 3a)

Question: I recently loaned money to a friend who has been able to repay only part of it. This was an interest-free loan. We exchanged a signed IOU, not a proper shtar with witnesses, since I have always trusted her integrity and only wanted a document that confirms what was loaned and what was repaid. Now that shemittah is approaching, what should I do? Should I forgive the loan? And if my friend is not able to repay it, may I deduct the unpaid money from my ma’aser requirement?

Name Withheld

e are in a time of serious crisis and must go beyond our present levels of chesed.

According to Ibn Ezra, the Torah was stressing through this covenant that hypocrisy was forbidden.

“Tony said that the code in most places in the U.S. is at least 36 inches for a residential guardrail,” replied Mr. Braun. “Some make it higher, 42, or even 52 inches for high porches. What is the required height according to halacha?”

Simcha is total; sahs is God’s joy in protecting us even when we are most vulnerable.

Not only do we accept You as our King, it is our greatest desire that the name of Your Kingdom be spread throughout the entire universe.

More Articles from Rabbi Raphael Fuchs
Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

Since it is a Rabbinic prohibition we may follow the more lenient opinion.

They ask, how can Rabbeinu Gershom forbid marrying more than one wife, when the Torah explicitly permits it in this parshah?

First, how could a beis din of 23 judges present a guilty verdict in a capital punishment case? After all, only a majority of the 23 judges ruled in favor of his verdict.

According to Rabbi Yishmael one was not permitted to eat such an animal prior to entering Eretz Yisrael, while according to Rabbi Akiva one was permitted to eat animals if he would perform nechirah.

Tosafos there takes issue with Rashi’s view that the letters that are formed in the knots of the tefillin are considered part of the name of Hashem.

The Rambam says that in order to honor Shabbos, one must wash his hands, face, and feet with warm water on Friday.

The talmid is not allowed to speak up due to any fear. If he remains silent, he is in violation of this prohibition.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/parsha/who-did-the-redemption/2013/05/09/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: